The impact of the Board of Director's composition on companies performance

The impact of the Board of Directors’ composition on companies’ performance This paper studies the impact that the board of directors’ composition has on companies’ performance in the Italian market. The research has been carried out by using a sample of 10 Italian companies, across different market sectors, over a period of 10 years (2005-2014). The characteristics of the BoD taken into consideration are the following: board size, board diversity (% of female directors), board independence and CEO duality. Results from the sample data collected concluded that these factors have a statistically significant impact on the performance of the companies that have been analysed.

The relationship between board of director's nationality diversity and financial performance

Companies are moving to a more international structure; going into new markets and having an increased competition in all fronts. Therefore, the practices that lead companies to a more efficient and competitive position are praised. The management of the workforce comes as one of the main concerns of companies, aiming at performance enhancing and at creating better environments that both attract and maintain the professional talents. In an increasingly international environment, companies tend to look for the specialists and best professionals, regardless of their nationality. This new structure with several different nationalities working together poses new challenges for companies. Understanding if and how a more diverse has a relationship with financial performance is the starting point for better managing this new corporate structure.

Board of Director and Officer of the Student Athletic Association, 1897-98

Back Row: Robert Danforth, Frank S. Simons, Forris D. Stevens, Albert H. Keith (baseball mngr), Harry Helfman (recoding secretary)

Middle Row: Harry L. Weinstein (treasurer), Carl M. Green, J.Deforest Richards (President), Albert Stevens, A.L.C. Atkinson

Front Row: Harry S. Vernon, Harrison Smalley, Harry T. Heald (ass't football mngr.)

Missing: Charles Tryon (vice president), Harry Potter (financial secretary), Ward Hughes (foootball mngr.), Allan Campbell (track mngr.), Walter Herrick (track mngr.), Harold Emmons, ass't football mngr.)

UK and US board director perceptions of the significance of gender and racial diversity on board governance

This mixed-methods study examines the perceptions and opinions of United Kingdom FTSE 350, and US Fortune 500 board of director members regarding the significance of gender and racial diversity on board governance. Perceptions were gathered from eighty-two directors using self-reported surveys and semi-structured interviews. This thesis provides: (1) an opportunity to investigate the perceptions (opinions) of directors regarding the effects of board gender and racial diversity on new board appointments and on the dynamics of board decision making (2) an opportunity to investigate the perception (opinions) of directors regarding the effects of social capital, new board appointments and the dynamics of board decision making, and (3) an opportunity to investigate comparatively the differences between UK and US director perceptions regarding the effects of board gender and racial diversity on new board appointments and board decision making. My findings indicate that directors believe that expertise and experience are by far the most important attributes when decisions on the selection of new directors are being considered. While US directors report observing tangible benefits to gender and racial diversity, for their firms, as well as a willingness to consider diversity as an attribute in the selection process; most UK directors were strongly opposed to positive discrimination measures.1 A majority of directors do not believe that their own demographic characteristics, such as race or gender were attributes to their being selected to a board position; however white males perceive that these attributes were considered attributes to the appointment of diverse directors. Moreover, in the United Kingdom, male directors reported that they may be at a disadvantage for board selection when compared to their female counterparts, hence advocating for a selection process with minimal considerations of the demographic characteristics of new directors. Directors do not seem to consider diverse social capital of directors when making board appointments. Instead, US directors were more likely to be assisted in board appointments by their having similar social capital, and UK directors indicated that they only consider director expertise, and that expertise is considered to ensure a broad mix of skills and professional experience on the board.

A framework for diagnosing board effectiveness

Pressure on boards to improve corporate performance and management oversight has led to a series of inquiries and reports advocating governance reform. These reports largely reflect an agency perspective of governance and seek to ensure greater board independence from and control of management. While board independence is important to good governance, we contend that frameworks, models and advice centred on one element of governance ignore the complexity of how boards work. We develop a holistic board framework based upon the concept of board intellectual capital to address this concern. Our framework proposes a series of inputs (e.g. company history, company constitution, legal environment) that lead to a particular mix of board intellectual capital. We contend that the balance of the different elements of board intellectual capital will lead to a series of board behaviours. Further, the board needs to mobilise its intellectual capital to carry out a series of roles. The exact nature of these roles will depend on the company's requirements. Thus, the governance outputs of organisational performance, board effectiveness and director effectiveness will depend on the match between the board's intellectual capital and the roles required of it. We conclude by demonstrating the benefits of this framework as a diagnostic tool. We outline how boards wishing to improve their governance systems can diagnose common governance problems by evaluating their own board's capabilities in relation to the different components of the framework.

