A filosofia value investing na gestão de fundos de investimentos brasileiros

Esta dissertação contribui com as pesquisas sobre value investing no Brasil, analisando os fundos brasileiros que adotam tal filosofia. Seu objetivo é identificar alguns dos fatores que influenciam as decisões dos gestores de value investing a manterem um ativo em sua carteira e a comprarem esses ativos. Secundariamente, é objetivo identificar algumas características sobre os fundos e sua aderência aos critérios formalizados na literatura. Os resultados mostram que as variáveis que influenciam o gestor a manter uma ação na carteira são: maior estabilidade no Lucro por Ação, alto ROA, alta Margem Bruta, tamanho da empresa e liquidez das ações. O índice Preço/Lucro é a única variável que influencia significativamente o momento da compra em um dos testes. Todos os fundos de value investing têm retorno maior que o Ibovespa no período amostral, com menor risco. A maioria dos fundos utiliza poucos instrumentos de investimento – basicamente ações e renda fixa.

Eficiência da magic formula de value investing no mercado brasileiro

O objetivo deste trabalho é realizar procedimento de back-test da Magic Formula na Bovespa, reunindo evidências sobre violações da Hipótese do Mercado Eficiente no mercado brasileiro. Desenvolvida por Joel Greenblatt, a Magic Formula é uma metodologia de formação de carteiras que consiste em escolher ações com altos ROICs e Earnings Yields, seguindo a filosofia de Value Investing. Diversas carteiras foram montadas no período de dezembro de 2002 a maio de 2014 utilizando diferentes combinações de número de ativos por carteira e períodos de permanência. Todas as carteiras, independentemente do número de ativos ou período de permanência, apresentaram retornos superiores ao Ibovespa. As diferenças entre os CAGRs das carteiras e o do Ibovespa foram significativas, sendo que a carteira com pior desempenho apresentou CAGR de 27,7% contra 14,1% do Ibovespa. As carteiras também obtiveram resultados positivos após serem ajustadas pelo risco. A pior razão retorno-volatilidade foi de 1,2, comparado a 0,6 do Ibovespa. As carteiras com pior pontuação também apresentaram bons resultados na maioria dos cenários, contrariando as expectativas iniciais e os resultados observados em outros trabalhos. Adicionalmente foram realizadas simulações para diversos períodos de 5 anos com objetivo de analisar a robustez dos resultados. Todas as carteiras apresentaram CAGR maior que o do Ibovespa em todos os períodos simulados, independentemente do número de ativos incluídos ou dos períodos de permanência. Estes resultados indicam ser possível alcançar retornos acima do mercado no Brasil utilizando apenas dados públicos históricos. Esta é uma violação da forma fraca da Hipótese do Mercado Eficiente.

Teste de eficiência da magic formula de value investing para o mercado brasileiro de ações

O objetivo desse trabalho é realizar um procedimento de back-test da Magic Formula no IBX-100, a fim de reunir evidencias sobre a eficiência de tal metodologia no processo de seleção das melhores ações e formação de carteiras que superem o desempenho do IBX-100 no longo prazo. Desenvolvida por Joel Greenblatt, a Magic Formula é uma metodologia de formação de carteiras que consiste em escolher ações com altos ROICs e Earnings Yields, seguindo a filosofia de Value Investing. Diversas carteiras foram montadas no período de janeiro de 2000 a junho de 2015 utilizando diferentes combinações de número de ativos por carteira e períodos de permanência. Nem todas as carteiras apresentaram retornos superiores ao índice de mercado. Aparentemente, as carteiras com mais ações e períodos de permanência mais longos apresentam desempenho superior às carteiras menores e com rotatividade maior (períodos de permanência mais curtos). A carteira de 10 ações, com período de permanência de 1 ano, apresentou o maior CAGR dentre todas as outras (17,77%), superando o CAGR de 13,17% do IBX-100 no mesmo período. Esse resultado foi superior mesmo quando ajustado ao risco. Independentemente do período de permanência e número de ações, todas as carteiras apresentaram riscos sistemáticos menores do que o índice IBX-100 (todos os betas foram significativos e menores do que 1). Por outro lado, os alfas das carteiras foram muito baixos e, raramente, significativos, sugerindo que a gestão ativa de acordo com os critérios da Magic Formula não adiciona retornos substancialmente maiores do que o retorno relacionado à variações de mercado.

