Proactive and Preventive Student Welfare Activities in Finnish Preschool and Elementary School: Handling of Transition to Formal Schooling and a National Anti-Bullying Program as Examples

Prerequisites and effects of proactive and preventive psycho-social student welfare activities in Finnish preschool and elementary school were of interest in the present thesis. So far, Finnish student welfare work has mainly focused on interventions and individuals, and the voluminous possibilities to enhance well-being of all students as a part of everyday school work have not been fully exploited. Consequently, in this thesis three goals were set: (1) To present concrete examples of proactive and preventive psycho-social student welfare activities in Finnish basic education; (2) To investigate measurable positive effects of proactive and preventive activities; and (3) To investigate implementation of proactive and preventive activities in ecological contexts. Two prominent phenomena in preschool and elementary school years—transition to formal schooling and school bullying—were chosen as examples of critical situations that are appropriate targets for proactive and preventive psycho-social student welfare activities. Until lately, the procedures concerning both school transitions and school bullying have been rather problem-focused and reactive in nature. Theoretically, we lean on the bioecological model of development by Bronfenbrenner and Morris with concentric micro-, meso-, exo- and macrosystems. Data were drawn from two large-scale research projects, the longitudinal First Steps Study: Interactive Learning in the Child–Parent– Teacher Triangle, and the Evaluation Study of the National Antibullying Program KiVa. In Study I, we found that the academic skills of children from preschool–elementary school pairs that implemented several supportive activities during the preschool year developed more quickly from preschool to Grade 1 compared with the skills of children from pairs that used fewer practices. In Study II, we focused on possible effects of proactive and preventive actions on teachers and found that participation in the KiVa antibullying program influenced teachers‘ self-evaluated competence to tackle bullying. In Studies III and IV, we investigated factors that affect implementation rate of these proactive and preventive actions. In Study III, we found that principal‘s commitment and support for antibullying work has a clear-cut positive effect on implementation adherence of student lessons of the KiVa antibullying program. The more teachers experience support for and commitment to anti-bullying work from their principal, the more they report having covered KiVa student lessons and topics. In Study IV, we wanted to find out why some schools implement several useful and inexpensive transition practices, whereas other schools use only a few of them. We were interested in broadening the scope and looking at local-level (exosystem) qualities, and, in fact, the local-level activities and guidelines, along with teacherreported importance of the transition practices, were the only factors significantly associated with the implementation rate of transition practices between elementary schools and partner preschools. Teacher- and school-level factors available in this study turned out to be mostly not significant. To summarize, the results confirm that school-based promotion and prevention activities may have beneficial effects not only on students but also on teachers. Second, various top-down processes, such as engagement at the level of elementary school principals or local administration may enhance implementation of these beneficial activities. The main message is that when aiming to support the lives of children the primary focus should be on adults. In future, promotion of psychosocial well-being and the intrinsic value of inter- and intrapersonal skills need to be strengthened in the Finnish educational systems. Future research efforts in student welfare and school psychology, as well as focused training for psychologists in educational contexts, should be encouraged in the departments of psychology and education in Finnish universities. Moreover, a specific research centre for school health and well-being should be established.

Defending behavior in bullying situations

In order to encourage children and adolescents to defend and support their victimized peers, it is important to identify factors that either maximize or minimize the probability that students will engage in such behaviors. This thesis is composed of four studies designed to elucidate how a variety of factors work in conjunction to explain why some children defend their victimized classmates, whereas others remain passive or reinforce the bully. The conceptual framework of this thesis is drawn from several theoretical considerations, including social cognitive learning theory, the expectancy-value framework as well as the literature emphasizing the importance of empathy in motivating behaviors. Also the child-by-environment perspective and the socialecological perspective influenced this research. Accordingly, several intra- and interpersonal characteristics (e.g., social cognitions, empathy, and social status) as well as group-level factors (e.g., norms) that may either enhance or reduce the probability that students defend their victimized peers are investigated. In Studies I and II, the focus is on social cognitions, and special attention is paid to take into account the domain-specificity of cognition-behavior processes. Self-efficacy for defending is still an interest of study III, but the role of affective empathy on defending is also investigated. Also social status variables (preference and perceived popularity) are evaluated as possible moderators of links between intrapersonal factors and defending. In Study IV, the focus is expanded further by concentrating on characteristics of children’s proximal environments (i.e., classroom). Bullying norms and collective perceptions (i.e., connectedness among the students and the teachers’ ability to deal with bullying situations) are examined. Data are drawn from two research projects: the Kaarina Cohort Study (consisting of fourth and eighth graders) and the randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effects of the KiVa antibullying program (consisting of third to fifth graders). The results of the thesis suggest that defending the victims of bullying is influenced by a variety of individual level motivational characteristics, such as social cognitions and affective empathy. Also, both perceived popularity and social preference play a role in defending, and the findings support the conceptualization that behavior results from the interplay between the characteristics of an individual child and their social-relational environment. Classroom context further influences students’ defending behavior. Thus, antibullying efforts targeting peer bystanders should aim to influence intra- and interpersonal characteristics of children and adolescents as well as their social environment.