The determinants and effects of board nomination committees

This article assesses the corporate governance-related antecedents of nomination committee adoption, and the impact of nomination committees’ existence and their composition on board independence and board demographic diversity. We conducted a longitudinal study of board composition amongst 210 Swiss public companies from January 2001 through December 2003, a period during which the Swiss (Stock) Exchange (SWX) introduced new corporate governance-related disclosure guidelines. We find firms with nomination committees are more likely to have a higher number of independent and foreign directors, but not more likely to have a higher number of female board members. Further, the existence of nomination committees is associated with a higher degree of nationality diversity but is not related to board educational diversity. We also find that nomination committee composition matters in the nomination of independent and foreign, but not of female directors. Our results suggest that understanding different board roles and composition require a multi-theoretical approach, and that agency theory, resource-dependence theory and group effectiveness theory help to explain different aspects of board composition and effectiveness. Finally, the article discusses the concept of diversity and appropriate ways to study diversity in a boardroom context.

Ownership Structure, Board Composition and Entrepreneurship : Evidence from Family Firms and Venture-Capital Backed Firms

The purpose of this article is to investigate how ownership structure, especially family and/or venture-capital involvement, as well as entrepreneurial activities, defined as strategic change and renewal, help explain the involvement of independent members on boards of directors. The CEOs of 2,455 small and medium-sized, private enterprises from practically all industries were contacted in a telephone survey, resulting in an exceptionally high response rate. The findings reveal that family firms are more reluctant to involve independent directors on their boards than non-family firms that presence of venture capitalists increases the frequency of independent board members and that ownership has an impact on board roles. The results do not support the hypothesised relationship that independent directors enhance entrepreneurial activities. One implication of our study is that the often-argued-for strategic contribution of outsiders to the boards in family firms may be overemphasised. Another implication is that family firms that choose to acquire additional capital should be aware that this could result in a change in the board composition and the loss of control of the business. However, new and external owners’ inclusion on the board seems to be negotiable since there are also venture capitalists that do not insist on board representation.

Hallintoelinten tehtävät ja palkitseminen osuustoiminnallisissa organisaatioissa

Tämä kvantitatiivisella tutkimuslomakkeella toteutettu tutkimus pyrki selvittämään, miten hallintoelinten (eri hallintoportaiden välistä) palkitsemisen oikeudenmukaisuutta voitaisiin kehittää. Tutkimus pilkkoutui pienempiin osiin, joissa selvitettiin mitä tehtävät hallintoelimissä käsittävät, mitä työn vaativuus hallintoelimissä käsittää sekä miten hallintohenkilön osaaminen, hallintotyön vaativuus ja hallinnon työskentelyprosessi vaikuttavat hallinnon palkitsemiseen. Tutkielman teoriapohja koostuu tieteellisen keskustelun hallinnon dynamiikkaa ilmentävistä teorioista, ryhmäprosessiteoriasta, työn vaativuuden osa-alueista ja rahallisen palkitsemisen oikeudenmukaisuudesta. Konteksti huomioidaan lain, osuuskunnan sääntöjen ja corporate governance -suositusten myötä. Tutkimuksen perusteella muiden paitsi hallitustehtävien osalta hallintoelinten tehtävät näyttäytyivät hieman epäselvinä hallinnon eri tehtävissä toimiville henkilöille. Puheenjohtajatehtävien osalta puheenjohtajat olivat perillä toiminnastaan kun taas muut hallintoelimet antoivat alempia arvioita puheenjohtajan toiminnan toteutumisesta listan mukaisten tehtävien mukaan. Työn vaativuus olisi tutkimuksen mukaan hyvä toteuttaa kokonaisuutena, mikäli sillä tavoitellaan hallinnon palkkioiden oikeudenmukaisuutta. Vaativuusarvioinnissa on siis hyvä huomioida niin tietotaito, ongelmanratkaisu kuin myös vastuu ja vaikuttavuus. Vaativuusarvioinnin lisäksi hallinnon työskentelyprosessin luonteeseen ja hallintohenkilön osaamiseen on syytä kiinnittää huomiota määritettäessä hallinnon palkkioiden sopivaa tasoa.

