Kierrätyspolttoaineiden käyttö leijukerrospoltossa vetykaasun kanssa

Tämä diplomityö on tehty Leppäkosken Energia Oy:n ja Kemira Chemicals Oy:n yhteisyritys FC Energia Oy:lle. FC Energia Oy suunnittelee rakentaa uutta bio-vetyvoimalaitosta Sastamalaan. Voimalaitoksella tuotettaisiin Kemira Chemicals Oy:n ylijäämävedystä ja biopolttoaineista sähköä, kaukolämpöä ja prosessihöyryä. Ympäristölupaa on haettu hakkeen, turpeen ja kierrätyspuun poltolle vetykaasun kanssa. Voimalaitoksen kattilan toiminta perustuu kuplivaan leijukerrostekniikkaan. Diplomityössä selvitettiin, mitä muutoksia kierrätyspolttoaineiden käyttö vaatii leijukerrospoltossa verrattuna hakkeen ja turpeen polttoon. Kierrätyspolttoaineena käytetään hyvälaatuista kierrätyspuuta. Kierrätyspuun käytössä sovelletaan jätteenpoltto-asetusta. Jätteenpolttoasetus määrää tiukemmat päästöjen raja-arvot rinnakkaispoltolle kuin hakkeen ja turpeen poltolle sekä jatkuvatoimiset savukaasujen mittauslaitteet. Rinnakkaispolton hiukkasmaisten päästöjen tiukempi raja-arvo vaatii tehokkaamman sähkösuodattimen. Lisäksi kierrätyspuuta käytettäessä tulistimen materiaaliin tulee olla kestävämpää, mikä aiheuttaa huomattavan lisäinvestoinnin. Työn päätavoitteena oli selvittää, onko kierrätyspuun käyttö taloudellisesti kannattavaa. Oletetulla kierrätyspuun hinnalla 10 €/MWh kierrätyspuuta polttavan voimalaitoksen takaisinmaksuaika on sama kuin haketta polttavan laitoksen ja vuoden lyhyempi kuin turvetta polttavan laitoksen. Tulokseksi saatiin, että rinnakkaispoltto käyttö on taloudellisesti kannattavaa hakkeenpolttoon nähden jos kierrätyspuun hinta on alle 11,2 €/MWh. Kierrätyspuun polttoon liittyy toiminnallinen riski, koska vastaavanlaisia rinnakkaispolttolaitoksia ei ole aiemmin rakennettu.

YmpäristöjärjesteImän kehittäminen kouluissa

Ympäristöasioiden hallintajärjestelmät perustuvat kestävään kehitykseen. Peruslähtökohta ympäristöjärjestelmän käyttöönottoon on joko ideologiassa tai puhtaasti myynnin edistämisessä. Tässä diplomityössä lähestytään ympäristöjärjestelmää ensin yritysten näkökulmasta ja sen jälkeen koulujen ja oppilaitosten näkökulmista. Työn tavoitteina on vastata kysymykseen kuinka kehittää koulujen käyttämää Vihreä lippu ympäristöjärjestelmää entistä paremmaksi, sekä kuinka helpottaa Vihreä lippu ympäristöjärjestelmän käyttöönottoa kouluissa. Tämä tutkimus perustuu ympäristöministeriön rahoittamaan hankkeeseen "Kokemuksia Vihreä lippu ympäristöjärjestelmän käytöstä kouluissa". Hanke toteutettiin syksyn 2008 ja kevään 2009 aikana. Hankkeen tiedot kerättiin sekä kyselyiden että haastattelujen avulla. Tutkimus on luonteeltaan kvantitatiivinen, mutta siinä on myös kvalitatiivisen tutkimuksen elementtejä. Tutkimusmenetelmien yhdistäminen tässä tutkimuksessa lisää selvästi tutkimuksen validiutta. Tutkimuksen johtopaatokset näyttävät, että aivan "kivutta" ympäristöjärjestelmä ei synny kouluihin. Asiaa helpottaa suuresti, jos koulun johtoporras sitoutuu näyttävästi ympäristöjärjestelmään. Johdon sitoutuminen ympäristöjärjestelmään sitouttaa kaikki muut. Käyttöönottoa auttaa myös, jos ympäristöjärjestelmää käytetään johdon työkaluna. Lisaksi koulujen kannattaa olla avoimia kaikille sidosryhmille ja ottaa heitä reippaasti mukaan koulujen normaaliin arkeen. Myös koulujen ulkoinen ja sisäinen viestintä kannattaa ottaa suurennuslasin alle.

