Health self-assessment by hemodialysis patients in the Brazilian Unified Health System

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To examine whether the level of complexity of the services structure and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients in hemodialysis are associated with the prevalence of poor health self-assessment. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated 1,621 patients with chronic terminal kidney disease on hemodialysis accompanied in 81 dialysis services in the Brazilian Unified Health System in 2007. Sampling was performed by conglomerate in two stages and a structured questionnaire was applied to participants. Multilevel multiple logistic regression was used for data analysis. RESULTS The prevalence of poor health self-assessment was of 54.5%, and in multivariable analysis it was associated with the following variables: increasing age (OR = 1.02; 95%CI 1.01–1.02), separated or divorced marital status (OR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.34–0.88), having 12 years or more of study (OR = 0.51; 95%CI 0.37–0.71), spending more than 60 minutes in commuting between home and the dialysis service (OR = 1.80; 95%CI 1.29–2.51), having three or more self-referred diseases (OR = 2.20; 95%CI 1.33–3.62), and reporting some (OR = 2.17; 95%CI 1.66–2.84) or a lot of (OR = 2.74; 95%CI 2.04–3.68) trouble falling asleep. Individuals in treatment in dialysis services with the highest level of complexity in the structure presented less chance of performing a self-assessment of their health as bad (OR = 0.59; 95%CI 0.42–0.84). CONCLUSIONS We showed poor health self-assessment is associated with age, years of formal education, marital status, home commuting time to the dialysis service, number of self-referred diseases, report of trouble sleeping, and also with the level of complexity of the structure of health services. Acknowledging these factors can contribute to the development of strategies to improve the health of patients in hemodialysis in the Brazilian Unified Health System.

Group Work as a Strategy to Improve the Effectiveness of the Learning Process

Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2013

Avaliação do projecto - Formalização da consulta de enfermagem em pneumologia

Mestrado em Intervenção Sócio-Organizacional na Saúde - Área de especialização: Políticas de Administração e Gestão de Serviços de Saúde.

Peer Instruction method in introductory math courses

Learning is not a spectator’s sport. Students do not learn much by just sitting in class listening their teachers, memorizing pre-packaged assignments and spitting out answers. The teaching-learning process has been a constant target of studies, particularly in Higher Education, in consequence of the annual increase of new students. The concern with maintaining a desired quality level in the training of these students, conjugated with the will to widen the access to all of those who finish Secondary School Education, has triggered a greater intervention from the education specialists, in partnership with the teachers of all Higher Education areas, in the analysis of this problem. Considering the particular case of Engineering, it has been witnessed a rising concern with the active learning strategies and forms of assessment. Research has demonstrated that students learn more if they are actively engaged with the material they are studying. In this presentation we describe, present and discuss the techniques and the results of Peer Instruction method in an introductory Calculus courses of an Engineering Bach

Barreiras e facilitadores à implementação de um modelo de gestão de cuidados em Saúde Mental

