24 resultados para Legislação penal


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Images have gained a never before seen importance. Technological changes have given the Information Society extraordinary means to capture, treat and transmit images, wheter your own or those of others, with or without a commercial purpose, with no boundaries of time or country, without “any kind of eraser”. From the several different ways natural persons may engage in image processing with no commercial purpose, the cases of sharing pictures through social networks and video surveillance assume particular relevance. Consequently there are growing legitimate concerns with the protection of one's image, since its processing may sometimes generate situations of privacy invasion or put at risk other fundamental rights. With this in mind, the present thesis arises from the question: what are the existent legal instruments in Portuguese Law that enable citizens to protect themselves from the abusive usage of their own pictures, whether because that image have been captured by a smartphone or some video surveillance camera, whether because it was massively shared through a blog or some social network? There is no question the one's right to not having his or her image used in an abusive way is protected by the Portuguese constitution, through the article 26th CRP, as well as personally right, under the article 79th of the Civil Code, and finally through criminal law, articles 192nd and 193rd of the Criminal Code. The question arises in the personal data protection context, considering that one's picture, given certain conditions, is personal data. Both the Directive 95/46/CE dated from 1995 as well as the LPD from 1998 are applicable to the processing of personal data, but both exclude situations of natural persons doing so in the pursuit of activities strictly personal or family-related. These laws demand complex procedures to natural persons, such as the preemptive formal authorisation request to the Data Protection National Commission. Failing to do so a natural person may result in the application of fines as high as €2.500,00 or even criminal charges. Consequently, the present thesis aims to study if the image processing with no commercial purposes by a natural person in the context of social networks or through video surveillance belongs to the domain of the existent personal data protection law. To that effect, it was made general considerations regarding the concept of video surveillance, what is its regimen, in a way that it may be distinguishable from Steve Mann's definition of sousveillance, and what are the associated obligations in order to better understand the concept's essence. The application of the existent laws on personal data protection to images processing by natural persons has been analysed taking into account the Directive 95/46/CE, the LPD and the General Regulation. From this analysis it is concluded that the regimen from 1995 to 1998 is out of touch with reality creating an absence of legal shielding in the personal data protection law, a flaw that doesn't exist because compensated by the right to image as a right to personality, that anyway reveals the inability of the Portuguese legislator to face the new technological challenges. It is urgent to legislate. A contrary interpretation will evidence the unconstitutionality of several rules on the LPD due to the obligations natural persons are bound to that violate the right to the freedom of speech and information, which would be inadequate and disproportionate. Considering the recently approved General Regulation and in the case it becomes the final version, the use for natural person of video surveillance of private spaces, Google Glass (in public and private places) and other similar gadgets used to recreational purposes, as well as social networks are subject to its regulation only if the images are shared without limits or existing commercial purposes. Video surveillance of public spaces in all situations is subject to General Regulation provisions.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação apresentada com vista à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Direito e Segurança

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

pp. 235-259

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia do Ambiente

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação apresentada para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Sociologia do Território, da Cidade e do Ambiente

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação de Mestrado em Comunicação, Media e Justiça

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação apresentada para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Comunicação, Media e Justiça