Monikansalliset yritykset Venäjällä

Tämä kandidaatintyö käsittelee monikansallisten yritysten mahdollisuuksia sekä vaikutuksia Venäjällä. Työ koostuu neljästä kokonaisuudesta, joista ensimmäinen käsittelee teorioita keskittyen OLI-paradigman ja suoran ulkomaisen investoinnin käsitteisiin. Seuraavat kolme osiota tutkivat tutkimuskysymyksiä, joista ensimmäisessä selvitetään monikansallisten yritysten vaikutusta Venäjän talouteen lähinnä suorien ulkomaisten investointien näkökulmasta. Kaksi viimeistä kappaletta käsittelevät, kuinka yritykset pääsevät Venäjälle ja millaisia etuja ja uhkia siellä toimimisesta on monikansallisille yrityksille. Näissä osioissa käsitellään erilaisia tapoja, joita yritykset käyttävät päästäkseen Venäjän markkinoille sekä millaisia seikkoja niiden täytyy huomioida tehdessään investointipäätöksen.

Tuotekehityksen kansainvälistyminen

Työn tavoitteena on etsiä syitä tuotekehityksen kansainvälistymiseen ja selvittää sen seurauksia. Myös ilmiön kansainvälisyyden nykyistä astetta kartoitetaan. Tuloksia verrataan sekä tuotekehityksen että yritysten kansainvälistymisen teorioihin. Monikansallisten yritysten toimintamallin kautta pyritään ymmärtämään tuotekehityksen kansainvälistymisen prosesseja. Yritykset harjoittavat kansainvälistä tuotekehitystä lähes aina, kun ne erilaistavat tuotteitaan kotipesän ulkopuolisten, kasvavien markkinoiden tarpeisiin. Monikansalliset yritykset tekevät kansainvälistä tuotekehitystä etupäässä hankkiakseen markkina-asemia ja kyvykkyyksiä. Kohdemaan innovaatiosysteemillä on tärkeä asema verkostoitumisstrategian onnistumisen kannalta, joka on monikansallisten yritysten pääasiallinen toimintatapa. Ulkomaansijoitusten eri tyypeistä tuotekehityksessä ylivoimaisesti eniten käytetyt ovat yhteisyritys sekä fuusioituminen & haltuunotto. Tuotekehitysyksiköiden siirtäminen ulkomaille saattaa vähentää toimintaa Suomessa. T&K-toiminnan painopiste on siirtymässä Aasiaan, vaikkakin Eurooppa ja USA ovat yhä tehokkuussyistä kannattavia alueita.

Application of Open Innovation Paradigm in Small and Medium Enterprises in Russia

The objective of this study is to explore how the Open Innovation paradigm is applied in by small and medium-size enterprises in Russia. The focus of the study is to understand how the processes of research and development and commercialization proceed in these kind of companies and to which extent they apply open innovation principles. Russian leadership makes certain steps for transition from the export of raw materials to an innovative model of economic growth. The research aims to disclose actual impact of these attempts. The closed innovation model and the erosion factors which lead to the destruction of an old one and emergence of new model are described. Features of open innovation implementation and intellectual property rights protection in small and medium enterprises are presented. To achieve the objective, a qualitative case study approach was chosen. Research includes facts and figures, views and opinions of management of studied companies related to innovation process in the company and in Russia in general. The research depicts the features of Open Innovation implementation by SMEs in Russia. A large number of research centers with necessary equipment and qualified personnel allow case companies to use external R&D effectively. They cooperate actively with research institutes, universities and laboratories. Thus, they apply inbound Open Innovation. On the contrary, lack of venture capital, low demand for technologies within the domestic market and weak protection of intellectual property limit the external paths to new markets. Licensing-out and creation of spin-off are isolated cases. Therefore, outbound Open Innovation is not a regular practice.

