23 resultados para ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
em Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland
Resumo:
Marketing and finance are both facing challenges in the constantly changing business environment. Finance is challenged to change its role from cost control to value-adding business partner while marketing needs to be able to demonstrate its accountability so how it contributes to firm performance. Finance is the key partner for marketing to prove its impact by helping marketing to measure its actions. By doing so, finance can also emphasize its business partner role. There is not a lot of research conducted of the relationship between marketing and finance departments. The aim of this study is to investigate how the professional differences of marketing and finance and their forms of cooperation affect marketing performance measurement. Literature of marketing and finance disciplines, their cooperation, performance implications of their interface as well as the roles of marketing performance measurement, performance measurement system and measures were reviewed. This research was conducted as a qualitative case study among senior management of marketing and finance in the sporting goods company. The data collected through semi-structured interviews, participant observation and secondary data was described and classified and connections were made. The results of the study show that the nature of marketing and finance disciplines has many effects on their cooperation and performance measurement. Due to the ambiguous nature of marketing, measuring its performance is still seen as a challenge but digitalization is helping the measurement. It was indicated that marketing and finance professionals need to have different skillsets in order to perform their roles effectively and thus cooperation is needed. Marketing performance needs to be measured with both financial and nonfinancial measures. Both marketing and finance interviewees highlighted the importance of marketing measures over financial measures. Measuring marketing performance comprehensively is seen as a challenge since marketing and finance cooperation is still shaped by the cost control and budget management roles, rather than performance measurement. We recognized three constraints affecting this cooperation and performance measurement: people, time and software. If marketing and finance would develop deeper cooperation, they could create comprehensive performance measurement system that improves organizational performance.
Resumo:
Tässä tutkielmassa on tarkasteltu case- yrityksen henkilöstön näkemyksiä henkilöstön kehittämisestä sekä case- yrityksen kehittämisestä. Tutkielman tavoitteena on ollut selvittää kuinka Oy Gust. Raninin henkilöstöä voitaisiin kehittää, jotta yritys kykenisi kehittämään toimintojaan, lisäämään työntekijöiden viihtyvyyttä ja ammattitaitoa sekä vastaamaan kilpailuun. Tutkimus on laadullinen case- tutkimus. Tutkimusmenetelmänä on käytetty teemahaastatteluja, joita tehtiin case- yrityksen eri henkilöstöryhmien edustajille. Tutkimus tehtiin Oy Gust. Raninille. Henkilöstön mielestä parhaita tapoja kehittää osaamista ovat erilaiset yrityksen ulkopuolisen ammattilaisen pitämät läheisesti työtehtäviin liittyvät kurssit joilta saa mukaan kurssimateriaalia. Työntekijät haluavat itse valita ne kurssit joihin he osallistuvat. Toinen suosittu kehittämistapa on työn- tai tehtävien kierto. Suurimmaksi ongelmakohdaksi koettiin puutteellinen tiedonkulku sekä esimiehiltä alaisille että työntekijöiden välillä. Muita kehittämiskohteita ovat atk- taidot sekä kielitaito. Henkilöstön suhtautuminen kaikenlaisiin kehittämistoimiin on positiivista ja henkilöstö on halukas kehittämään työtehtäviään.
