A preliminary study of the antibacterial potential of cetylpyridinium chloride in root canals infected by E. faecalis

The aim of this preliminary study was to verify the antibacterial potential of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) in root canals infected by Enterococcus faecalis. Forty human maxillary anterior teeth were prepared and inoculated with E. faecalis for 60 days. The teeth were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1: Root canal preparation (RCP) + 0.1% CPC with positive-pressure irrigation (PPI, Conventional, NaviTip®); 2: RCP + 0.2% CPC PPI; 3: RCP + 2.5% NaOCl PPI; 4: RCP + 2.5% NaOCl with negative-pressure irrigation system (NPI, EndoVac®); 5: Positive control; and 6: Negative control. Four teeth of each experimental group were evaluated by culture and 4 by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In all teeth, the root canals were dried and filled with 17% EDTA (pH 7.2) for 3 min for smear layer removal. Samples from the infected root canals were collected and immersed in 7 mL of Letheen Broth (LB), followed by incubation at 37°C for 48 h. Bacterial growth was analyzed by turbidity of culture medium and then observed with a UV spectrophotometer. The irrigating solutions were further evaluated for antimicrobial effect by an agar diffusion test.The statistical data were treated by means, standard deviation, Kruskal-Wallis test and analysis of variance. Significance level was set at 5%. The results showed the presence of E. faecalis after root canal sanitization. The number of bacteria decreased after the use of CPC. In the agar diffusion test, CPC induced large microbial inhibition zones, similar to 2% chlorhexidine and large than 2.5% NaOCl. In conclusion, cetylpyridinium chloride showed antibacterial potential in endodontic infection with E. faecalis.

Clinical results with two different methods of root-end preparation and filling in apical surgery: mineral trioxide aggregate and adhesive resin composite

INTRODUCTION: The aim of apical surgery is to hermetically seal the root canal system after root-end resection, thereby enabling periradicular healing. The objective of this nonrandomized prospective clinical study was to report results of 2 different root-end preparation and filling methods, ie, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and an adhesive resin composite (Retroplast). METHODS: The study included 353 consecutive cases with endodontic lesions limited to the periapical area. Root-end cavities were prepared with sonic microtips and filled with MTA (n = 178), or alternatively, a shallow concavity was prepared in the cut root face, with subsequent placement of an adhesive resin composite (Retroplast) (n = 175). Patients were recalled after 1 year. Cases were defined as healed when no clinical signs or symptoms were present and radiographs demonstrated complete or incomplete (scar tissue) healing of previous radiolucencies. RESULTS: The overall rate of healed cases was 85.5%. MTA-treated teeth demonstrated a significantly (P = .003) higher rate of healed cases (91.3%) compared with Retroplast-treated teeth (79.5%). Within the MTA group, 89.5%-100% of cases were classified as healed, depending on the type of treated tooth. In contrast, more variable rates ranging from 66.7%-100% were found in the Retroplast group. In particular, mandibular premolars and molars demonstrated considerably lower rates of healed cases when treated with Retroplast. CONCLUSIONS: MTA can be recommended for root-end filling in apical surgery, irrespective of the type of treated tooth. Retroplast should be used with caution for root-end sealing in apical surgery of mandibular premolars and molars.

Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Apical surgery has seen continuous development with regard to equipment and surgical technique. However, there is still a shortage of evidence-based information regarding healing determinants. The objective of this meta-analysis was to review clinical articles on apical surgery with root-end filling in order to assess potential prognostic factors. METHODS: An electronic search of PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed in 2008. Only studies with clearly defined healing criteria were included, and data for at least two categories per prognostic factor had to be reported. Prognostic factors were divided into patient-related, tooth-related, or treatment-related factors. The reported percentages of healed teeth ("the healed rate") were pooled per category. The statistical method of Mantel-Haenszel was applied to estimate the odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: With regard to tooth-related factors, the following categories were significantly associated with higher healed rates: cases without preoperative pain or signs, cases with good density of root canal filling, and cases with absence or size < or = 5 mm of periapical lesion. With regard to treatment-related factors, cases treated with the use of an endoscope tended to have higher healed rates than cases without the use of an endoscope. CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinician may be able to control treatment-related factors (by choosing a certain technique), patient- and tooth-related factors are usually beyond the surgeon's power. Nevertheless, patient- and tooth-related factors should be considered as important prognostic determinants when planning or weighing apical surgery against treatment alternatives.

Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems in a specialist practice setting

AIM: To assess survival rates and complications of root-filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems over a mean observation period of >or=4 years. METHODOLOGY: A total of 325 single- and multirooted teeth in 183 subjects treated in a private practice were root filled and restored with either a cast post-and-core or with a prefabricated titanium post and composite core. Root-filled teeth without post-retained restorations served as controls. The restored teeth served as abutments for single unit metal-ceramic or composite crowns or fixed bridges. Teeth supporting cantilever bridges, overdentures or telescopic crowns were excluded. RESULTS: Seventeen teeth in 17 subjects were lost to follow-up (17/325: 5.2%). The mean observation period was 5.2 +/- 1.8 (SD) years for restorations with titanium posts, 6.2 +/- 2.0 (SD) years for cast post-and-cores and 4.4 +/- 1.7 (SD) years for teeth without posts. Overall, 54% of build-ups included the incorporation of a titanium post and 26.5% the cementation of a cast post-and-core. The remaining 19.5% of the teeth were restored without intraradicular retention. The adjusted 5-year tooth survival rate amounted to 92.5% for teeth restored with titanium posts, to 97.1% for teeth restored with cast post-and-cores and to 94.3% for teeth without post restorations, respectively. The most frequent complications included root fracture (6.2%), recurrent caries (1.9%), post-treatment periradicular disease (1.6%) and loss of retention (1.3%). CONCLUSION: Provided that high-quality root canal treatment and restorative protocols are implemented, high survival and low complication rates of single- and multirooted root-filled teeth used as abutments for fixed restorations can be expected after a mean observation period of >or=4 years.

Intentional replantation for the management of maxillary sinusitis

AIM: To present a case that emphasizes the importance of the use of intentional replantation as a technique to successfully treat a periapical lesion and an odontogenic maxillary sinusitis through the alveolus at the same time. SUMMARY: This case report presents a patient with odontogenic maxillary sinusitis secondary to periapical disease of a maxillary molar that had previously received root canal treatment. The molar was extracted, with drainage and rinsing of the maxillary sinus. The apices were resected extra-orally, the retrograde cavities prepared with ultrasound and retrograde fillings of silver amalgam placed. The tooth was then replanted. After 2 years, the patient was asymptomatic, periapical radiography showed no evidence of root resorption and computed tomography scanning demonstrated the resolution of maxillary sinusitis. Key learning points: *When root canal treatment or periapical surgery cannot be undertaken or has failed, intentional replantation may be considered. *This alternative treatment may be predictable in certain cases.

[Periapical surgery with histologic examination of the periapical lesion. A case report]

Periapical surgery is required when periradicular pathosis associated with endodontically treated teeth cannot be resolved by nonsurgical root canal therapy (retreatment), or when retreatment was unsuccessful, not feasible or contraindicated. Endodontic failures can occur when irritants remain within the confines of the root canal, or when an extraradicular infection cannot be eradicated by orthograde root canal treatment. Foreign-body reponses towards filling materials, towards cholesterol crystals or radicular cysts might prevent complete periapical healing. Following enhanced microsurgical techniques in the last years the success rates of apical surgery have improved considerably. The aim of the current case report is to describe the therapeutical approach to a persistent periapical lesion and its histologic examination.

A 5-year review of teeth filled with the noninstrumentation technology

AIM: The aim of this Case Series was to evaluate the radiographic quality of root fillings performed 5 years previously using the noninstrumentation technology (NIT)-obturation method and to assess radiographically the outcome of these root canal treatments. METHODOLOGY: Seventeen patients requiring root canal treatment participated in this study and were re-evaluated after 5 years. After instrumentation with K-Flexofiles, Calcium-Hydroxide inter-appointment dressing, re-entry and copious irrigation with NaOCl, the teeth were root filled using the NIT. RESULTS: Immediately after obturation the root fillings were (-0.78 +/- 0.11 mm) short when taking the radiographic apex as a reference point. After 60 months these values were -0.85 +/- 0.11 mm. No statistical difference was found (P > 0.05). In the periapical region, PAI rating 1 and 2 increased from 20.1% to 75.6% after 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: * This prospective Case Series demonstrated the performance of the NIT-obturation method in vivo. * Root canals filled by the reduced-pressure method using sealer combined with gutta-percha cones showed good radiographic quality. * Periapical healing after 5 years was comparable with conventional filling techniques.

[Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics: a review for daily clinical practice]

Since the introduction of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), this 3-dimensional diagnostic imaging technique has been established in a growing number of fields in dental medicine. It has become an important tool for both diagnosis and treatment planning, and is also able to support endodontic treatments. However, the higher effective dose of ionizing radiation compared to conventional 2-dimensional radiographs is not justifiable in every case. CBCT allows for a more precise diagnosis of periapical lesions, root fractures as well as external and internal resorptions. Concerning the utility of CBCT in treatment planning decisions, the gain of information through 3-dimensional imaging for any of these pathologies has to be evaluated carefully on an individual basis. Moreover, radioopaque materials such as root canal filling and posts often create artefacts, which may compromise diagnosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the possibilities and limits of CBCT imaging in endodontology as well as introduce guidelines for daily clinical practice. Furthermore, the article presents possible therapeutic advantages of preexisting CBCT scans for root canal treatments.

Assessment of the nonoperated root after apical surgery of the other root in mandibular molars: a 5-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION If a surgical approach is chosen to treat a multirooted tooth affected by persistent periapical pathosis, usually only the affected roots are operated on. The present study assessed the periapical status of the nonoperated root 5 years after apical surgery of the other root in mandibular molars. METHODS Patients treated with apical surgery of mandibular molars with a follow-up of 5 years were selected. Patient-related and clinical parameters (sex, age, smoking, symptoms, and signs of infection) before surgery were recorded. Preoperative intraoral periapical radiographs and radiographs 5 years after surgery were examined. The following data were collected: tooth, operated root, type and quality of the coronal restoration, marginal bone level, length and homogeneity of the root canal filling, presence of a post/screw, periapical index (PAI) of each root, and radiographic healing of the operated root. The presence of apical pathosis of the nonoperated root was analyzed statistically in relation to the recorded variables. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Signs of periapical pathosis in the nonoperated root 5 years after surgery (PAI ≥ 3) could be observed in only 3 cases (8.1%). Therefore, statistical analysis in relation to the variables was not possible. The PAI of the nonoperated root before surgery had a weak correlation with signs of apical pathosis 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Nonoperated roots rarely developed signs of new apical pathosis 5 years after apical surgery of the other root in mandibular molars. It appears reasonable to resect and fill only roots with a radiographically evident periapical lesion.

Avaliação in vitro da capacidade de selamento de diferentes materiais usados como barreiras intra-coronal

Introdução: O adequado selamento do sistema de canais radiculatres (SCR) obtido através da obturação, evita a infiltração de micro-organismos entre as paredes do canal radicular e o material obturador, reduzindo a possibilidade de insucesso do tratamento endodôntico (TE). A falta de selamento coronal, o atraso da colocação da restauração permanente, a fratura da restauração coronal, assim como uma espessura inadequada da restauração provisória, inferior a 4mm, podem, entre outros factores, ser predisponentes para a recontaminação do SCR obturado. Sendo o selamento da entrada do SCR uma importante etapa do TE, neste estudo pretendeu-se avaliar diferentes materiais para tal procedimento, avaliando qual o material que proporciona menor infiltração. Materiais e métodos: Neste estudo foram utilizados 70 dentes humanos monocanalares, que foram divididos aleatoriamente em 6 grupos. Grupo I (15 dentes) foram selados com ionómero de vidro modificado por resina (Ionoseal - VOCO®), Grupo II (15 dentes) foram selados com ionómero de vidro modicifado por resina (GC Fuji II LC- GA America®), Grupo III (15 dentes) foram selados por um compósito fluído (GrandioSO Heavy Flow - VOCO®), Grupo IV (15 dentes) foram selados por um compósito nanohíbrido (GrandioSO - VOCO®). O Grupo V (5 dentes) e o Grupo VI (5 dentes) foram usados como controlo negativo e positivo, respectivamente. Os dentes foram submetidos a termociclagem de 500 ciclos, de 60 segundos de duração cada um, com variações de temperatura de 5°C - 55°C. Em seguida, foram imersos em corante azul de metileno a 2% para avaliação da infiltração dos materiais. Resultados: Em geral, Ionoseal® demonstrou maior infiltração de corante que os outros materiais, e quando comparado com os demais grupos a diferença foi significativa. Porem entre os grupos 1, 2 e 3 não houve diferença estatística significante. Conclusões: LC Fuji II®, GrandioSo® Nano partícula Flow e GrandioSo® Nano partícula podem ser usados como barreira intracanalar.