Luottamuksen rooli sidosryhmäyhteistyössä - Case: uuden teollisen yrityksen perustaminen

This study examines the role of trust in collaboration between stakeholders when establishing a new industrial company in Finland. Small and medium size company has been established about four years ago and nowadays it employs some tens of employees. Company is handled in this study as anonymous. Growth of the company has been fast, which means that stakeholder collaborations have been successful. The aim of the study is to examine what is the relation between trust and risk while establishing a new company. Secondly, the study examines what are the key expectations of the trust of new company. Third aim of this study is to examine how founders could build up trust among stakeholders The theoretical part of this qualitative research was done by using the theme interviews. The empirical material consisted of theme interviews of 8 persons, who are representing stakeholders of the new industrial company. The results of this study suggest that, when establishing an industrial company with aggressive growth plan, process is vulnerable and trust is having an important role. Stakeholders made some risk studies comparing to trust. Stakeholders were dependent of each others. Founder team consisted of trusted persons, which helped to have success in establishment process. Members of founder team have created all the elements of trust: honest, technical competence and attitude & behavior.

Thinking Outside the Box: Enhancing Science Teaching by Combining (Instead of Contrasting) Laboratory and Simulation Activities

The focus of the present work was on 10- to 12-year-old elementary school students’ conceptual learning outcomes in science in two specific inquiry-learning environments, laboratory and simulation. The main aim was to examine if it would be more beneficial to combine than contrast simulation and laboratory activities in science teaching. It was argued that the status quo where laboratories and simulations are seen as alternative or competing methods in science teaching is hardly an optimal solution to promote students’ learning and understanding in various science domains. It was hypothesized that it would make more sense and be more productive to combine laboratories and simulations. Several explanations and examples were provided to back up the hypothesis. In order to test whether learning with the combination of laboratory and simulation activities can result in better conceptual understanding in science than learning with laboratory or simulation activities alone, two experiments were conducted in the domain of electricity. In these experiments students constructed and studied electrical circuits in three different learning environments: laboratory (real circuits), simulation (virtual circuits), and simulation-laboratory combination (real and virtual circuits were used simultaneously). In order to measure and compare how these environments affected students’ conceptual understanding of circuits, a subject knowledge assessment questionnaire was administered before and after the experimentation. The results of the experiments were presented in four empirical studies. Three of the studies focused on learning outcomes between the conditions and one on learning processes. Study I analyzed learning outcomes from experiment I. The aim of the study was to investigate if it would be more beneficial to combine simulation and laboratory activities than to use them separately in teaching the concepts of simple electricity. Matched-trios were created based on the pre-test results of 66 elementary school students and divided randomly into a laboratory (real circuits), simulation (virtual circuits) and simulation-laboratory combination (real and virtual circuits simultaneously) conditions. In each condition students had 90 minutes to construct and study various circuits. The results showed that studying electrical circuits in the simulation–laboratory combination environment improved students’ conceptual understanding more than studying circuits in simulation and laboratory environments alone. Although there were no statistical differences between simulation and laboratory environments, the learning effect was more pronounced in the simulation condition where the students made clear progress during the intervention, whereas in the laboratory condition students’ conceptual understanding remained at an elementary level after the intervention. Study II analyzed learning outcomes from experiment II. The aim of the study was to investigate if and how learning outcomes in simulation and simulation-laboratory combination environments are mediated by implicit (only procedural guidance) and explicit (more structure and guidance for the discovery process) instruction in the context of simple DC circuits. Matched-quartets were created based on the pre-test results of 50 elementary school students and divided randomly into a simulation implicit (SI), simulation explicit (SE), combination implicit (CI) and combination explicit (CE) conditions. The results showed that when the students were working with the simulation alone, they were able to gain significantly greater amount of subject knowledge when they received metacognitive support (explicit instruction; SE) for the discovery process than when they received only procedural guidance (implicit instruction: SI). However, this additional scaffolding was not enough to reach the level of the students in the combination environment (CI and CE). A surprising finding in Study II was that instructional support had a different effect in the combination environment than in the simulation environment. In the combination