50 shared texts : photocopiable texts for shared reading : Year 1: Scotish primary 3.

Antología de textos para lectura compartida. Contiene 50 actividades fotocopiables de ficción, no ficción y poesía. Cada texto tiene una mini versión anotada que muestra cómo puede trabajarse en la lección. Las notas para el profesor muestran cómo pueden utilizarse para enseñar múltiples objetivos y se dan ideas para la lecto-escritura. Incluyen historias con configuración familiar, relatos significativos de cuentos infantiles, historias y poemas de otras culturas, poemas para jugar con el lenguaje, informes no cronológicos, instrucciones, extractos de diccionarios.

50 shared texts : photocopiable tests for shared reading : Year 1 : Scotish primary 2.

Antología de textos para lectura compartida. Contiene cincuenta actividades fotocopiables de ficción, no ficción y poesía. Cada texto tiene una mini versión anotada que muestra cómo puede trabajarse en la lección. Las notas para el profesor muestran cómo puede utilizarse para enseñar múltiples objetivos y se dan ideas para la lecto-escritura. Incluyen historias con configuración familiar, historias tradicionales y cuentos de hadas, historias fantásticas, rimas con patrones predecibles y repetitivos, poemas con temas similares, instrucciones, extractos de libros con información sencilla, e informes no cronológicos .

Scaffolding and bilingual shared reading experiences: Promoting primary school students' learning and development

This paper explores the connections between scaffolding, second language learning and bilingual shared reading experiences. A socio- cultural theory of cognition underpins the investigation, which involved implementing a language and culture awareness program (LCAP) in a year 4 classroom and in the school community. Selected passages from observations are used to analyse the learning of three students, particularly in relation to languages other than English (LOTE). As these three case study students interacted in the classroom, at home and in the community, they co-constructed, appropriated and applied knowledge form one language to another. Through scaffolding, social spaces were constructed, where students learning and development were extended through a variety of activities that involved active participation, such as experimenting with language, asking questions and making suggestions. Extending these opportunities for student learning and development is considered in relation to creating teaching and learning environments that celebrate socio-cultural and linguistic diversity.

Formar o “leitor público”: contributos do teatro para o desenvolvimento da leitura em voz alta

Dissertação apresentada à Escola Superior de Educação de Lisboa para obtenção de grau de mestre em Educação Artística, na especialização de Teatro na Educação

Lectura dialógica y transformación en las Comunidades de Aprendizaje

En la lectura dialógica, el significado, la comprensión y el aprendizaje se intensifican a través de las interacciones que establecen personas diferentes en relación con un texto. Este artículo se centra en el desarrollo de la lectura dialógica en las comunidades de aprendizaje,especialmente a través de las tertulias literarias dialógicas con familiares, con profesorado y con alumnado, y de las bibliotecas tutorizadas y otras prácticas de lectura compartida con familiares, con otros y otras agentes de la comunidad. Además, se analizan las transformaciones que se producen tanto personalmente como de manera colectiva y comunitaria.

La lectura compartida: una eina per l'aprenentatge de la lecto-escriptura en equips cooperatius

L’estudi de cas que es presenta l’hem realitzat a Cicle inicial (CI) de l’escola els Castanyers de Viladrau. Hem portat a terme un projecte per tal d’estudiar la lectura compartida tot utilitzant equips cooperatius (Pujolàs, 2008). Els objectius d’aquest treball són: en primer lloc, ensenyar els alumnes a aprendre de manera cooperativa, és a dir, saber treballar conjuntament, tenir respecte mutu, escoltar als companys, proporcionar ajudes a la resta de l’equip i respectar els punts de vista dels altres, i, en segon lloc, millorar la comprensió dels texts; millorar la lectura i l’escriptura, saber realitzar les tasques i rols, saber seleccionar informació, aprendre a realitzar preguntes. Per portar-lo a terme vam realitzar set sessions en les qual la lectura compartida i els equips cooperatius eren les bases de totes elles. El conjunts de les activitats ens ha permès evidenciar una cohesió del grup-classe més elevada que abans de realitzar-les, així com una lleugera millora en els aspectes relacionats amb la comprensió lectora.