Conceptualizing and counteracting the bullying dynamic: Classroom and school contexts matter

Guided by the social-ecological conceptualization of bullying, this thesis examines the implications of classroom and school contexts—that is, students’ shared microsystems—for peer-to-peer bullying and antibullying practices. Included are four original publications, three of which are empirical studies utilizing data from a large Finnish sample of students in the upper grade levels of elementary school. Both self- and peer reports of bullying and victimization are utilized, and the hierarchical nature of the data collected from students nested within school ecologies is accounted for by multilevel modeling techniques. The first objective of the thesis is to simultaneously examine risk factors for victimization at individual, classroom, and school levels (Study I). The second objective is to uncover the individual- and classroom-level working mechanisms of the KiVa antibullying program which has been shown to be effective in reducing bullying problems in Finnish schools (Study II). Thirdly, an overview of the extant literature on classroom- and school-level contributions to bullying and victimization is provided (Study III). Finally, attention is paid to the assessment of victimization and, more specifically, to how the classroom context influences the concordance between self- and peer reports of victimization (Study IV). Findings demonstrate the multiple ways in which contextual factors, and importantly students’ perceptions thereof, contribute to the bullying dynamic and efforts to counteract it. Whereas certain popular beliefs regarding the implications of classroom and school contexts do not receive support, the role of peer contextual factors and the significance of students’ perceptions of teachers’ attitudes toward bullying are highlighted. Directions for future research and school-based antibullying practices are suggested.

Maahanmuuttajaoppilaat erityiskouluissa

Immigrant Pupils in Special Education Schools The study focused on the opinions of immigrant pupils in the 1st–9th grades of basic education in four special education schools of the City of Turku and in need of special support about the following: 1. Their difficulties in going to school in general education before the transfer to a special education school. 2. Their opinions about the transfer process to special education and the changes in their school practice after being transferred to a special education school. 3. Their experiences about their school and coping in special education school. The study strengthened the idea that immigrant pupils need positive special treatment, linguistic support, individual guidance, small teaching groups and operating models that promote well-being on their integration and education path. The central educational idea of inclusive education is based on deconstructing the power structures concerning gender, ethnicity and “race” and approval of differences in the pupils. Shifting the emphasis from the pupil to working on the learning environment has resulted in special education no longer being primarily separate special education tied to a certain place, but directing the teaching more towards individuality. The central dimension of intercultural competence of a teacher working in a multicultural class seems to be the attitudes and approaches to a different pupil; the teacher must be interculturally sensitive when facing children and young people from a foreign culture. Education and teaching affect every sector of the pupil’s well-being. Learning and learning results have a connection with teaching, education and well-being. Every sector is important for the going to school and integration of an immigrant pupil in need of special support. The basis of the study is the equality of opportunities and the humanistic idea of the human being in the Finnish education policy. The immigrant pupils selected for the study represented the following language groups: Arabian, Albanian, Somali, Russian and Vietnamese. In the four special education schools, the number of immigrant pupils belonging to these language groups (2004) totalled 104. A total of 89 pupils i.e. 86% answered the questionnaire, which is sufficient considering the generalisation of the study. Although this is basically a quantitative study, the interviewing method was used in part of the study, because the questionnaires were in Finnish and consequently, it was difficult for some immigrant pupils to understand them. Understanding the questions was also affected by the fact that the age distribution in the study was very wide (7–18). According to the results of the study, the immigrants felt that the biggest drawbacks in general education were their inability to speak Finnish and lack of concentration. The actual process of being transferred to a special education class remained unclear for immigrant pupils, and they could do very little about the transfer themselves. The results show that immigrant pupils coped well in special education school; they felt that their learning ability and concentration improved in the small groups of the special education school. They considered the individual support given in the special education schools to be useful. The lower-grade immigrant pupils had a more positive attitude towards special education school than the upper-grade immigrant pupils. In all the special education schools the immigrant pupils experienced that they were in a good position in the class; girls felt this even a little more strongly than boys. The teacher-pupil-relationship was felt to be good. School bullying being so common was a negative feature experienced by immigrant pupils, who were often targets or bullies themselves. Immigrant pupils believed in their success at school and in the opportunities offered by special education schools. Generally they were of the opinion that pupils are not labelled by special school; however, upper-grade immigrant pupils were more hesitant than lower-grade immigrant pupils. This study aimed at bringing out the immigrant pupils’ own opinions. Teaching immigrant pupils in special education schools has not been very much studied in Finland, which made the topic new and even more challenging.

