Memory mixed with desire : a preliminary study of philosophy and literature in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche and Milan Kundera

Memory Mixed with Desire: A preliminary study of Philosophy and Literature in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche and Milan Kundera Robert Spinelli Brock University, Department of Philosophy This thesis studies intertextuality in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche and Milan Kundera through the primary themes of memory and forgetting. The thesis starts with two introductory chapters that delineate memory according to Nietzsche and Kundera respectively. From here, I move into a discussion of Nietzsche's Ubermensch as an example of the type of forgetting that Nietzsche sees as a cure for the overabundance of memory that has led to Christian morality. Next, I explore the Kunderan concept of kitsch as the polar opposite of what Nietzsche has sought in his philosophy, finishing the chapter by tying the two thinkers together in a Kunderan critique of Nietzsche. The thesis ends with a chapter devoted to the Eternal Return beginning with an exegesis of Nietzsche's idea and ending with a similar exegesis of Kundera's treatment of this thought. What I suggest in this chapter is that the Eternal Return might itself be a form of kitsch even in its attempt to revalue existence.

La racionalidad en la historia : sentido y contingencia

Resumen: Encontrar un sentido en la historia supone caminar por la delgada frontera situada entre lo necesario y el azar. Perdemos la historia en cuanto elegimos un extremo y olvidamos el otro. Merlau-Ponty propone, entonces, un modo de interpretar el devenir histórico articulando estos opuestos en una dialéctica, para encontrar una racionalidad histórica que no olvide la sin razón. Pero no sólo la historia en general, sino también la vida en particular de cada hombre se mueve en este límite, y la autora lo describe recurriendo a la obra La insoportable levedad del ser de Milan Kundera.

Milan Kundera et la littérature mondiale

« Les littératures nationales ne signifient plus grand-chose aujourd’hui. Nous entrons dans l’ère de la littérature mondiale et il appartient à chacun de nous de hâter cette évolution » (Goethe). Milan Kundera, écrivain natif de Moravie ayant émigré en France en 1975, reprend à son compte cet idéal formulé en 1827 par Goethe et le réactive : selon lui, en effet, le seul contexte où peuvent véritablement se révéler le sens et la valeur d’une œuvre est le grand contexte de l’histoire supranationale. Dans cet espace de diversité où l’œuvre n’est pas soutenue par son prestige national, mais par son originalité, un roman tchèque (littérature d’une petite nation) aussi bien qu’un roman français (littérature d’une grande nation) peut trouver sa place. Comment faire une histoire de la littérature mondiale sans la présenter comme une juxtaposition d’histoires littéraires nationales ? C’est la question à laquelle cette conférence s’efforcera de répondre en s’appuyant sur les réflexions culturelles aussi bien que politiques de Milan Kundera.

Exil, espace et frontières dans l'oeuvre de Milan Kundera

Milan Kundera emigrierte 1975 nach Frankreich. Der Zeitpunkt seiner Emigration trifft mit jenem zusammen, in dem sich in seiner Arbeit Überlegungen zu Exil, Grenzen und Raum entwickeln. In seinen politischen Schriften hebt er die Veränderung der europäischen Grenzen nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg hervor sowie den Umstand, dass sich die Tschechoslowakei und Zentraleuropa in der Sowjetunion im „Exil“ befinden. In seinen Exilromanen bewegen sich die Figuren zwischen heimischem und exilischem Raum, und diese territoriale Grenzüberschreitung wird systematisch von einem metaphysischen Grenzübergang begleitet. Schliesslich zeigt Kundera in seinen Erwägungen zur Literatur, dass literarische Werke, um in ihrer ganzen Vielfalt berücksichtigt zu werden, in anderen Kulturräumen als ihrem eigenen zirkulieren müssen. Diese „Reise“ durch Kunderas Werk wird uns denn auch dazu bringen, über mögliche paradigmatische Figuren des zeitgenössischen Exils nachzudenken.

Le Grand Retour ou les Grands Adieux ? Le roman de l’exil chez Kundera

Milan Kundera, an intellectual born in Moravia who emigrated to France in 1975, in L’Ignorance leans on the myth of Ulysses to question contemporary realities of exile and return, nostalgia and oblivion. Does the hope of returning to the place of origin really haunt the modern émigré? To what extent does the notion of homeland still have meaning for him? And what happens when the émigré, unlike Ulysses the great nostalgic, prefers to stay with Calypso his lover rather than return to his native land and faithful wife Penelope? With some cynicism, Kundera in L’Ignorance offers scenarios of exile which desecrate and destabilize historically and culturally available standards while allowing us to reflect on new paradigmatic figures of contemporary exile.

Body and forgetting

Body and Forgetting is a powerful dance performance that brings together the work of choreographer Liz Roche and film maker Alan Gilsenan, with a live score by Denis Roche. Inspired by the writings of Milan Kundera, Liz Roche Company's remarkable dancers find their way through delicately woven circumstances of disappearance, loss, relationship and hope. Their attempts to hold fast to memories and objects of meaning is at the heart of this work. The live performers move in dialogue with filmed versions of their dancing selves. They re-write their histories, make better endings to their stories, say what they regret not having said. These filmed reflections or versions of themselves, by offering a mirror, ultimately bring the performers back to themselves, richer from the experience.

