Strategiatutkimuksen koulukuntien vertailu - staattisesta dynaamiseen strategianäkemykseen

Tässä tutkielmassa vertaillaan strategiatutkimuksen koulukuntia, ja niiden välisiä suhteita. Tut-kielmassa esitettävät neljä strategianäkemystä on jaettu luonteeltaan staattisiin ja dynaamisiin. Tavoitteena onesittää, kuinka näiden näkemysten synteesinä voidaan siirtyä staattisesta strate-gia-ajattelusta dynaamiseen malliin, mikä luo yritykselle uusia mahdollisuuksia uudistaa ja tur-vata kilpailuetuaan. Tutkielmassa myös tarkastellaan viime aikoina esitettyä perinteiseen SWOT-analyysiin kohdistuvaa kritiikkiä, jonka mukaanstaattiseen analyysiin jäävä strateginen suunnittelu voi johtaa yritysjohdon huomiota vääriin asioihin tulevaisuuden kilpailuetua ajatel-len.

Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Performance

Firms operating in a changing environment have a need for structures and practices that provide flexibility and enable rapid response to changes. Given the challenges they face in attempts to keep up with market needs, they have to continuously improve their processes and products, and develop new products to match market requirements. Success in changing markets depends on the firm's ability to convert knowledge into innovations, and consequently their internal structures and capabilities have an important role in innovation activities. According 10 the dynamic capability view of the firm, firms thus need dynamic capabilities in (he form ofassets, processes and structures that enable strategic flexibility and support entrepreneurial opportunity sensing and exploitation. Dynamic capabilities are also needed in conditions of rapid change in the operating environment, and in activities such as new product development and expansion to new markets. Despite the growing interest in these issues and the theoretical developments in the field of strategy research, there are still only very few empirical studies, and large-scale empirical studies in particular, that provide evidence that firms'dynamic capabilities are reflected in performance differences. This thesis represents an attempt to advance the research by providing empirical evidence of thelinkages between the firm's dynamic capabilities and performance in intenationalization and innovation activities. The aim is thus to increase knowledge and enhance understanding of the organizational factors that explain interfirm performance differences. The study is in two parts. The first part is the introduction and the second part comprises five research publications covering the theoretical foundations of the dynamic capability view and subsequent empirical analyses. Quantitative research methodology is used throughout. The thesis contributes to the literature in several ways. While a lot of prior research on dynamic capabilities is conceptual in nature, or conducted through case studies, this thesis introduces empirical measures for assessing the different aspects, and uses large-scale sampling to investigate the relationships between them and performance indicators. The dynamic capability view is further developed by integrating theoretical frameworks and research traditions from several disciplines. The results of the study provide support for the basic tenets of the dynamic capability view. The empirical findings demonstrate that the firm's ability to renew its knowledge base and other intangible assets, its proactive, entrepreneurial behavior, and the structures and practices that support operational flexibility arepositively related to performance indicators.

Ownership Effects on Unrelated Diversification: An Institutions' Perspective

Purpose To show that differences in the extent to which firms engage in unrelated diversification can be attributed to differences in ownership structure. Methodology/approach We draw on longitudinal data and use a panel analysis specification to test our hypotheses. Findings We find that unrelated diversification destroys value; pressure-sensitive Anglo-American owners in a firm’s equity reduce unrelated diversification, whereas pressure-resistant domestic owners increase unrelated diversification; the greater the firm’s free cash flow, the greater the negative effect of pressure-sensitive Anglo-American owners on unrelated diversification. Research limitations/implications We contribute to corporate governance and strategy research by bringing in owners’ institutional origin as a shaper of owner preferences in particular with regards to unrelated diversification. Future research may expand our investigation to more than one home institutional context, and theorize on institutional origin effects beyond the dichotomy between Anglo-American and non-Anglo-American (not oriented toward shareholder value maximization) owners. Practical implications Policy makers, financial analysts, owners, and managers may want to reflect about the implications of ownership structure, as well as promoting or joining corporations with particular ownership configurations. Social implications A shareholder value-destroying strategy, such as unrelated diversification has adverse consequences for society at large, in terms of opportunity costs, that is, resources could be allocated to value-creating activities instead. Promoting an ownership configuration that creates value should contribute to social welfare. Originality/value Owners may not be exclusively driven by shareholder value maximization, but can be influenced by normative beliefs (biases) stemming from the institutional context they originate from.