Resumo:
Laajoilla kyselylomaketutkimuksilla on tutkittu organisaation itsearvioinnin käyttöönoton motiiveja, käyttöä ja käytön hyötyjä 1990-luvulla ja 2000-luvun alussa. Organisaation itsearviointia on myös tutkittu laatupalkintomallien soveltamisen yhteydessä. Kolmas tutkimussuuntaus, johon myös tämä tutkimus sisältyy, on organisaation itsearvioinnin tutkiminen erilaisissa asiayhteyksissä. Tämän tutkimuksen tarkoituksena on lisätä tietoa ja ymmärrystä organisaation itsearvioinnista ja sen vaikuttavuudesta tutkimalla, miten organisaatiota itsearvioidaan maavoimien valmiusyhtymissä ja Maasotakoulussa. Näissä neljässä paikallistutkimuksessa käytin tutkimusotteena tapaustutkimuksen mukaista tutkimusstrategiaa. Aiempien tutkimuksien tulosten perusteella tärkein yhdistävä tekijä toiminnan parantamisessa on pyrkimys kokonaisvaltaisuuteen toiminnan laadun parantamisessa ja erinomaisuuden tavoittelussa. Osin kokonaisvaltaisuuteen sisältyviä ja sitä tukevia tekijöitä ovat jatkuvan parantamisen periaatteen käyttäminen ja oppivan organisaation edellyttämien toimintaedellytyksien luominen ja niiden huomioon ottaminen toiminnassa. Edelleen yhteisenä tekijänä ovat johdon sitoutumisen ja osallistumisen vaikutukset työntekijöiden osallistumiseen ja sitoutumiseen. Teorian perusteella olen arvioinut muodostuvan kolme organisaation itsearvioinnin strategisen tason johtamiskäytäntöä, jotka ovat ”Laatupalkinnon hakeminen”, ”Toiminnan ja tulosten arviointi” sekä ”Toiminnan kypsyyden arviointi”. Tutkimuksen tulosten perusteella organisaation itsearvioinnin vaikuttavuuden merkityskokonaisuus on selitettävissä viiden teeman avulla. Koko tutkimusaineiston yhdistäväksi vaikuttavuuden teemaksi, josta myös organisaation itsearvioinnin vaiheistus saa tukea, muodostuu teema ”organisaation itsearviointi ja tulosjohtaminen”. Tämän teeman perusteella organisaation itsearvioinnin vaikuttavuus perustuu itsearvioinnin käyttämiseen sekä tulosyksikön sisäisenä että johdon strategisen tason itsearviointina osana tulosjohtamista. Samoin teema ”ollaanko samaa perhettä” löytyy jokaisesta tutkimuskohteena olleesta tulosyksiköstä. Teeman perusteella vaikuttavuus perustuu siihen, että organisaation itsearvioinnin tilaisuus koetaan sosiaalisena tapahtumana ja organisaation itsearviointi vahvistaa työntekijöiden osallistumista ja sitoutumista toiminnan laadun parantamiseen. Vaikuttavuuden teemoissa ”poistetaan kivi kengästä, ja hiertäminen loppuu siihen”, ”strateginen valinta” ja ”henkilöstön työhyvinvoinnin edistäminen” organisaation itsearvioinnin vaikuttavuus on tulosyksikkökohtainen. Organisaation itsearvioinnista haetaan vaikuttavuutta organisaation itsearvioinnista saatavien tulosten nopealla toimeenpanolla. Vaikuttavuuteen pyritään systemaattisella eri organisaation tasoilla tehtävillä toiminnan kuvauksilla, mihin liittyy laatupalkinnon hakeminen. Vaikuttavuuteen voidaan myös päästä työpistelähtöisesti henkilöstön johtamisen ja hallinnon kautta. Vaiheistettua organisaation itsearviointia voidaan käyttää osana tulosjohtamista. Muita keskeisiä tutkimustuloksia ovat organisaation itsearvioinnin välittömät ja välilliset vaikutukset. Tutkimuksen tulosten perusteella teen suositukset organisaation itsearvioinnin johtamiskäytännöistä ja organisaation itsearvioinnin vaiheistuksesta osana tulosyksikön tulosjohtamista. Kolmas suositus käsittää organisaation itsearvioinnin käytön palautejärjestelmänä.
Resumo:
Laura Pekkarisen väitös The relationships between work stressors and organizational performance in long-term care for elderly residents (Helsingin yliopisto 2008).
Resumo:
Intellectual assets have attained continuous attention in the academic field, as they are vital sources of competitive advantage and organizational performance in the contemporary knowledge intensive business environment. Intellectual capital measurement is quite thoroughly addressed in the accounting literature. However, the purpose of the measurement is to support the management of intellectual assets, but the reciprocal relationship between measurement and management has not been comprehensively considered in the literature. The theoretical motivation for this study rose from this paradox, as in order to maximise the effectiveness of knowledge management the two initiatives need to be closely integrated. The research approach of this interventionist case study is constructive. The objective is to develop the case organization’s knowledge management and intellectual capital measurement in a way that they would be closely integrated and the measurement would support the management of intellectual assets. The case analysis provides valuable practical considerations about the integration and related issues as the case company is a knowledge intensive organization in which the know-how of the employees is the central competitive asset and therefore, the management and measurement of knowledge are essential for its future success. The results suggest that the case organization is confronting challenges in managing knowledge. In order to appropriately manage knowledge processes and control the related risks, support from intellectual capital measurement is required. However, challenges in measuring intellectual capital, especially knowledge, could be recognized in the organization. By reflecting the knowledge management situation and the constructed strategy map, a new intellectual measurement system was developed for the case organization. The construction of the system as well as its indicators can be perceived to contribute to the literature, emphasizing of the importance of properly considering the organization’s knowledge situation in developing an intellectual capital measurement system.
