997 resultados para audit opinion


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

O presente trabalho possui o objetivo de identificar os determinantes dos honorários e serviços fora da área de auditoria, bem como avaliar se a prestação destes serviços conjuntamente com a auditoria das demonstrações financeiras afeta a independência dos auditores externos das companhias abertas brasileiras negociadas na BM&FBovespa. A amostra contempla um total de 180 empresas não financeiras observadas no período de 2010 a 2012. Os resultados indicam que as proxies para esforço e risco elevam os honorários de auditoria, enquanto a governança corporativa apresentou tanto o efeito demanda (elevam os honorários) quanto o efeito risco (reduzem os honorários) dependendo da proxy observada. No que tange a contratação de serviços fora da área de auditoria foi constatado que empresas com maior necessidade de monitoramento e com comitês de auditoria demandam esses serviços, embora o conselho fiscal iniba a contratação dos mesmos. Por fim, as evidências indicam que a prestação de serviços fora da área de auditoria não afeta a independência do auditor. Estes resultados são mantidos mesmo quando observada a probabilidade de ocorrência da modificação no parecer da auditoria relacionada à violação da premissa de continuidade da firma (Going Concern Opinion). Os testes adicionais realizados confirmam a manutenção da independência do auditor, inclusive quando observado o tipo de auditor (não Big4), expectativa de ganhos futuros relacionados a serviços fora da área de auditoria adicionais, empresas consideradas ressalváveis, bem como o efeito de melhores práticas de governança corporativa.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Abstract This paper analyses public opinion during the João Goulart government in Brazil (1961-1964), focusing on public perceptions on domestic and foreign policies. We employ a recently declassified public opinion survey conducted on behalf of United States Information Agency (USIA) in urban areas. We found that the Brazilian public opinion was somewhat coherent, supporting redistributive reforms domestically and a neutralist approach in foreign affairs.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In the 70s, a new line of research focused on the study of the influence of the audit report on the decision process of investors, financial analysts and credit analysts. Notwithstanding the numerous studies that have been carried out, results have not been consistent. Given the above, and considering the lack, in Portugal, of a research of this nature, it seems urgent to carry out a study that allows the analysis of the use of the audit report, as well as its influence on the decision making process of Portuguese stakeholders. For that purpose, in the light of the positivist research paradigm, a questionnaire was designed, which was administered by mail and on the Survey Monkey platform to a sample of institutional investors, financial analysts and credit analysts. The statistical analysis of the data obtained was undertaken with resource to the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences and SmartPLS 2.0. Corroborating the literature review and the assumptions of the Agency Theory and the Stakeholder Theory, used in the theoretical framework of analysis, empirical evidence has shown that the audit report influences the decision of institutional investors, financial analysts and credit analysts, and that the opinion expressed in that document is the most determinant factor of this influence. In addition to this factor, it was found that the degree of utilization of the audit report, as well as the value ascribed to this document, determine its influence in the decision process of research groups studied. Only in the case of institutional investors, the results did not reveal a correlation between the utility ascribed to the audit report and the influence of this document in their decision making process. In turn, the statistical inference of the model explaining the degree of use of the audit report revealed that it is conditioned by the perceived quality of the information enclosed in the audit report, the utility assigned to the audit report on the decision process, as well as the relevance of the other sources of information used by stakeholders. Therefore, this study allowed proving the importance of the audit report to its users. As a result, we believe to have filled a gap in national literature and to have contributed to the enhancement of international literature. The importance that this document has for the development of any country is, therefore, shown, and it is urgent to maintain rigor in the selection of its staff, in the development of its standards, and especially in the development of audits. Moreover, we also consider that this research may contribute to the improvement of the audit report, insofar as it will help professional bodies to understand the information needs and perceptions of stakeholders.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto para a obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Auditoria Orientada pelo Dr. José da Silva Fernandes

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto para a obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Auditoria Orientada por Mestre Alcina Portugal Dias

