Modernity, postmodernity and identity of jazz in Chile : The cases of the generation of 1990 and Ángel Parra

This research is about jazz in Chile in relation to modernity and identity. Final chapters focus and detach latest jazz musician s generation in 1990 decade and composer guitarist Angel Parra. An historic and sociological approach is developed, which will be useful for modernity and identity analysis, and so on post modernity and globalization. Modernity has been studied in texts of Adorno, Baudrillard, Brünner, García Canclini, Habermas and Jameson. Identity has been studied in texts of Aharonián, Cordúa, Garretón, Gissi, Larraín and others. Chapter 3 is about Latin-American musicology and jazz investigations, in relation to approach developed in chapter 2. Chapters 4 and 5 are about history of jazz in Chile until beginning of XXI century. Chapter 6 focuses in Ángel Parra Orrego. Conclusions of this investigation detach the modernist mechanical that has conducted jazz development in Chile, which in Ángel Parra´s case has been overcame by a post modernist behaviour. This behaviour has solved in a creative way, subjects like modernity and identity in jazz practice in a Latin-American country.

Kilpailukykyvaltion koululainsäädännön rakentuminen : Suomen eduskunta ja 1990-luvun koulutuspoliittinen käänne

Finnish education policy, educational legislation and the entire education system changed significantly during the 1990s as part of a general restructuring of public administration. There has been a clear divergence from the former tradition of a system of regulation, founded on detailed legislation and the principle of equality. The new governance, which is based more on individual choice, efficiency and evaluation, emphasizes that the development of a high standard of education is a necessity in the light of global competition. This study explores the legislative process regarding education policy in the Finnish Parliament during the 1990s, and highlights in particular how the international discourse on education policies was restructured in the context of Finnish legislation. The research material consists of all the public parliamentary documents relating to education, including government proposals, minutes from the discussions in the chamber and archive material (final protocols, reports and statements) for the Committee for Education and Culture. The discourse on the process of drafting and passing education legislation is modelled on three interrelated policy technologies (market, management and performance), which are understood here as mechanisms connecting general political ideas to normative legislation. The changes in the regulation of education were part of a general public administration reform instigated during the mid 1980s. The research results will prove that during the left-right coalition cabinet of PM Harri Holkeri, new policy technologies affected the parliamentary discourse on education policy. This was particularly influenced by a change in the preconditions for the management of education that was created as a result of the numerous demands to deregulate and delegate decision-making authority to the local and school levels while rendering the whole education system more effective. At the turn of the decade, market-type mechanisms were more indirectly manifested in the forms of individuality and freedom of choice, which were reflected, for example, in proposals to “lower the hurdles” by separating general from vocational secondary education with a view to encouraging students to select courses from other educational establishments, in addition to relaxing the requirements for establishing private schools and abolishing a hundred-year-old strict national catchment-area system. Later, in the course of the 1990s, after the subjects, players, and methods of evaluation had been more precisely defined, evaluation based on performance would result in the active measurement of the attainment of set objectives. In the spring of 1991, from the outset of PM Esko Aho's right-centre coalition cabinet, the education budget suffered cutbacks as a result of a global recession and this influenced the legislative work of, and discourses in, parliament. Representatives of the parties in power regarded the recession solely as an external factor that was remote from the political arena. In their view, the education system should rise to the challenge by ensuring the efficient and innovative use of the resources available and by developing new forms of indicators for evaluating results. Representatives of the opposition opposed the cabinet’s standpoint as a result of the recession, criticized the measures taken by pointing out the harmful effect of constantly cutting the budget and argued that the government had made political capital out of the recession by using it as an opportunity to give more room to market, management and performance technologies within the Finnish education system. Criticism of the new education policy became even stronger during PM Paavo Lipponen's first “rainbow” coalition cabinet with critical views being expressed not only from the opposition but also from representatives within the government. Representatives from the left demanded legislative restrictions and the instigation of measures to relieve the presumed negative effects of market, management and performance in the name of educational equality. The new management by results steering method within the university sector and the introduction of commercial education services in compulsory education were fiercely criticized. The argument over “setting outer limits” including, for example, the demands for more detailed legislation and earmarked state subsidies was characteristic of Parliament’s legislative discourse in the latter part of the 1990s. Keywords: education policy, education legislation, Parliament of Finland

Kouluromaanien opettajakuva 1930-luvulta 1990-luvulle : ihanteellisia, kapinallisia ja oman tien kulkijoita

