Étude sur l'équivalence de termes extraits automatiquement d'un corpus parallèle : contribution à l'extraction terminologique bilingue

Mémoire numérisé par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal

Proposta de modelo de dicionário bilíngue português-francês/francês-português de termos de estatutos sociais: uma colaboração para tradudores juramentados

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Equivalência lexical e aspectos morfológicos de termos em português e espanhol do domínio da dermatologia

Pós-graduação em Estudos Linguísticos - IBILCE

Proposta de um dicionário eletrônico terminológico onomasiológico bilíngue inglês-português no domínio das redes neurais artificiais

Pós-graduação em Estudos Linguísticos - IBILCE

Dicionário terminológico bilíngüe francês-português de termos jurídicos: tratamento terminográfico e reflexões sobre terminologia bilíngüe

Pós-graduação em Estudos Linguísticos - IBILCE

Tradução juramentada de documentos escolares→português: questões culturais, terminológicas e tradutórias

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Elaboração de um dicionário terminológico onomasiológico dos neônimos da biotecnologia: tratamento dos dados em português e busca de equivalentes em inglês

Pós-graduação em Estudos Linguísticos - IBILCE

Glossário bilíngue dos termos fundamentais do setor feirístico: busca de equivalências em inglês

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Estudo sobre os aspectos culturais da terminologia dos contratos de prestação de serviços em língua portuguesa e língua francesa

Pós-graduação em Estudos Linguísticos - IBILCE

Falsos cognatos francês-português entre termos de estatutos sociais

In this article we address the search for equivalents in the elaboration of a model dictionary for sworn translators of terms used in bylaws, in the Portuguese-French translation direction. We present, specifically, some cases in which the morphological similarity between the two languages can lead to errors, for example false cognates.

Elaboração de um dicionário português-francês de termos de estatutos sociais: contribuição ao trabalho dos tradutores

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Um estudo da terminologia de certidões de nascimento: elaboração de glossário português-francês para tradutores juramentados

Pós-graduação em Estudos Linguísticos - IBILCE

Terminología bilingüe y documentación ad hoc para intérpretes de conferencias. Una aproximación metodológica basada en corpus

El intérprete de conferencias debe llevar a cabo un trabajo documental antes, durante y después de los eventos en los que presta sus servicios, independientemente de su subcompetencia extralingüística. Desafortunadamente, pocas son las propuestas metodológicas que se hayan planteado para que este profesional pueda realizar esta tarea de manera sistemática. En el presente artículo, repasamos algunos de los trabajos que se han referido a las posibilidades que tiene el intérprete de satisfacer sus necesidades informativas. Una vez reseñada la mencionada escasez de propuestas, presentamos, en un estudio de caso, una aproximación metodológica a este trabajo de documentación, fundamentada en la compilación de corpus paralelos ad hoc y la extracción terminológica en forma de glosarios.

Criteria for the validation of specialized verb equivalents : application in bilingual terminography

Multilingual terminological resources do not always include valid equivalents of legal terms for two main reasons. Firstly, legal systems can differ from one language community to another and even from one country to another because each has its own history and traditions. As a result, the non-isomorphism between legal and linguistic systems may render the identification of equivalents a particularly challenging task. Secondly, by focusing primarily on the definition of equivalence, a notion widely discussed in translation but not in terminology, the literature does not offer solid and systematic methodologies for assigning terminological equivalents. As a result, there is a lack of criteria to guide both terminologists and translators in the search and validation of equivalent terms. This problem is even more evident in the case of predicative units, such as verbs. Although some terminologists (L‘Homme 1998; Lerat 2002; Lorente 2007) have worked on specialized verbs, terminological equivalence between units that belong to this part of speech would benefit from a thorough study. By proposing a novel methodology to assign the equivalents of specialized verbs, this research aims at defining validation criteria for this kind of predicative units, so as to contribute to a better understanding of the phenomenon of terminological equivalence as well as to the development of multilingual terminography in general, and to the development of legal terminography, in particular. The study uses a Portuguese-English comparable corpus that consists of a single genre of texts, i.e. Supreme Court judgments, from which 100 Portuguese and 100 English specialized verbs were selected. The description of the verbs is based on the theory of Frame Semantics (Fillmore 1976, 1977, 1982, 1985; Fillmore and Atkins 1992), on the FrameNet methodology (Ruppenhofer et al. 2010), as well as on the methodology for compiling specialized lexical resources, such as DiCoInfo (L‘Homme 2008), developed in the Observatoire de linguistique Sens-Texte at the Université de Montréal. The research reviews contributions that have adopted the same theoretical and methodological framework to the compilation of lexical resources and proposes adaptations to the specific objectives of the project. In contrast to the top-down approach adopted by FrameNet lexicographers, the approach described here is bottom-up, i.e. verbs are first analyzed and then grouped into frames for each language separately. Specialized verbs are said to evoke a semantic frame, a sort of conceptual scenario in which a number of mandatory elements (core Frame Elements) play specific roles (e.g. ARGUER, JUDGE, LAW), but specialized verbs are often accompanied by other optional information (non-core Frame Elements), such as the criteria and reasons used by the judge to reach a decision (statutes, codes, previous decisions). The information concerning the semantic frame that each verb evokes was encoded in an xml editor and about twenty contexts illustrating the specific way each specialized verb evokes a given frame were semantically and syntactically annotated. The labels attributed to each semantic frame (e.g. [Compliance], [Verdict]) were used to group together certain synonyms, antonyms as well as equivalent terms. The research identified 165 pairs of candidate equivalents among the 200 Portuguese and English terms that were grouped together into 76 frames. 71% of the pairs of equivalents were considered full equivalents because not only do the verbs evoke the same conceptual scenario but their actantial structures, the linguistic realizations of the actants and their syntactic patterns were similar. 29% of the pairs of equivalents did not entirely meet these criteria and were considered partial equivalents. Reasons for partial equivalence are provided along with illustrative examples. Finally, the study describes the semasiological and onomasiological entry points that JuriDiCo, the bilingual lexical resource compiled during the project, offers to future users.

Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers

This paper integrates research on child simultaneous bilingual (2L1) acquisition more directly into the heritage language (HL) acquisition literature. The 2L1 literature mostly focuses on development in childhood, whereas heritage speakers (HSs) are often tested at an endstate in adulthood. However, insights from child 2L1 acquisition must be considered in HL acquisition theorizing precisely because many HSs are the adult outcomes of child 2L1 acquisition. Data from 2L1 acquisition raises serious questions for the construct of incomplete acquisition, a term broadly used in HL acquisition studies to describe almost any difference HSs display from baseline controls (usually monolinguals). We offer an epistemological discussion related to incomplete acquisition, highlighting the descriptive and theoretical inaccuracy of the term. We focus our discussion on two of several possible causal factors that contribute to variable competence outcomes in adult HSs, input (e.g., Sorace, 2004; Rothman, 2007; Pascual y Cabo & Rothman, 2012) and formal instruction (e.g., Kupisch, 2013; Kupisch et al., 2014) in the HL. We conclude by offering alternative terminology for HS outcomes.