1000 resultados para Portuguese constitution
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
ABSTRACT - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shook the foundations of the US health system, offering all Americans access to health care by changing the way the health insurance industry works. As President Obama signed the Act on 23 March 2010, he said that it stood for “the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health care”. Unlike the U.S., the Article 64 of the Portuguese Constitution provides, since 1976, the right to universal access to health care. However, facing a severe economic crisis, Portugal has, under the supervision of the Troika, a tight schedule to implement measures to improve the efficiency of the National Health Service. Both countries are therefore despite their different situation, in a conjuncture of reform and the use of new health management measures. The present work, using a qualitative research methodology examines the Affordable Care Act in order to describe its principles and enforcement mechanisms. In order to describe the reality in Portugal, the Portuguese health system and the measures imposed by Troika are also analyzed. The intention of this entire analysis is not only to disclose the innovative U.S. law, but to find some innovative measures that could serve health management in Portugal. Essentially we identified the Exchanges and Wellness Programs, described throughout this work, leaving also the idea of the possibility of using them in the Portuguese national health system.
Resumo:
A tese de Mestrado com o título “A Proibição da Reformatio in Pejus: os efeitos processuais no direito processual penal e no direito das contraordenações”, é uma delas. Trata-se de tese com especial qualidade e muito útil ao leitor profissional e especializado das Ciências Jurídico-Criminais e portanto Constitucionais. Ou não fossem as garantias criminais o núcleo fundamental dos espaços e tempos de Direito, da democracia social: art. 32º/10 da Constituição da República Portuguesa: “10. Nos processos de contra-ordenação, bem como em quaisquer processos sancionatórios, são assegurados ao arguido os direitos de audiência e defesa.”; Abstract: The Master's thesis entitled "Prohibition of Reformatio in pejus: the legal proceedings in the criminal procedural law and the law relating to offenses", is one of them. It thesis with special quality and very useful to the professional and skilled reader of Legal and Criminal Sciences and therefore constitutional. Or were not criminal guarantees the fundamental core of the spaces and times of law, social democracy: art. 32/10 of the Portuguese Constitution: "10. In misdemeanor cases, as well as any disciplinary procedures, is guaranteed to the defendant the hearing and right of defense. ".
Resumo:
Revolução do 25 de Abril de 1974 e Constituição. 2/4/1976 é a data de nascimento da Constituição da República Portuguesa. No intermédio vigorou a Constituição salazarista de 1933. § Revolution of April 25, 1974 and the Constitution. 02/04/1976 is the date of birth of the Portuguese Constitution. The intermediate lasted Salazar's Constitution of 1933.
Resumo:
Se uns têm medo da Constituição lusa actual, uma das mais humanistas do mundo, outros querem uma “Constituição do Medo”. Dizíamos no último artigo, um dia antes de Nª Srª da Assunção (ainda é feriado!), que o Art. 1º da Constituição, “República Portuguesa”, diz: “Portugal é uma República soberana, baseada na dignidade da pessoa humana e na vontade popular e empenhada na construção de uma sociedade livre, justa e solidária”. § If some are afraid of the current Portuguese Constitution, one of the humanists of the world, others want a 'Constitution of Fear. "We said in the last article, the day before Our Lady of the Assumption (it's still holiday!), That Article 1 of the Constitution, "Portugal", he says. "Portugal is a sovereign Republic, based on human dignity and popular will and committed to building a free society, justice and solidarity ".