Resumo:
According to many academic researches, the development of marketing capabilities can enhance organizational performance. Similarly, downstream marketing capabilities have an important role in accomplishment the organizational goals. Particularly the downstream marketing capabilities identified in this research are the Marketing Communication, Selling, Marketing implementation, and Market information management. These four capabilities are summarized under the following abilities. First, the ability to manage customers’ opinion regarding the offered value from the organization. Second, the ability of the organization to obtain orders from new and established customers. Third, the ability of aligning and translate the marketing strategy into an operating action plan along with the deployment of the organizational resources. Forth, the continuous process of gathering and managing information about the markets. Moreover, the literature review of this research shed light on the elements that compose the downstream marketing capabilities. Specifically, this research examined the downstream processes and the required information required to control these processes based on the American Productivity and Quality Center’s Process Classification Framework. Furthermore, the literature review examined some of the technological tools that are used in marketing processes, and also some managerial implication regarding the management of the downstream marketing employees. Along with the investigation of downstream marketing capabilities, the literature review investigated the utilization and the benefits of Component Business Model and Process Classification Framework, as they are defined by the organizations that developed them. Besides this initial study, the research presents how the examined organization is using the two frameworks together by cross-referring them. Finally, the research presents the optimal deployment of the collected downstream capabilities elements in the current organizational structure. The optimal deployment has been grounded on the information collected from the literature review but also from internal documentation, provided from the examined organization. By comparing the optimal deployment and the current condition on the organization, the research exhibits some points for improvement, but also some of the projects that are currently in progress inside the organization and eventually will provide solutions to these downsides.
Resumo:
The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to widen and develop our theoretical frameworks for discussion and analyses of feedback practices in management accounting, particularly shedding light on its formal and informal aspects. The concept of feedback in management accounting has conventionally been analyzed within cybernetic control theory, in which feedback flows as a diagnostic or comparative loop between measurable outputs and pre-set goals (see e.g. Flamholtz et al. 1985; Flamholtz 1996, 1983), i.e. as a formal feedback loop. However, the everyday feedback practices in organizations are combinations of formal and informal elements. In addition to technique-driven feedback approaches (like budgets, measurement, and reward systems) we could also categorize social feedback practices that managers see relevant and effective in the pursuit of organizational control. While cybernetics or control theories successfully capture rational and measured aspects of organizational performance and offer a broad organizational context for the analysis, many individual and informal aspects remain vague and isolated. In order to discuss and make sense of the heterogeneous field of interpretations of formal and informal feedback, both in theory and practice, dichotomous approaches seem to be insufficient. Therefore, I suggest an analytical framework of formal and informal feedback with three dimensions (3D’s): source, time, and rule. Based on an abductive analysis of the theoretical and empirical findings from an interpretive case study around a business unit called Division Steelco, the 3Dframework and formal and informal feedback practices are further elaborated vis-á-vis the four thematic layers in the organizational control model by Flamholtz et al. (1985; Flamholtz 1996, 1983): core control system, organizational structure, organizational culture, and external environment. Various personal and cultural meanings given to the formal and informal feedback practices (“feedback as something”) create multidimensional interpretative contexts. Multidimensional frameworks aim to capture and better understand both the variety of interpretations and their implications to the functionality of feedback practices, important in interpretive research.