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

No meio jornalístico, a Internet veio estabelecer uma nova plataforma de informação, que atingiu os meios de comunicação e proliferou a forma como o cidadão comum pode obter informação. Através da Internet, podemos exercer o nosso direito de liberdade de expressão e informação (artigo 37.º da Constituição da República Portuguesa) em toda a sua plenitude. No entanto, este advento trouxe com ele novos meios para praticar crimes. A pessoa que escreve, publica ou vê algo através da Internet pode cometer um crime contra a honra, punido pelo Código Penal. Destes crimes fazem parte a difamação, o crime mais importante na Comunicação Social, a injúria ou a calúnia: a Internet é uma ferramenta facilitadora de atentar contra a honra da pessoa humana, um direito inerente à nossa simples existência. Na Internet o crime é muitas vezes motivado pela ideia de que o dispositivo informático permite esconder o autor, o que não acontece nos meios de comunicação dito tradicionais. Não obstante, a Internet é um meio de conservação de identidades muito poderoso. A pegada informática nunca é definitivamente apagada e, ainda que tendo a necessidade de ultrapassar alguns constrangimentos jurídicos, existe sempre a possibilidade de identificar os autores dos crimes. Os crimes praticados no mundo online já são, em Portugal, legislados offline. Esta mesma legislação pode ser aplicada a estes “novos” crimes, não sendo necessário uma regulação urgente para que este tipo de crimes seja punido. O que tem que existir é uma permanente observação, na medida em que os crimes contra a honra praticados online atingem um número inqualificável de pessoas e propagam-se a um ritmo avassalador.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Recordings and photographs obtained by private individuals can be two of the most relevant evidences in helping finding the truth; however, they can also conflict with fundamental rights such as privacy, spoken word or image of the targets. It is not enough that only the violation of the right to privacy is withdrawn because rights to spoken word or image, unattached from the first one, show up independently as the main violated rights and are criminally protected in article 199º of the criminal code. Its use as evidence is, on a first moment, dependent on the private's conduct lawfulness, as it is stated in article 167º of the criminal procedure code. In order to consider its lawfulness, and accept its use as evidence, portuguese higher courts have been defending constructions mostly based on legal causes of defense. Although agreeing with a more flexible position of weighing all the interests at stake instead of denying its use as evidence, we believe notwithstanding that some of these solutions are misleading and shall not be spared from critics. Lastly, even if we reach a positive conclusion about the lawfulness of obtaining and using recordings and photogtaphs carried out to court by private individuals, they must not be however automatically admitted as evidence, still being necessary to proceed to a separate weighting, within the criminal procedure and its own legal rules, about their real purposes in the case.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In the present thesis, we examine the approach to the so-called “informal conversations”, especially between a suspect or defendant and criminal police authorities. Our goal is to understand if criminal police authorities are allowed to testify about the content of these conversations, revealing facts that the suspect or defendant may have shared with them, as well as about evidence that they may have acquired through these statements. Firstly, we briefly present the notion of “informal conversations” and the great variety of situations they may encompass: intra or extra-procedural; prior or subsequent to someone acquires the status of defendant. Secondly, we analyse some of the principles and rules that are involved in this controversial issue: principles concerning the procedural structure, organization and dynamic; principles concerning the production and assessment of evidence in the trial hearing; principles concerning the prosecution and the powers of criminal police authorities; the procedural status of the defendant; the rules concerning the reading of statements in the trial hearing; the rules concerning hearsay testimonies. Thirdly, we go through the great amount of case law on the so-called “informal conversations” and related matters, analysing the most relevant cases and the arguments that sustain them, as well as the legal literature. Our goal is to understand the evolution, throughout the last two decades, of the different opinions regarding the approach to the various situations in which “informal conversations” may occur and in which the admissibility of a testimony by criminal police authorities is questioned. Finally, we defend a different approach for testimonies by criminal police authorities prior and subsequent to someone acquiring the status of defendant. We see the moment when someone acquires the status of defendant as a border area in the admissibility of “informal conversations”, because from then on the statements have to be collected and assessed according to the law, so all the other conversations (or any other evidence) collected informally are irrelevant. As to the specific case of the testimony about the re-enactment of the crime, given the high degree of difficulty in separating the defendant’s contributions that may be considered essential and those that may be considered less useful, but still relevant, we support the qualification of the defendant’s contributions as inseparable from the re-enactment, allowing it to be replicated and assessed in the trial hearing with no restrictions.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This paper examine the purpose of rehabilitation while main purpose of imprisonment application, and the divergence between its central role assumed in legislation and what is being practiced in the institutional dimension. This study aims to determine the expected outcome of this dialectical opposition, in pursuit of preventive purposes that guide the criminal reactions of Portuguese criminal - legal system. To this end, the sentence of imprisonment shall be framed in the main politico- criminal traits of our country, analyzing the standards and principles that underlie and underpin our legal – criminal system. The guiding principles of the prison sentence and the respective legislation will be presented, such as the prison system and treatment provided to achieve the above desideratum. Finally material factors and legislative contradictions that oppose the rehabilitation in prisons will be presented. The dissertation does not intend to expose the solution to this paradox insurmountable, but rather present the main factors that hinder the achievement of the objectives intended to be achieved with the prison sentence.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This dissertation aims to study the loyalty clauses present in most of the long lasting service contracts. We introduce its main features and the consequences that arise from breaching of contract. We analyze the presence of loyalty periods in the Portuguese legislation. In this sense, we discuss Decree-Law 446/85, Law 24/96, Decree-Law 57/2008 and Decree-Law 56/2010. The loyalty period is the minimum period of time for which the contract should be maintained. In most cases, when this obligation is not fulfilled a penalty clause is set, intending to push the weaker party to comply with the contract or sanction it when the party fails to do so. We conclude that the contractual relationship where there is a loyalty period is usually an unbalanced relationship because it only protects the interest of one party. The penalty clause should not be admitted between parties with unequal bargaining powers. The contractual imbalance is not limited to consumer contracts.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The present work aims to develop the theme "The summary procedure and the reform of 2013". The purpose of its analysis serves the interest to understand the virtues and disadvantages of the changes introduced by Act n.º 20/2013 to our Code of Criminal Procedure, and the main focus of the present reflection is to further the impact of the measures taken by the legislator to the summary proceedings. The opening of the most serious crimes to summary procedure is a reform measure duly highlighted because it is a true innovation in the Portuguese penal system. Therefore, it urges to analyse not only the consequences of this measure, as well as if the objectives of its introduction in the summary procedure system are met. It should be noted that the legislator intends to promote speedy trial, and at the same time, ensure compliance with the Constitutional rights associated to the accused. At this point it is important to realize if there is a restriction of the accused essential guarantees. On the other hand, it should be noted that the typical characteristics of summary proceedings might have been invariably modified, due to the innovative aspect of the reform. That said, the changes might have fostered a mischaracterization of the typical format of the summary procedure, both in terms of the nature of the proceedings and in terms of its space and objectives within the penal system. Reflecting on the above will provide a deeper understanding of the volatile balance between the Portuguese governing prosecution efficiency and the Constitution, as well as the future of the criminal policy in Portugal.