Ratiomuuttujat ja näennäinen korrelaatio

Eri tieteenalojen tutkijat ovat kiistelleet jo yli vuosisadan ajan ratiomuodossa olevien muuttujien käytön vaikutuksista korrelaatio- ja regressioanalyysien tuloksiin ja niiden oikeaan tulkintaan. Strategiatutkimuksen piirissä aiheeseen ei ole kuitenkaan kiinnitetty suuresti huomiota. Tämä on yllättävää, sillä ratiomuuttujat ovat hyvin yleisesti käytettyjä empiirisen strategiatutkimuksen piirissä. Tässä työssä luodaan katsaus ratiomuuttujien ympärillä käytyyn debattiin. Lisäksi selvitetään artikkelikatsauksen avulla niiden käytön yleisyyttä nykypäivän strategiatutkimuksessa. Työssä tutkitaan Monte Carlo –simulaatioiden avulla ratiomuuttujien ominaisuuksien vaikutuksia korrelaatio- ja regressioanalyysin tuloksiin erityisesti yhteisen nimittäjän tapauksissa.

Success of service-intensive manufacturing firms - resource-based view

The main objective of this study is to examine the relationships between resources, competitive advantage and firm success. The study focuses, on one hand, on the financial performance of service-intensive manufac-turing firms against competitors with a lower service intensity and, on the other hand, on the resources as drivers for competitive advantage and success. The purpose of the theoretical part is to link the study in the field of the strategy research. The empirical part of the study is based on the quantitative analyses of the survey data collected from 50 major suppliers of industrial machinery and transportation equipment in Europe and North America. Results indicate that service-intensive manufacturing firms have performed better and their performance has been more stable vis-à-vis their peers. The main resources that differentiate service-intensive manufacturing firms from their non-service intensive competitors are service strategy and service-oriented top management. The analyses on the VRIO resources produced only a limited amount of information and solely service-centred culture appeared to be a rent generating resource.

Social ventures : the development of the theory of sustainable contributive advantage and initial empirical tests

This thesis attempts to fill gaps in both a theoretical basis and an operational and strategic understanding in the areas of social ventures, social entrepreneurship and nonprofit business models. This study also attempts to bridge the gap in strategic and economic theory between social and commercial ventures. More specifically, this thesis explores sustainable competitive advantage from a resource-based theory perspective and explores how it may be applied to the nonmarket situation of nonprofit organizations and social ventures. It is proposed that a social value-orientation of sustainable competitive advantage, called sustainable contributive advantage, provides a more realistic depiction of what is necessary in order for a social venture to perform better than its competitors over time. In addition to providing this realistic depiction, this research provides a substantial theoretical contribution in the area of economics, social ventures, and strategy research, specifically in regards to resource-based theory. The proposed model for sustainable contributive advantage uses resource-based theory and competitive advantage in order to be applicable to social ventures. This model proposes an explanation of a social venture’s ability to demonstrate consistently superior performance. In order to determine whether sustainable competitive advantage is in fact, appropriate to apply to both social and economic environments, quantitative analyses are conducted on a large sample of nonprofit organizations in a single industry and then compared to similar quantitative analyses conducted on commercial ventures. In comparing the trends and strategies between the two types of entities from a quantitative perspective, propositions are developed regarding a social venture’s resource utilization strategies and their possible impact on performance. Evidence is found to support the necessity of adjusting existing models in resource-based theory in order to apply them to social ventures. Additionally supported is the proposed theory of sustainable contributive advantage. The thesis concludes with recommendations for practitioners, researchers and policy makers as well as suggestions for future research paths.

Bisnesenkeleiden ei-taloudelliset investoinnit startup-rahoituksessa: Näkökulmia Suomesta

Tämä tutkimus on kvalitatiivinen tutkimus bisnesenkelisijoittamisen ei-taloudellisesta osuudesta suomalaisessa startup-rahoitus kontekstissa. Tutkimus on toteutettu suorittamalla kirjallisuuskatsaus aiempaan alan kirjallisuuteen, sekä täydentämällä tätä kolmella puolistrukturoidulla enkelisijoittajan haastattelulla. Tutkimuksessa pyritään vastaamaan seuraaviin tutkimuskysymyksiin: mitä bisnesenkeleiden ei-taloudelliset investoinnit käytännössä ovat? Mitä tutkimusta bisnesenkeleiden ei-taloudellisista investoinneista on aikaisemmin tehty? Käyttääkö bisnesenkeli omia osaamisalueitaan ei-taloudellisissa investoinneissa? Onko olemassa jotain uniikkia suomalaista toimintatapaa tai erityispiirrettä ei-taloudellisille investoinneille?