Resumo:
Tiedon tehokas jakaminen ja tiedon hallinta näyttelee tärkeätä roolia yritysten kannattavuuden ja tehokkuuden kehittämisessä. Laadukkaan tiedon tehokas jakaminen ja omaksuminen korostuvat verkostoituneessa logistiikkaketjussa ja kolmannen osapuolen logistiikkaa harjoittavissa yrityksissä. Tehokkaalla tiedon jakamisella, tietämyksen hallinnalla sekä tietojohtamisen keinoilla voidaan luoda tehokkaita ja kilpailukykyisiä businessprosesseja. Työn tuloksena saavutettiin kuvaus tietojohtamisen eri näkökulmista sekä tietojohtamisesta tiedon hallinnan työkaluna. Työn teoreettisessa osuudessa käsitellään tietoa ja sen eri tasoja sekä perspektiivejä tietojohtamisessa käytettyinä syötteinä, sen prosesseina sekä lopputuloksena, joita tietojohtamisen käsitteen alla olevilla työkaluilla ja käytännöillä toteutetaan. Aiempi tutkimus osoittaa, että tietojohtaminen on yksi johtamisen malli, jonka avulla voidaan saavuttaa tehokkaan yritystoiminnan edellytykset sekä asetetut strategiset tavoit- teet. Kirjallisuuden perusteella pyrittiin kartoittamaan verkostoituneen logistiikkaketjun tiedonhallinnan esteet ja sitä rajoittavat tekijät. Työn empiirinen osuus toteutettiin kvalitatiivisena kysely- sekä haastattelututkimuksena, jonka avulla kerättiin työssä käytetty tutkimusaineisto. Työn empiirisessä osuudessa kartoitettiin kohdeorganisaation tiedonhallintaprosesseja sen kuljetustuotannon toiminnoissa, sekä niiden toteuttamista vaikeuttavia ja hidastavia tekijöitä. Empiirisen aineiston perusteella yritykselle ehdotettiin organisaation muokkaamista enemmän tiedon jakamista tu- kevaan suuntaan, joka voidaan teoriatiedon perusteella toteuttaa esimerkiksi luomalla fyysisiä ja henkisiä tiloja tietoprosessien toteuttamiselle.
Resumo:
Firms operating in a changing environment have a need for structures and practices that provide flexibility and enable rapid response to changes. Given the challenges they face in attempts to keep up with market needs, they have to continuously improve their processes and products, and develop new products to match market requirements. Success in changing markets depends on the firm's ability to convert knowledge into innovations, and consequently their internal structures and capabilities have an important role in innovation activities. According 10 the dynamic capability view of the firm, firms thus need dynamic capabilities in (he form ofassets, processes and structures that enable strategic flexibility and support entrepreneurial opportunity sensing and exploitation. Dynamic capabilities are also needed in conditions of rapid change in the operating environment, and in activities such as new product development and expansion to new markets. Despite the growing interest in these issues and the theoretical developments in the field of strategy research, there are still only very few empirical studies, and large-scale empirical studies in particular, that provide evidence that firms'dynamic capabilities are reflected in performance differences. This thesis represents an attempt to advance the research by providing empirical evidence of thelinkages between the firm's dynamic capabilities and performance in intenationalization and innovation activities. The aim is thus to increase knowledge and enhance understanding of the organizational factors that explain interfirm performance differences. The study is in two parts. The first part is the introduction and the second part comprises five research publications covering the theoretical foundations of the dynamic capability view and subsequent empirical analyses. Quantitative research methodology is used throughout. The thesis contributes to the literature in several ways. While a lot of prior research on dynamic capabilities is conceptual in nature, or conducted through case studies, this thesis introduces empirical measures for assessing the different aspects, and uses large-scale sampling to investigate the relationships between them and performance indicators. The dynamic capability view is further developed by integrating theoretical frameworks and research traditions from several disciplines. The results of the study provide support for the basic tenets of the dynamic capability view. The empirical findings demonstrate that the firm's ability to renew its knowledge base and other intangible assets, its proactive, entrepreneurial behavior, and the structures and practices that support operational flexibility arepositively related to performance indicators.