Sistemas auxiliares de desinfeção em Endodontia

Introdução: O objetivo da terapia endodôntica é eliminar a infeção presente nos canais radiculares e prevenir a reinfeção dos mesmos, criando assim as condições para a manutenção da peça dentária em função e livre de patologia pulpar ou peri-apical. A complexa anatomia dos canais faz com que seja impossível uma limpeza completa dos mesmos. Para se conseguir um bom resultado clínico é de extrema importância utilizarmos técnicas e procedimentos que visem uma utilização combinada de instrumentação mecânica e desinfeção com soluções de irrigação. Objetivo: Revisão bibliográfica sobre sistemas auxiliares de desinfeção em Endodontia, abordando as suas principais vantagens e limitações e apresentando estudos que provam a sua importância para o sucesso do tratamento endodôntico. Materiais e métodos: Realizou-se uma pesquisa eletrónica nos principais motores de busca online tais como PubMed, B-On, Scielo e Science Direct e em livros científicos sobre a temática, utilizando palavras-chave em inglês tais como “irrigation techniques”, “sonic irrigation”, “EndoVac”, “EDTA”, “hypoclorite sodium”, “passive ultrasonic irrigation”, “apical negative pressure irrigation”, “root canal irrigation”, “EndoAtivator”, e ainda alguns termos em português tais como “insucesso em endodontia”, “hipoclorito de sódio” “ácido cítrico” e “irrigação sónica e ultrasónica”. Da pesquisa efectuada entre Junho e Novembro de 2015 e cujo critério de inclusão foram artigos datados de 2001 a 2015, escolheu-se 65 artigos em inglês, 4 em português e 1 em espanhol, dos quais se utilizaram 44 artigos. Além dos artigos analisou-se 2 livros, dos quais se utilizou 1. Resultados: Os artigos analisados apresentam como principais resultados que a combinação de instrumentação mecânica e a irrigação reduz mas não elimina totalmente as bactérias. Até à data não existem soluções de irrigação ideais. Têm-se desenvolvido técnicas capazes de combater as dificuldades encontradas e aumentar as potencialidades da irrigação, cada uma apresentando suas vantagens e desvantagens. Dos resultados constatados, a literatura científica aparenta reconhecer o Sistema EndoVac como o melhor em termos de biossegurança e o sistema de irrigação ultrasónica passiva como o melhor em termos de desinfecção e limpeza. Conclusão: Uma combinação de soluções com uma sequência específica é aparentemente necessária para atingir o sucesso endodôntico, bem como uma escolha adequada da técnica. As novas técnicas desenvolvidas tais como a ativação dinâmica manual, irrigação ultrasónica passiva, ativação sónica e sistemas de pressão apical negativa apresentam melhores resultados quando associados a irrigantes adequados como o hipoclorito, EDTA, ácido cítrico, clorohexidina e álcool. No entanto, concluiu-se que mais investigação é necessária para melhorar o sucesso do tratamento endodôntico não-cirúrgico.