RESUMO: Enquadramento teórico - Os estudos epidemiológicos demonstram que apesar de todo o progresso científico, muitas pessoas continuam sem acesso aos Serviços de Saúde Mental (SSM) e que, em muitos casos, os cuidados não têm a qualidade suficiente. A experiência de vários países mostra que os processos de implementação de modelos de intervenção terapêutica, como é o da Gestão de Cuidados, são lentos e complexos, não dependendo somente do grau de efectividade ou da complexidade das práticas a implementar. O Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados (MGC), é definido como uma prática baseada na evidência, utilizada para ajudar os doentes nos seus processos de recuperação. As estratégias para implementar práticas baseadas na evidência são críticas para a melhoria dos serviços. Existem, apesar de toda a evidência, muitas barreiras à implementação. Ao constatarmos que as práticas validadas pela ciência estão longe de estar claramente disseminadas nos serviços de saúde mental, fundamentamos a necessidade de utilizar metodologia de implementação que, além da efectividade das práticas, permita uma efectividade da implementação. Para responder às necessidades de formação e no âmbito da implementação do Plano Nacional de Saúde Mental, foram formados, em Portugal, 170 profissionais de saúde mental provenientes de serviços públicos e do sector social, de todas as regiões de Portugal Continental. Considerando que estes profissionais adquiriram competências específicas no MGC, através de um programa de formação nacional idêntico para todos os serviços de saúde mental, investigámos o grau de implementação deste modelo, bem como os facilitadores e as barreiras à sua correcta implementação. Existem vários estudos internacionais sobre as barreiras e os facilitadores à implementação de práticas baseadas na evidência, embora a maior parte desses estudos seja baseado em entrevistas semi-estruturadas a profissionais. Por outro lado, não existem, em Portugal, estudos sobre as barreiras e os facilitadores à implementação de práticas de saúde mental. Objectivos 1. Estimar o grau da implementação do MGC nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses 2. Caracterizar as regiões onde a implementação do MGC tenha ocorrido em maior grau. 3. Identificar os factores facilitadores e as barreiras à implementação do MGC, entre as regiõesde saúde do país. 4. Explorar as relações entre a fidelidade da implementação, as barreiras e os facilitadores da implementação, a cultura organizacional e as características dos serviços de saúde mental. Metodologia Estudo observacional, transversal e descritivo, com características exploratórias. População: profissionais dos serviços de saúde mental públicos e do sector social que frequentaram o Programa Nacional de Formação em Saúde Mental Comunitária no curso “Cuidados Integrados e Recuperação”, da Coordenação Nacional para a Saúde Mental / Ministério da Saúde, entre Outubro de 2008 e Dezembro de 2009, (n=71). Avaliação Fidelidade de implementação do Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados - IMR-S (Illness Management and Recovery Scale); Qualidade das guidelines utilizadas na implementação do Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados - AGREE II-PT (Appraisal of Guidelines, for Research and Evaluation); Avaliação das Barreiras e Facilitadores à implementação do MGC - BaFAI (Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument); Avaliação da Cultura Organizacional dos serviços de saúde mental - CVF-I (Competing Values Framework Instrument). Análise Estatística Para a descrição dos dados foram aplicados métodos de estatística descritiva. Para a comparação de subgrupos foram utilizados os testes de Mann Whitney e Kruskall-Wallis. Para a investigação de associações foram utilizados os métodos de correlação de Spearman e a Regressão Múltipla. O tratamento e análise dos dados foram realizados utilizando o programa estatístico IBM SPSS Statistics® para Mac/Apple® nas versões 19 e 20. Resultados Serviços: A articulação com os cuidados de saúde primários existe na maioria dos serviços (56.34%) e 77.46% dos serviços têm autonomia para definir os cuidados a prestar. A maioria dos serviços (63.38%) realiza duas ou mais reuniões clínicas por mês e a quase totalidade (95.77%) recebe estagiários e/ou internos. A área da investigação tem níveis considerados baixos, quando comparados com outros países da Europa, tanto para a globalidade das áreas de investigação (25.35%), como para as áreas psicossociais (22.54%). Considerando componentes fundamentais para a implementação de modelos de gestão de cuidados, os resultados nacionais indicam que 66.20% dos serviços fazem registos em processo clínico único. As percentagens de utilização de planos individuais de cuidados são globalmente baixas (46.48%). Por seu turno, a utilização de guidelines, nos serviços do país, tem uma percentagem média nacional de 57.75%. Profissionais: São, na sua maioria, do sexo feminino (69.01%), com idades entre os 25 e os 56 anos (média 38.9, ± 7.41). Pertencem, maioritariamente, aos grupos profissionais da enfermagem (23.94%) e da psicologia (49.30%). A formação dos profissionais é de nível superior em todos os grupos, com uma percentagem total de licenciados de 80.3%, tendo os restantes uma formação ao nível do mestrado. Apesar dos valores baixos (17%) de formação prévia em modelos de gestão de cuidados, 39% dos profissionais indicou utilizar algumas vertentes destes modelos na sua prática. Apesar de 97,18% dos profissionais ter participado em dois ou mais encontros científicos, num período de dois anos, apenas 38.03% apresentou alguma comunicação científica no mesmo intervalo. Guideline: Os resultados da avaliação da guideline do MGC indicaram percentagens mais altas, quanto à qualidade do seu desenvolvimento, nos Domínios 1 (Objectivo e finalidade, com 72.2%) e 4 (Clareza de Apresentação, 77.7%). O Domínio 5 (Aplicabilidade) foi pontuado no limite inferior do desenvolvimento com qualidade suficiente (54.1%), ao passo que a guideline obteve uma pontuação negativa nos Domínios 2 (Envolvimento das partes interessadas, com 41.6%) e 3 (Rigor do Desenvolvimento, com 28.1%). Adicionalmente não foi possível às avaliadoras cotar o Domínio 6 (Independência editorial), por ausência de referências neste contexto. A guideline teve uma avaliação global positiva (66%), com recomendação de aceitação com modificações. Cultura Organizacional: O perfil de liderança com maior frequência nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses foi o de Mentor (45.61%). As percentagens mais baixas pertenceram aos perfis Monitor e Inovador (3.51%). Na perspectiva da cultura organizacional dos serviços, apontuação mais alta foi a da Cultura das Relações Humanas (74.07%). A estratégia de liderança, com predomínio em todas as regiões, foi a estratégia de Flexibilidade (66.10%). Os resultados mostram que a única associação positivamente significativa com o grau da implementação do MGC é a do perfil Produtor, com um peso específico de 14.55% na prevalência dos perfis de liderança nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses. Barreiras: As barreiras à implementação da prática do MGC, identificadas pelos profissionais dos serviços de saúde mental, com percentagens mais altas nos totais do país, foram: o tempo (57.7%), o conhecimento sobre o modelo e a motivação (40.8%), a colaboração dos outros profissionais (33.7%), o número de contactos reduzidos com os doentes (35.2%), as insuficiências do ponto de vista dos espaços (70.4%) e dos instrumentos disponíveis (69%) para implementar o MGC. Existiu uma variação entre as regiões de saúde do país. Os resultados mostram que houve uma correlação negativa, de forma significativa, entre a implementação do MGC e as barreiras: da resistência à utilização de protocolos, do formato da prática, da necessidade de mais treino e da não cooperação dos profissionais. Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre as barreiras à implementação e as características dos serviços, dos profissionais e da cultura organizacional. Implementação: A média nacional da fidelidade de implementação do MGC (41.48) teve valores aproximados aos de estudos similares. Na pontuação por regiões, a implementação com maior fidelidade ocorreu no Alentejo. Se considerarmos a implementação com fidelidade esta ocorreu em 57.75% dos serviços e uma boa implementação em 15.49%. Os métodos de regressão permitiram confirmar a capacidade preditiva das barreiras e da cultura organizacional quanto à fidelidade da implementação do MGC. Discussão: No universo das hipóteses inicialmente colocadas foi possível verificar a variação da implementação do MGC entre as regiões do país. O estudo permitiu, adicionalmente, concluir pela existência de denominadores comuns de maior sucesso da implementação do MGC. Foi ainda possível verificar uma relação significativa, existente entre o grau de implementação e as dimensões das barreiras, a cultura organizacional e os recursos dos SSM (aqui definidos pelas características dos serviços e dos profissionais). De uma forma mais conclusiva podemos afirmar que existem outros factores, que não estão relacionados com a avaliação restrita dos recursos financeiros ou humanos, associados à qualidade da implementação de práticas baseadas na evidência, como o MGC. Exemplo disso são os achados referentes à região de saúde do Alentejo, onde a distância dos grandes centros urbanos e as conhecidas dificuldades de acessibilidade, combinadas com os problemas conhecidos da falta de recursos, não impediram que fosse a região com os valores mais altos da fidelidade de implementação. Conclusões: Foram encontradas inúmeras barreiras à implementação do MGC. Existem barreiras diferentes entre regiões, que resultam das características dos serviços, dos profissionais e da cultura organizacional. Para existir implementação é necessária a consideração de metodologias próprias que vão para além dos tradicionais programas de formação. As práticas baseadas na evidência, amplamente defendidas, exigem implementações baseadas na evidência.-------------ABSTRACT: Introduction - Several epidemiological studies show that, despite all scientific progress, many people still continue to have no access to mental health services and in many situations the quality of care is poor. The experiences of several countries show that progress towards case management implementation is slow and complex, depending not only from the degree of effectiveness or the complexity of the practice. Case management is defined as an evidence-based practice used to help patients in the recovery process. Strategies to implement evidence-based practices are critical to services improvement. There are many barriers to their implementation, despite all available evidence. Realising that practices of proved scientific value are far from being clearly implemented, justifies the need to use implementation methodologies that, beyond practice effectiveness, allow implementation effectiveness. To answer training needs and in the framework of the National Mental Health Plan implementation, 170 mental health (MH) professionals from portuguese public and private sectors were trained. Considering that case management skills were acquired, as a result of this training programme, we decided to study the degree of implementation in the services.Barriers and facilitators to the implementation were studied as well. There are several studies related with barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based practices, but most of them use semi-structured interviews with professionals. Additionally, there are no studies in Portugal related with barriers and facilitators to the implementation of mental health practices. Objectives1. Estimate the degree of case management implementation in Portuguese MH Services. 2.Describe regions where implementation occurred with higher fidelity degree. 3. Identify barriers and facilitators to case management implementation across country regions. 4. Explore the relationships between implementation, barriers and facilitators, organisational culture and services characteristics. Methodology - Cross sectional, descriptive study. Assessments - Implementation fidelity - IMR-S (Illness Management and Recovery Scale); Guideline quality - AGREE II-PT (Appraisal of Guidelines, for Research and Evaluation); Barriers and facilitators assessment - BaFAI (Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument); Organisational culture assessment - CVF-I (Competing Values Framework Instrument). Statistical analysis - Descriptives and cross-tabs. Subgroups comparison: Mann-Witney and Kruskall-Wallis. Associations between variables were calculated using Spearman correlation's and Multiple Regression. Results - Services: Liaison with primary care is done in most services (56.34%) and 77.46% have autonomy to determine care. Most services have regular clinical meetings and almost all give internship training (95.77%). Research activity is low compared with other European countries, for both general and psychosocial research. Considering key components for the case management implementation, 66.20% of all services use single clinical records. The use of individual care plans is globally low (46.48%) and there is a use of guidelines in 57.75% of services. Human Resources: most are women (69.01%), with age ranging from 25-56 (average 39.9, SD 7.41). The majority are psychologists (49.30%) and nurses (23.94%). All have a university degree, 19.7% have a masters degree and 83% didn’t have any case management training before the above mentioned national training. Despite the low levels of preceding case management training, 39% have used model components in day-to-day practice and although 97.18% of the workforce have attended scientific meetings in the last 2 years, only 38.03% presented communications in the same period. Guideline: Results show that higher scores were obtained in Domain 1. Scope and Purpose (72.2.%),and Domain 4. Clarity of presentation (77.7%). Domain 5. pplicability scored near low boundary (54.1%) and negative scores were found in Domain 2. Stakeholder Involvement (41.6%) and Domain 3. Rigour of Development (28.1%). Global score was 66% and the guideline was recommended with modifications. Organisational Culture: The most frequent leadership profile was the Mentor profile (45.61%). Lower scores belonged to Innovator and Monitor profiles (3.51%). On the organisational culture overall, higher scores were found in the Human Relations culture (74.07%). The higher leadership strategy was the strategy of flexibility (66.10%). The results additionally showed that the only leadership profile associated with case management implementation was the Producer profile, representing 14.55% of all leadership profiles in the country.Barriers: The barriers identified by MH professionals, with high percentages, were: lack of time (57.7%), knowledge and motivation (40.8%), other colleagues cooperation (33.7%), low number of contacts with patients (35.2%), lack of facilities (70.4%) and lack of instruments (69%) to implement case management, varying across regions. Results show that there was a negative correlation between implementation and the following barriers: using protocols, practice format, need for more training and lack of cooperation from colleagues. Additionally, statistical differences were found between barriers to implementation and: services characteristics, workforce characteristics, organisational culture. Implementation: The national average results of case management implementation fidelity was (41.48), close to values found in similar studies. In the regional scores South Region Alentejo had the highest implementation score. If we look at minimum scores to assume implementation fidelity, these occurred in 57.75% of services and a good implementation occurred in 15.49% of these. Regression methods allowed to confirm that implementation score prediction was possible using the combination of barriers and organisational culture scores. Discussion - Considering the initial study hypotheses, it was possible to confirm the variation of case management implementation across country regions. Additionally, we could conclude that common denominators exist when successful implementation occurred. It was possible to observe a significant relationship between implementation degree and the dimensions of barriers, organisational culture and services resources (defined as professionals and services characteristics). In a more conclusive way, we can say that there are factors, other than financial and human resources, that are associated with evidence based practices implementation like case management. An example is the Alentejo region, were the distance from urban centres, and the known difficulties associated with accessibility, plus the lack of financial and human resources, have not impeded the regional higher score on implementation. Conclusions: Case management implementation had several barriers to implementation. There are different barriers across country regions, resulting from organisational culture, services and professionals characteristics. To reach implementation it is necessary to consider specific methodologies that go beyond traditional training programs and evident practices, widely promoted. Evidence-based practices require evidence-based implementations.