Resumo:
Globalization and new information technologies mean that organizations have to face world-wide competition in rapidly transforming, unpredictable environments, and thus the ability to constantly generate novel and improved products, services and processes has become quintessential for organizational success. Performance in turbulent environments is, above all, influenced by the organization's capability for renewal. Renewal capability consists of the ability of the organization to replicate, adapt, develop and change its assets, capabilities and strategies. An organization with a high renewal capability can sustain its current success factors while at the same time building new strengths for the future. This capability does not only mean that the organization is able to respond to today's challenges and to keep up with the changes in its environment, but also that it can actas a forerunner by creating innovations, both at the tactical and strategic levels of operation and thereby change the rules of the market. However, even though it is widely agreed that the dynamic capability for continuous learning, development and renewal is a major source of competitive advantage, there is no widely shared view on how organizational renewal capability should be defined, and the field is characterized by a plethora of concepts and definitions. Furthermore,there is a lack of methods for systematically assessing organizational renewal capability. The dissertation aims to bridge these gaps in the existing research by constructing an integrative theoretical framework for organizational renewal capability and by presenting a method for modeling and measuring this capability. The viability of the measurement tool is demonstrated in several contexts, andthe framework is also applied to assess renewal in inter-organizational networks. In this dissertation, organizational renewal capability is examined by drawing on three complimentary theoretical perspectives: knowledge management, strategic management and intellectual capital. The knowledge management perspective considers knowledge as inherently social and activity-based, and focuses on the organizational processes associated with its application and development. Within this framework, organizational renewal capability is understood as the capacity for flexible knowledge integration and creation. The strategic management perspective, on the other hand, approaches knowledge in organizations from the standpoint of its implications for the creation of competitive advantage. In this approach, organizational renewal is framed as the dynamic capability of firms. The intellectual capital perspective is focused on exploring how intangible assets can be measured, reported and communicated. From this vantage point, renewal capability is comprehended as the dynamic dimension of intellectual capital, which consists of the capability to maintain, modify and create knowledge assets. Each of the perspectives significantly contributes to the understanding of organizationalrenewal capability, and the integrative approach presented in this dissertationcontributes to the individual perspectives as well as to the understanding of organizational renewal capability as a whole.
Resumo:
Tämän työn tarkoituksena oli tutkia kuinka organisaation kyvykkyyksiä voidaan mitata engineering- ja konsultointialalla käyttämällä ns. kyvykkyysauditointimenetelmää. Päämotiivit aineettoman omaisuuden mittaamiseksi tunnistettiin kirjallisuuskatsauksen pohjalta. Erilaisten menetelmien etuja ja haittoja tutkittiin, jotta kyvykkyysauditoinnin suorittamiseen liittyvät haasteet ja vaatimukset tulisivat tunnistetuiksi. Kyvykkyysauditoinnin rakentaminen vaati teollisuudenalan erityispiirteiden tunnistamista. Niiksi havaittiin tietointensiivisyys ja projektikeskeisyys. Auditoinnin implementaatioprosessi koostui neljästä osasta, joista kolmen ensimmäisen suorittamiseen case-yritys antoi merkittävän panoksensa. Kriittisten menestystekijöiden selvittämisen jälkeen voitiin niihin vaikuttavat organisaation kyvykkyydet tunnistaa ja arviointi suorittaa. Arvioinnit kerättiin sisäisiltä ja ulkoisilta arvioijilta, ja ne muodostivat pohjan analyysille, joka selvitti yrityksen kehittämistarpeita. Kyvykkyysauditoinnin hyödyiksi laskettiin kasvanut tietämys yrityksen vahvuuksista ja heikkouksista sekä mahdollisuus tarkkailla säännöllisesti sen kokonaissuorituskykyä ja parantaa sitä.
Resumo:
Sekä organisaatiokulttuuria, luottamusta että innovatiivisuutta on tutkittu paljon, mutta toistaiseksi nämä käsitteet yhdistävää kokonaisvaltaista tutkimusta ei juuri ole tehty tai ainakaan raportoitu tieteellisissä julkaisuissa. Tätä tutkimus käsitteli organisaatiokulttuurin, luottamuksen ja innovatiivisuuden suhteita erilaisissa organisaatiokulttuureissa. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli tutkia organisaatiokulttuurin vaikutusta luottamukseen (sekä kompetenssiin, hyväntahtoisuuteen että rehellisyyteen perustuvaan lateraaliin, vertikaaliin ja institutionaaliseen luottamukseen), innovaatioilmastoon ja innovaatiotoiminnan tuloksellisuuteen. Organisaatiokulttuurin, luottamuksen ja innovatiivisuuden yhteyttä tarkasteltiin neljässä erityyppisessä organisaatiokulttuurissa (klaani-, adhokratia-, hierarkia- ja markkinakulttuurit), jotka pohjautuvat kilpailevien arvojen malliin. Tutkimuksen empiirinen osa toteutettiin posti ja Internet -pohjaisena kyselytutkimuksena 40 organisaatioyksikössä tilastollisen analyysin menetelmin. Yleisellä tasolla työssä saatiin selville, että luottamuksen ja innovatiivisuuden tasot vaihtelevat erityyppisissä organisaatio-kulttuureissa. Tarkemmin sanottuna klaani- ja adhokratiakulttuureissa luottamus ja innovatiivisuus olivat korkeita, ja näillä kulttuureilla oli myös positiivinen vaikutus innovaatiotoiminnan tuloksellisuuteen. Erityisesti institutionaalisen luottamuksen ja innovaatiotuen merkitykset olivat tärkeitä, sillä ne toimivat mediaattoreina organisaatiokulttuurin ja innovatiivisuuden välisessä suhteessa. Luottamuksella ja innovatiivisuudelle ei sitä vastoin ollut vaikutusta hierarkia- ja markkinakulttuureissa, tai vaikutus oli negatiivinen. Tässä työssä osoitettiin myös aiemmin hyvin vähän tutkitun institutionaalisen organisatorisen luottamuksen merkitys organisaatioiden innovatiivisuudessa.
