Luke, The Friend of Sinners

I examine the portrayal of Jesus as a friend of toll collectors and sinners in the Third Gospel. I aim at a comprehensive view on the Lukan sinner texts, combining questions of the origin and development of these texts with the questions of Luke s theological message, of how the text functions as literature, and of the social-historical setting(s) behind the texts. Within New Testament scholarship researchers on the historical Jesus mostly still hold that a special mission to toll collectors and sinners was central in Jesus public activity. Within Lukan studies, M. Goulder, J. Kiilunen and D. Neale have claimed that this picture is due to Luke s theological vision and the liberties he took as an author. Their view is disputed by other Lukan scholars. I discuss methods which scholars have used to isolate the typical language of Luke s alleged written sources, or to argue for the source-free creation by Luke himself. I claim that the analysis of Luke s language does not help us to the origin of the Lukan pericopes. I examine the possibility of free creativity on Luke s part in the light of the invention technique used in ancient historiography. Invention was an essential part of all ancient historical writing and therefore quite probably Luke used it, too. Possibly Luke had access to special traditions, but the nature of oral tradition does not allow reconstruction. I analyze Luke 5:1-11; 5:27-32; 7:36-50; 15:1-32; 18:9-14; 19:1-10; 23:39-43. In most of these some underlying special tradition is possible though far from certain. It becomes evident that Luke s reshaping was so thorough that the pericopes as they now stand are decidedly Lukan creations. This is indicated by the characteristic Lukan story-telling style as well as by the strongly unified Lukan theology of the pericopes. Luke s sinners and Pharisees do not fit in the social-historical context of Jesus day. The story-world is one of polarized right and wrong. That Jesus is the Christ, representative of God, is an intrinsic part of the story-world. Luke wrote a theological drama inspired by tradition. He persuaded his audience to identify as (repenting) sinners. Luke's motive was that he saw the sinners in Jesus' company as forerunners of Gentile Christianity.

Agreeable Agreement : An Examination into the Quest for a Solid Consensus in Light of Bilateral Doctrinal Dialogues among Anglicans, Lutherans and Roman Catholics

The purpose of this study is to analyse the development and understanding of the idea of consensus in bilateral dialogues among Anglicans, Lutherans and Roman Catholics. The source material consists of representative dialogue documents from the international, regional and national dialogues from the 1960s until 2006. In general, the dialogue documents argue for agreement/consensus based on commonality or compatibility. Each of the three dialogue processes has specific characteristics and formulates its argument in a unique way. The Lutheran-Roman Catholic dialogue has a particular interest in hermeneutical questions. In the early phases, the documents endeavoured to describe the interpretative principles that would allow the churches to together proclaim the Gospel and to identify the foundation on which the agreement in the church is based. This investigation ended up proposing a notion of basic consensus , which later developed into a form of consensus that seeks to embrace, not to dismiss differences (so-called differentiated consensus ). The Lutheran-Roman Catholic agreement is based on a perspectival understanding of doctrine. The Anglican-Roman Catholic dialogue emphasises the correctness of interpretations. The documents consciously look towards a common future , not the separated past. The dialogue s primary interpretative concept is koinonia. The texts develop a hermeneutics of authoritative teaching that has been described as the rule of communion . The Anglican-Lutheran dialogue is characterised by an instrumental understanding of doctrine. Doctrinal agreement is facilitated by the ideas of coherence, continuity and substantial emphasis in doctrine. The Anglican-Lutheran dialogue proposes a form of sufficient consensus that considers a wide set of doctrinal statements and liturgical practices to determine whether an agreement has been reached to the degree that, although not complete , is sufficient for concrete steps towards unity. Chapter V discusses the current challenges of consensus as an ecumenically viable concept. In this part, I argue that the acceptability of consensus as an ecumenical goal is based not only the understanding of the church but more importantly on the understanding of the nature and function of the doctrine. The understanding of doctrine has undergone significant changes during the time of the ecumenical dialogues. The major shift has been from a modern paradigm towards a postmodern paradigm. I conclude with proposals towards a way to construct a form of consensus that would survive philosophical criticism, would be theologically valid and ecumenically acceptable.