Programme de remédiation cognitive pour patients présentant une schizophrénie ou un trouble associé (Recos) : résultats préliminaires [Cognitive remediation program for individuals living with schizophrenia (Recos): preliminary results].

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, cognitive remediation is widely accepted as an effective treatment for patients with schizophrenia. In French-speaking countries, techniques used in cognitive remediation for patients with schizophrenia have been applied from those used for patients with cerebral injury. As cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia, the Département de psychiatrie du CHUV in Lausanne (DP-CHUV) intended to develop a cognitive remediation program for patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disease (Recos-Vianin, 2007). Numerous studies show that the specific cognitive deficits greatly differ from one patient to another. Consequently, Recos aims at providing individualized cognitive remediation therapy. In this feasibility trial, we measured the benefits of this individualized therapy for patients with schizophrenia. Before treatment, the patients were evaluated with a large battery of cognitive tests in order to determine which of the five specific training modules - Verbal memory, visuospatial memory and attention, working memory, selective attention, reasoning - could provide the best benefit depending on their deficit. OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to evaluate the benefits of the Recos program by comparing cognitive functioning before and after treatment. METHOD: Twenty-eight patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (schizophrenia [n=18], schizoaffective disorder [n=5], schizotypal disorder [n=4], schizophreniform disorder [n=1], DSM-IV-TR) participated in between one and three of the cognitive modules. The choice of the training module was based on the results of the cognitive tests obtained during the first evaluation. The patients participated in 20 training sessions per module (one session per week). At the end of the training period, the cognitive functioning of each patient was reevaluated by using the same neuropsychological battery. RESULTS: The results showed a greater improvement in the cognitive functions, which were specifically trained, compared to the cognitive functions, which were not trained. However, an improvement was also observed in both types of cognitive functions, suggesting an indirect cognitive gain. CONCLUSION: In our view, the great heterogeneity of the observed cognitive deficits in schizophrenia necessitates a detailed neuropsychological investigation as well as an individualized cognitive remediation therapy. These preliminary results need to be confirmed with a more extended sample of patients.