Readers' resposes versus reader-response theories : An empirical study

This study examines both theoretically an empirically how well the theories of Norman Holland, David Bleich, Wolfgang Iser and Stanley Fish can explain readers' interpretations of literary texts. The theoretical analysis concentrates on their views on language from the point of view of Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. This analysis shows that many of the assumptions related to language in these theories are problematic. The empirical data show that readers often form very similar interpretations. Thus the study challenges the common assumption that literary interpretations tend to be idiosyncratic. The empirical data consists of freely worded written answers to questions on three short stories. The interpretations were made by 27 Finnish university students. Some of the questions addressed issues that were discussed in large parts of the texts, some referred to issues that were mentioned only in passing or implied. The short stories were "The Witch à la Mode" by D. H. Lawrence, "Rain in the Heart" by Peter Taylor and "The Hitchhiking Game" by Milan Kundera. According to Fish, readers create both the formal features of a text and their interpretation of it according to an interpretive strategy. People who agree form an interpretive community. However, a typical answer usually contains ideas repeated by several readers as well as observations not mentioned by anyone else. Therefore it is very difficult to determine which readers belong to the same interpretive community. Moreover, readers with opposing opinions often seem to pay attention to the same textual features and even acknowledge the possibility of an opposing interpretation; therefore they do not seem to create the formal features of the text in different ways. Iser suggests that an interpretation emerges from the interaction between the text and the reader when the reader determines the implications of the text and in this way fills the "gaps" in the text. Iser believes that the text guides the reader, but as he also believes that meaning is on a level beyond words, he cannot explain how the text directs the reader. The similarity in the interpretations and the fact that the agreement is strongest when related to issues that are discussed broadly in the text do, however, support his assumption that readers are guided by the text. In Bleich's view, all interpretations have personal motives and each person has an idiosyncratic language system. The situation where a person learns a word determines the most important meaning it has for that person. In order to uncover the personal etymologies of words, Bleich asks his readers to associate freely on the basis of a text and note down all the personal memories and feelings that the reading experience evokes. Bleich's theory of the idiosyncratic language system seems to rely on a misconceived notion of the role that ostensive definitions have in language use. The readers' responses show that spontaneous associations to personal life seem to colour the readers' interpretations, but such instances are rather rare. According to Holland, an interpretation reflects the reader's identity theme. Language use is regulated by shared rules, but everyone follows the rules in his or her own way. Words mean different things to different people. The problem with this view is that if there is any basis for language use, it seems to be the shared way of following linguistic rules. Wittgenstein suggests that our understanding of words is related to the shared ways of using words and our understanding of human behaviour. This view seems to give better grounds for understanding similarity and differences in literary interpretations than the theories of Holland, Bleich, Fish and Iser.

Unidentified family dressed in costume; Milan.

Handwritten caption: Mein Bruder Eduard links und Familie in Mailand Italien

La suisse les lacs italiens, Milan, Turin, genes et nice

UANL

Éloge et critique de l’empereur chez Ambroise de Milan et Symmaque : au confluent de deux conceptions idéologiques du pouvoir impérial romain

L’expression idéologique du pouvoir impérial romain au IVe siècle apr. J.-C. fut profondément marquée par les contextes religieux, culturel et littéraire dans lesquels elle s’inséra et dans lesquels coexistèrent deux religions et donc deux systèmes différents de pensée et de représentation du monde, soit le paganisme, religion traditionnelle de l’État romain, et le christianisme, religion émergente qui s’imposa de plus en plus dans l’Empire, notamment à partir du règne de Constantin. Cette trame de fond, loin de signifier à cette époque la fin totale du paganisme – comme il a longtemps été admis – au profit de la religion chrétienne qui entretint, grâce au support impérial, une relation nouvelle avec le pouvoir politique, modela de nouveaux critères d’exercice du pouvoir et des conceptions de l’idéal impérial qui s’exprimèrent dans les discours d’éloge destinés à l’empereur. Miroir du prince et moyen de communication entre ce dernier et l’élite, les éloges d’Ambroise de Milan et de Symmaque s’insérèrent dans le débat politique de leur temps en élaborant un archétype de l’empereur et en déterminant ses devoirs. Pour mesurer toute l’ampleur de la symbolique véhiculée dans de tels discours, il importe, pour le IVe siècle, de considérer la mentalité des auteurs, chrétiens et païens, d’où émanaient les éloges – ou encore les critiques – de la personne impériale. Ce mémoire propose ainsi d’analyser l’idéologie du pouvoir impérial selon les discours chrétien et païen, à travers les éloges d’Ambroise et de Symmaque, afin de relever les points de rencontre, d’influence ou de divergence entre ces représentations du monde et, plus spécifiquement, du pouvoir impérial, qui ont longtemps été considérées comme totalement opposées et incompatibles.