Using Instrumented Vehicles To Detect Damage in Bridges

Bridge structures are subject to continuous degradation due to the environment, ageing and excess loading. Monitoring of bridges is a key part of any maintenance strategy as it can give early warning if a bridge is becoming unsafe. This paper will theoretically assess the ability of a vehicle fitted with accelerometers on its axles to detect changes in damping of bridges, which may be the result of damage. Two vehicle models are used in this investigation. The first is a two degree-of-freedom quarter-car and the second is a four degree-of-freedom halfcar. The bridge is modelled as a simply supported beam and the interaction between the vehicle and the bridge is a coupled dynamic interaction algorithm. Both smooth and rough road profiles are used in the simulation and results indicate that changes in bridge damping can be detected by the vehicle models for a range of vehicle velocities and bridge spans.

Using Instrumented Vehicles to Detect Damage in Bridges

This paper describes a ‘drive-by’ method of bridge inspection using an instrumented vehicle. Accelerometers on the vehicle are proposed as a means of detecting damage on the bridge in the time it takes for the vehicle to cross the bridge at full highway speed. For a perfectly smooth road profile, the method is shown to be feasible. Changes in bridge damping, which is an indicator of damage, are clearly visible in the acceleration signal of a quarter-car vehicle on a smooth road surface modelled using MatLab. When road profile is considered, the influence of changes in bridge damping on the vehicle acceleration signal is much less clear. However, when a half-car model is used on a road with a rough profile, it is again possible to detect changes in bridge damping, provided the vehicle has two identical axles.

Basic research in crashworthiness II - low speed impact tests of modified vehicles. Interim technical report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

On-road driving studies to understand why drivers behave as they do at regional rail level crossings

Improving safety at rail level crossings is an important part of both road and rail safety strategies. While low in number, crashes between vehicles and trains at level crossings are catastrophic events typically involving multiple fatalities and serious injuries. Advances in driving assessment methods, such as the provision of on-road instrumented test vehicles with eye and head tracking, provide researchers with the opportunity to further understand driver behaviour at such crossings in ways not previously possible. This paper describes a study conducted to further understand the factors that shape driver behaviour at rail level crossings using instrumented vehicles. Twenty-two participants drove an On-Road Test Vehicle (ORTeV) on a predefined route in regional Victoria with a mix of both active (flashing lights with/without boom barriers) and passively controlled (stop, give way) crossings. Data collected included driving performance data, head checks, and interview data to capture driver strategies. The data from an integrated suite of methods demonstrated clearly how behaviour differs at active and passive level crossings, particularly for inexperienced drivers. For example, the head check data clearly show the reliance and expectancies of inexperienced drivers for active warnings even when approaching passively controlled crossings. These studies provide very novel and unique insights into how level crossing design and warnings shape driver behaviour.

Near term weight reduction potential in a 1977 General Motors B body vehicle. Final report.

Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 25 mph, 60 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 3. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 4. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 60 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 5. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 60 degree impact, Impala-to-Volare, test no. 10. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Impala-to-Volare, test no. 11. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 60 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 6. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 60 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 7. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 8. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Baseline test of compact vehicle side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 9. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Side impact crashworthiness of full-size hardtop automobiles. Final report. Phase II.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.