EORTC-ROG expert opinion: radiotherapy volume and treatment guidelines for neoadjuvant radiation of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction and the stomach.

PURPOSE: The Gastro-Intestinal Working Party of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group (GIWP-ROG) developed guidelines for target volume definition in neoadjuvant radiation of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and the stomach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Guidelines about the definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) are based on a systematic literature review of the location and frequency of local recurrences and lymph node involvement in adenocarcinomas of the GEJ and the stomach. Therefore, MEDLINE was searched up to August 2008. Guidelines concerning prescription, planning and treatment delivery are based on a consensus between the members of the GIWP-ROG. RESULTS: In order to support a curative resection of GEJ and gastric cancer, an individualized preoperative treatment volume based on tumour location has to include the primary tumour and the draining regional lymph nodes area. Therefore we recommend to use the 2nd English Edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association which developed the concept of assigning tumours of the GEJ and the stomach to anatomically defined sub-sites corresponding respectively to a distinct lymphatic spread pattern. CONCLUSION: The GIWP-ROG defined guidelines for preoperative irradiation of adenocarcinomas of the GEJ and the stomach to reduce variability in the framework of future clinical trials.

Cardiac and pericardial fistulae associated with esophageal or gastric neoplasms: a literature review

Pericardial and cardiac fistulae secondary to esophageal or gastric tumors are considered exceptional. They have never been the object of a literature review. We reviewed the medical literature between 1881 and 2001, searching for all published cases of pericardial or cardiac fistulae developed from esophageal and gastric tumors or favored by the applied therapy to these tumors. The cases of metastasization, tumor spread, and neoplasic pericardial effusion without fistula were excluded. Fifty patients were identified, with one original case. More than half the cases (56%) occurred in the last 25 years. Substernal pain is the main symptom. The majority of patients present at least one condition favoring fistula formation. The auscultation of a water-wheel murmur may suggest a pneumopericardium and therefore a pericardial fistula, as does a purulent pericarditis. Arrhythmias, signs of ischemia, and hematemesis point toward a ventricular fistula. Neurological and hemostasis disorders may be suspect of an atrial lesion. Diagnosis should be made by the association of a scanner and a transit. Prognosis is bad: 76% of the patients die in the first month. Pericardial or cardiac fistulae are part of the differential diagnosis of thoracic pain in patients with esophageal or gastric tumors and in patients who were treated for these pathologies. The diagnosis must be as quick as possible. An operation (patients with a good prognosis) or the placement of a stent (patients with a bad prognosis) is the only chance of survival

The stomach cancer pooling (StoP) project: study design and presentation.

Gastric cancer affects about one million people per year worldwide, being the second leading cause of cancer mortality. The study of its etiology remains therefore a global issue as it may allow the identification of major targets, besides eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, for primary prevention. It has however received little attention, given its comparatively low incidence in most high-income countries. We introduce a consortium of epidemiological investigations named the 'Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project'. Twenty-two studies agreed to participate, for a total of over 9000 cases and 23 000 controls. Twenty studies have already shared the original data set. Of the patients, 40% are from Asia, 43% from Europe, and 17% from North America; 34% are women and 66% men; the median age is 61 years; 56% are from population-based case-control studies, 41% from hospital-based ones, and 3% from nested case-control studies derived from cohort investigations. Biological samples are available from 12 studies. The aim of the StoP Project is to analyze the role of lifestyle and genetic determinants in the etiology of gastric cancer through pooled analyses of individual-level data. The uniquely large data set will allow us to define and quantify the main effects of each risk factor of interest, including a number of infrequent habits, and to adequately address associations in subgroups of the population, as well as interaction within and between environmental and genetic factors. Further, we will carry out separate analyses according to different histotypes and subsites of gastric cancer, to identify potential different risk patterns and etiological characteristics.

Immunohistochemical expression of HER-2/NEU-CERBB-2 in patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of Her-2/Neu-cerbb-2 in the gastric mucosa of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma in a brazilian patient group. METHODS: The immunohistochemical expression of Her-2/Neu was studied in 37 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. RESULTS: The immunohistochemical reaction produced by the anti-HER-2/Neu antibody was positive in two cases (5.4%). CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of Her-2/Neu observed in these southern brazilian cases is probably due to the great number of poorly differentiated cancers in this serie.