Nuorisorikollisuuden esiintyvyys, taustatekijät ja sovittelu

Tausta Vaikka nuorisorikollisuus on kriminologisen tutkimuksen perinteinen kohde, on edelleen tarvetta pitkittäistutkimuksille, joissa on laaja, koko väestöä edustava otos. Kriminaalipolitiikan alalla puolestaan rikosten sovittelu ja muut restoratiivisen oikeuden muodot ovat nousseet Suomessakin haastamaan perinteiset rikoskontrollin paradigmat, rangaistuksen ja hoidon. Tutkimuskysymykset Tutkimuksen pääkysymyksenä oli, mitkä lapsuudessa (8 v.) ja nuoruudessa (18 v.) mitatut psykososiaaliset tekijät ovat yhteydessä nuorisorikollisuuden (16-20 v.) määrään ja lajiin. Lisäksi yhtenä kysymyksenä oli, miten varusmiespalvelun aikaiset psykiatriset diagnoosit liittyvät nuorisorikollisuuteen. Lisäksi tutkimme nuorisorikollisuuden esiintyvyyttä ja palvelujen käyttöä, ja vertailimme eri informanttien (tutkimushenkilöt itse, vanhemmat ja opettajat) vastausten ennusvoimaa lasten tulevan rikollisuuden suhteen. Rikosten sovittelun osalta kysymyksenä oli, miten suomalainen sovittelukäytäntö vastaa restoratiivisen oikeuden teoriaa ja miten sovittelua pitäisi kehittää. Aineisto ja metodit Pitkittäistutkimuksemme aineistona oli valtakunnallisesti edustava satunnaisotos, joka vastasi 10% vuonna 1981 Suomessa syntyneistä suomenkielisistä pojista. Ensimmäinen tiedonkeruu tapahtui 1989, kun pojat olivat 8-vuotiaita. Tietoa kerättiin lomakekyselyin pojilta itseltään sekä heidän vanhemmiltaan ja opettajiltaan. Tietoja saatiin 2946 pojasta. Lasten lomakkeena oli Children’s Depression Inventory, vanhemman lomakkeena Rutter A2 ja opettajan lomakkeena Rutter B2. Toinen tiedonkeruu järjestettiin, kun pojat osallistuivat kutsuntoihin 1999. Tietoja saatiin 2330 pojasta. Lomakkeena oli Young Adult Self-Report . Puolustusvoimien rekisteristä saatiin tiedot poikien kutsunnoissa ja palvelusaikana (vuosina 1999-04) saamista psykiatrisista diagnooseista, jotka luokiteltiin kuuteen luokkaan: antisosiaalinen persoonallisuushäiriö, päihdehäiriöt, psykoottiset häiriöt, ahdistuneisuushäiriöt, masennustilat ja sopeutumishäiriöt. Tieto mahdollisesta diagnoosista saatiin 2712 pojasta. Rikollisuus operationalisoitiin poliisin ns. RIKI-rekisteriin vuosina 1998-2001 rekisteröityjen tekojen avulla, kun pojat olivat pääasiassa 16-20-vuotiaita. Rikosten määrän mukaan pojat jaettiin neljään ryhmään: ei rikoksia, 1-2 rikosta (satunnainen rikollisuus), 3-5 rikosta (uusintarikollisuus) ja yli 5 rikosta (aktiivinen uusintarikollisuus). Rikoslajeista muodostettiin viisi kategoriaa: huume-, väkivalta-, omaisuus-, liikenne- ja rattijuopumusrikollisuus. Analyysivaiheessa rekisteridatasta poistettiin liikennerikkomukset. Kaikkiaan tiedot mahdollisista poliisikontakteista saatiin 2866 pojasta. Sovitteludata koostui 16 sovittelujutun havainnoinnista Turussa vuosina 2001- 2003. Tulokset Kaikkiaan 23% pojista oli rekisteröity rikoksesta (poissulkien liikennerikkomukset) nelivuotisen tutkimusperiodin aikana 16-20-vuotiaana. Satunnaisia rikoksentekijöitä oli 15%, uusijoita 4% ja moninkertaisia uusijoita 4%. Rikokset kasautuivat moninkertaisille uusijoille: tämä 4%:n ryhmä teki 72% kaikista rikoksista . Omaisuus- ja liikennerikollisia oli eniten (kumpiakin 11%), ja huumerikollisia vähiten (4%). Kaikki rikoslajit korreloivat keskenään tilastollisesti merkitsevästi. Nuorisorikollisuuden itsenäisiä ennustekijöitä lapsuudessa olivat rikkinäinen perherakenne, vanhempien alhainen koulutustaso, lapsen käytösongelmat ja hyperaktiivisuus. Kun verrattiin eri informantteja (lapset itse ja heidän vanhempansa ja