Beyond splitting: observer-rated defense mechanisms in borderline personality disorder

Defense mechanism is a key concept in the psychoanalytic psychopathology of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Theoretical and empirical elaborations on this question are briefly reviewed and discussed with respect to process assessment of defense mechanisms; we put forward observer-rater methodology as an accurate means of assessing unconscious in-session processes. A sample of 25 patients presenting with BPD were interviewed, as were subjects from a matched control group without psychiatric symptoms (n = 25), using a psychodynamic interview paradigm. These interviews were transcribed and rated using the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales. The results indicate that, compared to controls, patients with BPD used higher percentages of a action, borderline, disavowal, narcissistic, and hysteric defenses, along with lower levels of mature and obsessional defenses. Overall defensive functioning was significantly lower in the patients with BPD, compared to controls. Narcissistic defenses were related with symptom level. These results are discussed in light of previous studies on defensive functioning of BPD and the literature on psychoanalytic psychopathology. These results have several important clinical implications.

Les itinéraires cliniques sont-ils efficaces ? : revue Cochrane pour le praticien

Cet article présente les résultats de la revue systématique: Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, et al. Clinical pathways : Effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. Art. No:CD006632. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006632.pub2. PMID: 20238347.

Manuel du programme « Qualité » des Hospices

[Table des matières] 1. Généralités : Politique et objectifs qualité - Cadre général - Responsabilité des directeurs d'établissements - Système d'information - Financement. 2. Organisation du Programme Qualité : Organisation générale - Revue de direction. 3. Procédures : Procédure d'élaboration et de sélection des projets (avec demande de financement;avec demande de soutien technique; pour information; appel d'offres) - Procédure de suivi. 4. Annexes : Contrat pour la réalisation d'un projet qualité : pour information, sans soutien - avec demande de soutien technique - avec demande de soutien financier. Ce document à usage interne définit la politique "qualité" et décrit l'ensemble des dispositions générales prises en matière de qualité pour la période 97-98.

Qualité des soins ambulatoires : opinion des patients infectés par le VIH

Ce travail décrit une étude, qui a visé à évaluer la performance d'un questionnaire de satisfaction en développement, destiné à mesurer l'opinion de patients infectés par le VIH suivis ambulatoirement. 1. Problématique. 1.1. La qualité des soins, une définition. 1.2. L'opinion des patients : comment la mesurer ? Le questionnaire, les questionnaires existants, le focus groups, description de la technique. 2. Patients et méthodes. 2.1. Critères d'inclusion et d'exclusion. 2.2. Les envois et les rappels. 2.3. Stabilité test-retest. 2.4. Le recrutement. 3. Résultats. 3.1. Acceptabilité du questionnaire : participation. 3.2. Représentativité de l'échantillon. 3.3. Scores par dimension. 3. 4. Evaluation de la validité du questionnaire, convergence des items par dimension et cohérence interne. 3.5. Les questions issues du questionnaire SF-36. 4. Discussion. 4.1. Coping et méthodes alternatives. 4.2. Impact sur les service d'une enquête sur la qualité des soins. 5.1. Le questionnaire de satisfaction élaboré. 5.2. Les différents questionnaires des Hospices : patients hospitalisés et ambulatoires. 5.3. Formulaire d'information de l'enquête par questionnaire. 5.4. Formulaire de consentement à l'enquête. 5.5. Lettre d'accompagnement du questionnaire. 5.6. Profil socio-démographique et résultats complets par item.