environment explicit instruction (CE) did not seem to elicit much additional gain for students’ understanding of electric circuits compared to implicit instruction (CI). Instead, explicit instruction slowed down the inquiry process substantially in the combination environment. Study III analyzed from video data learning processes of those 50 students that participated in experiment II (cf. Study II above). The focus was on three specific learning processes: cognitive conflicts, self-explanations, and analogical encodings. The aim of the study was to find out possible explanations for the success of the combination condition in Experiments I and II. The video data provided clear evidence about the benefits of studying with the real and virtual circuits simultaneously (the combination conditions). Mostly the representations complemented each other, that is, one representation helped students to interpret and understand the outcomes they received from the other representation. However, there were also instances in which analogical encoding took place, that is, situations in which the slightly discrepant results between the representations ‘forced’ students to focus on those features that could be generalised across the two representations. No statistical differences were found in the amount of experienced cognitive conflicts and self-explanations between simulation and combination conditions, though in self-explanations there was a nascent trend in favour of the combination. There was also a clear tendency suggesting that explicit guidance increased the amount of self-explanations. Overall, the amount of cognitive conflicts and self-explanations was very low. The aim of the Study IV was twofold: the main aim was to provide an aggregated overview of the learning outcomes of experiments I and II; the secondary aim was to explore the relationship between the learning environments and students’ prior domain knowledge (low and high) in the experiments. Aggregated results of experiments I & II showed that on average, 91% of the students in the combination environment scored above the average of the laboratory environment, and 76% of them scored also above the average of the simulation environment. Seventy percent of the students in the simulation environment scored above the average of the laboratory environment. The results further showed that overall students seemed to benefit from combining simulations and laboratories regardless of their level of prior knowledge, that is, students with either low or high prior knowledge who studied circuits in the combination environment outperformed their counterparts who studied in the laboratory or simulation environment alone. The effect seemed to be slightly bigger among the students with low prior knowledge. However, more detailed inspection of the results showed that there were considerable differences between the experiments regarding how students with low and high prior knowledge benefitted from the combination: in Experiment I, especially students with low prior knowledge benefitted from the combination as compared to those students that used only the simulation, whereas in Experiment II, only students with high prior knowledge seemed to benefit from the combination relative to the simulation group. Regarding the differences between simulation and laboratory groups, the benefits of using a simulation seemed to be slightly higher among students with high prior knowledge. The results of the four empirical studies support the hypothesis concerning the benefits of using simulation along with laboratory activities to promote students’ conceptual understanding of electricity. It can be concluded that when teaching students about electricity, the students can gain better understanding when they have an opportunity to use the simulation and the real circuits in parallel than if they have only the real circuits or only a computer simulation available, even when the use of the simulation is supported with the explicit instruction. The outcomes of the empirical studies can be considered as the first unambiguous evidence on the (additional) benefits of combining laboratory and simulation activities in science education as compared to learning with laboratories and simulations alone.

The effectiveness of financial innovation support tools. Comparative study of Latvia and Finland

In the Innovation Union Scoreboard of 2011, Latvia ranked last amongst the EU countries in innovation performance. Even though there is sufficient scientific and technological basis, the results remain modest or low in most of the indicators concerning innovations. Several aspects influence the performance a national innovation system. In Latvia, the low effectiveness is often attributed to lack of financial support tools. As a comparison, Finland was chosen because of its well-established and documented innovation system. The aim of this study is to research the efficiency and effectiveness of the current financial innovation support tool system in Latvia from the point of view of an innovating company. It also attempts to analyze the support tool system of Latvia and compare to the relevant parts of the Finnish system. The study found that it is problematic for innovative companies in Latvia to receive the necessary funding especially for start-ups and SMEs due to the low number of grant programs, funds and lacking offer from banks, venture capital and business angels. To improve the situation, the Latvian government should restructure the funding mechanisms putting a bigger emphasis on innovative start-ups and SMEs. That would lay a foundation for future growth and boost research and scientific activities in Latvia.

