The evaluation of 1975 Torino type 2 restraint systems with web locking and force limiting features. Test report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

The development of an independent locking securement system for mobility aids on public transportation vehicles. Final report.

Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C.

Door locking systems study. Phase 1. Final report.

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Locking forms for the job press, containing useful information regarding the imposition of job forms; wooden and metal furniture, quoins, bearers, foundry guards, etc.,

Mode of access: Internet.

Imposing tables and lock-up appliances, describing the tools and materials used in locking up forms for the press, including some modern utilities for special purposes,

Mode of access: Internet.

Improvements of methods for determining pre-crash parameters from skid marks. Final report.

Mode of access: Internet.

The effect of light truck design variables on top speed, performance, and fuel economy, 1981. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Effect of rate of change of slip on the peak braking coefficient of passenger car tires. Technical report.

Mode of access: Internet.

Development of a low cost anti-lock brake system for small motorcycles. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Relationship of locked wheel friction to that of other test modes. Final report.

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Materials, Testing and Research, Harrisburg

Truck tire cornering and braking traction study. Final report.

Mode of access: Internet.

Reviewing the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) /

"As currently interpreted, it is difficult to see why the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) warrants much support as a nonproliferation convention. Most foreign ministries, including that of Iran and the United States, insist that Article IV of the NPT recognizes all states' "inalienable right" of all states to develop "peaceful nuclear energy". This includes money-losing activities, such as nuclear fuel reprocessing, which can bring countries to the very brink of acquiring nuclear weapons. If the NPT is intended to ensure that states share peaceful "benefits" of nuclear energy and to prevent the spread of nuclear bomb making technologies, it is difficult to see how it can accomplish either if the interpretation identified above is correct."--P. 3