The aim of this research is to define what kind of characters and images of teachers appear in Finnish school novels describing social changes and educational political reform from the 1930s to the 1990s written by teachers, particularly grammar school teachers. As comparison material, I use school novels written by Swedish school teachers, in which the changes in Swedish society and educational system and their expressions in the characters of teachers of the school novels are studied. The main focus of my study is centred particularly on school novels in which the images of grammar school teachers are described during times of school reform. From these starting points, the main objectives of the study are novels written by Finnish school teachers Anneli Toijala and Sampo Haahtela and Swedish school teacher Hugo Swensson, who was inspired by Haahtela. The research is qualitative multidisciplinary case analysis. The research method is content analysis, and the approach is hermeneutic. The research is divided into eight main chapters. After the introduction I introduce the essential concepts of my research. In the third main chapter I define the research function. In that context, besides the research objectives, I introduce former research on character description in literature, I define the methodological solutions with grounds and present the research material. Both literary research methods and sociological terminology are applied in the research alongside with pedagogical research. The research results show that images of teachers are diverse. At one end of the spectrum these represent immature pictures of teachers withdrawn into the routines of everyday life; at the other, they advance and reflect the reformist teacher. This becomes clearly evident when comparing the teacher "monsters" of the classic authors to the educational optimists at the end of the 20th century. The results show that the images of teachers in school novels are almost without exception coherent, psychologically credible and consistent, and hardly any different from the images of teachers in the Swedish school novels used as comparison material. On the contrary, plenty of similarities are found. The comprehensive school reform, educational political discourse and teachers' feelings are realistically clarified in the school novels that describe the period. Keywords: literature image, school reform, school novel, teacher image, reflection, internal co-operation in school

Käsityöläisyyden kuva kultasepän ammatissa : Käsityöläisyys Suomen Kultaseppien Liiton lehdessä 1990-luvun lopussa

The aim of this study is to survey the meaning of craftmanship in goldsmith occupation. The image of craftmanship is built theoretically as well as researcher's own practical experience. The study describes a dialogue between self-employed goldsmith s everyday work and trade union's opinion. Suomen Kultaseppien Liitto (The Goldsmith Assosiation of Finland) was chosen forthe trade union, because it is the biggest, the oldest and the most influential on the occupational area. The research data are volumes 1995 - 1998 of occupational membership journal of Suomen Kultaseppien Liitto. The data analyzed with Adapted Content Analysis and Grounded Theory. The professional occupation of goldsmiths, the role of craftmanship and the future of the occupation are discussed. Additionally, the relationship between the Suomen Kultaseppien Liitto and occupational culture and profession of goldsmiths was studied. Craft and craftmanship is most often discussed in articles related to tradition and education.Craftmanship is understood very idealistically, with little meaning in practical life. St. Eligius and the skill and art of goldsmiths in St Petersburg are raised to symbols of craftmanship. The occupational image is broken and a clear conflict between education and occupation is visible. Education produces artist-craftsmen, while handicraft workers are required in industry, and retailers or specially trained store assistant in business. Computer-aided design and manufacture render handicraft workmanship unnecessary. In a pessimistic view, the future possibilities of the goldsmith occupational profession are dim, because the artist-craftsmen are bound to lose to fast-paced machines. On the other hand, people involved in goldsmith education see the future light, designer-goldsmiths developing the occupational to new dimensions. Suomen Kultaseppien Liitto represents goldsmiths in public. The union, however is governed by non-artisan goldsmiths. The union stresses business attitudes and enterpreneurship, and has succeeded in protecting the privileges of retailers and industry. Goldsmiths profession is seen in the research data as a combination of precious-metal industry, jewellery and watch stores, anda goldsmith shop is considered a specialized giftstore. The goldsmiths occupation is not a profession, and the Suomen Kultaseppien Liitto is not a trade union for artist and craftmen. Accordingly, part of the representative authority of the union could be transferred from the Association to Taidekäsityöläiset Taiko ry, a member of organization of Ornamo. Results of this study show the importance of defining the images of the goldsmith occupational profession and the trade union. The results could be applied to goldsmith education to examine what would be the optimal education and training for present employment opportunities. The important background theories has been the theories of Habermas and Lévi-Strauss.

