888 resultados para Learning Society
Resumo:
Education in the Information Society is based on asynchronism in time and space, interactivity and virtual restructuring of the educational space. One way to implement such a model of training is web-based - use of the WWW as a virtual environment to access educational materials or to organize the learning process. This work presents a virtual learning environment (VLE) developed for students and made up of modules of dynamically changing content implemented by authorized users. The aim is, through advanced technology for e-learning, testing and self-testing to stimulate students’ activity to focus their potential on the acquisition of the necessary knowledge, skills and competences. The VLE was developed under the Human Resources Development Operational Programme.
Resumo:
Доклад по покана, поместен в сборника на Националната конференция "Образованието в информационното общество", Пловдив, октомври, 2006 г.
Resumo:
The logic of ‘time’ in modern capitalist society appears to be a fixed concept. Time dictates human activity with a regularity, which as long ago as 1944, George Woodcock referred to as The Tyranny of the Clock. Seventy years on, Hartmut Rosa suggests humans no longer maintain speed to achieve something new, but simply to preserve the status quo, in a ‘social acceleration’ that is lethal to democracy. Political engagement takes time we no longer have, as we rush between our virtual spaces and ‘non-places’ of higher education. I suggest it’s time to confront the conspirators that, in partnership with the clock, accelerate our social engagements with technology in the context of learning. Through Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) I reveal an alarming situation if we don’t. With reference to Bauman’s Liquid Modernity, I observe a ‘lightness’ in policy texts where humans have been ‘liquified’ Separating people from their own labour with technology in policy maintains the flow of speed a neoliberal economy demands. I suggest a new ‘solidity’ of human presence is required as we write about networked learning. ‘Writing ourselves back in’ requires a commitment to ‘be there’ in policy and provide arguments that decelerate the tyranny of time. I am though ever-mindful that social acceleration is also of our own making, and there is every possibility that we actually enjoy it.
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2013
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2013
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2013
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2013
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2014
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2014
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2014
Resumo:
In global policy documents, the language of Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL) now firmly structures a perception of educational technology which ‘subsumes’ terms like Networked Learning and e-Learning. Embedded in these three words though is a deterministic, economic assumption that technology has now enhanced learning, and will continue to do so. In a market-driven, capitalist society this is a ‘trouble free’, economically focused discourse which suggests there is no need for further debate about what the use of technology achieves in learning. Yet this raises a problem too: if technology achieves goals for human beings, then in education we are now simply counting on ‘use of technology’ to enhance learning. This closes the door on a necessary and ongoing critical pedagogical conversation that reminds us it is people that design learning, not technology. Furthermore, such discourse provides a vehicle for those with either strong hierarchical, or neoliberal agendas to make simplified claims politically, in the name of technology. This chapter is a reflection on our use of language in the educational technology community through a corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). In analytical examples that are ‘loaded’ with economic expectation, we can notice how the policy discourse of TEL narrows conversational space for learning so that people may struggle to recognise their own subjective being in this language. Through the lens of Lieras’s externality, desubjectivisation and closure (Lieras, 1996) we might examine possible effects of this discourse and seek a more emancipatory approach. A return to discussing Networked Learning is suggested, as a first step towards a more multi-directional conversation than TEL, that acknowledges the interrelatedness of technology, language and learning in people’s practice. Secondly, a reconsideration of how we write policy for educational technology is recommended, with a critical focus on how people learn, rather than on what technology is assumed to enhance.
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2015
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2015
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2015
Resumo:
Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2014