How effective are selection methods in medical education? : A systematic review

Funded by Health Education England (HEE) Office for Fair Access (OFFA)

Evolving student–faculty partnerships in medical education through peer-assisted learning

Peer reviewed

Ultrasound in undergraduate medical education: A systematic and critical review

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use in clinical care is growing rapidly, and advocates have recently proposed the integration of ultrasound into undergraduate medical education (UME). The evidentiary basis for this integration has not been evaluated critically or systematically. In this study, we conducted a critical and systematic review framed by the rationales enumerated by advocates of ultrasound in UME in academic publications.

Methods: This research was conducted in two phases. First, the dominant discursive rationales for the integration of ultrasound in UME were identified using techniques from Foucauldian critical discourse analysis (CDA) from an archive of 403 academic publications. We then sought empirical evidence in support of theses rationales, using a critical synthesis methodology also adapted from CDA.

Results: We identified four dominant discursive rationales, with different levels of evidentiary support. Ultrasound was not demonstrated to improve students’ understanding of anatomy. The benefit of ultrasound in teaching physical examination was inconsistent,and rests on minimal evidence. With POCUS, students’ diagnostic accuracy was improved for certain pathologies, but findings were inconsistent for others. Finally, the rationale that ultrasound training in UME will improve quality of patient care was difficult to evaluate.

Discussion: Our analysis has shown that the frequently repeated rationales for the integration of ultrasound in UME are not supported by a sufficient base of empirical research. The repetition of these dominant discursive rationales in academic publications legitimizes them and may preclude further primary research. Since the value of clinical ultrasound use by medical students remains unproven, educators must consider whether the associated financial and temporal costs are justified or whether more research is required.

Disability and Participation in the Professions: Examples from Higher and Medical Education

Learners with disabilities remain under-represented in higher education and courses, such as medicine, that grant access to ‘the professions’. National and professional legislation, policy and guidance have changed over the last few decades in response to reforms in the way disability is viewed and valued by society. Principles of equal rights and equality of opportunity inform the negotiation of widened participation in the professions. However, drawing on the example of medical education, it is possible to see that widening articipation agendas may be insensitive to the needs of learners with disabilities. Analysing the development of practice and policy from a participation perspective suggests that tokenism may have played a role in deprioritising the voices of individuals with disabilities, rendering policy disconnected from the needs of marginalised groups. The concept of participatory parity may provide an opportunity to readdress this misrepresentation.

WONCA Rural Medical Education Guidebook

We are very excited to launch the WONCA Rural Medical Education Guidebook at the 12th WONCA World Rural Health Conference, Gramado, Brazil. The roots for the Guidebook go back to 1992 when a very important meeting was held on the sidelines of the WONCA Global Family Doctor conference in Vancouver, Canada. At this meeting an interested group of rural practitioners saw the need for WONCA to develop a specific focus on rural doctors. As a result, the WONCA Working Party on Rural Practice (WWPRP) was formed. The group set about producing a visionary roadmap for rural medical education in the form of a seminal document, the WONCA policy on Training for Rural Practice 1995. This was followed four years later by further recommendations made in a companion document, the WONCA policy on Rural Health and Rural Practice 1999, which was revised in 2001.

Rationing medical education.

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the role of rationing in medical education. Medical education is expensive and there is a limit to that which governments, funders or individuals can spend on it. Rationing involves the allocation of resources that are limited. This paper discussed the pros and cons of the application of rationing to medical education and the different forms of rationing that could be applied. Even though some stakeholders in medical education might be taken aback at the prospect of rationing, the truth is that rationing has always occurred in one form or another in medical education and in healthcare more broadly. Different types of rationing exist in healthcare professional education. For example rationing may be implicit or explicit or may be based on macro-allocation or micro-allocation decisions. Funding can be distributed equally among learners, or according to the needs of individual learners, or to ensure that overall usefulness is maximised. One final option is to allow the market to operate freely and to decide in that way. These principles of rationing can apply to individual learners or to institutions or departments or learning modes. Rationing is occurring in medical education, even though it might be implicit. It is worth giving consideration to methods of rationing and to make thinking about rationing more explicit.

Using serious games for improving medical education: an application to cytopathology

El objetivo principal del proyecto es desarrollar una plataforma compuesta por aplicaciones educativas gamificadas para el entrenamiento de personal médico en países de recursos limitados en citopatología mediante dispositivos Android de bajo presupuesto. Antes de desplegar la plataforma en países con recursos limitados, va a ser probada en un curso de Introducción a Citopatología de la Escuela Médica de Harvard. El proyecto final debe funcionar tanto en PCs como en dispositivos Android de bajo coste (p.e. 50 dólares americanos, Amazon Kindle Fire 7 pulgadas) y no puede depender de una conexión a internet continua. Se han analizado algunas aplicaciones con propósito de juego y simulaciones gamificadas para tener una base de conocimiento común entre expertos médicos y desarrolladores. También se han estudiado juegos y aplicaciones cuyo objetivo es hacer uso de imágenes médicas para entrenamiento de personal médico o están enfocadas al diagnóstico mediante colaboración por parte de personal no-médico. Esto nos ha permitido identificar las mejores mecánicas de juego para nuestro caso de uso. A continuación, se han comparado diferentes herramientas de edición y motores de juegos desde el punto de vista del rendimiento ofrecido, las plataformas soportadas, su documentación y licencia. Todo ello nos ha permitido elegir la tecnología de desarrollo (libGDX). Finalmente, diseñamos e implementamos un sistema integrado de aplicaciones (editor de contenido y generador de juegos). El sistema está enfocado a reducir la dependencia entre el personal experto y los desarrolladores para crear y mantener contenido educativo. Se trata de una arquitectura formada por un servicio RESTful, y un editor asociado, orientado a la gestión de contenido educativo orientado para citopatología y dos clientes para diferentes plataformas (PC y Android) que consumen dicho servicio. Finalmente, se presentan las conclusiones y el trabajo futuro del proyecto.

Office of Graduate Medical Education Annual Review July 1, 2008-June 30, 2009

Each year the Medical University of South Carolina produces an annual accountability report for the South Carolina General Assembly and the Budget and Control Board. Included is an executive summary, agency discussion and analysis, and strategic planning documents.

Office of Graduate Medical Education Annual Review July 1, 2010-June 30, 2011

Each year the Medical University of South Carolina produces an annual accountability report for the South Carolina General Assembly and the Budget and Control Board. Included is an executive summary, agency discussion and analysis, and strategic planning documents.

Office of Graduate Medical Education Annual Report July 1, 2011-June 30, 2012

Each year the Medical University of South Carolina produces an annual accountability report for the South Carolina General Assembly and the Budget and Control Board. Included is an executive summary, agency discussion and analysis, and strategic planning documents.

Office of Graduate Medical Education Annual Report July 1, 2012-June 30, 2013

Each year the Medical University of South Carolina produces an annual accountability report for the South Carolina General Assembly and the Budget and Control Board. Included is an executive summary, agency discussion and analysis, and strategic planning documents.

Office of Graduate Medical Education Annual Report July 1, 2013-June 30, 2014

Each year the Medical University of South Carolina produces an annual accountability report for the South Carolina General Assembly and the Budget and Control Board. Included is an executive summary, agency discussion and analysis, and strategic planning documents.