Evaluating boards and directors

The challenge for boards is to prevent crises in the organisations they govern. Performance evaluation is a key means by which boards can recognise and correct corporate governance problems and add real value to their organisations. Our paper provides a practical introduction to board and director evaluations. We discuss the reasons for governance failures and how board evaluations can help prevent them from occurring. We then review the performance pressures facing boards and the benefits of board evaluations in meeting these pressures. Finally, we introduce our framework for a successful board and/or individual director evaluation, whatever the company type. In this framework, we suggest there are seven key questions to consider when planning a board evaluation and discuss each of these seven decision areas.

Corporate governance and accounting conservatism:evidence from the banking industry

Research Question/Issue: In this paper, we empirically investigate whether US listed commercial banks with effective corporate governance structures engage in higher levels of conservative financial accounting and reporting. Research Findings/Insights: Using both market- and accrual-based measures of conservatism and both composite and disaggregated governance indices, we document convincing evidence that well-governed banks engage in significantly higher levels of conditional conservatism in their financial reporting practices. For example, we find that banks with effective governance structures, particularly those with effective board and audit governance structures, recognize loan loss provisions that are larger relative to changes in nonperforming loans compared to their counterparts with ineffective governance structures. Theoretical/Academic Implications: We contribute to the extant literature on the relationship between corporate governance and quality of accounting information by providing evidence that banks with effective governance structures practice higher levels of accounting conservatism. Practitioner/Policy Implications: The findings of this study would be useful to US bank regulators/supervisors in improving the existing regulatory framework by focusing on accounting conservatism as a complement to corporate governance in mitigating the opaqueness and intense information asymmetry that plague banks.

Política de humanização em serviços de saúde – contributos para a definição de indicadores

A reforma dos cuidados de saúde primários (CSP), iniciada em 2005, visa melhorar o desempenho dos centros de saúde através da reorganização dos serviços em várias unidades funcionais, no sentido de resolver os problemas tendo em conta as necessidades a satisfazer, complementando-se entre si e assumindo compromissos de acessibilidade e qualidade nos cuidados de saúde prestados. Ao mesmo tempo, são criados órgãos de gestão e governação clínica que nunca antes existiram nos CSP, envolvendo a participação da comunidade. A optimização da gestão e da governação clínica permitiu organizar os serviços de saúde em Agrupamentos de Centros de Saúde (AGES), dando-lhes poderes e responsabilidades para solucionarem problemas e tomarem as decisões acertadas e céleres, já que conhecem melhor as necessidades de saúde das populações. As relações burocráticas são substituídas por relações de contratualidade, orientadas para obter melhores resultados em saúde. Partindo destes pressupostos, o estudo realizado pretende analisar a percepção de profissionais de saúde quanto à política de humanização dos CSP, bem como, identificar/construir indicadores que avaliem essa política, sendo um estudo de carácter exploratório e descritivo, à luz de uma abordagem qualitativa. Participaram neste estudo cinco profissionais de saúde da Administração Regional de Saúde (ARS) do Norte, lP, do Departamento de Contratualização, Departamento de Estudos e Planeamento da ARS Norte e do AGES Tâmega 11 - Vale Sousa Sul, seleccionados por conveniência e inquiridos por entrevista semi-estruturada. Os dados foram tratados através da análise de conteúdo com o apoio informático NVivo9. Os resultados apresentados, com base nas entrevistas realizadas aos participantes no estudo, sustentam que os actuais indicadores quantitativos contratualizados com as unidades funcionais, expressam a política de humanização num serviço de saúde, não coincidindo totalmente com as definições internacionais expressas neste estudo.

