Wybiórczość siedliskowa dzięcioła średniego Dendrocopos medius w zróżnicowanych ekosystemach leśnych

Wydział Biologii

Spór o wspólnotę w perspektywie badań nad miastem postindustrialnym

Wydział Nauk Społecznych: Instytut Kulturoznawstwa

Spór o kulturę muzyczną w Polsce – tw��rca modernistyczny w polemice z awangardą na przykładzie działalności i tw��rczości Tadeusza Szeligowskiego

Wydział Nauk Społecznych

Projekty rozwojowe w tubylczej społeczności Meksyku i ich społeczno-kulturowe konsekwencje

Wydział Historyczny

Problemy z pojęciem wiedzy w ramach epistemicznej koncepcji znaczenia Michaela Dummetta

According to epistemic theory of meaning the meaning is not understanding-transcendent – understanding is a kind of knowledge and the meaning is the content of this knowledge. The main problem of such a theory is to provide an adequate characteristic of the notion of knowledge. Dummett claims that understanding cannot be reduced neither to purely practical abilities, nor to explicit theoretical knowledge. In his opinion the most important part of the knowledge that constitutes understanding is a kind of implicit knowledge, something halfway between practical ability and theoretical knowledge. Unfortunately is not so simple to provide sufficiently clear characteristics of it. Moreover, because of implicitness of this knowledge, there is problem with manifestation of possession of such knowledge. Understanding should be related to the practice of making assertions. In the article I try to argue for soundness of thesis that important part of knowledge that constitutes understanding is a kind of procedural knowledge. This type of knowledge (called “knowledge-how���) cannot be reduced to propositional or conceptual knowledge (“knowledge-that”). Procedural knowledge has manifestation in activities doing in accordance with some set of the rules, but possession of this knowledge does not require explicit knowledge-that of the rules. Procedural knowledge is also located in the middle of the spectrum – between reflex actions and theoretical knowledge.

Wokół pierwszego pobytu Apostoła Paw��a w Efezie (Dz 18,18-22)

One of the crucial stages of the Apostle Paul’s ministry was his stay at Ephesus. However, considering the fact that the reliability of some data in the Acts of the Apostles on the time of Paul’s arrival to Ephesus is nowadays frequently put into question, it has become necessary to investigate the issue. In the present article the author assesses the relevant source material and takes a stand on the particular opinions of contemporary interpreters of the subject. Based on an analysis of the text of the Acts of the Apostles he is led to conclude that Luke’s account of Paul’s first short visit to Ephesus reveals traits of historicity.

Zintegrowane kształcenie przedmiotowo-językowe. Dydaktyka zadaniowa a rozw��j osobistej kompetencji komunikacyjnej w warunkach półautonomii

Wydział Neofilologii

Narracyjne i antynarracyjne modele egzystencji w naukach humanistycznych i praktyce literackiej

Wydział Nauk Społecznych