Bisnesenkelit aloittavien kasvuyritysten vauhdittajina – Tapaustutkimus

Bisnesenkelit, eli yksityiset riskisijoittajat ovat tärkeä ulkopuolinen rahoittajataho aloittaville kasvuyrityksille. Varallisuuden sijoittamisen ohella bisnesenkeleiden tärkeä ominaisuus on osaamisen ja verkostojen sijoittaminen yritykseen, minkä myötä yritys saa paremmat edellytykset kasvua varten. Bisnesenkeleiden kontribuutio ajoittuu tyypillisesti jälki-investointivaiheeseen, eli varallisuuden sijoittamisen jälkeen. Osallistumi-sen myötä yrittäjä-sijoittajasuhde on tärkeä taustatekijä bisnesenkelin kontribuutiossa aloittavalle kasvuyritykselle. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli luoda ymmärrystä bisnesenkelien kontribuutioon aloittavien kasvuyritysten jälki-investointivaiheessa. Tähän päätutkimusongelmaan vastattiin kuvailemalla lähtökohtia bisnesenkelin osallistumiselle, selvittämällä bisnesenkelin konkreettisia osallistumistapoja sekä kontribuutiosta koettua hyötyä erityisesti yrittäjien kannalta. Tutkimus toteutettiin laadullisena tutkimuksena hyödyntäen tapaustutkimusta. Tutkimusaineistona käytettiin neljälle yrittäjälle ja neljälle bisnesenkelille tehtyä teemahaastattelua. Tutkitut yritykset valittiin pääasiassa teknologiatoimialalta. Bisnesenkeleiden osallistumisen taustalla on pyrkimys viedä yritystä eteenpäin kasvua ja tulevasta exitistä saatavaa tuottoa ajatellen. Nämä tavoitteet ohjaavat bisnesenkeliä välittämään yritykseen strategista ja operatiivista osaamistaan sekä verkostojaan yrityksen tarpeista riippuen. Yrittäjän kannalta oleelliseksi havaittiin myös keskustelukumppanin merkitys. Suhteen toimivuuden edellytyksinä ovat erityisesti osapuolten välinen luottamus ja riittävä vuorovaikutus. Bisnesenkelin kontribuutio koettiin pääosin hyödyllisenä, esimerkiksi kasvua nopeuttaen.

Social ventures : the development of the theory of sustainable contributive advantage and initial empirical tests

This thesis attempts to fill gaps in both a theoretical basis and an operational and strategic understanding in the areas of social ventures, social entrepreneurship and nonprofit business models. This study also attempts to bridge the gap in strategic and economic theory between social and commercial ventures. More specifically, this thesis explores sustainable competitive advantage from a resource-based theory perspective and explores how it may be applied to the nonmarket situation of nonprofit organizations and social ventures. It is proposed that a social value-orientation of sustainable competitive advantage, called sustainable contributive advantage, provides a more realistic depiction of what is necessary in order for a social venture to perform better than its competitors over time. In addition to providing this realistic depiction, this research provides a substantial theoretical contribution in the area of economics, social ventures, and strategy research, specifically in regards to resource-based theory. The proposed model for sustainable contributive advantage uses resource-based theory and competitive advantage in order to be applicable to social ventures. This model proposes an explanation of a social venture’s ability to demonstrate consistently superior performance. In order to determine whether sustainable competitive advantage is in fact, appropriate to apply to both social and economic environments, quantitative analyses are conducted on a large sample of nonprofit organizations in a single industry and then compared to similar quantitative analyses conducted on commercial ventures. In comparing the trends and strategies between the two types of entities from a quantitative perspective, propositions are developed regarding a social venture’s resource utilization strategies and their possible impact on performance. Evidence is found to support the necessity of adjusting existing models in resource-based theory in order to apply them to social ventures. Additionally supported is the proposed theory of sustainable contributive advantage. The thesis concludes with recommendations for practitioners, researchers and policy makers as well as suggestions for future research paths.