Resumo:
The objective of this master’s thesis was to examine how corporate values come true among the white-collar employees in the case organization. It was also studied if values were perceived similarly in the different departments. Impact of organizational position and education on value orientation was tested through hypotheses based on earlier values research. There are only few value scales available for measuring organizational values. The empirical study results indicate that personnel’s perception of organizational values can be measured statistically. When defining the scale it is utmost important to link the questions and claims close to the employees’ daily working environment. In this study, Work ethic appeared as the strongest organizational value reflecting respondents’ commitment to their duties. Related to corporate values, Performance was perceived as the strongest value and Emphasis on people the weakest. Value consensus between the departments varied. According to the previous research organizational position and educational level has an impact on value perceptions. In this study, employees in superior position or with higher education perceived organizational values to come true better than subordinates or employees with lower education. Empirical data (N=229) was collected by a web-based survey questionnaire among white-collar employees in the case organization in April 2008. Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS programme.
Resumo:
Market orientation is the organizational culture that creates the necessary behaviors for continuous additional value for customers and thus continuous superior performance for the business. The field of market orientation has been studied repeatedly during the past two decades. Yet research has concentrated on large firms in large domestic markets creating a need for diversifying research. The master’s thesis at hand examined the general incidence of market orientation among SMEs from five different industries as well as its consequences on SME performance. The empirical part of the thesis was conducted with a web-based survey that resulted in 255 responses. The data of the survey was analyzed by statistical analysis. The incidence of market orientation varied among dimensions and market orientation did not show any direct effect on firm performance. Customer orientation was the only dimension that showed a direct (positive) effect. On the contrary, moderating effects were found which indicate that the effect of market orientation in SMEs is influenced by other factors that should receive further attention. Also industry specific differences were discovered and should be further examined.
Resumo:
Trust in inter-organizational collaborative relationships has attracted substantial research interest among academics and practitioners. Previous studies have concentrated on the benefits of trust to business outcomes and economic performance, as it is considered to be a source of competitive advantage. Despite this increased level of interest, there is no consensus, much less overall agreement, about how it should be conceptualized or about the number of dimensions it incorporates. On the inter-organizational level there is an obvious challenge in defining both the trusting party and the objects of trust. Thus, the notion of trust as an under-theorized and poorly understood phenomenon still holds. Hence, the motivation of this study was fuelled by the need to increase our knowledge and understanding of the role and nature of trust in inter-organizational collaborative relationships. It is posited that there is a call for more understanding about its antecedents and consequences, as well as about the very concept in inter-organizational collaborative relationships. The study is divided into two parts. The first part gives a general overview, and the second part comprises four research publications. Both qualitative and quantitative research methodology is utilized. A multi-method research design was used because it provides different levels of data and different perspectives on the phenomenon. The results of this study reveal that trust incorporates three dimensions on both the individual and the organizational level: capability, goodwill, and self-reference. Trust develops from the reputation and behavior of the trusted party. It appears from this study that trust is clearly directed towards both individual boundary spanners and the counterpart company itself – i.e. not only to one or the other. The trusting party, on the other hand, is always an individual, and not the organization per se. Trust increases collaboration benefits and lowers collaboration drawbacks, thus having a positive effect on relationship performance. The major contribution of this study lies in uncovering the critical points and drawbacks in prior research and thereby in responding to the highlighted challenges. The way in which these challenges were addressed offers contributions to three major issues in the emerging theory of trust in the inter-organizational context: firstly, this study clarifies the trustor-trustee discussion; secondly, it conceptualizes trust as existing on both individual and organizational levels; and thirdly, it provides more information about the antecedents of trust and the ways in which it affects relationship performance.