An open book: what and how young children learn from picture and story books

Looking at and listening to picture and story books is a ubiquitous activity, frequently enjoyed by many young children and their parents. Well before children can read for themselves they are able to learn from books. Looking at and listening to books increases children’s general knowledge, understanding about the world and promotes language acquisition. This collection of papers demonstrates the breadth of information pre-reading children learn from books and increases our understanding of the social and cognitive mechanisms that support this learning. Our hope is that this Research Topic/eBook will be useful for researchers as well as educational practitioners and parents who are interested in optimizing children’s learning. We conceptually divide this research topic into four broad sections, which focus on the nature and attributes of picture and story books, what children learn from picture and story books, the interactions children experience during shared reading, and potential applications of research into shared reading, respectively.

Leitura, leituras de leitores e leituraleitores: texto e espaço narrativa

Pós-graduação em Educação - IBRC

O programa Literatura em Minha Casa enquanto política pública: avaliando a formação de famílias leitoras

Pós-graduação em Educação - FCT

Des livres et des mots : l’entrée dans l’univers de l’écrit de 4 à 9 ans

Dans son milieu familial, le jeune enfant développe ses habiletés langagières en plus de s’initier à la lecture et à l’écriture. Ce chapitre se divise en deux sections. Dans la première, nous décrivons un ensemble d’études qui convergent vers un modèle théorique de la littératie familiale et de son lien avec le développement du langage et de la lecture. Ce modèle, proposé par Sénéchal et ses collègues, suggère une association robuste entre lecture partagée et langage oral, d’une part, et entre enseignement parental et habiletés de littératie, d’autre part. Dans la deuxième section du chapitre, nous montrons, en résumant des études corrélationnelles et quasi-expérimentales, comment l’entrée de l’enfant dans le monde de la lecture peut être facilitée par ses premières tentatives, même non conventionnelles, d’écriture de mots. Dans chacune des deux sections, nous nous intéressons aux trajectoires d’apprentissage allant d’habiletés émergentes à la compétence en lecture.

How to assess, plan and teach shared and guided reading and writing 1 : key stage one, primary 1-3.

El desarrollo de la alfabetización infantil se inicia desde el momento en que los padres, hablan, cantan y leen a sus bebés. Estas buenas experiencias son las bases sobre las que seguir, pues, después, aprenden a jugar con los libros, a disfrutar con sus imágenes y sus páginas, a imitar a los adultos en la lectura, a garabatear y a escribir como ellos. Aunque, algunos niños hayan carecido de estas experiencias en su hogar, al incorporarse a la escuela, es necesario darles todas las oportunidades posibles para observar a sus compañeros lectores y escritores, interactuar con los libros y experimentar ellos mismos con la lectura y la escritura.

How to assess, plan and teach shared and guided reading and writing 2 : key stage two, primary 4-7.

En esta etapa del desarrollo de la alfabetización, la mayoría de los niños han comprendido sus conceptos fundamentales y ya saben hablar, leer y escribir para distintos tipos de oyentes y para distintos propósitos. Para la consolidación de estos conocimientos y la adquisición de nuevas habilidades necesitan contar con una amplia gama de textos y contextos, aprender a decodificar palabras desconocidas, deletrear palabras difíciles. El modelo de lectura y escritura compartida y guiada es la estrategia de enseñanza más idónea.

Distributional profiles of homologous open reading frames among bacterial phyla: implications for vertical and lateral transmission

If open reading frames (ORFs) have been transmitted primarily by vertical descent, the distributional profile of orthologues of each ORF should be congruent with the organismal tree or a subtree thereof. Distributional patterns not reconciled parsimoniously with tree-like descent and loss are prima facie evidence of lateral gene transfer. Herein, a rigorous criterion for recognizing ORF distributions is described and implemented; it does not require the inference of phylogenetic trees, nor does it assume any specific tree. Because lineage-specific differences in rates of sequence change can also generate unexpected distributional patterns, rate artefacts, were controlled for by requiring pairwise matches between ORFs to exceed a rigorous inclusion threshold, but absence of a match was assessed against a more-permissive exclusion threshold. Applying this dual-threshold criterion to cross-domain and cross-phylum distributional patterns for ORFs in 23 bacterial genomes, a relative abundance of ORFs was observed that find a match in exactly seven other bacterial phyla; 94-99% of these ORFs also find matches among the Archaea and/or Eukarya. In the larger (and some smaller) bacterial genomes, ORFs that find matches in exactly one other bacterial phylum are also relatively abundant, but fewer of these have non-bacterial homologues; most of their matches within the Bacteria are to the Proteobacteria and/or Firmicutes, which cannot be sister lineages to all bacteria. ORFs that are neither distributed universally among the Bacteria, nor necessarily shared with topologically adjacent lineages, are preferentially enriched in large bacterial genomes.