opettajansa), etenkin opettajien vastaukset ennustivat lasten tulevaa rikollisuutta. Nuoruudessa rikollisuuden itsenäisiä korrelaatteja olivat pienellä paikkakunnalla asuminen, vanhempien ero, seurustelu, itse ilmoitettu antisosiaalisuus ja säännöllinen tupakointi ja humalajuominen. Ennus- ja taustatekijöille oli tyypillistä se, että ne olivat lineaarisessa yhteydessä rikosten määrään (ongelmat ja rikosten määrä lisääntyivät käsi kädessä) ja että ne liittyivät useaan rikoslajiin yhtä aikaa. Huumerikollisuudella oli kuitenkin vähemmän itsenäisiä ennus- ja taustatekijöitä kuin muilla rikoslajeilla. Joka kymmenes poika kärsi psykiatrisista häiriöistä. Tämä ryhmä teki noin puolet kaikista rikoksista, ja lähes joka toinen poika, jolla oli psykiatrinen häiriö, oli rekisteröity rikoksista. Rikolliseen käytökseen liittyivät etenkin antisosiaalinen persoonallisuushäiriö ja päihdehäiriöt. Masennustilat olivat kuitenkin ainoa diagnoosiryhmä, joka ei ollut yhteydessä rikollisuuteen. Myös psykiatristen häiriöiden esiintyvyys kasvoi lineaarisesti rikosten määrän kanssa; aktiivisista uusintarikollisista yli puolella (59%) oli psykiatrinen diagnoosi. Rikollisuuden lisäksi erilaiset psykososiaaliset ongelmat kasautuivat pienelle vähemmistölle. Aktiivisten uusijoiden ryhmään olivat tilastollisesti merkitsevästi yhteydessä lähes kaikki ongelmat mitä tutkimme. Kuitenkin tästä ryhmästä vain alle 3% oli käyttänyt mielenterveyspalveluja viimeisen vuoden aikana. Rikossovittelun havainnointitutkimuksen perusteella sovittelussa monet perusasiat ovat kunnossa, ja toiminta on mielekästä niin asianosaisten kuin yhteiskunnankin kannalta. Useimmiten osapuolet kohtasivat ja saivat aikaan sopimuksen, johon he vaikuttivat tyytyväisiltä. Rikoksentekijät olivat motivoituneita korvaamaan aiheuttamansa vahingot. Osapuolet saivat kertoa tarinansa omin sanoin, heitä kuunneltiin ja he ymmärsivät mitä sovittelussa puhutaan ja sovitaan. Sovittelun kuluessa jännitys väheni ja asiat saatiin loppuunkäsiteltyä. Asianosaiset saivat vaikuttaa prosessiin ja sopimukseen, ja uhrin oikeudet olivat sovittelussa keskeisellä sijalla. Restoratiivisen teorian perusteella sovittelussa havaittiin myös kehittämisen varaa: Etenkin nuoria rikoksentekijöitä oli hankala saada osallistumaan tosissaan, ja aikuiset helposti hallitsivat keskustelua. Etukäteistapaamisia ja tukihenkilöitä ei juuri hyödynnetty. Sovitteluja hallitsi puhe sopimuksesta ja rahasta. Työkorvauksia ei käytetty eikä rehabilitaatiota käsitelty. Sekä sovitteluun pääsy että sovittelumenettely riippuivat yksittäisistä henkilöistä. Johtopäätökset Rikosten tekeminen nuoruudessa on melko yleistä ja monimuotoista. Rikokset ja psykososiaaliset ongelmat kasautuvat pienelle ryhmälle ja kulkevat käsi kädessä. Myös psykiatriset häiriöt ovat lineaarisessa yhteydessä rikosten määrään. Rikosriskiä voidaan ennustaa jo lapsuudessa, ja etenkin opettajat ovat tarkkanäköisiä lasten ongelmien suhteen. Eri rikoslajeilla on varsin samanlaisia taustatekijöitä. Aktiiviset rikoksentekijät vastaavat suuresta osasta kokonaisrikollisuutta, tarvitsevat eniten apua, mutta eivät kuitenkaan hakeudu psykososiaalisten palvelujen piiriin. Rikosten sovittelu tarjoaa keinon puuttua ongelmiin varhaisessa vaiheessa ilman leimaamista. Sovittelun kehitystehtävät liittyvät etenkin dialogiin, valmisteluihin, tukihenkilöihin, työkorvauksiin, palveluunohjaukseen ja sovittelun sovellusalaan. Sovittelua ja muita restoratiivisia menettelyjä on kehitettävä ja laajennettava esimerkiksi niin, että niitä voitaisiin käyttää palveluunohjauksen välineenä.

Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program

According to the participant role approach (Salmivalli, Lagerspetz, Björkqvist, Österman, & Kaukiainen, 1996), bullying is a group phenomenon that is largely enabled and maintained by the classmates taking on different participant roles (e.g., reinforcers or assistants of the bully). There is, however, very little evidence on whether the bystander behaviors actually have an effect on the risk for victimization. Furthermore, the participant role approach implies that the bystanders should be used in putting an end to bullying. This view has been put into practice in the KiVa antibullying program, but it has not yet been investigated whether the program is effective. Four studies were conducted to investigate, (a) whether the behaviors of bystanders have an effect on the risk for victimization (Study I) and (b) whether the KiVa program reduces bullying and victimization and has other beneficial effects as well (Studies II–IV). The participants included large samples of elementary and lower secondary school students (Grades 1–9) from Finland. The assessments were done with web-based questionnaires including questions about bullying and victimization (both self- and peer reports), and about several bullying-related constructs. The results of this thesis suggest that bystander behaviors in bullying situations may influence the risk for victimization of vulnerable students. Moreover, the results indicate that the KiVa antibullying program is effective in reducing victimization and bullying. The program effects are larger in elementary schools than in lower secondary schools, whereas in Grades 8 and 9, they are larger for boys than girls for some peer-reported outcomes. The magnitude of the overall effects can be considered practically significant when obtained in a large-scale dissemination of the program.

Nuorena vanhemmaksi tulemista ja raskaudenkeskeytystä ennustavat lapsuusiän tekijät

Tämän tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli tutkia kahdeksan vuoden iässä arvioitujen perhetekijöiden, psyykkisten oireiden ja kiusaamiskäyttäytymisen yhteyttä äidiksi tulemiseen alle 20-vuotiaana, isäksi tulemiseen alle 22-vuotiaana ja raskaudenkeskeytyksen tekemiseen alle 29-vuotiaana. Tutkimus perustui suomalaiseen LAPSET-kohorttiin, joka on yleisväestöotos (n=5813) vuonna 1981 syntyneistä henkilöistä. Vuonna 1989 tutkittavat sekä heidän vanhempansa ja opettajansa vastasivat psyykkistä oireilua ja kiusaamista koskeviin kyselyihin. Vanhemmat antoivat tietoa myös perhetekijöistä ja opettajat koulumenestyksestä. Tiedot tyttöjen (n=2694, 94 % osallistuneista tytöistä) synnytyksistä ja raskaudenkeskeytyksistä kerättiin hoitoilmoitusrekisteristä ja raskaudenkeskeyttämisrekisteristä. Poikien (n=2721, 92 % osallistuneista pojista) osalta nuorena isäksi tuleminen selvitettiin väestötietojärjestelmästä. Nuorten äitien tyttäret tulivat vanhempien äitien tyttäriä todennäköisemmin nuorena äidiksi ja nuorten isien pojat nuorena isäksi. Matalasti koulutettujen äitien pojilla oli kohonnut todennäköisyys nuorena isäksi tulemiseen ja tyttärillä raskaudenkeskeytykseen. Muu kuin kahden biologisen vanhemman muodostama perherakenne oli yhteydessä nuorena äidiksi tulemiseen ja raskaudenkeskeytykseen. Lapsuuden käytösongelmat olivat yhteydessä nuorena vanhemmaksi tulemiseen sekä raskaudenkeskeytykseen. Ylivilkkaus oli yhteydessä nuorena äidiksi tulemiseen. Tytöistä ne, jotka olivat kiusaajia tai kiusaaja-kiusattuja, tulivat todennäköisimmin nuorena äidiksi ja pojista kiusaaja-kiusatut nuorena isäksi. Kiusaaminen ei ollut yhteydessä raskaudenkeskeytyksen tekemiseen. Tutkimustuloksia voidaan hyödyntää terveydenhuollossa kohdattaessa nuoria vanhempia ja muita nuoria. Lisäksi niillä voi olla merkitystä esimerkiksi suunniteltaessa toimenpiteitä, joiden tavoitteena on nuorten epätoivottujen raskauksien ehkäiseminen.

Same- and Other-Sex Victimization : Risk Factors, Consequences, and Protection by Peers

Bullying can be viewed as goal-oriented behavior in the strive for dominance and prestige in the peer group (Salmivalli, 2010). To ensure the effectiveness of their power demonstrations, bullies often choose targets from among their vulnerable peers (Salmivalli, 2010; Veenstra et al., 2007). A large number of studies have also shown that victimization has severe consequences for the victims’ psychosocial adjustment (Reijntjes, Kamphuis, Prinzie, & Telch, 2010; Ttofi, Farrington, Lösel, & Loeber, 2011). In this thesis I investigate – based on three empirical studies – whether similar dynamics on the risk factors and consequences apply to same- and other-sex victimization. In the empirical studies, we used the data from the randomized control trial of the KiVa antibullying program for the elementary school grades 4–6 (2007–2008), and for the middle school grades 7–9 (2008–2009). We measured same- and other-sex victimization, and victims’ defending relationships by dyadic questions: “By which classmates are you victimized?” and “By which classmates are you supported, comforted, or defended?” In addition, we used self-reports and peer reports to measure adjustment and social status. The findings imply that other-sex victimization may be challenging for antibullying work. First, although targets of bullying seemed to be selected from among vulnerable peers for the most part, perceived popularity increased the risks of other-sex victimization. Popularity of these victims may falsely lead to an impression that the victims are doing well. Second, the consequences considering victims’ later psychosocial adjustment were alarming concerning girls bullied by boys. Thus, despite the fact that the targets may be perceived as popular, other-sex victimization can have even more severe consequences than same-sex victimization. Third, we found that defending relationships were mostly same-sex relationships, and consequently, we may ask whether defending is effective against other-sex bullies. Finally, the KiVa antibullying program was less effective against other-sex victimization in the adolescent sample. The findings altogether emphasize the importance of taking into account the sex composition of the bully-victim dyad, both considering future research on bullying and in the antibullying work with children and adolescents.