The Use of Systematic Value Strategies in Separating the Winners from the Losers: Evidence from the Finnish Markets

This study examines the Magic Formula and ERP5 value strategies in the Finnish stocks markets. Magic Formula ranks stocks based on EV/EBIT and ROA and ERP5 based on EV/EBIT, ROA, P/B and five-year trailing ROA. The purpose of the study is to examine whether the value strategies can be used to generate excess returns over the market index. The data has been collected from the Datastream database for the sample period from May 1997 to May 2010 and consists of the companies listed on the main list of Helsinki Stock Exchange. This study confirms the findings of previous research that value premium exists in the Finnish stock markets and that systematic value strategies can be used to form portfolios that outperform the market index with lower volatility.

Mitigating high ‘equity capital’ risk exposure to ‘small cap’ sector in India: analysing ‘key factors of success’ for ‘Institutional Investors’ whilst Investing in small cap sector in India

This paper deals with the subject of mitigating high ‘Equity Capital’ Risk Exposure to ‘Small Cap’ Sector in India. Institutional investors in India are prone to be risk averse when it comes to investing in the small cap sector in India as they find the companies risky and volatile. This paper will help analyse ‘Key Factors of success’ for ‘Institutional Investors’ whilst investing in Small Cap sector in India as some of these Indian small cap stocks offer handsome returns despite economic downturn. This paper has been harnessed carefully under the influence of expert investors, which includes Benjamin Graham (Security Analysis); Warren Buffet; Philip Fisher (Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits); and Aswath Damodaran.

Arvostrategioiden menestys Suomen osakemarkkinoilla

Tämän tutkimuksen tavoitteena on selvittää saavutetaanko passiivisilla arvostrategioilla riskikorjattuna ylisuuria tuottoja Suomen osakemarkkinoilla. Tuottaako matalien tunnuslukujen perusteella valittujen osakkeiden portfolio enemmän kuin korkeiden tunnuslukujen portfolio? Ovatko alfat tilastollisesti merkitseviä? Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on myös selvittää, ovatko korkeimman ja matalimman arvostustason portfolioiden menestyserot tilastollisesti merkitseviä. Tunnuslukuina on tarkasteltu P/E-, EV/EBIT- ja EV/EBITDA-tunnuslukuja sekä P/B- ja P/S–lukuja. Lisäksi on tutkittu yhdistelmätunnuslukuina P/E- ja P/B–lukujen tulon muodostamaa tunnuslukua, sekä suhteellisiin EV/EBITDA-, P/B- ja P/S-lukuihin perustuvaa arvostusmittaria. Tutkimusaineisto koostuu Suomen osakemarkkinoilla julkisesti noteeratuista yrityksistä toukokuusta 1991 toukokuuhun 2006. Osakkeet järjestettiin tunnuslukujen arvostustason perusteella kvintiiliportfolioihin. Myöhemmin portfoliot muodostettiin uudelleen kolmen ja viiden vuoden välein. Lopuksi tarkasteltiin kvintiiliportfolioiden kuukausittaisia tuottoja tunnuslukukohtaisesti koko tutkimusjakson ajalta. Tulosten perusteella on selkeästi havaittavissa, että matalan tunnusluvun kvintiiliportfoliot menestyivät paremmin kuin korkean tunnusluvun kvintiiliportfoliot. Kolmen vuoden jaksoissa P/E-, EV/EBITDA-, P/B-, P/S- ja kolmen tunnusluvun yhdistelmällä muodostetuilla kvintiiliportfolioilla arvopreemio oli selkeästi havaittavissa. Viiden vuoden jaksoissa vastaava ilmiö toistui EV/EBITDA-tunnusluvulla muodostetuilla kvintiiliportfolioilla. Eniten tuotti absoluuttisesti sekä riskikorjattuna tutkimuksessa esiteltävä kolmen vuoden jaksoissa kolmen tunnusluvun yhdistelmällä muodostettu matalimman arvostustason kvintiiliportfolio, joka tuotti riskikorjattuna tilastollisesti erittäin merkitsevästi positiivista alfaa matalalla riskitasolla.