Resumo:
Art. 114º da Constituição da República Portuguesa: “1. Os partidos políticos participam nos órgãos baseados no sufrágio universal e directo, de acordo com a sua representatividade eleitoral. 2. É reconhecido às minorias o direito de oposição democrática, nos termos da Constituição e da lei. 3. Os partidos políticos representados na Assembleia da República e que não façam parte do Governo gozam, designadamente, do direito de serem informados regular e directamente pelo Governo sobre o andamento dos principais assuntos de interesse público, de igual direito gozando os partidos políticos representados nas Assembleias Legislativas das regiões autónomas e em quaisquer outras assembleias designadas por eleição directa relativamente aos correspondentes executivos de que não façam parte.”. § Article 114 of the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic. "1. Political parties shall participate in organs based on direct and universal suffrage, according to their electoral representation. 2. It is recognized minorities the right to democratic opposition, under the Constitution and the law. 3. Political parties represented in Parliament and not forming part of the Government shall, in particular, the right to be informed regularly and directly by the Government on the progress of the main matters of public interest, equal rights enjoying the political parties represented in Legislative Assemblies of the autonomous regions and any other assemblies formed through direct elections with respect to the corresponding executives who are not part. ".
Resumo:
“Todos têm o direito de resistir a qualquer ordem que ofenda os seus direitos, liberdades e garantias e de repelir pela força qualquer agressão, quando não seja possível recorrer à autoridade pública”. É o que consagra o art. 21º da Constituição da República Portuguesa. Trata-se não apenas dum direito fundamental, mas também dum dever fundamental. § "Everyone has the right to resist any order that offends the rights, freedoms and guarantees and to resist by force any aggression when it is not possible recourse to a public authority." It is what establishes the art. 21 of the Portuguese Constitution. It is not just of a fundamental right, but also as a fundamental duty.
Resumo:
A descriminação e a ausência de igualdade de oportunidades no acesso a direitos fundamentais inscritos na constituição portuguesa continuam a ser para as pessoas com deficiência um tema bastante actual e uma das preocupações nucleares de todos aqueles que directa ou indirectamente se interessam por estas questões. O acesso a educação e ao emprego, ainda que incentivado por políticas sociais inclusivas, continua a ser extremamente dificultado pela existência de barreiras, com configurações diversas, mas quase sempre organizadas em torno de representações acerca da deficiência pouco coerentes e coincidentes com o entendimento actual deste fenómeno. O trabalho por nós realizado teve como objectivo contribuir para o estudo das representações sociais relativamente à deficiência em Portugal, perspectivada a análise a partir dos agentes educativos do agrupamento de escolas do distrito de Viana do Castelo, uma das zonas do país com maior número de pessoas com deficiência, de acordo com o Censo de 2001. O inquérito por questionário de auto-administração realizado a uma amostra de 56 agentes educativos foi concordante com muitas das crenças e estereótipos face às pessoas com deficiência encontrados em estudos similares, nomeadamente no que reporta às atitudes negativas de pena e de culpa e à visualização da pessoa com deficiência como incapaz e pouco autónoma. Esta situação sugere a necessidade de se continuar a desenvolver estudos de caracterização destes traços em diferentes micro-culturas, no sentido de se desenvolverem estratégias personalizadas que permitam a sua remissão e o desmantelar das barreiras ainda existentes para a inclusão destes cidadãos na sociedade.
Resumo:
ISSN 1577-4430, com fator de impacto, calculado pelo IN-RECS (http://ec3.ugr.es/in-recj/ii/Derecho_Civil-2010.htm), Bases de dados de indexação: LATINDEX, DIALNET, ISOC, COMLUDOC e AGRIS]
Resumo:
Dissertação de Mestrado em Solicitadoria
Resumo:
In, AAVV "Estudos de direito público", Lisboa: âncora Editora, 2006, 243-346 pp.