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A ocorrência de grandes escândalos financeiros na última década, um pouco por todo o mundo, provocou uma crise de confiança na informação financeira prestada pelas empresas e levou à discussão de conceitos como Corporate Governance e Expectation Gap e a uma “revolução” no mundo da auditoria. A necessidade de confiança na opinião dos auditores conduziu à discussão acerca de como é que o trabalho de auditoria é realizado, em que “bases” é que o auditor determina o que analisar e, por último, como decide o que é material ou não. Esta discussão traz a si associado o conceito de materialidade. O objectivo deste estudo é compreender os aspectos inerentes à determinação da materialidade e a sua importância, tanto no planeamento como na avaliação de resultados. O presente trabalho está estruturado em sete capítulos, correspondendo os cinco primeiros ao enquadramento teórico do tema, realizado através de revisão de literatura. No sexto capítulo explicita-se a investigação empírica realizada sobre a forma como a materialidade é entendida e utilizada pelas Sociedades de Revisores Oficiais de Contas (SROC) em Portugal. Terminamos com a conclusão do estudo, em que, para além das conclusões obtidas, se indicam os problemas e obstáculos encontrados ao longo do mesmo, bem como possibilidades de investigação futura.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

OBJECTIVE: To describe the opinion of doctors who participated in the Latin American Study on Cesarean section in Brazil regarding the second opinion strategy when faced with the decision of performing a C-section. METHODS: Seventy-two doctors from the hospitals where the study took place (where the second opinion was routinely sought) and 70 from the control group answered a pre-tested self-administered structured questionnaire. Descriptive tables were prepared based on the frequency of relevant variables on opinion of physicians regarding: effectiveness of the application of the second opinion strategy; on whether they would recommend implementation of this strategy and reasons for not recommending it in private institutions; feasibility of the strategy implementation and reasons for not considering this implementation feasible in private institutions. RESULTS: Half of the doctors from the intervention hospitals (50%) and about two thirds of those in the control group (65%) evaluated the second opinion as being or having the potential of being effective/very effective in their institutions. The great majority of those interviewed from both intervention and control hospitals considered this strategy feasible in public (87% and 95% respectively) but not in private hospitals (64% and 70% respectively), mainly because in the latter the doctors would not accept interference from a colleague in their decision-making process. CONCLUSION: Although the second opinion strategy was perceived as effective in reducing C-section rates, doctors did not regard it feasible outside the public health system in Brazil.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação de Mestrado apresentado ao Instituto de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto para a obtenção do grau de Mestre em Auditoria, sob orientação da Doutora Alcina Augusta de Sena Portugal Dias

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

PURPOSE: Screening programs to detect visual abnormalities in children vary among countries. The aim of this study is to describe experts' perception of best practice guidelines and competency framework for visual screening in children. METHODS: A qualitative focus group technique was applied during the Portuguese national orthoptic congress to obtain the perception of an expert panel of 5 orthoptists and 2 ophthalmologists with experience in visual screening for children (mean age 53.43 years, SD ± 9.40). The panel received in advance a script with the description of three tuning competencies dimensions (instrumental, systemic, and interpersonal) for visual screening. The session was recorded in video and audio. Qualitative data were analyzed using a categorical technique. RESULTS: According to experts' views, six tests (35.29%) have to be included in a visual screening: distance visual acuity test, cover test, bi-prism or 4/6(Δ) prism, fusion, ocular movements, and refraction. Screening should be performed according to the child age before and after 3 years of age (17.65%). The expert panel highlighted the influence of the professional experience in the application of a screening protocol (23.53%). They also showed concern about the false negatives control (23.53%). Instrumental competencies were the most cited (54.09%), followed by interpersonal (29.51%) and systemic (16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Orthoptists should have professional experience before starting to apply a screening protocol. False negative results are a concern that has to be more thoroughly investigated. The proposed framework focuses on core competencies highlighted by the expert panel. Competencies programs could be important do develop better screening programs.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mestrado em Auditoria

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mestrado em Auditoria

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The aim of this study was to describe experts’ perception of best-practice guidelines and competency framework for visual screening in children. This study uses qualitative data and shows individual/ group conceptualization. The use of evidence from qualitative studies has traditionally been a fundamental source of knowledge in the clinical and social sciences.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação de Mestrado apresentado ao Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto para a obtenção do grau de Mestre em Auditoria sob orientação de Adalmiro Álvaro Malheiro de Castro Andrade Pereira