Pricing anomalies in the Finnish stock market

The aim of this thesis is to examine whether the pricing anomalies exists in the Finnish stock markets by comparing the performance of quantile portfolios that are formed on the basis of either individual valuation ratios, composite value measures or combined value and momentum indicators. All the research papers included in the thesis show evidence of value anomalies in the Finnish stock markets. In the first paper, the sample of stocks over the 1991-2006 period is divided into quintile portfolios based on four individual valuation ratios (i.e., E/P, EBITDA/EV, B/P, and S/P) and three hybrids of them (i.e. composite value measures). The results show the superiority of composite value measures as selection criterion for value stocks, particularly when EBITDA/EV is employed as earnings multiple. The main focus of the second paper is on the impact of the holding period length on performance of value strategies. As an extension to the first paper, two more individual ratios (i.e. CF/P and D/P) are included in the comparative analysis. The sample of stocks over 1993- 2008 period is divided into tercile portfolios based on six individual valuation ratios and three hybrids of them. The use of either dividend yield criterion or one of three composite value measures being examined results in best value portfolio performance according to all performance metrics used. Parallel to the findings of many international studies, our results from performance comparisons indicate that for the sample data employed, the yearly reformation of portfolios is not necessarily optimal in order to maximally gain from the value premium. Instead, the value investor may extend his holding period up to 5 years without any decrease in long-term portfolio performance. The same holds also for the results of the third paper that examines the applicability of data envelopment analysis (DEA) method in discriminating the undervalued stocks from overvalued ones. The fourth paper examines the added value of combining price momentum with various value strategies. Taking account of the price momentum improves the performance of value portfolios in most cases. The performance improvement is greatest for value portfolios that are formed on the basis of the 3-composite value measure which consists of D/P, B/P and EBITDA/EV ratios. The risk-adjusted performance can be enhanced further by following 130/30 long-short strategy in which the long position of value winner stocks is leveraged by 30 percentages while simultaneously selling short glamour loser stocks by the same amount. Average return of the long-short position proved to be more than double stock market average coupled with the volatility decrease. The fifth paper offers a new approach to combine value and momentum indicators into a single portfolio-formation criterion using different variants of DEA models. The results throughout the 1994-2010 sample period shows that the top-tercile portfolios outperform both the market portfolio and the corresponding bottom-tercile portfolios. In addition, the middle-tercile portfolios also outperform the comparable bottom-tercile portfolios when DEA models are used as a basis for stock classification criteria. To my knowledge, such strong performance differences have not been reported in earlier peer-reviewed studies that have employed the comparable quantile approach of dividing stocks into portfolios. Consistently with the previous literature, the division of the full sample period into bullish and bearish periods reveals that the top-quantile DEA portfolios lose far less of their value during the bearish conditions than do the corresponding bottom portfolios. The sixth paper extends the sample period employed in the fourth paper by one year (i.e. 1993- 2009) covering also the first years of the recent financial crisis. It contributes to the fourth paper by examining the impact of the stock market conditions on the main results. Consistently with the fifth paper, value portfolios lose much less of their value during bearish conditions than do stocks on average. The inclusion of a momentum criterion somewhat adds value to an investor during bullish conditions, but this added value turns to negative during bearish conditions. During bear market periods some of the value loser portfolios perform even better than their value winner counterparts. Furthermore, the results show that the recent financial crisis has reduced the added value of using combinations of momentum and value indicators as portfolio formation criteria. However, since the stock markets have historically been bullish more often than bearish, the combination of the value and momentum criteria has paid off to the investor despite the fact that its added value during bearish periods is negative, on an average.

Rahoituksellisen velkaantuneisuuden ja B/P-luvun yhteys sekä niiden tuottojenennustuskyky

Tämän kandidaatintutkielman tarkoituksena oli tutkia rahoituksellisen velkaantuneisuuden vaikutusta yritysten B/P-lukuihin ja keskimääräisiin tuottoihin Suomen osakemarkkinoilla vuosina 1996–2012. Tutkielman perustana oleva ilmiö on B/P-anomalia, jonka mukaan korkean B/P:n osakkeet eli arvo-osakkeet menestyvät osakemarkkinoilla paremmin kuin matalan B/P:n osakkeet eli kasvuosakkeet. Useiden tutkijoiden mielestä arvoanomalioiden syynä on korkeampi systemaattinen riski, jonka yksi komponenteista on rahoituksellinen velkaantuneisuus. Näiden tutkimusten perusteella korkean B/P:n yrityksillä pitäisi olla korkeampi systemaattinen riski ja siten todennäköisesti myös korkeampi rahoituksellinen velkaantuneisuus. Aineistona tutkimuksessa toimi Helsingin pörssin yritykset vuosilta 1996–2012 pois lukien rahoitus- ja vakuutusalan yritykset sekä kiinteistösijoitusyhtiöt. Tulosten perusteella B/P:n sekä rahoituksellisen velkaantuneisuuden välillä oli positiivinen, monotoninen ja tilastollisesti merkitsevä suhde, kun aineiston yritykset olivat jaettu kolmeen portfolioon niiden B/P-lukujen perusteella, mutta yhteyttä ei ollut löydettävissä kuuden portfolion tapauksessa. B/P-anomaliasta oli viitteitä, kun portfolioina käytettiin kolmea B/P-luvun pohjalta muodostettua portfoliota, mutta erot eivät olleet tilastollisesti merkitseviä. Rahoituksellisen velkaantuneisuuden sekä keskimääräisten vuosituottojen väliltä ei ollut löydettävissä tilastollisesti merkitsevää yhteyttä tästä aineistosta.

