Apocalypse forever? International relations implications of 11 September

This is a contribution to ongoing discussion of the international relations issues raised by the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. It acknowledges apparent failings (of analysis or prediction) in the IR literature but then suggests the shortcomings are really the product of divergent traditions of analysis (behaviouralism, structuralism and evolutionism) which isolate different aspects of phenomena for attention. The paper then discusses the contrast between hard power and soft power - to help identify the distinctiveness of the new forms of terrorism (their non-linear objectives and the lack of proportionality involved). It concludes on an encouraging note by urging international cooperation as a solution, even in cases where the protagonists' resentments have tended to militate against conventional channels of dispute resolution.

A arbitragem como alternativa para diminuir a morosidade do sistema judiciário brasileiro

This thesis is about arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution, as a solution for the slowness of the Brazilian Judiciary. The paper starts with an approach of the fundamental rights, highlighting their positivation, important to distinguish them from human rights, the four dimensions of the fundamental rights and, lastly, the analysis of their features, emphasizing their characters of complementarity and universality. After, it starts to discourse about the “access to Justice”, an important fundamental right, and, to delimitate the role of the Judiciary and the problems related to solve cases in a reasonable amount of time. Next, it exposes other alternative forms of dispute resolutions that, like the arbitration, can help to the concretization of a faster and more effective Justice. Then, it discusses the historical evolution of the arbitration in Brazil, highlighting the contemporary features of the institute, which were more visible with the ratification of the New York Convention and the promulgation of Law nº 9.307/1996. In addition, it analyses the possible changes that will come with the New Brazilian Procedure Law Code and the PL 7.108/2014, intended to change the current Arbitration Law. It also explains the main arbitration attributes, describing the peculiarities of the arbitral convention, the arbitrator role, and the arbitral award aspects. At least, it lists the main reasons someone should choose arbitration instead the Judiciary, considering the Brazilian Courts reality.

Conselho de Resolução de Litígios

The scope of the following study is to present an alternative and preventive dispute resolution method known as Dispute Resolution Board. The Dispute Resolution Board mechanism is included in construction contracts to support project participants in avoiding and resolving disputes. Over the years the construction industry dealt with the resolution of claims and disputes through several methods. One of the most successful and lasting is the Dispute Resolution Board. A Dispute Resolution Board is a board of impartial professionals formed at the start of the project to follow construction progress, prevent arising disputes, and assist in the resolution of disputes during the project. When a dispute arises the Board meets with the parties to settle this dispute. The recommendation of this Board is non-binding for the parties. In Portugal there is no experience with this form of conciliation.

O contrato de prestação de serviços de fornecimento de água

The theme of thid thesis is the water supply services contract. The texto starts with an analysis of the service, aimed at clarifying what is the system organization and the principles applicable to this essential public service. Then the water supply services contract is analyzed according to the law on essential public services. Subsequently, connections are established with other applicable laws and the differing doctrinal and jurisprudential perspectives are presented. The thesis ends with an outlook on the dispute resolution mechanisms at the users’ disposal.

As conversas informais na reconstituição

The theme of thid thesis is the water supply services contract. The texto starts with an analysis of the service, aimed at clarifying what is the system organization and the principles applicable to this essential public service. Then the water supply services contract is analyzed according to the law on essential public services. Subsequently, connections are established with other applicable laws and the differing doctrinal and jurisprudential perspectives are presented. The thesis ends with an outlook on the dispute resolution mechanisms at the users’ disposal.

O princípio da confidencialidade na mediação em matéria civil e comercial

The purpose of the following study is to analyze the relevance of the principle of confidentiality concerning mediation on civil and commercial matters developed in Portugal. We will, essentially, try to determine just how pivotal is this principle and how it affects the effectiveness of that method of alternative dispute resolution. We believe it is fundamental to understand the true extent of this principle and its goals, emphasizing the protection given to those who decide to resort to mediation and its impact on this process. For this dissertation, we have based our analysis on the interpretation of the set rules assembled by Law nr 29/2013, April 19th, while combining it with data gathered from other laws and regulations that had also addressed mediation. Furthermore, given the fact that this subject has been regulated by Directive 2008/52/EC, we deem pertinent to include references to other European mediation regulations, namely from Germany, Spain and France. With this study, we have established that, even though the Portuguese mediation law is based on a European Directive, we have determined a more restrictive regulation for the principle of confidentiality. We have concluded that the rules regarding this principle try to preserve, above all, the trust and honesty established during the course of the mediation, while restricting the possibility of using the information disclosed during these sessions on other cases. Additionally, we believe confidentiality is such a distinctive and relevant feature that its legal framework leads us to deem it as a true obstacle to the parties’ private autonomy and their power to determine how the mediation should be carried out.

Conselho de Resolução de Litígios

The scope of the following study is to present an alternative and preventive dispute resolution method known as Dispute Resolution Board. The Dispute Resolution Board mechanism is included in construction contracts to support project participants in avoiding and resolving disputes. Over the years the construction industry dealt with the resolution of claims and disputes through several methods. One of the most successful and lasting is the Dispute Resolution Board. A Dispute Resolution Board is a board of impartial professionals formed at the start of the project to follow construction progress, prevent arising disputes, and assist in the resolution of disputes during the project. When a dispute arises the Board meets with the parties to settle this dispute. The recommendation of this Board is non-binding for the parties. In Portugal there is no experience with this form of conciliation.