A shared-disk parallel cluster file system

Dissertação apresentada para obtenção do Grau de Doutor em Informática Pela Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia

Socially shared metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning processes in student dyads and small groups

Traditionally metacognition has been theorised, methodologically studied and empirically tested from the standpoint mainly of individuals and their learning contexts. In this dissertation the emergence of metacognition is analysed more broadly. The aim of the dissertation was to explore socially shared metacognitive regulation (SSMR) as part of collaborative learning processes taking place in student dyads and small learning groups. The specific aims were to extend the concept of individual metacognition to SSMR, to develop methods to capture and analyse SSMR and to validate the usefulness of the concept of SSMR in two different learning contexts; in face-to-face student dyads solving mathematical word problems and also in small groups taking part in inquiry-based science learning in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. This dissertation is comprised of four studies. In Study I, the main aim was to explore if and how metacognition emerges during problem solving in student dyads and then to develop a method for analysing the social level of awareness, monitoring, and regulatory processes emerging during the problem solving. Two dyads comprised of 10-year-old students who were high-achieving especially in mathematical word problem solving and reading comprehension were involved in the study. An in-depth case analysis was conducted. Data consisted of over 16 (30–45 minutes) videotaped and transcribed face-to-face sessions. The dyads solved altogether 151 mathematical word problems of different difficulty levels in a game-format learning environment. The interaction flowchart was used in the analysis to uncover socially shared metacognition. Interviews (also stimulated recall interviews) were conducted in order to obtain further information about socially shared metacognition. The findings showed the emergence of metacognition in a collaborative learning context in a way that cannot solely be explained by individual conception. The concept of socially-shared metacognition (SSMR) was proposed. The results highlighted the emergence of socially shared metacognition specifically in problems where dyads encountered challenges. Small verbal and nonverbal signals between students also triggered the emergence of socially shared metacognition. Additionally, one dyad implemented a system whereby they shared metacognitive regulation based on their strengths in learning. Overall, the findings suggested that in order to discover patterns of socially shared metacognition, it is important to investigate metacognition over time. However, it was concluded that more research on socially shared metacognition, from larger data sets, is needed. These findings formed the basis of the second study. In Study II, the specific aim was to investigate whether socially shared metacognition can be reliably identified from a large dataset of collaborative face-to-face mathematical word problem solving sessions by student dyads. We specifically examined different difficulty levels of tasks as well as the function and focus of socially shared metacognition. Furthermore, the presence of observable metacognitive experiences at the beginning of socially shared metacognition was explored. Four dyads participated in the study. Each dyad was comprised of high-achieving 10-year-old students, ranked in the top 11% of their fourth grade peers (n=393). Dyads were from the same data set as in Study I. The dyads worked face-to-face in a computer-supported, game-format learning environment. Problem-solving processes for 251 tasks at three difficulty levels taking place during 56 (30–45 minutes) lessons were video-taped and analysed. Baseline data for this study were 14 675 turns of transcribed verbal and nonverbal behaviours observed in four study dyads. The micro-level analysis illustrated how participants moved between different channels of communication (individual and interpersonal). The unit of analysis was a set of turns, referred to as an ‘episode’. The results indicated that socially shared metacognition and its function and focus, as well as the appearance of metacognitive experiences can be defined in a reliable way from a larger data set by independent coders. A comparison of the different difficulty levels of the problems suggested that in order to trigger socially shared metacognition in small groups, the problems should be more difficult, as opposed to moderately difficult or easy. Although socially shared metacognition was found in collaborative face-to-face problem solving among high-achieving student dyads, more research is needed in different contexts. This consideration created the basis of the research on socially shared metacognition in Studies III and IV. In Study III, the aim was to expand the research on SSMR from face-to-face mathematical problem solving in student dyads to inquiry-based science learning among small groups in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. The specific aims were to investigate SSMR’s evolvement and functions in a CSCL environment and to explore how SSMR emerges at different phases of the inquiry process. Finally, individual student participation in SSMR during the process was studied. An in-depth explanatory case study of one small group of four girls aged 12 years was carried out. The girls attended a class that has an entrance examination and conducts a