Ideological notions in public health care rationing : Case studies from Oregon, New Zealand and Finland

The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze and explicate the ideological content, which is often implicit, in the health care rationing discussion. The phrase "ideological content" refers to viewpoints and assumptions expressed in the rationing discussion that may be widespread and accepted, but without clear evidential support. The study method is philosophical text analysis. The study begins by exploring the literature from the 1970s that affects the present-day rationing discussion. Since ideological contents may have different emphases in realm of health care, three representative cases were studied. The first was a case study of the first and best-known rationing experiment in the American state of Oregon, namely, an experimental rationing plan within the public health program Medicaid, which is designed to provide care for the poor and underprivileged. The second was a study of the only national-level public priority setting that has been conducted in New Zealand. The third examined the Finnish Care Guarantee plan introduced in March 2005. The findings show that several problematic and scientifically mostly unproven concepts have remained largely uncontested in the debate about public health care rationing. Some of these notions already originated decades ago in studies that relied on outdated data or research paradigms. The problematic ideological contents have also been taken up from one publication into another, thereby affecting the rationing debate. The study suggests that before any new public health care rationing experiments are undertaken, these ideological factors should be properly examined, especially in order to avoid repetitious research and perhaps erroneous rationing decisions.

The Nature, Origins, and Consequences of Finnish Shame-Proneness: A Grounded Theory Study

Although shame is a universal human emotion and is one of the most difficult emotions to overcome, its origins and nature as well as its effects on psychosocial functioning are not well understood or defined. While psychological and spiritual counselors are aware of the effects and consequences of shame for an individual s internal well-being and social life, shame is often still considered a taboo topic and is not given adequate attention. This study aims to explain the developmental process and effects of shame and shame-proneness for individuals and provide tools for practitioners to work more effectively with their clients who struggle with shame. This study presents the empirical foundation for a grounded theory that describes and explains the nature, origins, and consequences of shame-proneness. The study focused on Finnish participants childhood, adolescence and adulthood experiences and why they developed shame-proneness, what it meant for them as children and adolescents and what it meant for them as adults. The data collection phase of this study began in 2000. The participants were recruited through advertisements in local and country-wide newspapers and magazines. Altogether 325 people responded to the advertisements by sending an essay concerning their shame and guilt experiences. For the present study, 135 essays were selected and from those who sent an essay 19 were selected for in-depth interviews. In addition to essays and interviews, participants personal notebooks and childhood hospital and medical reports as well as their scores on the Internalized Shame Scale were analyzed. The development of shame-proneness and significant experiences and events during childhood and adolescence (e.g., health, parenting and parents behavior, humiliation, bullying, neglect, maltreatment and abuse) are discussed and the connections of shame-proneness to psychological concepts such as self-esteem, attachment, perfectionism, narcissism, submissiveness, pleasing others, heightened interpersonal subjectivity, and codependence are explained. Relationships and effects of shame-proneness on guilt, spirituality, temperament, coping strategies, defenses, personality formation and psychological health are also explicated. In addition, shame expressions and the development of shame triggers as well as internalized and externalized shame are clarified. These connections and developments are represented by the core category lack of gaining love, validation and protection as the authentic self. The conclusions drawn from the study include a categorization of shame-prone Finnish people according to their childhood and adolescent experiences and the characteristics of their shame-proneness and personality. Implications for psychological and spiritual counseling are also discussed. Key words: shame, internalized shame, external shame, shame development, shame triggers, guilt, self-esteem, attachment, narcissism, perfectionism, submissiveness, codependence, childhood neglect, childhood abuse, childhood maltreatment, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, spiritual abuse, psychological well-being

Ihanteena vapaaehtoisuus : Diakoniatyö Porvoon hiippakunnan seurakunnissa, erityisesti Iitin ja Tampereen rovastikunnissa vuosina 1897-1923