A criação de um Tribunal Internacional Tributário como forma de superar limitações do Procedimento Amigável previsto no artigo 25.º da Convenção Modelo da OCDE

Dissertação de mestrado em Direito Tributário e Fiscal

A (in)existência de apoio judiciário na arbitragem administrativa: o direito de acesso à tutela jurisdicional efetiva?

Dissertação de mestrado em Direito Administrativo

Mediação Penal Juvenil: um novo paradigma de resposta à delinquência

Dissertação de mestrado em Direito Judiciário (Direitos Processuais e Organização Judiciária)

Self-serving biases: Evidence from a simulated labor relationship

Previous studies have found evidence of a self-serving bias in bargaining and dispute resolution. We use experimental data to test for this effect in a simulated labor relatonship. We finda consistent discrepancy between employer beliefs and employee actions that can only be attributed to self-serving biases. This discrepancy is evident through stated beliefs, revealed satisfaction, and actual actions. We present evidenceand discuss implications.

Bargaining efficiency and screening: An experimental investigation

This paper investigates whether information about fairness types canbe useful in lowering dispute costs and enhancing bargaining efficiency.An experiment was conducted in which subjects were first screened usinga dictator game, with the allocations chosen used to separate participantsinto two types. Mutually anonymous pairs of subjects then bargained, witha dispute cost structure imposed. Sorting with identification reducesdispute costs; there are also significant differences in bargainingefficiency across pairing types. Information about types is crucial forthese differences and also strongly affects the relative bargainingsuccess of the two types and the hypothetical optimal bargaining strategy.

La mediació i l'arbitratge de consum: explorar sistemes d'ODR

La utilització dels mitjans alternatius de resolució de conflictes (ADR) en l'àmbit de les reclamacions de consum té un marc legal específic a Espanya -i també a la UE- des del 1993, que deriva de les seves característiques especials. Algunes són d'encuny exclusivament jurídic: es tracta de reclamacions en què el marc legal aplicable és el denominat dret de consum; d'altres tenen un suport bàsicament fàctic: solen tenir poca entitat econòmica, és a dir, entren en la categoria del que denominem small claims, i el fet que les reclamacions -en alguns casos que van en augment- siguin transfrontereres condiciona l'opció entre jurisdicció tradicional i ADR, com també tindrem ocasió d'analitzar. Cal afegir a aquests elements jurídics i fàctics un element important de política legislativa en un àmbit de la UE: els ADR s'entenen com un instrument bàsic per a garantir l'accés dels consumidors a la justícia, però alhora, en l'àmbit del comerç electrònic, són un element de gran transcendència en la creació de la denominada confiança electrònica o e-confidence. Per aquest motiu, s'exploren contínuament proces- sos de resolució en línia de conflictes (on-line dispute resolution, ODR). Els ODR pretenen la màxima eficàcia oferint un suport tècnic capaç de solucionar una controvèrsia amb la intervenció d'un tercer o sense, i dins o fora de l'organització de l'empresari. D'aquesta manera, s'usa un mateix expedient tècnic per a posar en marxa successivament més d'un ADR, o es potencien els mecanismes automàtics que prescindeixen dels conceptes jurídics i, en mig de l'exploració constant, Espanya aposta per l'arbitratge electrònic de consum en el RD 236/2008. A aquests temes ens referirem a continuació.

La mediación y el arbitraje de consumo: explorando sistemas de ODR

La utilización de ADR en el ámbito de las reclamaciones de consumo tiene un marco legal específico en España -y también en la UE- desde 1993, que deriva de sus características especiales. Algunas son de cuño exclusivamente jurídico: se trata de reclamaciones en las que el marco legal aplicable es el denominado derecho de consumo; otras poseen un soporte básicamente fáctico: suelen tener poca entidad económica, es decir, entran en la categoría de lo que denominamos small claims, y el hecho de que las reclamaciones -en algunos supuestos que van en aumento- sean transfronterizas condiciona la opción entre jurisdicción tradicional y ADR, como también tendremos ocasión de analizar. Hay que añadir a estos elementos jurídicos y fácticos un elemento importante de política legislativa en un ámbito de la UE; los ADR se entienden como un instrumento básico para garantizar el acceso de los consumidores a la justicia, pero al mismo tiempo, en el ámbito del comercio electrónico, son un ele- mento de gran trascendencia en la creación de la denominada e-confidence. Por este motivo, se explo- ran continuamente formas de ODR (On-line Dispute Resolution). Los ODR pretenden la mayor eficacia ofreciendo un soporte técnico capaz de solucionar una controversia con o sin la intervención de un tercero, y dentro o fuera de la organización del empresario. De este modo, se usa un mismo expediente técnico para poner en marcha sucesivamente más de un ADR, o se potencian los mecanismos automáticos que prescinden de los conceptos jurídicos y, en medio de la exploración constante, España apuesta por el arbitraje electrónico de consumo en el RD 236/2008. A estos temas vamos a referirnos a continuación.