Palvelumenojen muutokset lapsiperheissä 1990-luvulla

Tämän tutkielman tarkoituksena on ollut tarkastella lapsiperheiden palveluihin käytettyjen kulutusmenojen muutoksia 1990-luvulla. Tavoitteena on ollut selvittää poikkesiko yhden ja kahden huoltajan talouksien palvelumenojen muutokset toisistaan. Aineistona on käytetty Tilastokeskuksen kulutustutkimuksista tehtyä aikasarjaa 1990-1998. Vertailut kotitaloustyyppien välillä on tehty aina kulutusyksikköä kohden. Palvelumenoja on selvitetty ensin kokonaisuudessaan ja sen jälkeen palveluryhmittäin. Osa palveluryhmistä on jaettu vielä edelleen kahteen osaan. Tutkimus osoitti, että lapsiperheiden palvelumenoissa tapahtui muutoksia. Palvelumenot laskivat yhden ja kahden huoltajan talouksissa vuodesta 1990 vuoteen 1994/96, jonka jälkeen palvelumenot kääntyivät kahden huoltajan talouksissa kasvuun. Yhden huoltajan talouksissa palvelumenot laskivat edelleen vuotta 1998 kohden. Palveluryhmittäisessä tarkastelussa voitiin havaita, että muutokset palvelumenoissa olivat tavallisesti lapsiperheissä saman suuntaisia. Yhden huoltajan talouksissa muutokset olivat tavallisesti jyrkempiä. Palvelumenoissa 1990-luvun alussa olleet tasoerot yhden ja kahden huoltajan talouksien välillä myös säilyivät lähes samana vuosikymmenen loppuun saakka. Kotitalouden tuotantoteoriasta johdettiin tutkimusta varten taustateoreettinen viitekehys, jossa kuvataan kotitalouksien vaihtoehtoisia tapoja tuottaa perushyödykkeitä. Johtopäätöksinä havaittiin teorian soveltuvan palvelumenojen muutosten kuvaamiseen. Kotitalouksien toiminnan kannalta vaihtoehtoisia tapoja tuottaa perushyödykkeitä on oltava, jotta tarpeet saataisiin tyydytetyksi erilaisissa taloudellisissa olosuhteissa. Tutkielman tulokset ovat yleisesti ottaen yhteneviä aikaisempien lapsiperheitä koskevien tutkimusten tulosten kanssa. Avainsanat: lapsiperhe, palvelumeno, muutos, 1990-luku

Pimeä hehku : Satanismi ja saatananpalvonta 1990-luvun suomalaisessa nuorisokulttuurissa

Satanism in the Finnish Youth Culture of the 1990s The aim of this study was to investigate Satanism among Finnish youth in the 1990s. Thematic interviews of young Finnish Satanists are the basic material of this study. The research employs a theoretical framework derived from narrative psychology and the role-theoretical thinking of Dan P. McAdams. The young Satanists in Finland have been divided into two different groups: the criminal and drug using "devil-worshipping gangs"; and the more educated and philosophically oriented "Satanists" (Heino 1993). What can we say about this division? In the 1990s around Finland, there were young people calling themselves as devil- worshippers (either singular or in groups). They were strongly committed to a mythical devilish and cosmic battle, which they believed was going on in this world. They had problems with their mental health, also in their family socialization and peer groups. In their personal attitudes they were either active fighters or passive tramps. There were also rationally oriented young Satanists, that were ritually active and mainly atheistic. They strongly expressed their personal experiences of being individual and of being different than others. In their personal attitudes they were critical fighters and active survivors. They saw their lives through the satanistic 'finding-oneself experience'. They understood themselves as a "postmodern tribe" (Michel Maffesoli's sosiocultural concept): their sense of themselves was that of a dynamic collectivity which is social, dynamic, nonlocal and mythically historical. Death and black metal culture in the 1990s formed a common space for youth culture, where young individuals could work out their feelings and express their attitudes to life using dark satanic themes and symbols. The sense of "otherness" (also other than satanic) and collective demands for authenticity were essential tools that were used for identity work here. Personal disengagement from satanic/satanistic groups were observed to be gradual or quite rapid. Religious conversions back-and-forth also accured. At the end of the 1990s all off satanism in Finland bore a negative devil-worshipping stigma. Ritual homicide in South-Finland (Kerava/Hyvinkää) was connected to Satanism, which then became unpopular both in the personal life stories and alternative youth cultural circles at the beginning of the 2000s.

