The interrogation of witnesses abroad in execution of a european investigation order: an examination from eyes of the defence

European Master Human Rights and Democratisation

Insurance segmentation as unfair discrimination: what to expect next in the wake of Test-Achats

Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference organized by the Insurance Law Association of Serbia and German Foundation for International Legal Co-Operation (IRZ), entitled "Insurance law, governance and transparency: basics of the legal certainty" Palic Serbia, 17-19 April 2015.

‘Wooden Man’? : Masculinities in the Work of J. M. Coetzee (Boyhood, Youth and Summertime)

In seeking to advance the possibility of justice, gender and postcolonial studies have argued for the importance of the study of masculinities, through the acknowledgment that a richer understanding of such gendered formations may provide the basis for recognition of the Other and that, left uncriticised, such formations may be continuously delineated by the reproduction of systems of domination. The current study finds as its object the representations of masculinities in J. M. Coetzee’s Boyhood (1997), Youth (2002) and Summertime (2009). As works of transition in terms of Coetzee’s oeuvre - post-apartheid and post-Disgrace - the trilogy provides an account of the development of a man through several stages of life. While portraying the tensions of different geographical and cultural locations, such as apartheid South Africa and the London of the Sixties, the trilogy articulates the various norms that impact in the formation of gender, particularly of masculinities, through a complex system of power relations. The adherence to such norms is never linear, as the trilogy provides imaginative accounts of the contradictions that assist in the formulation of gender, depicting both the allure and the terror that constitute hegemonic masculinity. Located in the intersection of gender and postcolonial studies, the present study is based on the works by Raewyn Connell on masculinities. Animated by such a critical framework, the main research question of the present study is whether the trilogy advances a notion of masculinity that differs from the traditional rigid model, that is, whether there is resistance to hegemonic masculinity and what the spaces inhabited by the subaltern are. It is suggested that the trilogy presents the reader with instances of resistance to normative formulations of masculinity, by contrasting domination with the possibility of justice, and advancing an understanding of the often fatal consequences of gender norms to one’s sense of being in the world.

Corrupção Política em Portugal : O Jornalismo Judiciário como «Denunciante»

A relação entre a Justiça e os media gerou, desde sempre, um debate controverso nas sociedades. Há opiniões que advogam um afastamento total entre as duas áreas, em nome da imparcialidade e do rigor; outras vozes defendem a possibilidade de construção de pontes que favoreçam o dever de informar enquanto bem público, essencial à concretização de uma verdadeira democracia. A presente dissertação pretende averiguar o papel do jornalismo judiciário na «denúncia» de casos de corrupção política em Portugal. Pode o jornalismo assumir uma função de «denunciante»? Estarão os jornalistas preparados para essa tarefa? É necessária uma maior aposta ao nível da formação de jornalistas? A todas estas questões procurámos dar resposta nas páginas que se seguem. A contextualização histórica e a referência a alguns dos casos de corrupção mais mediáticos da última década em Portugal ocupam a primeira parte da dissertação; pareceu-nos relevante revisitar alguns processos conhecidos do grande público para melhor enquadrar a problemática abordada, uma vez que os temas da justiça marcaram presença na imprensa, desde sempre. O relato que a comunicação social faz sobre os casos de corrupção política é objeto de reflexão na segunda parte da tese, tendo em conta os valores-notícia. Selecionámos a cobertura mediática do processo Face Oculta pelo jornal Público e pelo Correio da Manhã como caso de estudo e direcionámos a nossa análise em três fases distintas: divulgação pública da investigação da Polícia Judiciária (outubro de 2009), início do julgamento no Tribunal de Aveiro (novembro de 2011) e leitura do acórdão (setembro de 2014). Para melhor nos documentarmos sobre o processo, entrevistámos agentes da Justiça e dos media, que nos apresentaram a sua perspetiva sobre questões como o segredo de justiça ou a possível criação de gabinetes de imprensa nos tribunais. Na terceira e última parte da dissertação, procurámos enquadrar um conjunto de recomendações quer ao campo da justiça, quer ao campo mediático, com vista a uma relação profícua entre ambos e à concretização de um trabalho pedagógico no combate e na prevenção da corrupção política. Ao longo desta investigação, verifica-se que houve já alguns avanços na comunicação da justiça, mas conclui-se também que há ainda muito caminho a percorrer.