The Ideal of Volunteerism. An institutional approach to social welfare work in the parishes of the Diocese of Porvoo especially in the deaneries of Iitti and Tampere, Finland, in the years 1897-1923 Social welfare work (also known as diakonia) has achieved a high status in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland. Since 1944, provisions of the Finnish Church Act have obliged each parish to employ at least one deacon or deaconess. This study sets out to examine the background and development of social welfare work in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland from the 1890s to the 1920s, by which time social welfare work had become an established practice in the Church. The study investigates the development of social welfare work on the level of parishes. The main source material was collected from sixteen parishes in the Diocese of Porvoo especially in the deaneries of Iitti and Tampere. In the 1890s, two approaches were used in church social work in Finland. The dioceses of Kuopio, Savonlinna and Turku pursued a congregational approach to social work, while the Diocese of Porvoo employed an institutional approach, mainly because of the influence of Bishop Herman Råbergh. This study charts the formation of church social work in Finnish parishes, which took place during a period of tension between the two approaches. The institutional approach to church social work adopted by the Diocese of Porvoo was based on the German system of Asisters= houses@, in which deaconess institutes sent parish sisters to serve congregations. The parish or, in many cases, a separate association dedicated to church social work paid an annual fee to the deaconess institute, which took care of the parish sisters in old age. In the institutional approach, volunteers were recruited to carry out church social work. It was considered as inappropriate to use tax revenue or other public funding for church social work, which was supposed to be based on Christian love for one=s fellow humans and the needy, and for which only voluntary financial contributions were supposed to be used. In the congregational approach, church social work was directly based on the efforts of the parish. The approach relied on the administrative bodies of parishes and the Church, and tax revenue collected by the parishes, as well as other forms of public funding, could be used to carry out the social welfare work. The parishes employed deacons and deaconesses and paid their salaries. The approaches described above were not pursued in their ideal forms; instead, many variations existed. However, in principle, the social welfare work undertaken by the parishes of the Diocese of Porvoo was based on the institutional approach, while the congregational approach was largely employed elsewhere in Finland. Both of the approaches were viable. Parishes began to employ deacons and deaconesses as of the 1890s. The number of parishes which had hired a deacon or deaconess increased particularly in the 1910s, by which time 60% of parishes had employed one. This level was maintained until 1944 when each parish in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland was obliged to employ a deacon or deaconess. Deaconesses usually worked as travelling nurses. The autonomous status of Finland as part of the Russian Empire did not give Finns the right to develop legislation on social affairs and health care. Consequently, the legislation process did not begin until Finland gained its independence in 1917. The social welfare work carried out by parishes and a number of voluntary organisations satisfied the emerging need for medical treatment in Finnish society. Neither the government nor the municipalities had sufficient resources to provide this treatment. Based on the ideal of volunteerism, the institutional social work practiced in the Diocese of Porvoo ran into serious difficulties at the end of the First World War. Because of severe inflation, prices began to rise as of 1915 and tripled in 1917-1918. During the same period, Finnish society went through a deep crisis which escalated into Civil War in spring 1918. This period of economic and social turmoil marked a turning-point which led to a weakening of the status of institutional social work in parishes. Voluntary efforts were no longer sufficient to maintain the practice. In contrast, congregational social work, which was based on public funding, was able to cope with the changes and survived the crisis. The approach to social work adopted by the Diocese of Porvoo turned out to be no more than a brief detour in the history of social work in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland. At the start of the 1920s, the two approaches were integrated into a common vision for establishing church social work as a statutory practice in parishes.

Autuus on katsojan silmässä : lukijakeskeinen tutkimus autuaaksijulistuksista Matt. 5 : 1-12