S9511: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II study of trimetrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the response rate for trimetrexate in conjunction with 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) (= TFL) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in a phase II, cooperative group setting. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach received trimetrexate 110 mg/m IV over 60 minutes day 1, followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m IV bolus and LV 200 mg/m IV over 60 minutes day 2, followed by oral LV 15 mg every 6 hours x 7 doses, all weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest, continued until progression. RESULTS: Characteristics for 37 eligible patients: median age 63 (range: 23-83); male/female: 69% of 31%; performance status 0/1/2 15/20/1. The confirmed response rate was 19%, and median overall survival was 6 months. Two patients died as a result of therapy, 1 because of infection without significant neutropenia, and 1 due to perforation of a responding gastric lesion. Seventy-two percent experienced grades 3 and 4 toxicity, most commonly diarrhea, fatigue, and lymphopenia. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen achieves response rates comparable to other 5-FU-based regimens, when used in treatment of incurable gastric cancer. Toxicity appears manageable.

Differential expression of the eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3/GSPT1) according to gastric cancer histological types

Background: There are now several lines of evidence to suggest that protein synthesis and translation factors are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and cancer development. Aims: To investigate gene expression patterns of eukaryotic releasing factor 3 (eRF3) in gastric cancer. Methods: RNA was prepared from 25 gastric tumour biopsies and adjacent non-neoplastic mucosa. Real time TaqMan reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to measure the relative gene expression levels. DNA was isolated from tumour and normal tissues and gene dosage was determined by a quantitative real time PCR using SYBR Green dye. Results: Different histological types of gastric tumours were analysed and nine of the 25 tumours revealed eRF3/GSPT1 overexpression; moreover, eight of the 12 intestinal type carcinomas analysed overexpressed the gene, whereas eRF3/GSPT1 was overexpressed in only one of the 10 diffuse type carcinomas (Kruskal-Wallis Test; p , 0.05). No correlation was found between ploidy and transcript expression levels of eRF3/GSPT1. Overexpression of eRF3/GSPT1 was not associated with increased translation rates because the upregulation of eRF3/GSPT1 did not correlate with increased eRF1 levels. Conclusions: Overexpression of eRF3/GSPT1 in intestinal type gastric tumours may lead to an increase in the translation efficiency of specific oncogenic transcripts. Alternatively, eRF3/GSPT1 may be involved in tumorigenesis as a result of its non-translational roles, namely (dis)regulating the cell cycle, apoptosis, or transcription.

Translation termination and protein folding pathway genes are not correlated in gastric cancer

Background: The eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3) has been shown to affect both tubulin and actin cytoskeleton, suggesting a role in cytoskeleton assembly, mitotic spindle formation and chromosome segregation. Also, direct interactions between eRF3 and subunits of the cytosolic chaperonin CCT have been described. Moreover, both eRF3a and CCT subunits have been described to be up-regulated in cancer tissues. Our aim was to evaluate the hypothesis that eRF3 expression levels are correlated with the expression of genes encoding proteins involved in the tubulin folding pathways. Methods: Relative expression levels of eRF1, eRF3a/GSPT1, PFDN4, CCT2, CCT4, and TBCA genes in tumour samples relative to their adjacent normal tissues were investigated using real time-polymerase chain reaction in 20 gastric cancer patients. Results: The expression levels of eRF3a/GSPT1 were not correlated with the expression levels of the other genes studied. However, significant correlations were detected between the other genes, both within intestinal and diffuse type tumours. Conclusions: eRF3a/GSPT1 expression at the mRNA level is independent from both cell translation rates and from the expression of the genes involved in tubulin-folding pathways. The differences in the patterns of expression of the genes studied support the hypothesis of genetically independent pathways in the origin of intestinal and diffuse type gastric tumours.