Success Factors of Accelerators

There is wide interest in new business creation especially in high-growth companies because of the transition from the industrial era to the information era. Previously traditional industry has been a major employer but now industrial employment is moving to countries that provide cheaper labor, and therefore Western countries are reaching for new solutions that could safeguard the current stage of economic wealth. High-growth companies are seen as one opportunity. The aim of this study is to clarify the success factors of accelerators. Acceleration is a relatively new phenomenon, which has its roots in the venture capital industry. Their fundamental goal is to create high-growth companies that have global market potential. Accelerators could be defined as venture-to-capital actors that bridge the competence and equity gaps of startups. The access to the knowledge and funding are the prerequisites of the existence of accelerator. This research was qualitative and based on 18 semi-structured or thematic interviews with 15 accelerators and topic related professionals from Finland, Estonia, Denmark, Germany, the UK and the US. The data was analyzed with a content analysis approach. The study revealed three fundamental preconditions for success. First, the deep business knowledge and access to relevant networks is a foundation and fundamental precondition. Second, the ability to transfer knowledge from the accelerator to startups has significant importance. And third, the dynamics of an accelerator organization can restrict the use of business knowledge. Moreover, the attraction of an accelerator and team selection are crucial issues for success.

Osakkeiden yhtiöoikeudellinen vaihdannan rajoittaminen ja VC-DCF -arvonmäärityksen käyttömahdollisuudet osakkeenomistajan irtaantuessa kasvuyhtiöstä

Yhtiöoikeus, yhtiöoikeuden reunaehtojen mukainen yhtiöjärjestys ja osakassopimus määrittävät kolme sääntelytasoa osakkeenomistajan irtaantuessa osakeyhtiöstä. Ulkopuolisen pääomasijoittajan liittyminen kohdeyhtiön vähemmistöosakkeenomistajaksi edellyttää monipuolista sopimista ja räätälöityjen määräys- ja sopimuslausekkeiden käyttöä yhtiöjärjestyksessä ja osakassopimuksessa tulevaa etukäteen sovittua irtaantumista varten. Yhtiöoikeudellinen määräystaso yhtiöjärjestyksessä, jota täydennetään osakeyhtiölain tahdonvaltaisella säännöstöllä, luo edellytykset osakkeenomistajien välisen riskienhallinnan toteuttamiseksi osakassopimuksessa. Osakeyhtiölain mukaisilla pakottavilla exit-oikeuksilla ja erikseen määritellyillä irtaantumistavoilla voi olla erilaiset arvonmääritystavat. Erityisen arvonmääritystavan valinta ja sen liittäminen sopimuskokonaisuuteen on syytä tehdä harkitusti niin, että irtaantumistilanteet määritetään tapauskohtaisesti etukäteen. Start-up -vaiheessa tapahtuvan rahoituksen kiertokulkusuunnittelun ja arvonmäärityksen siirryttäessä Venture Capital-arvonmäärityksestä kasvuvaiheen diskontattujen kassavirtojen DCF-arvonmääritysmalliin tulee olla yhteensovitettuja yhtiöoikeudellisesti ja sopimusoikeudellisesti. Erilaisten kauppahintamekanismien vaikutukset lunastushintaan on tunnistettava. Yrityksen rahoituksen eri kehitysvaiheita kuvaavaa yhdistettyä VC-DCF -arvonmääritysmallia on tarpeellista käyttää tietyissä tilanteissa, koska VC-menetelmä ei itse pysty ratkaisemaan kaikkia fundamentaalista tarvetta vaativia arvonmääritysvaiheita. Työssä esitetään erilaiset irtaantumisvaihtoehdot ja tarvittavien DCF-arvonmäärityskomponenttien sisältö ja käyttömahdollisuudet, joilla voidaan pienentää vähemmistöosakkeenomistajan riskiä ja tuottovaatimusta.