School Bullies’ Quest for Power: Implications for Group Dynamics and Intervention

Bullying is characterized by an inequality of power between perpetrator and target. Findings that bullies can be highly popular have helped redefine the old conception of the maladjusted school bully into a powerful individual exerting influence on his peers from the top of the peer status hierarchy. Study I is a conceptual paper that explores the conditions under which a skillful, socially powerful bully can use the peer group as a means of aggression and suggests that low cohesion and low quality of friendships make groups easier to manipulate. School bullies’ high popularity should be a major obstacle for antibullying efforts, as bullies are unlikely to cease negative actions that are rewarding, and their powerful position could discourage bystanders from interfering. Using data from the Finnish program KiVa, Study II supported the hypothesis that antibullying interventions are less effective with popular bullies in comparison to their unpopular counterparts. In order to design interventions that can address the positive link between popularity and aggression, it is necessary to determine in which contexts bullies achieve higher status. Using an American sample, Study III examined the effects of five classroom features on the social status that peers accord to aggressive children, including classroom status hierarchy, academic level and grade level, controlling for classroom mean levels of aggression and ethnic distribution. Aggressive children were more popular and better liked in fifth grade relative to fourth grade and in classrooms of higher status hierarchy. Surprisingly, the natural emergence of status hierarchies in children’s peer groups has long been assumed to minimize aggression. Whether status hierarchies hinder or promote bullying is a controversial question in the peer relations’ literature. Study IV aimed at clarifying this debate by testing the effects of the degree of classroom status hierarchy on bullying. Higher hierarchy was concrrently associated with bullying and predictive of higher bullying six months later. As bullies’ quest for power is increasingly acknowledged, some researchers suggest teaching bullies to attain the elevated status they yearn for through prosocial acts. Study V cautions against such solutions by reviewing evidence that prosocial behaviors enacted with the intention of controlling others can be as harmful as aggression.

Att lindra ett lidande : en kvalitativ studie om lindrande av den mobbade elevens lidande

The study's aim is to achieve knowledge of how to relieve the suffering of the bullied student. The methodology in this study is hermeneutics. The theoretical perspective is the caritative theory. The questions in the study are: 1) What does it mean to relieve a suffering? 2) What can caregivers do to relieve the suffering of the young bullied pupil? 3) How do the caregivers experience their role in relieving the suffering? The review of previous research shows that bullying is a phenomenon that causes great harm to the health of young people. There are varying developed strategies to deal with bullying in the schools. Only one article studied the counsellor role in fighting bullying. There is a need to examine how a suffering can be relieved, how the caregiver experience handling bullying, and how caregivers can be involved in relieving the suffering the bullied youngster is going through. The empirical part of the study was conducted through qualitative semi-structured interviews with counsellors who work with high school students. The study was conducted in close collaboration with the project "Analys av ungdomsenkäten" conducted by the youth researchers at Åbo Akademi and the Swedish Ostrobothnia Youth foundation (SOU). The collected material was analyzed according to Elo and Kyngäs (2007) guidelines for inductive content analysis. The result shows that caregivers play an important role in relieving a suffering. Counsellors emphasize the importance of a mutual relationship in order to relieve the victims suffering. Lack of time was the main culprit. The core of alleviating a suffering can be compared with those factors the informants take into account in the caring encounter with the bullied pupil.

Bully-victims: Prevalence, psychosocial adjustment, and responsiveness to intervention

In this thesis, a unique subgroup involved in the bullying phenomenon, the bully-victims, are identified and examined. Despite the increasing attention on the bully-victims in recent years, their prevalence, psychosocial adjustment, and response to anti-bullying programs has not been clearly determined. Three empirical studies were conducted in this thesis to examine the prevalence of bully-victims. Moreover, in study I, the psychosocial adjustment of bully-victims was compared with that of pure bullies, pure victims, and non-involved students. In study II, different forms of bullying and victimization were compared among pure bullies, pure victims, bully-victims, and non-involved students. In study III, the effectiveness of anti-bullying programs, in particular, the KiVa program, on bully-victims was demonstrated. Overall, bully-victims formed the smallest group comparing with pure bullies, pure victims, and non-involved students, and in general differed from pure bullies rather than pure victims in terms of subjective experience of maladjustment. They employed more verbal, physical, and cyberbullying perpetration, but not indirect bullying; and they were more victimized by verbal, physical, cyber, and indirect bullying. The KiVa anti-bullying program in Finland is effective in reducing the prevalence of bully-victims.