Yksilöllisyys ja yhteisöllisyys K. E. Nipkowin uskonnonpedagogisen teorian kehityksessä 1960-1990

Individuality and the Community in the Development of K. E. Nipkow's Theory of Religious Education from 1960 to 1990 The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the development occurred between 1960 and 1990 of the theory of religious education as proposed by K. E. Nipkow, the German Religious Education specialist, from the point of view of individuality and the community. Nipkow's methodological approach of dialectic convergence theory resulted in a dialogue between theological and educational factors, which supported the thirty-year development of Nipkow's models, theoretical foundations, and theory of religious education. Nipkow's doctoral dissertation, published in 1960, deals with individuality in the thinking of Pestalozzi, Humboldt and Schleiermacher. Nipkow regarded individuality as one of the basic concepts of education, which were to be interpreted anew as social and historical situations changed. In the late 1960s Nipkow developed the so-called experiential hermeneutically oriented context model for the needs of religious education. In this model, individuality is expressed in the attention paid to pupils' life situations and the educational reality. The multi-dimensional theoretical framework of religious education in 1975 emphasized supporting identity as a fundamental task of religious education. The concept of individuality was thus given a new form, in accordance with contemporary theories of developmental psychology. Other fundamental tasks, such as the socio-ethical task, the task of critical religious thinking, and that of ecumenical learning, meant a more specific emphasis on the community. It was an outline of a liberating education, which faced the individualistic-existential and social-ecclesiastical challenges of the time with a critical attitude. The further development of the theoretical outline in 1982 continued to uphold the perspectives of both individuality and the community, as Nipkow combined a historical-social dimension with theories of developmental psychology, especially that of life-span research. According to him, the development of the individual and communal life-reality belonged together. The fundamental task of religious education came to be learning to live and believe together. Nipkow transferred the idea of dialogue into inter-generational learning and developed elementarization as a methodology of Religious Education, which takes into account the point of departure of each age group. His theory of educational responsibility in the church (1990) contained the tasks of walking alongside the individual and the renewal of church communities as prerequisites of communicating the Christian faith in an era characterized by multifaceted Christianity. The "geisteswissenschaftliche" school and its concepts (Ger. Individualität; Bildung) were found to be the explanatory factor of the concepts of individuality and the community in the development of Nipkow's theory of religious education. The concept of education employed by Nipkow (Ger. Bildung) implies, on one hand, the individuality, autonomy, freedom and personal responsibility of people of different ages, and on the other hand, the dialogical nature of education in the community facilitated by this concept. Theologically, Nipkow associates himself in his views on individuality and the community with Schleiermacher's understanding of faith, of which openness towards the world was characteristic. The significance of individuality and the community in Nipkow's thinking was, furthermore, deepened by his participation, as a member of working parties, in the educational discussions of the World Council of Churches.

Kannustaminen ja moraali : Kannustamisen idea suomalaisessa yhteiskuntapolitiikassa 1990-luvulta alkaen

Even though the concept of incentive has become very popular in Finnish welfare politics since the economic crisis of the 1990s, the content of this concept is not clear. Fundamentally, it is a matter of controlling the behaviour of individuals to accord with the authorities' objectives and interests in gaining cooperative benefits. As early as in Plato's Republic, citizens were encouraged to use their abilities and skills in a way most beneficial to the society. Similarly, in today's welfare society citizens are urged to produce common goods and distribute welfare to enable a better life for all through cooperation. The fundamental question is to what extent society can shape individuals' preferences with incentives, and encourage them without external coercion to choose actions beneficial for both the society and the individuals themselves. The objective of the incentive institution is to gain cooperative benefits, but there are different views on how it should be implemented. For example, the incentive system in the Finnish welfare society includes several economic and social conceptions which adjust the distribution of welfare. From an economic perspective, the objective of the incentive system is economic efficiency, while from a social perspective it is the securing of social rights and citizens' equality. The market mechanism, for example, can at best lead to economically efficient activity, but it might sacrifice fairness and equality. In this research, the idea of activation policy expands to cover normative and social incentives, in addition to the economic factors affecting human choice and social actions. Desirable co-living and meaningful cooperation have some prerequisites. We need the expanded idea of activation to study them, and to maintain them in society. The themes discussed in all the ten chapters aim at evaluating the preconditions of a just society. This study provides tools to examine the changes in the welfare state, also from the viewpoint of normative ethics. This offers a morally and conceptually wider perspective than a normative viewpoint of economics alone. In terms of the values of our welfare society, it makes a difference how the relationship between the legalities of economics and citizens' well-being is understood. The research asks whether economic benefits to the society should be allowed to supersede the principles of human dignity Key words:incentives, activation policy, morality, social philosophy, social justice, policy paradigm