From network pictures to network insight in solution business – the role of internal communication

Operating in business-to-business markets requires an in-depth understanding on business networks. Actions and reactions made to compete in markets are fundamentally based on managers‘ subjective perceptions of the network. However, an amalgamation of these individual perceptions, termed a network picture, to a common company level shared understanding on that network, known as network insight, is found to be a substantial challenge for companies. A company‘s capability to enhance common network insight is even argued to lead competitive advantage. Especially companies with value creating logics that require wide comprehension of and collaborating in networks, such as solution business, are necessitated to develop advanced network insight. According to the extant literature, dispersed pieces of atomized network pictures can be unified to a common network insight through a process of amalgamation that comprises barriers/drivers of multilateral exchange, manifold rationality, and recursive time. However, the extant body of literature appears to lack an understanding on the role of internal communication in the development of network insight. Nonetheless, the extant understanding on the amalgamation process indicates that internal communication plays a substantial role in the development of company level network insight. The purpose of the present thesis is to enhance understanding on internal communication in the amalgamation of network pictures to develop network insight in the solution business setting, which was chosen to represent business-to-business value creating logic that emphasizes the capability to understand and utilize networks. Thus, in solution business the role of succeeding in the amalgamation process is expected to emphasize. The study combines qualitative and quantitative research by means of various analytical methods including multiple case analysis, simulation, and social network analysis. Approaching the nascent research topic with differing perspectives and means provides a broader insight on the phenomenon. The study provides empirical evidence from Finnish business-to-business companies which operate globally. The empirical data comprise interviews (n=28) with managers of three case companies. In addition the data includes a questionnaire (n=23) collected mainly for the purpose of social network analysis. In addition, the thesis includes a simulation study more specifically achieved by means of agent based modeling. The findings of the thesis shed light on the role of internal communication in the amalgamation process, contributing to the emergent discussion of network insights and thus to the industrial marketing research. In addition, the thesis increases understanding on internal communication in the change process to solution business, a supplier‘s internal communication in its matrix organization structure during a project sales process, key barriers and drivers that influence internal communication in project sales networks, perceived power within industrial project sales, and the revisioning of network pictures. According to the findings, internal communication is found to play a substantial role in the amalgamation process. First, it is suggested that internal communication is a base of multilateral exchange. Second, it is suggested that internal communication intensifies and maintains manifold rationality. Third, internal communication is needed to explicate the usually differing time perspectives of others and thus it is suggested that internal communication has role as the explicator of recursive time. Furthermore, the role of an efficient amalgamation process is found to be emphasized in solutions business as it requires a more advanced network insight for cross-functional collaboration. Finally, the thesis offers several managerial implications for industrial suppliers to enhance the amalgamation process when operating in solution business.

Organisational learning and knowledge acquisition. A case study of internationalising manufacturers of wood-based prefabricated buildings

The study investigates organisational learning and knowledge acquisition of wood-based prefabricated building manufacturers. This certain group of case companies was chosen, because their management and their employees generally have a strong manufacturing and engineering background, while the housing sector is characterised by national norms, regulations, as well as local building styles. Considering this setting, it was investigated, how the case companies develop organisational learning capabilities, acquire and transfer knowledge for their internationalisation. The theoretical framework of this study constitutes the knowledge-based conceptualisation of internationalisation, which combines the traditional internationalisation process, as well as the international new venture perspective based on their commonalities in the knowledge-based view of the firm. Different theories of internationalisation, including the network-perspective, were outlined and a framework on organisational learning and knowledge acquisition was established. The empirical research followed a qualitative approach, deploying a multiple-case study with five case companies from Austria, Finland and Germany. In the study, the development of the wood-based prefabricated building industry and of the case companies are described, and the motives, facilitators and challenges for foreign expansion, as well as the companies’ internationalisation approaches are compared. Different methods of how companies facilitate the knowledge-exchange or learn about new markets are also outlined. Experience, market knowledge and personal contacts are considered essential for the internationalisation process. The major finding of the study is that it is not necessary to acquire the market knowledge internally in a slow process as proposed by the Uppsala model. In four cases companies engaged knowledge in symbiotic relations with local business partners. Thereby, the building manufacturers contribute their design and production capabilities, and in return, their local partners provide them with knowledge about the market and local regulations; while they manage the sales and construction operations. Thus, the study provides strong evidence for the propositions of network perspective. One case company developed the knowledge internally in a gradual process: it entered the market sequentially with several business lines, showing an increasing level of complexity. In both of the observed strategies, single-loop and double-loop learning processes occurred.