Carl Icahn pushes ebay to spin-off paypal

The following case-study describes the situation involving eBay, PayPal and Carl Icahn as of February 2014. Its structure is divided between the narrative and a teaching note. The case narrative describes all the events between the three parties until the 24th of February 2014, when the activist investor Carl Icahn sends a public shareholder letter strongly criticizing eBay’s board and corporate governance practices while proposing at the same time the spin-off of PayPal from eBay. The teaching note intends to analyse the possibility of spinning-off PayPal, while at the same time analysing the Corporate Governance issues in eBay’s board. The final conclusion in the teaching note is favourable towards the spin-off of PayPal.

Osakeyhtiölain maksukykyisyystestin sisältö ja tulkintaongelmat

Tämä Pro gradu -työ on lainopillinen selvitys maksukykyisyystestin sääntelystä ja tulkintaongelmista. Tavoitteena on selvittää maksukykyisyystestin sisältöä sekä esitellä ja analysoida erilaisia näkökantoja siitä, miten maksukykyisyystestiä on tulkittu. Testin mukaan osakeyhtiöstä ei saa jakaa varoja, jos jaosta päätettäessä tiedetään tai pitäisi tietää yhtiön olevan maksukyvytön tai varojenjaon aiheuttavan maksukyvyttömyyden. Maksukykyisyystestin avulla hallitaan osakeyhtiön varojenjakoa: maksukykyisyystesti on siis vain väline rajoittaa varojen jakamista. On monia tapoja jakaa varoja, mutta tässä tutkimuksessa keskitytään osingonjakoon. Tutkimusmenetelmänä on laadullinen tutkimus. Tarkastelen aihetta pääosin oikeustieteellisestä näkökulmasta, mutta tutkimus sivuaa myös liiketaloustieteellistä tutkimusmetodia, koska usein maksukykyisyystestiä on perusteltu taloudellisista lähtökohdista käsin ja taloudellisilla tunnusluvuilla. Juridisen tarkastelun muodostaa osakeyhtiölaki ja muita lakeja tarkastellaan vain siinä määrin, kuin ne välittömästi liittyvät maksukykyisyystestiin. Perimmäisenä tutkimuskysymyksenä on selvittää maksukyvyn arvioinnin ajankohta ja kenen vastuulla maksukykyisyystestin toteuttaminen lopulta on: onko se hallituksen, toimitusjohtajan vai osakkeenomistajan vastuulla? Etenkin hallituksen vastuuta ja sen suhdetta maksukykyisyystestiin on oleellista tarkastella, koska tutkimuksen kohteena ovat pörssiyhtiöt.

Conselho de Escola: cenários e desafios de uma escola pública de Natal

This dissertation work studies the Board of Director , created in 1995, in the public schools of the Rio Grande do Norte. It aims to analyze if the creation of this collegiate at Berilo Wanderley State School contributes to accomplish the participation of school segments, democratizing the decision-making in the interior of the institution. This research configures itself as a study of case with information collected together to the representatives of Board through of semi-structuralized interviews. Also they had been essential in the investigation , the informal talks and the registered direct comments in a field diary. For the data analysis we contemplate the following dimensions of the object: the institutionalization process of the Board at Berilo Wanderley State School; the insertion form of the representatives in the collegiate one; the participation of the members in the Board decisions ; the Board s role in the school management and the Board as democratization space. Based in the theoretical and empirical information that we made use, we look for to identify the limits and possibilities of the Board performance in a state public school. The research results indicate that the institutionalization of the Board of Director at the Berilo Wanderley State School presents limits to materialize an effective participation of school community in the essential decisions to the functioning of the school. Also it was possible to underline the fragility of an understanding on the part of school community, the potentialities that the Board in the process of democratization of the school has, translated in the discrepancy between the saying and making of the council members. It can be highlighted that the Board in the school only exists to correspond to a educational policy guideline, with a little significant role , without corresponding to the democratizing possibilities of the collegiate participation. In spite of all the evidenced debilities in the Board of Director experience of the Wanderley Berilo State School , it is worth clarifying that the actor participation, for more limited than either, it represents new something in the setting of the school. In this direction we detach the importance to invest in the improvement of the Board s role, because it can form itself in an educative space for the building of democratic practices in the scope of the school