Mecanismos biopatológicos da metastização ganglionar no carcinoma gástrico. Implicações para a cirurgia radical

RESUMO A constatação de que o carcinoma gástrico continua a ser a segunda causa de morte por doença oncológica no mundo em geral e em particular em Portugal, assim como a verificação da elevada incidência e letalidade no nosso país, justifica uma particular atenção a esta doença. Apesar de avanços recentes na acção adjuvante e neo-adjuvante de terapêuticas não cirúrgicas, com algumas referências a melhorias na sobrevivência, estas terapêuticas não têm eficácia curativa. Sendo assim, a cirurgia continua a constituir a única esperança de cura no carcinoma gástrico. Em consequência, a correcta selecção da técnica a aplicar, assim como a sua correcta execução, vão ter influência marcante na sobrevivência do doente. Os estudos dos centros oncológicos diferenciados em várias zonas geográficas demonstram que a cirurgia radical, com adequada extensão da gastrectomia e com linfadenectomia alargada permite obter as melhores sobrevivências. O tipo de cirurgia mais praticado nos referidos centros oncológicos diferenciados é a gastrectomia com linfadenectomia D2, ou seja, com excisão da segunda estação ganglionar. Este tipo de cirurgia não aumenta a mortalidade, mas aumenta a morbilidade. No entanto, verifica-se que muitos doentes não desenvolvem metastização que atinja a estação ganglionar de nível 2 e, por outro lado, muitos outros ultrapassam esta estação ganglionar. Ou seja, a linfadenectomia D2 é exagerada para alguns doentes, é necessária e suficiente para muitos, mas pelo contrário, é insuficiente para outros. A questão radica na necessidade de equilíbrio em oferecer a cada doente a cirurgia necessária para obter a melhor sobrevivência, ainda que à custa de maior morbilidade e, por outro lado, conseguir identificar os factores que determinam que alguns doentes não necessitem de ser submetidos a uma terapêutica tão agressiva. Se a primeira questão é eminentemente fisiopatológica e consiste em compreender os mecanismos da metastização ganglionar no carcinoma gástrico, de modo a poder prever a incidência e extensão da metastização ganglionar em cada doente em particular e, assim, adequar a terapêutica. No estudo de 50 doentes, que elaborámos, a interpretação fisiopatológica apoia-se na avaliação de parâmetros aceites como convencionais e de parâmetros oncológicos. Dentro dos parâmetros convencionais estudámos a localização do tumor, a sua dimensão, a classificação de Borrmann, as alterações metabólicas, a gastrina sérica, a citologia peritoneal, a infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori (Hp), a metaplasia intestinal, a classificação de Ming, a classificação de Lauren, a invasão em profundidade da parede gástrica (T), a metastização no “early gastric câncer”, a classificação TNM, o CEA 19.9 e o CA 72.4 séricos. Para identificar quais os marcadores oncobiológicos mais adequados, efectuámos uma revisão da literatura relativamente a: Ki-67, p53, caderina-E, ERBB2, Instabilidade de Microssatélites, MUC 1, Sialil Tn e Sialil Lewis X. De acordo com os resultados referidos na literatura, seleccionámos para estudo os seguintes marcadores: Ki-67, p53, caderina-E, ERBB2 e Instabilidade de Microssatélites. Relacionámos todos estes parâmetros com a metastização ganglionar, nos aspectos de frequência da metastização, número de gânglios metastizados (classificação N da UICC) e metastização das cadeias ganglionares distais (classificação N japonesa). No que se refere à execução do programa cirúrgico, foram obtidos níveis de radicalidade semelhantes ou superiores aos referidos na literatura internacional, com frequência de complicações ao nível da referida na literatura europeia. No que se refere ao estudo dos factores de metastização ganglionar verificámos que os parâmetros que apresentam maior relação com a frequência da metastização são: a dimensão ≥ 5 cm; a profundidade de invasão da parede (T) atingindo as camadas profundas; o tipo infiltrativo na classificação de Borrmann; a expressão de Ki-67 > 75%; a expressão de p53 positiva; a expressão de caderina-E anormal; a associação de Ki-67 ≥ 50% + caderina-E anormal + p53 positiva; a associação de dimensão ≥ 5 cm + p53 positiva; a associação de T3/T4 + p53 positiva; a presença de marcadores tumorais elevados. A ausência de metastização ganglionar ou metastização limitada à primeira estação ganglionar, em que é suficiente uma cirurgia conservadora de tipo D1, relaciona-se com a dimensão < 5 cm; a invasão em profundidade da parede (T) limitada às camadas superficiais; a ausência de expressão de p53; a ausência de níveis elevados de marcadores tumorais. Recorrendo ao estudo dos quatro parâmetros que podem ser determinados no pré-operatório – dimensão, invasão em profundidade, expressão de p53 e marcadores tumorais convencionais foi possível identificar 75% dos tumores N0 e 50% do conjunto dos tumores N0 + N1, ou seja, os tumores que não carecem de linfadenectomia alargada. Estudando a dimensão, a presença de Hp, a invasão em profundidade, os níveis elevados de marcadores tumorais, a expressão de p53, Ki-67, de Caderina-E e de Instabilidade de Microssatélites foi possível caracterizar os tumores que envolvem maior risco de invadir as cadeias ganglionares distais e que, portanto, carecem de linfadenectomia alargada. Verifica-se assim que, com esta metodologia, é possível identificar uma percentagem significativa dos casos que não carecem de linfadenectomia alargada assim como daqueles que necessitam deste tipo de cirurgia.

Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric cancer: a distinct molecular subtype of the disease?

Abstract: Approximately 90% of the world population is infected by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Usually, it infects B lymphocytes, predisposing them to malignant transformation. Infection of epithelial cells occurs rarely, and it is estimated that about to 10% of gastric cancer patients harbor EBV in their malignant cells. Given that gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with a global annual incidence of over 950,000 cases, EBV-positive gastric cancer is the largest group of EBV-associated malignancies. Based on gene expression profile studies, gastric cancer was recently categorized into four subtypes; EBV-positive, microsatellite unstable, genomically stable and chromosomal instability. Together with previous studies, this report provided a more detailed molecular characterization of gastric cancer, demonstrating that EBV-positive gastric cancer is a distinct molecular subtype of the disease, with unique genetic and epigenetic abnormalities, reflected in a specific phenotype. The recognition of characteristic molecular alterations in gastric cancer allows the identification of molecular pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival, with the potential to identify therapeutic targets. These findings highlight the enormous heterogeneity of gastric cancer, and the complex interplay between genetic and epigenetic alterations in the disease, and provide a roadmap to implementation of genome-guided personalized therapy in gastric cancer. The present review discusses the initial studies describing EBV-positive gastric cancer as a distinct clinical entity, presents recently described genetic and epigenetic alterations, and considers potential therapeutic insights derived from the recognition of this new molecular subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Sclérodermie et risques oncologiques [Systemic sclerosis and cancer]

The combination of skin induration with clinical features such as dyspnea, facial telangiectasia, digital infarctions and/or dysphagia supports the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. The oesophageal dysmotility is associated with symptoms which may delay the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal cancer. Herein we report a case of long standing systemic sclerosis with heartburn and dysphagia symptoms which were monitored closely. Unfortunately, these symptoms delayed the diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. This case prompted us to review the evidence of the association of cancer and systemic sclerosis and if any oncologic evaluation is required during the follow-up of patients affected with systemic sclerosis.

Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil; docetaxel and cisplatin; and epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil as systemic treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial evaluated two docetaxel-based regimens to see which would be most promising according to overall response rate (ORR) for comparison in a phase III trial with epirubicin-cisplatin-fluorouracil (ECF) as first-line advanced gastric cancer therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma, a performance status <or= 1, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function randomly received <or= eight 3-weekly cycles of ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil [FU] 200 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 21), TC (docetaxel initially 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 [later reduced to 75 mg/m(2) as a result of toxicity] and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1), or TCF (TC plus FU 300 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 14). Study objectives included response (primary), survival, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: ORR was 25.0% (95% CI, 13% to 41%) for ECF, 18.5% (95% CI, 9% to 34%) for TC, and 36.6% (95% CI, 23% to 53%) for TCF (n = 119). Median overall survival times were 8.3, 11.0, and 10.4 months for ECF, TC, and TCF, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable, with one toxic death (TC arm). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in more treatment cycles with docetaxel (TC, 49%; TCF, 57%; ECF, 34%). Global health status/QOL substantially improved with ECF and remained similar to baseline with both docetaxel regimens. CONCLUSION: Time to response and ORR favor TCF over TC for further evaluation, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting. A trend towards increased myelosuppression and infectious complications with TCF versus TC or ECF was observed.