language-enriched curriculum. The small group solved complex science problems in an asynchronous CSCL environment, participating in research-like processes of inquiry during 22 lessons (á 45–minute). Students’ network discussion were recorded in written notes (N=640) which were used as study data. A set of notes, referred to here as a ‘thread’, was used as the unit of analysis. The inter-coder agreement was regarded as substantial. The results indicated that SSMR emerges in a small group’s asynchronous CSCL inquiry process in the science domain. Hence, the results of Study III were in line with the previous Study I and Study II and revealed that metacognition cannot be reduced to the individual level alone. The findings also confirm that SSMR should be examined as a process, since SSMR can evolve during different phases and that different SSMR threads overlapped and intertwined. Although the classification of SSMR’s functions was applicable in the context of CSCL in a small group, the dominant function was different in the asynchronous CSCL inquiry in the small group in a science activity than in mathematical word problem solving among student dyads (Study II). Further, the use of different analytical methods provided complementary findings about students’ participation in SSMR. The findings suggest that it is not enough to code just a single written note or simply to examine who has the largest number of notes in the SSMR thread but also to examine the connections between the notes. As the findings of the present study are based on an in-depth analysis of a single small group, further cases were examined in Study IV, as well as looking at the SSMR’s focus, which was also studied in a face-to-face context. In Study IV, the general aim was to investigate the emergence of SSMR with a larger data set from an asynchronous CSCL inquiry process in small student groups carrying out science activities. The specific aims were to study the emergence of SSMR in the different phases of the process, students’ participation in SSMR, and the relation of SSMR’s focus to the quality of outcomes, which was not explored in previous studies. The participants were 12-year-old students from the same class as in Study III. Five small groups consisting of four students and one of five students (N=25) were involved in the study. The small groups solved ill-defined science problems in an asynchronous CSCL environment, participating in research-like processes of inquiry over a total period of 22 hours. Written notes (N=4088) detailed the network discussions of the small groups and these constituted the study data. With these notes, SSMR threads were explored. As in Study III, the thread was used as the unit of analysis. In total, 332 notes were classified as forming 41 SSMR threads. Inter-coder agreement was assessed by three coders in the different phases of the analysis and found to be reliable. Multiple methods of analysis were used. Results showed that SSMR emerged in all the asynchronous CSCL inquiry processes in the small groups. However, the findings did not reveal any significantly changing trend in the emergence of SSMR during the process. As a main trend, the number of notes included in SSMR threads differed significantly in different phases of the process and small groups differed from each other. Although student participation was seen as highly dispersed between the students, there were differences between students and small groups. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the amount of SSMR during the process or participation structure did not explain the differences in the quality of outcomes for the groups. Rather, when SSMRs were focused on understanding and procedural matters, it was associated with achieving high quality learning outcomes. In turn, when SSMRs were focused on incidental and procedural matters, it was associated with low level learning outcomes. Hence, the findings imply that the focus of any emerging SSMR is crucial to the quality of the learning outcomes. Moreover, the findings encourage the use of multiple research methods for studying SSMR. In total, the four studies convincingly indicate that a phenomenon of socially shared metacognitive regulation also exists. This means that it was possible to define the concept of SSMR theoretically, to investigate it methodologically and to validate it empirically in two different learning contexts across dyads and small groups. In-depth micro-level case analysis in Studies I and III showed the possibility to capture and analyse in detail SSMR during the collaborative process, while in Studies II and IV, the analysis validated the emergence of SSMR in larger data sets. Hence, validation was tested both between two environments and within the same environments with further cases. As a part of this dissertation, SSMR’s detailed functions and foci were revealed. Moreover, the findings showed the important role of observable metacognitive experiences as the starting point of SSMRs. It was apparent that problems dealt with by the groups should be rather difficult if SSMR is to be made clearly visible. Further, individual students’ participation was found to differ between students and groups. The multiple research methods employed revealed supplementary findings regarding SSMR. Finally, when SSMR was focused on understanding and procedural matters, this was seen to lead to higher quality learning outcomes. Socially shared metacognition regulation should therefore be taken into consideration in students’ collaborative learning at school similarly to how an individual’s metacognition is taken into account in individual learning.