International adoption: Symptoms of attachment disorders and their associations with the child’s background and developmental outcome

Many internationally adopted children have lived their first years of life in an environment with limited opportunities for primary caregiving. The lack of consistent care increases the prevalence of attachment disorders among them. Less is known about the influences of attachment disorders on a child’s later course of life. This study is part of the Finnish Adoption Study. Parents of all Finnish children who had been internationally adopted by legal adoption organisations between 1985 and 2007 were sent questionnaires (N=1450). Parental evaluations of the children’s symptoms of reactive attachment disorder (RAD) at the time of adoption, their later learning or language problems using a screening scale, and children’s self-reported school bullying experiences were evaluated. Each child’s attachment-related behavioural problems were requested in a follow-up survey 1.9 and 3.8 years after adoption and compared with a Finnish reference group. This study indicated that Finnish internationally adopted children have at least three-fold prevalence of learning and language problems compared with their age-mates. A child’s symptoms of attachment disorders were associated with learning or language problems at school age as well as with his/her school bullying experiences. The adopted children had more attachment-related behavioural problems two years after adoption than their age-mates, but the difference was no longer evident four years after adoption. In conclusion, this study showed that the symptoms of attachment disorder indicate a risk for an adopted child’s later developmental outcome. The findings demonstrate the need for comprehensive clinical examinations and planning of treatment strategies for children with symptoms of RAD.

Sopeutumattomien oppilaiden tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitojen kehittyminen: Oppilaiden ja opettajien arvioita ja kokemuksia Aggression portaat -interventiosta

Tässä tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan sopeutumattomien erityisoppilaiden tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitojen kehittymistä Aggression portaat -interventio-ohjelman avulla kolmen vuoden tutkimusjakson aikana. Käsite sopeutumaton oppilas ei ole yksiselitteisesti määriteltävissä, mutta tässä tutkimuksessa sillä tarkoitetaan yleisopetussuunnitelman mukaan opiskelevaa oppilasta, joka käyttäytymiseen ja tunne-elämään liittyvien haasteidensa vuoksi on saanut siirron erityisopetuksen oppilaaksi ja saa enintään 10 oppilaan opetusryhmässä erityistä pedagogista tukea. Tutkimuksen yksi keskeinen tehtävä oli tutkia, onko tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitojen opettamisesta hyötyä sopeutumattomien oppilaiden tunteiden hallinnan ja käyttäytymisen itsesäätelyn kannalta. Tutkimuksen teoreettisena viitekehyksenä on Rose-Krasnorin (1997) malli yksilön sosioemotionaalisesta kompetenssista täydennettynä muiden tutkijoiden näkemyksillä. Sosioemotionaalinen kompetenssi on yläkäsite, johon kuuluvat alakäsitteinä tunne- ja itsesäätelytaidot, sosiokognitiiviset taidot ja sosiaaliset taidot. Lisäksi sosioemotionaaliseen kompetenssiin vaikuttavat kiintymyssuhteet ja osallisuus sekä tavoitteet vuorovaikutuksessa ja konteksti. Tässä tutkimuksessa keskitytään tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitoihin. Interventioryhmän (N=36) muodostivat Varsinais-Suomen alueella opiskelevat sopeutumattomien oppilaiden erityiskoulun 8-13-vuotiaat oppilaat, joille opetettiin tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitoja Aggression portaat -opetusmateriaaliin (Cacciatore 2007) pohjautuvan intervention avulla. Kontrolliryhmän (N=26) oppilaat olivat interventioryhmän oppilaiden ikäisiä ja he opiskelivat Varsinais-Suomen alueen kouluissa pienluokissa myös käyttäytymiseen ja tunne-elämään liittyvien haasteidensa vuoksi. Kontrolliryhmän oppilaat eivät saaneet tutkimusjakson aikana interventio-ohjelman mukaista opetusta. Interventioryhmän oppilaat kävivät erityiskoulua, jossa kaikilla oppilailla oli sopeutumisongelmia ja kontrolliryhmän oppilaat opiskelivat yleisopetuksen koulujen yhteydessä olevilla sopeutumattomien oppilaiden pienluokilla. Tutkimusaineisto on kerätty vuosina 2010-2012. Tutkimusmetodeina olivat sekä oppilaille että opettajille laaditut Webropol-alustaiset kyselyt ja oppilaiden kirjoittamat väkivalta-aiheiset tekstit. Tutkimus- ja kontrolliryhmän oppilaille pidettiin ”Tunteiden hallinta ja käyttäytyminen”- kyselyn avulla alkumittaus syksyllä 2009 ja mittaus toistettiin keväällä 2010, 2011 ja 2012. Kyselyiden avulla selvitettiin, miten oppilaiden tunteiden kokeminen ja ilmaiseminen sekä tunteiden hallinta ja käyttäytymisen itsesäätely muuttuivat tutkimusjakson aikana. Kyselyssä kartoitettiin myös oppilaiden kokemuksia kiusaamisena ilmenevästä väkivallasta. Aineistolähtöisen sisällönanalyysin avulla selvitettiin oppilaiden kirjoitelmista heidän ajatuksiaan ja näkemyksiään väkivallasta ja ehdotuksia keinoista väkivallan vähentämiseksi. Keväällä 2012 interventioryhmän oppilaille ja opettajille laadittujen erillisten kyselyiden avulla selvitettiin sekä oppilaiden että opettajien arvioita ja kokemuksia oppilaiden tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitojen muutoksesta interventio-ohjelman avulla. Lisäksi oppilaat ja opettajat arvioivat pidettyjen tunnetaitotuntien hyödyllisyyttä oppilaille. Interventioryhmän opettajat arvioivat myös Aggression portaat -interventiomateriaalin käyttökelpoisuutta. Vuoden 2014 Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteissa esitetyt velvoitteet opettaa kouluissa oppilaille tunne- ja vuorovaikutustaitoja edellyttävät tietoa konkreettisista käytänteistä ja tutkimusperustaisista interventio-ohjelmista. Tämän tutkimuksen tulokset osoittavat, että interventioryhmän muodostaneet sopeutumattomat oppilaat hyötyivät Aggression portaat -interventiosta. Heidän tunne- ja itsesäätelytaidoissaan tapahtui myönteistä kehitystä etenkin myönteisten tunnekokemusten lisääntymisen ja toisiin kohdistuneen fyysisen väkivallan vähenemisen osalta. Myös suhtautuminen väkivaltapelien ikärajoihin oli merkittävästi myönteisempää kuin kontrolliryhmän oppilailla, joilla kielteinen asenne lisääntyi selvästi tutkimusjakson aikana. Lisäksi interventioryhmän oppilailla oli keinoja itsensä rentouttamiseksi, päinvastoin kuin kontrolliryhmän oppilailla, joilla keinottomuuden kokemus jopa lisääntyi. Interventioryhmän oppilaat suhtautuivat hyvin kielteisesti toisen yllyttämiseen väkivaltaiseen tekoon ja kirjoittivat enemmän ajatuksiaan väkivallasta tuoden esille runsaasti ehdotuksia keinoista väkivallan vähentämiseksi. Myös oppilaat ja opettajat kokivat interventio-ohjelman oppilaiden kehityksen kannalta hyödylliseksi ja opettajat myös interventiomateriaalin käyttökelpoiseksi.