La disonancia cognitiva y trampa de la memoria en decisiones de Inversión: caso colombiano

Este documento es el resultado de una investigación bajo el enfoque de Finanzas Corporativas del Comportamiento, disciplina relevante en el mundo financiero desde el 2002 y que hasta el momento poco se ha investigado en Colombia. Esta difiere del supuesto tradicional de la racionalidad de los individuos en la toma de decisiones financieras, ya que pueden ser influenciadas por sesgos cognitivos y emocionales que la teoría ortodoxa no tiene en cuenta en sus supuestos. Esta investigación busca indagar, desde el punto de vista conceptual y mediante el análisis de resultados de estudio de campo con operadores del mercado bursátil colombiano, sobre la posible presencia de elementos comportamentales en las decisiones de inversión. Los sesgos que se evaluaron fueron: disonancia cognitiva, heurístico de disponibilidad y sesgo de confirmación. Para la recolección de fuentes primarias, una encuesta fue enviada a los operadores Colombianos, categorizados en operadores con experiencia y operadores jóvenes. Después del filtro, 142 encuestas fueron seleccionadas para el análisis. Los principales hallazgos fueron que los jóvenes son más propensos a experimentar disonancia cognitiva y heurístico de disponibilidad y en ambas categorías, los sesgos analizados influencian medianamente la toma de decisiones de inversión.

Análisis fundamental aplicado a la industria minera : un estudio multivariante

Este trabajo tiene por objeto aplicar los principios del Value Investing a veinticuatro empresas del sector minero y definir las claves para extrapolar, en base a un análisis fundamental, una calificación para cada una de las empresas. Con este fin, se ha realizado un estudio estadístico multivariante para comparar las correlaciones existentes entre cada ratio fundamental y su evolución en bolsa a uno, tres y cinco años vista. Para procesar los datos se han utilizado los programas MATLAB y EXCEL. Sobre ellos se ha planteado una Matriz de Correlaciones de Pearson y un estudio de dispersión por cruce de pares. El análisis demostró que es posible aplicar la metodología del Value Investing a empresas del sector minero con resultados positivos aunque, el ajuste de las correlaciones, sugiere utilizar series temporales más largas y un mayor número de empresas para ganar fiabilidad en el contraste de estas hipótesis. De los estudios realizados, se deduce que unos buenos fundamentales influyen, de manera notable, a la revalorización bursátil a 3 y 5 años destacando, además, que el ajuste es mejor cuanto mayor sea este tiempo. Abstract This study aims to apply the principles of Value Investing to twenty four mining companies and, based on this fundamental study, develop a rating to classify those companies. For this purpose, we have performed a multivariate statistical study to compare the correlations between each fundamental ratio and its stock revalorization for one, three and five years. MATLAB and EXCEL have been used to process data. The statistical methods used are Pearson Matrix of Correlations and a Cross Pairs Scattering Study. The analysis showed that it is possible to apply the methodology of Value Investing to mining companies, although, the adjustment of correlations suggests using longer time series and a larger amount of companies to test these hypothesis. From the studies performed, it follows that good fundamentals significantly influence the stock market value at 3 and 5 years, noting that, the larger the period under study, the better the fit.

Value creation in the nursing home real estate investment market - A case study

The underlying thesis examines the value drivers of direct investments in nursing home real estate in Germany. A survey among investors and operators is conducted in order to identify significant value drivers. Moreover, based on survey results, a framework for assessing German nursing home real estate is developed. This is applied in a case-study about the set-up of a nursing home value-add fund which will demonstrate the value creation process of redeveloping an existing nursing home real estate portfolio. Through a concluding analysis the sources of value creation, sensitivities and future prospects of direct investing into German nursing home real estate are concluded.

Investing Effectively in Information and Communication Technology in Schools, 2008-2013

Learning is changing. A pivotal force in bringing about this change is the use of information and communications technology (ICT) which provides richer, more immediate, world-relevant educational resources and opportunities. When used well, ICT enriches learning and enhances teaching. It invigorates classroom activities and is a powerful motivational tool that encourages learners to progress in more personalised and self-directed ways. Ireland has achieved rapid change and growth in the past decade, but to sustain this we must prepare the next generation for the knowledge society in which they will live. The challenge we face is to ensure that the emphasis on ICT in schools shifts, in the immediate future, from technology provision to a focus on its deliberate use by the learner. Fostering personal creativity has always been a desirable educational value. The pursuit of creativity and inventiveness are now pivotal skills in a knowledge economy and the embedding of ICT in learning can greatly facilitate their development. Web 2.0 will facilitate greater interactivity and enable greater levels of user-generated content. It is crucial that young people acquire the ICT and related skills to support these new opportunities.