“En ole tyhjäpää turha julkku” – Julkkisehdokasdiskurssin hegemonisoituminen 1990-luvun eduskuntavaaleissa

Pro gradu-tutkimukseni käsittelee niin sanottuja julkkisehdokkaita ja heidän representaatiotaan mediassa 1990-luvun eduskuntavaalien aikaan. Nyky-yhteiskunnassa julkkisehdokkaat näyttäytyvät itsestään selvänä ilmiönä, jonka alkuperälle ei juuri uhrata ajatuksia. Ilmiön taustalla on poliittisen kulttuurin muuttuminen yhä viihteellisemmäksi ja henkilökeskeisemmäksi. Poliitikot käyttäytyvät kuin julkisuuden henkilöt ja samalla julkisuuden henkilöt ovat pyrkineet poliitikoiksi. Lisäksi suomalaisessa vaalijärjestelmässä ei käytetä niin sanottuja listavaaleja, vaan äänestetään yksittäisiä ehdokkaita. Niinpä vaaleissa päähuomio kiinnittyy ehdokkaiden henkilökohtaisiin ominaisuuksiin ja yksilöiden välisiin kamppailuihin. Näissä olosuhteissa julkkisehdokkaat ovat potentiaalinen keino saavuttaa lisää näkyvyyttä ja herättää myös politiikasta vähän kiinnostuneiden äänestäjien mielenkiinto. Tutkimukseni ajallinen viitekehys on 1990-luku, sillä halusin selvittää mitkä ovat julkkisehdokasilmiön juuret ja miten ilmiö on kehittynyt. Oman tutkimukseni valossa vuoden 1991 eduskuntavaalit olivat julkkisehdokkaiden läpimurto. Keskeinen hypoteesini on, että media ei anna julkkisehdokkailla tasavertaisia mahdollisuuksia muiden ehdokkaiden kanssa esiintyä vakavasti otettavina ja ”oikeina” poliittisina ehdokkaina. Media puhuu julkkisehdokkaista alentuvasti ja asenteellisesti sekä heidän poliittisia kykyjään epäillen. Tämän asenteellisuuden tutkimiseksi tarkastelin kuutta valtakunnallista sanomalehteä (Helsingin Sanomat, Iltalehti, Ilta-Sanomat, Demari, Nykypäivä ja Suomenmaa) kolmien eduskuntavaalien ajalta. Tarkoituksena oli saada selville onko olemassa jonkinlainen hegemoninen julkkisehdokasdiskurssi, jonka seurauksena kaikista julkkisehdokkaista puhutaan samalla tavalla alentuvasti. Ilmiön taustoitukseksi selvitin julkisuuden teoriaa, politiikan ja viihdeteollisuuden suhdetta, parasosiaalisia suhteita sekä julkkisehdokkaiden historiaa. Hegemonisen diskurssin piirteitä tutkin puolestaan kriittisen diskurssianalyysin keinoin. Aluksi tarkastelin millaisia representaatioita, identiteettejä ja suhteita diskurssissa luodaan. Tämän jälkeen tutkin diskurssin ideologisuutta ja hegemonisuutta. Julkkisehdokasdiskurssi näyttäytyi 1990-luvun sanomalehdissä vaihtoehdottomana ja sen sosiaalinen alkuperä pimittyi vuosikymmenen kuluessa. Näin ollen diskurssi hegemonisoitui ja 2000-luvulle tultaessa siitä on muodostunut hyvin itsestään selvä puhetapa, jota ei kyseenalaisteta. Julkkisehdokkaita paheksutaan yleisesti, vaikka puolueet saavat julkkisehdokkaiden kautta näkyvyyttä, media myy heidän avullaan tuotteitaan ja äänestäjät saavat eduskuntaan tuoreita ja ”ryvettymättömiä” kansanedustajia. Pro gradu -tutkimukseni tekee hegemonisen julkkisehdokasdiskurssin näkyväksi, mutta vain media kykenee haastamaan vallitsevan

Phytoplankton succession from 1968 to 1990 in the subarctic Lokka reservoir

Tiivistelmä: Kasviplanktonin kehitys vuosina 1968-1990 subarktisessa Lokan tekoaltaassa

Eräiden kansalaisjärjestöjen verkkosivut ja osallistamisen muutos 1990-luvulta 2010-luvulle