Statistics as a basis for discrimination in the insurance business

The European Court of Justice has held that as from 21 December 2012 insurers may no longer charge men and women differently on the basis of scientific evidence that is statistically linked to their sex, effectively prohibiting the use of sex as a factor in the calculation of premiums and benefits for the purposes of insurance and related financial services throughout the European Union. This ruling marks a sharp turn away from the traditional view that insurers should be allowed to apply just about any risk assessment criterion, so long as it is sustained by the findings of actuarial science. The naïveté behind the assumption that insurers’ recourse to statistical data and probabilistic analysis, given their scientific nature, would suffice to keep them out of harm’s way was exposed. In this article I look at the flaws of this assumption and question whether this judicial decision, whilst constituting a most welcome landmark in the pursuit of equality between men and women, has nonetheless gone too far by saying too little on the million dollar question of what separates admissible criteria of differentiation from inadmissible forms of discrimination.

O direito de exoneração do acionista minoritário

This study specifically addresses the situation of minority shareholders after the transfer of control in an listed company. The various underlying interests and reasons that shareholders have for investing in a company can demonstrate shareholders’ reasoning for taking radically different positions on issues relating to the transfer of control of the referred company. This study analyses the current legal system in Portugal and in the European Union in order to assess whether, in the event of a takeover bid of a listed company where there is a transfer of control, minority shareholders have the same appraisal rights as other shareholders to sell their shares and leave the company. The study then examines the European Court of Justice decision on whether a general principle of equal treatment of minority shareholders exists upon a transfer of control (Audiolux) and the Portuguese Securities Market Commission decision regarding the delisting of Brisa - Autoestradas de Portugal, S.A. based on the principle of investor protection. The study concludes that although the principle of equality amongst shareholders has made progress in the European legal system e.g. it is laid down in Directive 2004/25/EC of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids and the Portuguese Securities Market Code, there is also a need for further improvement, which can be accomplished by allowing minority shareholders to exercise an appraisal right in similar unregulated situations.

A intervenção dos orgãos de polícia criminal em sede de julgamento

Currently, Portugal assumes itself as a democratic rule of substantive law State, sustained by a legal system seeking the right balance between the guarantee of fundamental rights and freedoms constitutional foreseen in Portugal’s Fundamental Law and criminal persecution. The architecture of the penal code lies with, roughly speaking, a accusatory basic structure, “deliberately attached to one of the most remarkable achievements of the civilizational democratic progress, and by obedience to the constitutional commandment”, in balance with the official investigation principle, valid both for the purpose of prosecution and trial. Regarding the principle of non self-incrimination - nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare, briefly defined as the defendant’s right of not being obliged to contribute to the self-incrimination, it should be stressed that there isn’t an explicit consecration in the Portuguese Constitution, being commonly accepted in an implicit constitutional prediction and deriving from other constitutional rights and principles, first and foremost, the meaning and scope of the concept of democratic rule of Law State, embedded in the Fundamental Law, and in the guidelines of the constitutional principles of human person dignity, freedom of action and the presumption of innocence. In any case, about the (in) applicability of the principle of the prohibition of self-incrimination to the Criminal Police Bodies in the trial hearing in Court, and sharing an idea of Guedes Valente, the truth is that the exercise of criminal action must tread a transparent path and non-compliant with methods to obtain evidence that violate the law, the public order or in violation of democratic principles and loyalty (Guedes Valente, 2013, p. 484). Within the framework of the penal process relating to the trial, which is assumed as the true phase of the process, the witness represents a relevant figure for the administration of criminal justice, for the testimonial proof is, in the idea of Othmar Jauernig, the worst proof of evidence, but also being the most frequent (Jauernig, 1998, p. 289). As coadjutant of the Public Prosecutor and, in specific cases, the investigating judge, the Criminal Police Bodies are invested with high responsibility, being "the arms and eyes of Judicial Authorities in pursuing the criminal investigation..." which has as ultimate goal the fulfillment of the Law pursuing the defense of society" (Guedes Valente, 2013, p. 485). It is in this context and as a witness that, throughout operational career, the Criminal Police Bodies are required to be at the trial hearing and clarify the Court with its view about the facts relating to occurrences of criminal context, thus contributing very significantly and, in some cases, decisively for the proper administration of the portuguese criminal justice. With regards to the intervention of Criminal Police Bodies in the trial hearing in Court, it’s important that they pay attention to a set of standards concerning the preparation of the testimony, the very provision of the testimony and, also, to its conclusion. Be emphasized that these guidelines may become crucial for the quality of the police testimony at the trial hearing, thus leading to an improvement of the enforcement of justice system. In this vein, while preparing the testimony, the Criminal Police Bodies must present itself in court with proper clothing, to read before and carefully the case files, to debate the facts being judged with other Criminal Police Bodies and prepare potential questions. Later, while giving his testimony during the trial, the Criminal Police Bodies must, summing up, to take the oath in a convincing manner, to feel comfortable, to start well by convincingly answering the first question, keep an attitude of serenity, to adopt an attitude of collaboration, to avoid the reading of documents, to demonstrate deference and seriousness before the judicial operators, to use simple and objective language, to adopt a fluent speech, to use nonverbal language correctly, to avoid spontaneity responding only to what is asked, to report only the truth, to avoid hesitations and contradictions, to be impartial and to maintain eye contact with the judge. Finally, at the conclusion of the testimony, the Criminal Police Bodies should rise in a smooth manner, avoiding to show relief, resentment or satisfaction, leaving a credible and professional image and, without much formality, requesting the judge permission to leave the courtroom. As final note, it’s important to stress that "The intervention of the Police Criminal Bodies in the trial hearing in Court” encloses itself on a theme of crucial importance not only for members of the Police and Security Forces, who must welcome this subject with the utmost seriousness and professionalism, but also for the proper administration of the criminal justice system in Portugal.