Autuus on katsojan silmässä: lukijakeskeinen tutkimus autuaaksijulistuksista Matt. 5 : 1-12 on reseptioanalyyttisellä metodilla tehty tutkimus siitä, miten akateeminen tutkimuskirjallisuus ja kymmenen valikoitua Jeesus-elokuvaa ovat ymmärtäneet autuaaksijulistusten merkityksen. Kartoitettuaan autuaaksijulistusten tulkintahistoriaa ja Jeesus-elokuvien kulttuurihistoriaa tutkielma kääntyy reseptiohistorialliseksi analyysiksi. Akateemisen tutkimuskirjallisuuden ja Jeesus-elokuvien esittämät tulkinnat Matteuksen evankeliumin autuaaksijulistuksista rinnas-tetaan suhteessa autuaaksijulistusten tyyliin, sisältöön, rakenteeseen ja merkitykseen. Autuaaksijulistusten tyylin tulkinnan analysointi tapahtuu vertailemalla millainen narratiivinen sijainti autuaaksijulistuksille on tarinassa annettu, millaiseksi elokuvat ja tutkimuskirjallisuus tulkitsevat julistusten esitykselliset puitteet sekä mitä näkemyksiä niillä on julistusten kohdeyleisöstä ja Jeesuksen esiintymistavasta. Autuaaksijulistusten sisällön analysointi tarkoittaa yksittäisten autuaaksijulistusten merkityksen selvittelyä. Tämä tapahtuu edelleen Jeesus-elokuvien ja tutkimuskirjallisuuden tekemiä tulkintoja vertailemalla. Näiden lisäksi tekijä esittää oman käännöksensä autuaaksijulistuksista eksegeettisen analyysin keinoin. Käännöksen tavoitteena ei kuitenkaan ole sanatarkkuus, vaan dynaamisuus lukijan tulkinnan säilyttämiseksi. Autuaaksijulistusten rakenteen analysointi esittelee muutamia erilaisia malleja, joiden mukaan tutkimuskirjallisuudessa Matteuksen evankeliumin autuaaksijulistuksia on ryhmitelty. Tässä alaluvussa elokuva-aineiston ja tutkimuskirjallisuuden erot ovat selkeimmin näkyvillä, sillä elokuvat pyrkivät ryhmittelyn sijasta luomaan autuaaksijulistuksille kokonaan uuden rakenteen, joka sopii elokuvakerrontaan julistuslistaa paremmin. Autuaaksijulistusten merkitystä analysoitaessa tutkielmassa asetetaan rinnan kolme Jeesus-elokuvaa, jotka edustavat tulkintahistoriasta tuttuja tulkinnallisia pääsuuntia: autuaaksijulistukset tulkitaan joko eettisiksi kehotuksiksi tai lupauksiksi armosta. Kolmas Jeesus-elokuva edustaa kontroversiaalista näkemystä, joka kiistää molemmat edellä mainitut tulkintatavat. Johtopäätöksissä osoitetaan reseptiohistorialliseen analyysiin viitaten, että tulkintojen muotoutuminen ei ole yksinkertaista. Tulkintaan vaikuttavat paitsi tulkitsijan ennakkokäsitykset, myös tulkittava teksti ja tulkintatilanne. Johtopäätöksissä puolustetaan myös populaarikulttuurin teologisten elementtien tutkimusta osana eksegetiikkaa.

