Codification vs personalisation: A study of the information evaluation practice between aerospace and construction industries

In the emerging digital economy, the management of information in aerospace and construction organisations is facing a particular challenge due to the ever-increasing volume of information and the extensive use of information and communication technologies (ICTs). This paper addresses the problems of information overload and the value of information in both industries by providing some cross-disciplinary insights. In particular it identifies major issues and challenges in the current information evaluation practice in these two industries. Interviews were conducted to get a spectrum of industrial perspectives (director/strategic, project management and ICT/document management) on these issues in particular to information storage and retrieval strategies and the contrasting approaches to knowledge and information management of personalisation and codification. Industry feedback was collected by a follow-up workshop to strengthen the findings of the research. An information-handling agenda is outlined for the development of a future Information Evaluation Methodology (IEM) which could facilitate the practice of the codification of high-value information in order to support through-life knowledge and information management (K&IM) practice.

Knowledge and information evaluation practice: an exploratory study in a construction firm

There are a number of challenges associated with managing knowledge and information in construction organizations delivering major capital assets. These include the ever-increasing volumes of information, losing people because of retirement or competitors, the continuously changing nature of information, lack of methods on eliciting useful knowledge, development of new information technologies and changes in management and innovation practices. Existing tools and methodologies for valuing intangible assets in fields such as engineering, project management and financial, accounting, do not address fully the issues associated with the valuation of information and knowledge. Information is rarely recorded in a way that a document can be valued, when either produced or subsequently retrieved and re-used. In addition there is a wealth of tacit personal knowledge which, if codified into documentary information, may prove to be very valuable to operators of the finished asset or future designers. This paper addresses the problem of information overload and identifies the differences between data, information and knowledge. An exploratory study was conducted with a leading construction consultant examining three perspectives (business, project management and document management) by structured interviews and specifically how to value information in practical terms. Major challenges in information management are identified. An through-life Information Evaluation methodology (IEM) is presented to reduce information overload and to make the information more valuable in the future.

Information literacy skills of portuguese LIS students: some topics on evaluation of resources credibility

This paper focuses on the Portuguese results from an international survey on LIS students’ information literacy skills. The results’ analysis will be grounded on a literature review on the criteria application to evaluate information and determine the credibility by undergraduate students. The guidelines for the information evaluation, especially regarding credibility aspect, on three main information literacy frameworks will be presented. After an overall presentation of the main results, the analysis of the Portuguese survey results will focus on issues related to information evaluation skills, namely on criteria to assess information credibility and on difficulties to apply them.

Defining a framework for the evaluation of information

In any enterprise, decisions need be made during the life cycle of information about its management. This requires information evaluation to take place; a little-understood process. For evaluation support to be both effective and resource efficient, some sort of automatic or semi-automatic evaluation method would be invaluable. Such a method would require an understanding of the diversity of the contexts in which evaluation takes place so that evaluation support can have the necessary context-sensitivity. This paper identifies the dimensions influencing the information evaluation process and defines the elements that characterise them, thus providing the foundations for a context-sensitive evaluation framework.

The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions

The value of forensic results crucially depends on the propositions and the information under which they are evaluated. For example, if a full single DNA profile for a contemporary marker system matching the profile of Mr A is assessed, given the propositions that the DNA came from Mr A and given it came from an unknown person, the strength of evidence can be overwhelming (e.g., in the order of a billion). In contrast, if we assess the same result given that the DNA came from Mr A and given it came from his twin brother (i.e., a person with the same DNA profile), the strength of evidence will be 1, and therefore neutral, unhelpful and irrelevant 1 to the case at hand. While this understanding is probably uncontroversial and obvious to most, if not all practitioners dealing with DNA evidence, the practical precept of not specifying an alternative source with the same characteristics as the one considered under the first proposition may be much less clear in other circumstances. During discussions with colleagues and trainees, cases have come to our attention where forensic scientists have difficulty with the formulation of propositions. It is particularly common to observe that results (e.g., observations) are included in the propositions, whereas-as argued throughout this note-they should not be. A typical example could be a case where a shoe-mark with a logo and the general pattern characteristics of a Nike Air Jordan shoe is found at the scene of a crime. A Nike Air Jordan shoe is then seized at Mr A's house and control prints of this shoe compared to the mark. The results (e.g., a trace with this general pattern and acquired characteristics corresponding to the sole of Mr A's shoe) are then evaluated given the propositions 'The mark was left by Mr A's Nike Air Jordan shoe-sole' and 'The mark was left by an unknown Nike Air Jordan shoe'. As a consequence, the footwear examiner will not evaluate part of the observations (i.e., the mark presents the general pattern of a Nike Air Jordan) whereas they can be highly informative. Such examples can be found in all forensic disciplines. In this article, we present a few such examples and discuss aspects that will help forensic scientists with the formulation of propositions. In particular, we emphasise on the usefulness of notation to distinguish results that forensic scientists should evaluate from case information that the Court will evaluate.

High value information in engineering organisations

The management of information in engineering organisations is facing a particular challenge in the ever-increasing volume of information. It has been recognised that an effective methodology is required to evaluate information in order to avoid information overload and to retain the right information for reuse. By using, as a starting point, a number of the current tools and techniques which attempt to obtain ‘the value’ of information, it is proposed that an assessment or filter mechanism for information is needed to be developed. This paper addresses this issue firstly by briefly reviewing the information overload problem, the definition of value, and related research work on the value of information in various areas. Then a “characteristic” based framework of information evaluation is introduced using the key characteristics identified from related work as an example. A Bayesian Network diagram method is introduced to the framework to build the linkage between the characteristics and information value in order to quantitatively calculate the quality and value of information. The training and verification process for the model is then described using 60 real engineering documents as a sample. The model gives a reasonable accurate result and the differences between the model calculation and training judgements are summarised as the potential causes are discussed. Finally, several further issues including the challenge of the framework and the implementations of this evaluation assessment method are raised.