Evaluation globale et prise en charge gériatriques: quel intérêt ?: revue Cochrane pour le praticien.

Cet article présente les résultats de la revue systématique: Ellis G, Whitehead MA, O'Neill D, Langhorne P, Robinson D. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD006211. PMID: 21735403.

Closure of large intrathoracic airway defects using extrathoracic muscle flaps.

BACKGROUND: Prospective assessment of pedicled extrathoracic muscle flaps for the closure of large intrathoracic airway defects after noncircumferential resection in situations where an end-to-end reconstruction seemed risky (defects of > 4-cm length, desmoplastic reactions after previous infection or radiochemotherapy). METHODS: From 1996 to 2001, 13 intrathoracic muscle transpositions (6 latissimus dorsi and 7 serratus anterior muscle flaps) were performed to close defects of the intrathoracic airways after noncircumferential resection for tumor (n = 5), large tracheoesophageal fistula (n = 2), delayed tracheal injury (n = 1) and bronchopleural fistula (n = 5). In 2 patients, the extent of the tracheal defect required reinforcement of the reconstruction by use of a rib segment embedded into the muscle flap followed by temporary tracheal stenting. Patient follow-up was by clinical examination bronchoscopy and biopsy, pulmonary function tests, and dynamic virtual bronchoscopy by computed tomographic (CT) scan during inspiration and expiration. RESULTS: The airway defects ranged from 2 x 1 cm to 8 x 4 cm and involved up to 50% of the airway circumference. They were all successfully closed using muscle flaps with no mortality and all patients were extubated within 24 hours. Bronchoscopy revealed epithelialization of the reconstructions without dehiscence, stenosis, or recurrence of fistulas. The flow-volume loop was preserved in all patients and dynamic virtual bronchoscopy revealed no significant difference in the endoluminal cross surface areas of the airway between inspiration and expiration above (45 +/- 21 mm(2)), at the site (76 +/- 23 mm(2)) and below the reconstruction (65 +/- 40 mm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathoracic airway defects of up to 50% of the circumference may be repaired using extrathoracic muscle flaps when an end-to-end reconstruction is not feasible.

Added Value of Deep Sequencing Relative to Population Sequencing in Heavily Pre-Treated HIV-1-Infected Subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential of deep HIV-1 sequencing for adding clinically relevant information relative to viral population sequencing in heavily pre-treated HIV-1-infected subjects. METHODS: In a proof-of-concept study, deep sequencing was compared to population sequencing in HIV-1-infected individuals with previous triple-class virological failure who also developed virologic failure to deep salvage therapy including, at least, darunavir, tipranavir, etravirine or raltegravir. Viral susceptibility was inferred before salvage therapy initiation and at virological failure using deep and population sequencing genotypes interpreted with the HIVdb, Rega and ANRS algorithms. The threshold level for mutant detection with deep sequencing was 1%. RESULTS: 7 subjects with previous exposure to a median of 15 antiretrovirals during a median of 13 years were included. Deep salvage therapy included darunavir, tipranavir, etravirine or raltegravir in 4, 2, 2 and 5 subjects, respectively. Self-reported treatment adherence was adequate in 4 and partial in 2; one individual underwent treatment interruption during follow-up. Deep sequencing detected all mutations found by population sequencing and identified additional resistance mutations in all but one individual, predominantly after virological failure to deep salvage therapy. Additional genotypic information led to consistent decreases in predicted susceptibility to etravirine, efavirenz, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and indinavir in 2, 1, 2 and 1 subject, respectively. Deep sequencing data did not consistently modify the susceptibility predictions achieved with population sequencing for darunavir, tipranavir or raltegravir. CONCLUSIONS: In this subset of heavily pre-treated individuals, deep sequencing improved the assessment of genotypic resistance to etravirine, but did not consistently provide additional information on darunavir, tipranavir or raltegravir susceptibility. These data may inform the design of future studies addressing the clinical value of minority drug-resistant variants in treatment-experienced subjects.