Resumo:
Currently, Portugal assumes itself as a democratic rule of substantive law State, sustained by a legal system seeking the right balance between the guarantee of fundamental rights and freedoms constitutional foreseen in Portugal’s Fundamental Law and criminal persecution. The architecture of the penal code lies with, roughly speaking, a accusatory basic structure, “deliberately attached to one of the most remarkable achievements of the civilizational democratic progress, and by obedience to the constitutional commandment”, in balance with the official investigation principle, valid both for the purpose of prosecution and trial. Regarding the principle of non self-incrimination - nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare, briefly defined as the defendant’s right of not being obliged to contribute to the self-incrimination, it should be stressed that there isn’t an explicit consecration in the Portuguese Constitution, being commonly accepted in an implicit constitutional prediction and deriving from other constitutional rights and principles, first and foremost, the meaning and scope of the concept of democratic rule of Law State, embedded in the Fundamental Law, and in the guidelines of the constitutional principles of human person dignity, freedom of action and the presumption of innocence. In any case, about the (in) applicability of the principle of the prohibition of self-incrimination to the Criminal Police Bodies in the trial hearing in Court, and sharing an idea of Guedes Valente, the truth is that the exercise of criminal action must tread a transparent path and non-compliant with methods to obtain evidence that violate the law, the public order or in violation of democratic principles and loyalty (Guedes Valente, 2013, p. 484). Within the framework of the penal process relating to the trial, which is assumed as the true phase of the process, the witness represents a relevant figure for the administration of criminal justice, for the testimonial proof is, in the idea of Othmar Jauernig, the worst proof of evidence, but also being the most frequent (Jauernig, 1998, p. 289). As coadjutant of the Public Prosecutor and, in specific cases, the investigating judge, the Criminal Police Bodies are invested with high responsibility, being "the arms and eyes of Judicial Authorities in pursuing the criminal investigation..." which has as ultimate goal the fulfillment of the Law pursuing the defense of society" (Guedes Valente, 2013, p. 485). It is in this context and as a witness that, throughout operational career, the Criminal Police Bodies are required to be at the trial hearing and clarify the Court with its view about the facts relating to occurrences of criminal context, thus contributing very significantly and, in some cases, decisively for the proper administration of the portuguese criminal justice. With regards to the intervention of Criminal Police Bodies in the trial hearing in Court, it’s important that they pay attention to a set of standards concerning the preparation of the testimony, the very provision of the testimony and, also, to its conclusion. Be emphasized that these guidelines may become crucial for the quality of the police testimony at the trial hearing, thus leading to an improvement of the enforcement of justice system. In this vein, while preparing the testimony, the Criminal Police Bodies must present itself in court with proper clothing, to read before and carefully the case files, to debate the facts being judged with other Criminal Police Bodies and prepare potential questions. Later, while giving his testimony during the trial, the Criminal Police Bodies must, summing up, to take the oath in a convincing manner, to feel comfortable, to start well by convincingly answering the first question, keep an attitude of serenity, to adopt an attitude of collaboration, to avoid the reading of documents, to demonstrate deference and seriousness before the judicial operators, to use simple and objective language, to adopt a fluent speech, to use nonverbal language correctly, to avoid spontaneity responding only to what is asked, to report only the truth, to avoid hesitations and contradictions, to be impartial and to maintain eye contact with the judge. Finally, at the conclusion of the testimony, the Criminal Police Bodies should rise in a smooth manner, avoiding to show relief, resentment or satisfaction, leaving a credible and professional image and, without much formality, requesting the judge permission to leave the courtroom. As final note, it’s important to stress that "The intervention of the Police Criminal Bodies in the trial hearing in Court” encloses itself on a theme of crucial importance not only for members of the Police and Security Forces, who must welcome this subject with the utmost seriousness and professionalism, but also for the proper administration of the criminal justice system in Portugal.