Tudo o que vem à rede é peixe? A credibilidade da informação na web

O objetivo deste estudo é conhecer uma vertente específica do perfil informacional dos alunos que cresceram na era digital, ditos nativos digitais, na utilização que fazem da Internet. Assim, pretende-se aferir os critérios que aplicam na avaliação das fontes de informação disponíveis na web na vertente da credibilidade. A análise dos dados obtidos, resultantes da aplicação de 195 questionários a alunos do 8º ao 12º, é enquadrada e sustentada por revisão da literatura acerca do conceito de credibilidade da informação.

A credibilidade da informação na web: estudo de práticas informacionais em contexto escolar

Apresentam-se os resultados parcelares de um estudo destinado a promover um melhor conhecimento das estratégias que os jovens em idade escolar (12-18 anos) consideram relevantes para avaliar as fontes de informação disponíveis na Internet. Para o efeito, foi aplicado um inquérito distribuído a uma amostra de 195 alunos de uma escola do 3o ciclo e outra do ensino secundário de um concelho do distrito do Porto. São apresentados e discutidos os resultados acerca da perceção destes alunos quanto aos critérios a aplicar na avaliação das fontes de informação disponíveis na Internet, na vertente da credibilidade. Serão apresenta- das as práticas que os jovens declaram ter relativamente ao uso de critérios de autoria, originalidade, estrutura, atualidade e de comparação para avaliar a credibilidade das fontes de informação. Em complemento, estes resultados serão comparados e discutidos com as perceções que os mesmos inquiridos demonstram possuir relativamente aos elementos que compõem cada um destes critérios. A análise dos dados obtidos é enquadrada e sustentada numa revisão da literatura acerca do conceito de credibilidade, aplicado às fontes de informação disponíveis na Internet. São ainda abordados alguns tópicos relaciona- dos com a inclusão de estratégias de avaliação da credibilidade da informação digital no modelo Big6, um dos modelos de desenvolvimento de competências de literacia da informação mais conhecidos e utilizados nas bibliotecas escolares portuguesas.

Strategies to assess web resources credibility: results of a case study in primary and secondary schools from Portugal

In this paper, three approaches for the assessment of credibility in a web environment will be presented, namely the checklists model, the cognitive authority model and the contextual model. This theoretical framework was used to conduct a study about the assessment of web resources credibility among a sample of 195 students, from elementary and secondary schools in a municipality in Oporto district (Portugal). The practices that young people and children claim to use regarding the use of criteria for web resources selection will be presented. In addition, these results will be discussed and compared with the perceptions that these respondents have demonstrated for the use of criteria to establish or assess authorship, originality, or information resources structure. These results will be also discussed and compared with the perceptions that these respondents have demonstrated for the elements that make up each of these criteria.

Kontekstitietoisen mobiilipelin suunnittelu ja toteutus

Kontekstitietoisuuden katsotaan voivan parantaa sovellusten ja palvelujen käytettävyyttä matkapuhelimissa. Kontekstitietoisuuden tekniikoita voidaan käyttää myös peleissä, joko siksi, että ne mahdollistavat uudenlaisia pelejä, tai siksi, että peleillä voidaan havainnollistaa ja testata eri tekniikoiden toimintaa. Diplomityössä esitellään prototyyppi monen pelaajan kontekstitietoisesta mobiilipelistä, jossa pelivälineinä käytetään kamerapuhelimella luettavia tavallisia viivakoodeja. Viivakoodit on yhdistetty palvelimella sijaitsevan pelimaailman kohteisiin, joiden omistuksesta pelaajat kilpailevat. Peliä on tarkoitus arvioida myöhemmin pelattavuuden ja idean kiinnostavuuden kannalta. Prototyypin toinen tehtävä on havainnollistaa Multi-User Publishing Environment (MUPE) -sovellusalustan tukea kontekstitietoisuudelle. Työ kuvaa pelin suunnittelun, toteutuksen ja arvioinnin alkaen varhaisimmista ideoista ja päättyen osittaiseen prototyyppiin. Prototyypissä on toteutettu osa pelilogiikasta ja käyttöliittymästä, mutta sitä ei ole integroitu kontekstitietoa kerääviin sensoreihin. Pelin suunnittelussa käytettiin apuna heuristista arviointia ja kahta fokusryhmähaastattelua.

ECS Resources for INFO 2009

These slides support students in understanding how to respond to the challenge of: "I’ve been told not to use Google or Wikipedia to research my essay. What else is there?" The powerpoint guides students in how to identify high quality, up to date and relevant resources on the web that they can reliably draw upon for their academic assignments. The slides were created by the subject liaison librarian who supports the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the UNiversity of Southampton, Fiona Nichols.

How Preliminary Are Preliminary Decisions?

The present research focuses on the question of whether even a preliminary decision causes a confirmation bias in order to maintain the status quo and examines individual differences in consistency between the preliminary and final decision and biased information processing. Dispositional Need for Closure (NFC, Webster & Kruglanski, 1994) was expected to predict revision or maintenance of the preliminary decision (decision consistency) after additional information on the issue was searched for and evaluated. Participants higher on dispositional NFC were less likely to change their preliminary decision than participants lower on dispositional NFC. Furthermore, the effect of NFC on decision consistency was fully mediated by biased information evaluation following the preliminary decision.