Implementing The KiVa Antibullying Program: What Does It Take?

There is variation in how teachers and schools implement bullying prevention programs. Although this variation has been discussed, there has been little empirical research concerning the relationship between implementation fidelity and program outcomes. This thesis contains three studies, each of them in the context of implementing the KiVa antibullying program, and examines teachers’ actions in preventing and intervening in school bullying. The first aim of this thesis is to examine implementation degree of the KiVa curriculum and its’ association with reductions in victimization and bullying perpetration (Study I). The second aim is to clarify why teachers displayed different degrees of adherence to the KiVa curriculum during a school year (Study II). Thirdly, it is investigated whether recognizing victimization can be difficult for school staff (Study III). In addition to these peer-reviewed studies, the thesis includes a qualitative analysis (unpublished) of the teachers’ open answers concerning their implementation experiences. The data were collected from elementary school teachers (Studies I–II; the unpublished study), elementary school students (Study I), and students on the elementary and middle school levels (Study III) during the evaluation of the effectiveness of KiVa antibullying program between 2007 and 2009. The findings demonstrate that a larger reduction in victimization can be achieved in classrooms where teachers display higher levels of adherence to the KiVa curriculum and invest more time for preparing the lessons. Bullying perpetration, however, was not equally affected by the level of curriculum implementation. With respect to the implementation process over one year, there was significant variation between individual teachers’ activity—ranging from systematic and high implementation to declining delivery from lesson to lesson. The sustained actions (high and moderate levels of implementation) were premised on principal support for antibullying work. Lesson preparation was associated with keeping implementation high throughout the school year. The findings also implied that the belief in the effectiveness of the program is important for a higher implementation degree at starting point of the process. Finally, there are severe flaws in teachers’ ability to identify students who are victimized. As it turns out, it is possible that only one-fourth of chronically victimized students are helped by the school staff. Especially when the victims are middle-school-aged girls, when they bully others themselves, or when they do not tell adults about bullying, reaching out for them is difficult. Implementation and dissemination of research-based interventions will take a good deal of time and effort. The findings demonstrate that active implementation is important for improving program outcomes. They also show how implementation can be sustained—there are both individual and interpersonal factors that facilitate or inhibit high-quality implementation. Thus, implications for future research regarding the implementation of school-based programs are suggested.