The effect of light truck design variables on top speed, performance, and fuel economy, 1981. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Vehicle fog lighting: an analytical evaluation. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Development of headlight system performance criteria. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Diagnostic motor vehicle inspection demonstration projects, program engineering support. Volume 8 - appendix G: vehicle-in-use standards. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Closed loop control of automotive engines. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Engineering model of future motor vehicles. Volume I. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Engineering model of future motor vehicles. Volume II: data book. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Increased fuel economy in transportation systems by use of energy management. Volume II - digital automotive propulsion simulator programs and description.

Transportation Department, Washington, D.C.

Increased fuel economy in transportation systems by use of energy management. Volume III. Real-time (hybrid computer) simulation program set.

Transportation Department, Washington, D.C.

Analysis of truck safety on crest vertical curves. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Increased fuel economy in transportation systems by use of energy management - third year's program. Final report.

Transportation Department, Washington, D.C.

Engineering model of future motor vehicles. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Evaluation of automobile drivetrain components to improve fuel economy. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Evaluation of Characterization and Performance Modeling of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Cementitious stabilization of aggregates and soils is an effective technique to increase the stiffness of base and subbase layers. Furthermore, cementitious bases can improve the fatigue behavior of asphalt surface layers and subgrade rutting over the short and long term. However, it can lead to additional distresses such as shrinkage and fatigue in the stabilized layers. Extensive research has tested these materials experimentally and characterized them; however, very little of this research attempts to correlate the mechanical properties of the stabilized layers with their performance. The Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) provides a promising theoretical framework for the modeling of pavements containing cementitiously stabilized materials (CSMs). However, significant improvements are needed to bring the modeling of semirigid pavements in MEPDG to the same level as that of flexible and rigid pavements. Furthermore, the MEPDG does not model CSMs in a manner similar to those for hot-mix asphalt or portland cement concrete materials. As a result, performance gains from stabilized layers are difficult to assess using the MEPDG. The current characterization of CSMs was evaluated and issues with CSM modeling and characterization in the MEPDG were discussed. Addressing these issues will help designers quantify the benefits of stabilization for pavement service life.

Post-operating performance of cross-delisted firms from U.S. stock exchanges

We investigate the long-term performance of cross-delisted firms from U.S. stock markets. Using a sample of foreign firms listed and delisted from U.S. stock exchange markets over 2000-2012, we examine the operating performance and the long-run stock returns performance of firms post-cross-delisting. Our results suggest that cross-delisted firms have less growth opportunities than matched cross-listed firms in the long run. Moreover, firms that cross-delist after the passage of Rule 12h-6 of 2007 exhibit a significant decline in operating performance. In contrast, before the adoption of the Rule 12h-6, cross-delisted firms seem to be affected by the cost of a U.S. listing in the precross -delisting period. In addition, we provide evidence that cross-delisted firms underperform their cross-listed peers; cross-delisted firms experience negative average abnormal returns, especially in the post-delisting period.