Pursuit of change versus organizational inertia: a study on strategic renewal in the Finnish broadcasting company

This doctoral dissertation explores the intra-organizational dynamics of a strategic renewal process. The main research question is how the pursuit of change and organizational inertia co-exist, intertwine, and collide in organizational cognition and capabilities during the strategic renewal. It is a comprehensive study on how organizational capabilities, organizational cognition, and structure enhance and inhibit change. Theoretically, the study is positioned in the modern tradition of strategy research, using the dynamic capability view and the organizational and managerial cognition research tradition as the main theoretical frames. Empirically, the study is a longitudinal case study of the Finnish Broadcasting Company (Yle), following the organizational changes during the years of 2011-1014. The analysis is based on both quantitative and qualitative data, which was collected during the research process using surveys, interviews, and archives. The main theoretical contribution is the application of the two theoretical approaches in one study. Empirically, the study contributes to operationalization of the concepts related to the dynamic capability view and organizational cognition, in a media context that is going through drastic changes due to digitalization. Furthermore, the case of a public broadcasting company extends the application of the theoretical concepts to the context of public management. The results suggest that renewal is a complex process, in which an organization’s perceptions intertwine with the strategic actions and decision-making. The change evolves pathdependently: the past experiences, routines, and organizational structures tend to dictate the future visions, desires, and actions. The study also reveals how the public nature of an organization adds to the tensions between change and organizational inertia, and hampers the decision-making. The doctoral dissertation consists of six research papers, each of which explores the phenomenon under study from a different perspective.

La adopción de un enfoque de trabajo en red: implicaciones en torno al proceso estratégico de las organizaciones

En el mundo actual el enfoque del proceso estratégico es una variable que cada vez va tomando un mayor peso e incidencia en las decisiones de los directores de empresa, sin embargo, poco se ha estudiado sobre esta variable al ser adoptado por los nuevos modelos de cooperación empresarial en las organizaciones. Es por esta razón que esta investigación busca esclarecer la aplicabilidad de las metodologías y herramientas utilizadas en la planeación estratégica de una empresa en una red, además de servir como un primer acercamiento a los aspectos más importantes en la planeación estratégica de una red.

Elementos para la relación entre cultura organizacional y estrategia: caso IBM

Este trabajo es una contribución al proyecto de investigación del Profesor Carlos Eduardo Méndez Álvarez, Elementos para la relación entre cultura organizacional y estrategia, proyecto que hace parte de la línea de investigación de Estrategia de la Escuela de Administración de la Universidad del Rosario. Esta investigación se realiza con el fin de identificar la relación entre los factores de cultura y estrategia organizacional que permiten alinear los objetivos de las empresas con las actividades de su cadena de valor, logrando ser cada vez más competitivas y perdurables en el mercado. Como base teórica se tendrá en cuenta los trabajos de Carlos Eduardo Méndez Álvarez, Charles Handy , Edgar Schein y Geert Hofstede, entre otros , para la cultura organizacional, y a Michael Porter, Henry Mintzberg, Peter Drucker, Tom Peters, entre otros, para el componente de Estrategia Organizacional; así también, se tomará como referencia el caso de éxito de la compañía estadounidense IBM, en el cuál fue fundamental la alineación entre los elementos culturales de la organización y la estrategia planteada en medio de un entorno de cambiante y extremadamente competitivo. El propósito de esta investigación es realizar análisis, discusiones y propuestas acerca del tema.

Creating a world class business through a merger of two equals: an interview with Paul Walsh, Chief Executive Officer of Diageo Plc

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore, from a practical point-of-view, a number of key strategic issues that critically influence organisations' competitiveness. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a semi-structured interview with Mr Paul Walsh, CEO of Diageo. Diageo is a highly successful company and Mr Walsh has played a central role in making Diageo the number one branded drink company in the world. Findings – The paper discusses the key attributes of successful merger, lessons from a complex cross boarder acquisition, rationale for strategic alliance with competitors, distinctive resources, and the role of corporate social responsibility. Research limitations/implications – It is not too often that management scholars have the opportunity to discuss with the CEOs of large multinationals the rational of key strategic decisions. In this paper these issues are explored from the perspective of a CEO of a large and successful company. The lessons, while not generalisable, offer unique insights to students of management and management researchers. Originality/value – The paper offers a bridge between theory and practice. It demonstrates that from Diageo's perspective the distinctive capabilities are intangible. It also offers insight into how to successfully execute strategic decision. In terms of originality it offers a view from the top, which is often missing from strategy research.

The impact of added cultural distance and cultural diversity on international expansion patterns: a Penrosian perspective

International strategy research has identified a variety of multinational enterprise (MNE) expansion patterns. Some MNEs appear to expand internationally at a stable rate, whereas others expand rapidly in one period and then tend to experience slower growth. The latter pattern suggests the occurrence of the Penrose effect. We identified two determinants of these diverging patterns. First, we propose that high levels of added cultural distance (reflecting expansion into new local contexts) during one period, may negatively affect further international expansion because of dynamic adjustment costs. Second, we suggest that managing a network of subsidiaries operating in a set of local contexts with high cultural diversity, increases environmental and internal governance complexity. Extant cultural diversity of the local contexts where the MNE is active in a first period may therefore discourage adding further cultural distance. We test the hypothesized relationships using a panel of 91 German companies.