Situational awareness concept in a multinational collaboration environment : challenges in the information sharing framework

Technological capabilities are built to support different types of collaboration, and this gives the justification to widely observe, how activity environments are influenced by technology. Technology as an enabler can be addressed from different perspectives, other than merely technological. Dynamic, evolving environment is at the same time interesting but also challenging. As a multinational collaboration environment, the maritime surveillance is an good example of time critical and evolving environment, where technological solutions enable new ways of collaboration. Justification for the inspiration to use maritime environment as the baseline for understanding the challenges in creating and maintaining adequate level of situational awareness, derives from the complexity of the collaboration and information sharing environment elements, needed to be taken into account, when analyzing criticalities related to decision making. Situational awareness is an important element supporting decision making, and challenges related to it can also be observed in the maritime environment. This dissertation describes the structures and factors involved in this complex setting, found from the case studies that should be taken into account when trying to understand, how these elements affect the activities. This dissertation focuses on the gray area that is between a life threatening situation and normal everyday activities. From the multinational experimentation series case studies, MNE5 and MNE6 it was possible to observe situations that were not life threatening for the participants themselves, but not also basic every day activities. These case studies provided a unique possibility to see situations, where gaining of situational awareness and decision making are challenged with time critical crisis situations. Unfortunately organizations do not normally take the benefit from the everyday work to prepare themselves for possible emerging crisis situations. This dissertation focuses on creating a conceptual model and a concept that supports organizations – also outside the maritime community – to improve their ability to support gaining of situational awareness from the individual training level, all the way to changes in organizational structures in aiming for better support for decision making from the individual level to the highest decision making level. Quick changes and unpredictability are reality in organizations and organizations do not have the possibility to control all the factors that affect their functioning. Since we cannot be prepared for everything, and predict every crisis, individual activities inside teams and as a part of organizations, need to be supported with guidance, tools and training in order to support acting in challenging situations. In fact the ideology of the conceptual model created, lies especially in the aim of not controlling everything in beforehand, but supporting organizations with concrete procedures to help individuals to react in different, unpredictable situations, instead of focusing on traditional risk prevention and management. Technological capabilities are not automatically solutions for functional challenges; this is why it is justified to broaden the problem area observation from the technological perspective. This dissertation demonstrates that it is possible to support collaboration in a multinational environment with technological solutions, but it requires the recognition of technological limitations and accepting the possible restrictions related to technological innovations. Technology should not be considered value per se, the value of technology should be defined according to the support of activities, including strategic and operational environment evaluation, identification of organizational elements, and taking into account also the social factors and their challenges. Then we are one step closer to providing technological solutions that support the actual activities by taking into account the variables of the activity environment in question. The multidisciplinary view to approach the information sharing and collaboration framework, is derived especially from the complexity of decision making and building of situational awareness, since they are not build or created in vacuity, but in the organizational framework by the people doing it with the technological capabilities, enabled by the organizational structures. Introduced case studies were related to maritime environment, but according to the research results, it is valid to argue, that based on the lessons learned it is possible to create and further develop conceptual model and to create a general concept to support a wider range of organizations in their attempt to gain better level of situational awareness (SA) and to support decision making. To proof the versatile usage of the developed concept, I have introduced the case study findings to the health care environment and reflected the identified elements from the trauma center to the created concept. The main contribution to complete this adventure is the presented situational awareness concept created in the respect to NATO concept structure. This has been done to tackle the challenge of collaboration by focusing on situational awareness in the information sharing context by providing a theoretical ground and understanding, of how these issues should be approached, and how these elements can be generalized and used to support activities in other environments as well. This dissertation research has been a several year evolving process reflecting and affecting presented case studies and this learning experience from the case studies has also affected the goals and research questions of this dissertation. This venture has been written from a retro perspective according to ideology of process modeling and design rationale to present to the reader how this entire journey took place and what where the critical milestones that affected the end result, conceptual model. Support in a challenging information sharing framework can be provided with the right type of combination of tools, procedures and individual effort. This dissertation will provide insights to those with a new approach to war technology for the organizations to gain a better level of awareness and to improve the capabilities in decision making. This dissertation will present, from the war technology starting point, a new approach and possibility for the organizations to create a better level of awareness and support for decision making with the right combination of tools, procedures and individual effort.