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer currently ranks second in global cancer mortality. Most patients are either diagnosed at an advanced stage, or develop a relapse after surgery with curative intent. Apart from supportive care and palliative radiation to localized (e.g. bone) metastasis, systemic chemotherapy is the only treatment option available in this situation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of chemotherapy versus best supportive care, combination versus single agent chemotherapy and different combination chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to March 2009, reference lists of studies, and contacted pharmaceutical companies and national and international experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials on systemic intravenous chemotherapy versus best supportive care, combination versus single agent chemotherapy and different combination chemotherapies in advanced gastric cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data. A third investigator was consulted in case of disagreements. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty five trials, with a total of 5726 patients, have been included in the meta-analysis of overall survival. The comparison of chemotherapy versus best supportive care consistently demonstrated a significant benefit in overall survival in favour of the group receiving chemotherapy (hazard ratios (HR) 0.37; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.24 to 0.55, 184 participants). The comparison of combination versus single-agent chemotherapy provides evidence for a survival benefit in favour of combination chemotherapy (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90, 1914 participants). The price of this benefit is increased toxicity as a result of combination chemotherapy. When comparing 5-FU/cisplatin-containing combination therapy regimens with versus without anthracyclines (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95, 501 participants) and 5-FU/anthracycline-containing combinations with versus without cisplatin (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92, 1147 participants) there was a significant survival benefit for regimens including 5-FU, anthracyclines and cisplatin. Both the comparison of irinotecan versus non-irinotecan (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.02, 639 participants) and docetaxel versus non-docetaxel containing regimens (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.15, 805 participants) show non-significant overall survival benefits in favour of the irinotecan and docetaxel-containing regimens. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy significantly improves survival in comparison to best supportive care. In addition, combination chemotherapy improves survival compared to single-agent 5-FU. All patients should be tested for their HER-2 status and trastuzumab should be added to a standard fluoropyrimidine/cisplatin regimen in patients with HER-2 positive tumours. Two and three-drug regimens including 5-FU, cisplatin, with or without an anthracycline, as well as irinotecan or docetaxel-containing regimens are reasonable treatment options for HER-2 negative patients.

15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is down-regulated in gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: We have investigated the expression and regulation of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) in gastric cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Clinical gastric adenocarcinoma samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR for protein and mRNA expression of 15-PGDH and for methylation status of 15-PGDH promoter. The effects of interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) and epigenetic mechanisms on 15-PGDH regulation were assessed in gastric cancer cell lines. RESULTS: In a gastric cancer cell line with a very low 15-PGDH expression (TMK-1), the 15-PGDH promoter was methylated and treatment with a demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine restored 15-PGDH expression. In a cell line with a relatively high basal level of 15-PGDH (MKN-28), IL-1beta repressed expression of 15-PGDH mRNA and protein. This effect of IL-1beta was at least in part attributed to inhibition of 15-PGDH promoter activity. SiRNA-mediated knockdown of 15-PGDH resulted in strong increase of prostaglandin E(2) production in MKN-28 cells and increased cell growth of these cells by 31% in anchorage-independent conditions. In clinical gastric adenocarcinoma specimens, 15-PGDH mRNA levels were 5-fold lower in gastric cancer samples when compared with paired nonneoplastic tissues (n = 26) and 15-PGDH protein was lost in 65% of gastric adenocarcinomas (n = 210). CONCLUSIONS: 15-PGDH is down-regulated in gastric cancer, which could potentially lead to accelerated tumor progression. Importantly, our data indicate that a proinflammatory cytokine linked to gastric carcinogenesis, IL-1beta, suppresses 15-PGDH expression at least partially by inhibiting promoter activity of the 15-PGDH gene.