A necessária implicação das fontes na produção da verdade jornalística e na concreta realização da Justiça

Na fundamentada opinião de Javier del Moral1, a fonte de informação é “uma pessoa, um grupo de pessoas, organizadas ou não, que foram testemunhas ou conhecem os factos que o jornalista vai converter em notícia, de maneira direta (informação verbal) ou mediante a entrega de documentos”. O autor refere ainda que estes dois tipos de fontes se complementam. Desta forma, são um elemento central no processo de investigação, quer ao nível do jornalismo, quer ao nível dos órgãos de polícia criminal. Ambas as instâncias, para desenvolverem um trabalho aprofundado, necessitam de ter por base diversas informações, sendo estas fornecidas pelas fontes. Quanto mais credíveis forem as fontes, mais credíveis são as informações. A presente dissertação pretende averiguar qual o papel desenvolvido pelas fontes na investigação judiciária e na investigação jornalística. Tentaremos, ao longo deste estudo, perceber que diferenças existem entre aquelas que são as fontes da comunicação e aquelas que são as fontes da Justiça. Existirão semelhanças entre ambas? Podem os dois sistemas funcionar como fonte um do outro? É a estas perguntas que procurámos dar resposta. Queremos ainda identificar os cuidados necessários no relacionamento com as fontes de informação. E entender como é que estas podem contribuir para a produção da verdade jornalística e para a concreta realização da Justiça. Não deixaremos de parte um olhar abrangente sobre o relacionamento entre o sistema da Justiça e os Media. Uma relação que ao longo dos anos se tem revelado conflituosa, distante de uma comunicação possível, mas estritamente necessária ao funcionamento de uma sociedade democrática. Para que esta dissertação estivesse à luz daquilo que acontece atualmente nas redações e nos tribunais, entrevistámos agentes da Justiça e dos Media, que nos apresentam a sua visão sobre as fontes, sobre o segredo de justiça e sobre o jornalismo judiciário. Por fim e a título de ilustração, elaborámos um estudo de caso sobre a Tragédia do Meco, onde analisaremos dois dos principais jornais diários portugueses: o Correio da Manhã e o Público. O objetivo é verificar o tratamento jornalístico-­‐judiciário que foi feito durante a primeira semana do acontecimento.