Tutkimus analysoi kansalaisten ja kansalaisjärjestöjen välistä vuorovaikutusta verkkomedian mahdollisuuksien kautta. Taustalla on ensinnäkin politiikan teorian kautta muodostettu käsitys kansalaisjärjestöjen positiivisista vaikutuksista niin demokratiaan kuin kansalaisten omiin taitoihin. Toiseksi aiemman aihetta käsittelevän empiirisen tutkimuksen, erityisesti Steinin (2009) ja Brudinin (2008) analyysien perusteella kansalaisjärjestöjen verkkosivut on luotu ennen kaikkea yksisuuntaiseen tiedotukseen, eivätkä ne sisällä kaksisuuntaisen vuorovaikutuksen elementtejä. Viimeisenä perusteena tutkimuksen mielekkyydelle toimii esimerkiksi Winnerin (1985) huomio, että teknologialla ja sen käyttöönotolla on aina poliittinen ulottuvuus, minkä voidaan ajatella pätevän myös kansalaisjärjestöjen tilanteessa. Tässä tutkimuksessa olennainen lisä aiempaan tutkimukseen verrattuna on historiallinen tarkastelutapa. Tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan kymmenen kansalaisjärjestön verkkosivujen ja muun verkkopresenssin kehittymistä vuodesta 1996 vuoteen 2011. Tätä kautta on mahdollista tutkia tarkemmin kahta tutkimuskysymystä: 1. Kansalaisjärjestöjen organisaatiollinen kehityksen, erityisesti institutionalisoitumisen ja professionalisoistumisen vaikutukset, vähentävät kansalaisjärjestöjen osallistuvuutta (Kriesi 1996, Tarrow 1998, Blumer 1951). Havaitaanko näitä muutoksia myös verkkopresenssin kautta? 2. Verkkomedia on kokenut voimakkaita muutoksia, erityisesti 2000-luvun alusta lähtien. Eräs näiden muutoksien keskeinen elementti on ollut kaksisuuntaisten viestintämahdollisuuksien kehittyminen ja parantuminen (Majava 2006, Erkkola 2008). Miten kansalaisjärjestöjen verkkoviestinnässä on otettu näitä uusia verkkomedian mahdollisuuksia käyttöön? Kysymyksiä lähestytään laadullisen analyysin kautta tutkimalla verkkosivujen osallistamista, eli sitä onko kaksisuuntainen vuorovaikutus mahdollista vai ei. Osallistumisen mahdollisuuksien kuvaukseen käytetään Chadwickin ja Mayn (2003) viitekehystä, jonka mukaan verkko-osallistuminen voi olla tiedottavaa, konsultoivaa tai keskustelevaa. Tiedottavalle verkko-osallistumiselle ominaispiirteistä on sen yksisuuntainen luonne, kun taas konsultoiva ja keskusteleva osallistuminen ovat kaksisuuntaista viestintää. Konsultoivaan osallistumiseen verrattuna keskustelevalle osallistumiselle ominaista on jaetumpi tietokäsitys ja kansalaisten mukaanotto agendan muotoilussa. Keskeisenä tuloksena voidaan esittää, ettei ensimmäiseen tutkimuskysymykseen tämän kymmenen tapauksen tapaustutkimuksella voida antaa luotettavaa vastausta. Ensinnäkin, eri ikäisten kansalaisjärjestöjen verkkosivujen osallistumisen mahdollisuuksien välillä ei ole selkeitä eroja. Toiseksi, nuorempien kansalaisjärjestöjen kohdalla osallistumisen mahdollisuuksissa ei havaittu merkittävää muutosta tarkastellulla aikavälillä. Toiseen tutkimuskysymykseen taas voidaan vastata, että osallistumisen mahdollisuudet ovat kasvaneet verkkomedian muutosten ansiosta. Käytännössä siirtymä osallistumista paremmin mahdollistaviin mekaniikkoihin, kuten kommentoinnin mahdollistamiseen, tapahtui 2000-luvun lopussa. Siirtymä on kuitenkin kohdistunut suurimmilta osin vain konsultoiviin mekaniikkoihin, eli näennäisestä vuorovaikutteisuudesta huolimatta aloitteen tekemisen monopoli on säilynyt kansalaisjärjestöillä itsellään. Lisäksi on syytä huomioida, etteivät osallistumisen mahdollisuudet sellaisenaan johda vielä aitoon osallistumiseen, eli kansalaisjärjestöjen ja kansalaisten väliseen vuorovaikutukseen.