Resumo:
RESUMO - O acesso com equidade aos cuidados de saúde é uma das pedras angulares da constituição da nossa República e do SNS. A garantia de igual utilização para iguais necessidades seguindo os princípios de equidade é parte integrante da legislação Portuguesa. Os indivíduos com menor estatuto-socioeconómico são apontados unanimemente pela literatura internacional como possuindo pior estado de saúde que os mais abastados, sendo por isso de prever uma maior utilização dos cuidados de saúde. Através deste trabalho pretendemos aferir a equidade da despesa com cuidados de saúde, partindo da premissa que pior estatuto socioeconómico está relacionado com pior estado de saúde, serão os indivíduos com menor capacidade financeira a utilizar mais os cuidados de saúde e portanto a apresentar maior despesa. Utilizando o INS 05/06, e, através de uma regressão multivariada, ajustámos os resultados em relação às variáveis comummente associadas com necessidades em cuidados de saúde, e verificámos que efectivamente existem iniquidades na despesa com cuidados de saúde. Analisando o rendimento líquido total da família do utente no mês anterior ao inquérito existe uma clara gradação, em que maior rendimento se reflecte em maior despesa. Verificámos que as despesas com cuidados de saúde são superiores nos indivíduos com idade superior a 34 anos, com uma educação de nível terciário ou superior, com rendimento superior ou igual a 700,20 euros, com estado de saúde auto-reportado Muito Mau, com seguro de saúde e com doenças crónicas. A despesa não variou significativamente tendo em conta o sexo. Na idade, apenas a categorias etárias 18 a 34 anos e maiores de 75 anos apresentaram uma diferença estatisticamente significativa em relação à despesa com cuidados de saúde. À luz dos resultados obtidos, concluímos que existem efectivamente iniquidades favoráveis aos mais ricos na despesa com cuidados de saúde em Portugal.
Resumo:
Images have gained a never before seen importance. Technological changes have given the Information Society extraordinary means to capture, treat and transmit images, wheter your own or those of others, with or without a commercial purpose, with no boundaries of time or country, without “any kind of eraser”. From the several different ways natural persons may engage in image processing with no commercial purpose, the cases of sharing pictures through social networks and video surveillance assume particular relevance. Consequently there are growing legitimate concerns with the protection of one's image, since its processing may sometimes generate situations of privacy invasion or put at risk other fundamental rights. With this in mind, the present thesis arises from the question: what are the existent legal instruments in Portuguese Law that enable citizens to protect themselves from the abusive usage of their own pictures, whether because that image have been captured by a smartphone or some video surveillance camera, whether because it was massively shared through a blog or some social network? There is no question the one's right to not having his or her image used in an abusive way is protected by the Portuguese constitution, through the article 26th CRP, as well as personally right, under the article 79th of the Civil Code, and finally through criminal law, articles 192nd and 193rd of the Criminal Code. The question arises in the personal data protection context, considering that one's picture, given certain conditions, is personal data. Both the Directive 95/46/CE dated from 1995 as well as the LPD from 1998 are applicable to the processing of personal data, but both exclude situations of natural persons doing so in the pursuit of activities strictly personal or family-related. These laws demand complex procedures to natural persons, such as the preemptive formal authorisation request to the Data Protection National Commission. Failing to do so a natural person may result in the application of fines as high as €2.500,00 or even criminal charges. Consequently, the present thesis aims to study if the image processing with no commercial purposes by a natural person in the context of social networks or through video surveillance belongs to the domain of the existent personal data protection law. To that effect, it was made general considerations regarding the concept of video surveillance, what is its regimen, in a way that it may be distinguishable from Steve Mann's definition of sousveillance, and what are the associated obligations in order to better understand the concept's essence. The application of the existent laws on personal data protection to images processing by natural persons has been analysed taking into account the Directive 95/46/CE, the LPD and the General Regulation. From this analysis it is concluded that the regimen from 1995 to 1998 is out of touch with reality creating an absence of legal shielding in the personal data protection law, a flaw that doesn't exist because compensated by the right to image as a right to personality, that anyway reveals the inability of the Portuguese legislator to face the new technological challenges. It is urgent to legislate. A contrary interpretation will evidence the unconstitutionality of several rules on the LPD due to the obligations natural persons are bound to that violate the right to the freedom of speech and information, which would be inadequate and disproportionate. Considering the recently approved General Regulation and in the case it becomes the final version, the use for natural person of video surveillance of private spaces, Google Glass (in public and private places) and other similar gadgets used to recreational purposes, as well as social networks are subject to its regulation only if the images are shared without limits or existing commercial purposes. Video surveillance of public spaces in all situations is subject to General Regulation provisions.