Construção de uma responsabilidade europeia além-fronteiras

The suppression of internal border controls has led the European Union to establish a mechanism for determining the Member State responsible for examining each asylum application, with the main intention of deterring asylum seekers from lodging multiple applications and guaranteeing that it will be assessed by one of the States – the Dublin System. Even though it holds on a variety of criteria, the most commonly used is the country of first entrance in the EU. The growing migrating flows coming mainly from Northern Africa have thus resulted in an incommensurable burden over the border countries. Gradually, countries like Greece, Bulgaria and Italy have lost capability of providing adequate relief to all asylum seekers and the records of fundamental rights violations related to the provision of housing and basic needs or inhuman detention conditions started piling up. To prevent asylum seekers who had already displaced themselves to other Member States from being transferred back to countries where their human dignity is questionable, the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice have developed a solid jurisprudence determining that when there is a risk of serious breach of fundamental rights all transfers to that country must halt, especially when it is identified with systemic deficiencies in the asylum system and procedures. This reflexion will go through the jurisprudence that influenced very recent legislative amendments, in order to identify which elements form part of the obligation not to transfer under the Dublin System. At last, we will critically analyze the new rising obligation, that has clearly proven insufficient in light of the international fundamental rights framework that the Member States and the EU are bound to respect, proposing substantial amendments with a view to reach a future marked by high solidarity and global responsibility from the European Union.

O direito de exoneração do acionista minoritário

This study specifically addresses the situation of minority shareholders after the transfer of control in an listed company. The various underlying interests and reasons that shareholders have for investing in a company can demonstrate shareholders’ reasoning for taking radically different positions on issues relating to the transfer of control of the referred company. This study analyses the current legal system in Portugal and in the European Union in order to assess whether, in the event of a takeover bid of a listed company where there is a transfer of control, minority shareholders have the same appraisal rights as other shareholders to sell their shares and leave the company. The study then examines the European Court of Justice decision on whether a general principle of equal treatment of minority shareholders exists upon a transfer of control (Audiolux) and the Portuguese Securities Market Commission decision regarding the delisting of Brisa - Autoestradas de Portugal, S.A. based on the principle of investor protection. The study concludes that although the principle of equality amongst shareholders has made progress in the European legal system e.g. it is laid down in Directive 2004/25/EC of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids and the Portuguese Securities Market Code, there is also a need for further improvement, which can be accomplished by allowing minority shareholders to exercise an appraisal right in similar unregulated situations.

O governo da justiça : o Conselho Superior da Magistratura

O Conselho Superior da Magistratura (CSM), enquanto instituição de governo do poder judicial, desempenha um papel central na democracia portuguesa. Estudado maioritariamente sob a perspectiva jurídica, este Conselho, tal como todo o sistema de justiça, reclama hoje um olhar atento da ciência política. Nesta Dissertação principia-se com um estudo comparativo entra as diferentes soluções de governo da justiça europeias. Procurando isolar variáveis foram analisados os sistemas de Espanha, França, Alemanha e Inglaterra. Seguidamente, e tendo em conta o momento crítico da transição para a democracia, analisa-­se o lugar do CSM na constituição daí resultante, acompanhando a sua evolução até aos dias de hoje. Finalmente, procede-­se à caraterização prosopográfica da elite de juízas e juízes que ocuparam os lugares do CSM ao longo destes 40 anos. Os resultados obtidos no estudo comparado, vêm confirmar que estando garantida a liberdade individual de cada juíza ou juiz no ato de julgar, a forma de governo da justiça parece definitivamente configurar um campo em aberto. Mais do que um modelo ideal, estes órgãos são o resultado de autênticas complementaridades institucionais. A análise histórica demonstra que no poder judicial, a transição decorreu de forma pacífica e consensual, traduzindo-se num ganho progressivo de autonomia externa da magistratura ao longo destes 40 anos. O estudo da elite judicial pertencente ao CSM veio revelar uma uniformidade com poucas variações. Neste momento, os membros do conselho privilegiam o princípio da independência, verificando-­se uma certa desconfiança entre o poder político e o poder judicial.

A Justiça como instituição política

Neste estudo, procede-se á análise histórica e comparativa as diferentes teorias de justiça, com especial incidência nas modernas teorias igualitárias, quer das conceções liberais, quer das conceções comunitaristas. Para o efeito a Teoria da justiça de Rawls constitui um “marco” importante, tomando-se para reflexão as críticas e alternativas que posteriormente foram sendo apresentadas na teoria política tendo em conta variáveis como o multiculturalismo e problemas específicos. A conclusão inclinar-se-á para a tese de Amartya Sen e a ênfase dada à igualização das capabilidades, assente na razão deliberativa própria da democracia, bem como a necessidade de tratar problemas locais e específicos sob a perspetiva da justiça política que remete para a problemática do Estado-Providência como garante da distribuição de serviços sociais que permitem alcançar a equidade como objetivo.