Remoção de instrumentos fraturados em Endodontia

A área da Endodontia está em constante progresso. Os materiais utilizados nos instrumentos Endodônticos, primordialmente, eram construídos com base em cordas de piano. Seguiu-se uma fase em que estes eram de aço de carbono, mas sofriam corrosão significativa devido ao cloro presente no hipoclorito de sódio, bem como aos processos de esterilização a vapor. Foi necessário evoluir novamente e foram introduzidos os instrumentos de aço inoxidável. Estes apresentavam alta resistência e dureza, mas algumas desvantagens devido à falta de flexibilidade. Atualmente, os instrumentos de NiTi proporcionam uma melhor flexibilidade e efeito de memória de forma. A fratura de instrumentos em Endodontia pode ocorrer por dois grandes fatores: a torção e a flexão por fadiga cíclica, podendo também ser a conjugação de ambos. Fatores anatômicos, como a curvatura e a largura do canal ou outros fatores como ciclos de esterilização, número de usos, etc., podem influenciar uma fratura mais precoce dos instrumentos. A incidência da fratura de instrumentos, embora seja pouco frequente, pode ser reduzida a um mínimo absoluto se os clínicos usarem as características de torque e de stress adequadas. Um bom conhecimento dos procedimentos clínicos, da anatomia, dos materiais e a utilização de instrumentos como o microscópio podem ajudar a prevenir ou a resolver a fratura dos instrumentos. No entanto, a melhor forma de prevenir a fratura é a sua prevenção. A desinfeção é o procedimento mais importante para o sucesso de um tratamento Endodôntico, portanto para que isto seja possível, é necessária uma boa conformação canalar. A presença de um instrumento no interior do canal pode comprometer a desinfecção, especialmente caso tenha ocorrido numa fase precoce da preparação canalar. Aquando da fratura de um instrumento, deve-se refletir sobre os procedimentos a seguir, podendo-se optar por várias abordagens, nomeadamente pela manutenção do instrumento no canal e obturação incorporando o fragmento, pela remoção do segmento através de diversas técnicas (ultrassons ou técnicas de microtubos, etc.), e ainda pela realização do bypass ou pela cirurgia Endodôntica. Em última instância pode ser realizada a extração do elemento dentário.

Análise comparativa "in vitro" da extrusão apical de detritos originados por diferentes técnicas de instrumentação do sistema de canais radiculares

Introdução: A extrusão apical detritos (EAD) consequência indesejável da instrumentação canalar pode ser associada a dor/edema, podendo atrasar a cicatrização periapical. O nosso trabalho teve como objectivo avaliar e quantificar a EAD em canais instrumentados por sistemas de instrumentação rotatória contínua e reciprocante. Materiais e Métodos: 80 dentes monocanalares sem tratamento endodôntico prévio foram aleatoriamente divididos em 4 grupos (n=20): One Shape® Protaper® NEXT, Hyflex® EDM e WaveOne® Gold. Um tubo de Eppendorf (TdE) foi pesado antecipadamente numa balança analítica de precisão e com um dente inserido foi montado num dispositivo modificado, similar ao método descrito por Myers & Montgomery. Os canais foram instrumentados e irrigados com água destilada. Os dentes instrumentados foram removidos dos TdE e estes preenchidos com água destilada até perfazer 1,5ml, incubados a 70ºC durante cinco dias sendo pesados novamente, calculando a diferença entre o peso inicial e final determinando o peso dos detritos. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente utilizando o IBM SPSS Statistics 22, considerando α=0,05. Efetuaram-se testes Kruskal-Wallis e post-hoc com ajustamento do ρ-value pelo método Dunn-Bonferroni. Resultados: Houve EAD em todas as técnicas de instrumentação. A análise estatística mostrou haver diferenças significativas na EAD entre as técnicas utilizadas (α=0,002). Entre as técnicas WaveOne® Gold e One Shape® (α=0,003), WaveOne® Gold e Protaper® NEXT (α=0,023) e WaveOne® Gold e Hyflex® EDM (α=0,028). Conclusões: A técnica One Shape® apresentou menor EAD e a técnica WaveOne® Gold com movimento reciprocante constitui maior fator de risco tendo apresentado maior EAD. Os resultados deste estudo indicam que os profissionais devem estar cientes para a EAD que pode ocorrer com cada instrumento, o que poderá servir de base para a selecção de um instrumento particular. Implicações clínicas: A escolha do sistema de instrumentação canalar influencia a extrusão de detritos. Fontes de financiamento: Agradecimentos as empresas; Micro-Mega, França, COLTÉNE e Dentsply Maillefer, Suíça.