Kehottomat sielut ja reinkarnaatio Filonin ajattelussa

Egyptin Aleksandriassa ajanlaskun taitteen molemmin puolin elänyt hellenistijuutalainen raamattufilosofi Filon korostaa laajassa tuotannossaan, että ihmisen on suuntauduttava pois kehon, aistinautintojen ja paheiden orjuudesta kohti hyveitä, oikeaa filosofiaa ja pelastusta: sielun transsendenttia päämäärää, Jumalaa. Filon selittää heprealaista Raamattua - lähinnä Tooraa - vertauskuvallisen menetelmän ja kreikkalaisen, etenkin Platonin, filosofian avulla. Filon samaistaa toisiinsa ihmisyksilön henkisen olemuspuolen eli sielun (????) tai mielen (????) ja alkuperäisen, Jumalan kuvan mukaan luodun ihmisen. Ihmisen sielu on Filoninin raamatunselityksessä olemassa ennen kuin se laskeutuu ihmiskehoon, ja sen on aktiivisesti pyrittävä vapautumaan tuosta "vankilastaan" tai "haudastaan" noustakseen jälleen taivaalliseen alkutilaansa. Tämä vastaa läheisesti Platonin etenkin dialogeissaan Faidros ja Timaios esittämää skeemaa, ja myös sanastolliset yhteydet Platoniin ovat merkittäviä. Filon on kuitenkin myös muokannut tämän suuresti arvostamansa filosofin ajatuksia esimerkiksi korostamalla Jumalan armon merkitystä ihmisen pelastumiselle. Ihmisen keho-vankeuden juuret juontavat Filon ajattelussa ensimmäisen maallisen ihmisen lankeemuksesta, jota - kuten paheellista elämää yleisemminkin - hän luonnehtii sielun kuolemaksi. Nautinto vietteli mielen aistien välityksellä, ja ihminen vaihtoi kuolemattomuutensa kuolevaiselämään kehossa. Vaihtokauppa on kuitenkin mahdollista purkaa ja kehosta vähittäin vapautua. Platonilla sielut reinkarnoituvat maan päälle, kunnes ne kykenevät lopullisesti jättämään kehon taakseen. Reinkarnoituminen johtuu yhtäältä sielujen maallista kohtaan tuntemasta vetovoimasta. Toisaalta on kyse paheellisen elämän pitkittämästä rangaistuksesta, jonka alkuperäinen syy Faidroksessa esitetyssä vertauksessa on taitamattomuus taivaallisessa, Zeuksen johtamassa valjakkoajelussa. Lopulta sielut kykenevät kasvattamaan siivet ja nousemaan takaisin taivaaseen. Ne voivat nopeuttaa prosessia suuntautumalla pois ruumiillisista asioista oikeanlaiseen filosofiaan. Filon mainitsee reinkarnaation suoraan vain muutaman kerran koko tuotannossaan. Unien selittämistä koskevan teoksensa De somniis kohdassa 1.138-1.139 hän tuo sen esiin kaikkein selvimmin: kehoista fyysisessä kuolemassa vapautuneista sieluista "yhdet kuolevaiselämän tavanomaisuuksia kaivaten palaavat takaisin". Exodusta selittävän Quaestiones in Exodum -teoksensa kohdassa 2.40 hän puolestaan kuvaa sieluja, joiden ei onnistu nousta taivaan tuolle puolen, Jumalaan: "siipien vähän matkaa niitä kannettua [ne] palaavat heti"; toisille se Jumalan armosta onnistuu: "Onnellisia ovat ne, jotka eivät palaa." Lisäksi teoksen De cherubim kohtaan 114 sisältyy mahdollinen viittaus reinkarnaatioon, maininta kuoleman jälkeen aineettomaan tilaan päätyneiden sielujen rientämisestä "uuteen syntymään". Tutkimuskirjallisuudessa ei reinkarnaatioteema ole saanut osakseen kovin suurta huomiota. Useat tutkijat sivuuttavat aiheen. Jotkut suhtautuvat Filonin reinkarnaatiouskoon epäillen ja jotkut jopa kiistävät sen, mutta näiden tutkijoiden perustelut joko puuttuvat kokonaan tai eivät kestä lähempää tarkastelua. Löytämistäni kannanotoista suuri enemmistö on sillä kannalla, että usko ihmissielun paluuseen maan päälle uuteen kehoon todellakin kuului Filonin ajatteluun. Sen lisäksi, että Filon mainitsee asian suoraan joitain kertoja, reinkarnaatio on myös loogisesti ottaen välttämätön osa hänen ajatteluaan: ihmisen tulee vapautua kehostaan, mutta Filon tekee selväksi, ettei kyse ole fyysisen kuoleman tavoittelusta.

Eläinsuojelu elämänpolitiikkana : Tutkimus eläinasialiikkeestä ja Eläinsuojeluliitto Animalian jäsenistä

Tutkielmassa tarkastellaan perinteiseen, maltilliseen eläinsuojelujärjestöön kuuluvien eläinsuojelijoiden elämänpolitiikkaa ja suomalaista eläinasialiikettä, joka aikaisemmin on hahmotettu lähinnä uuden, radikaalin eläinoikeusaktivismin kautta. Uskontososiologian ja -antropologian alaan sijoittuva tutkimus ottaa osaa sosiologi Anthony Giddensin elämänpolitiikan käsitteestä käytyyn keskusteluun empiirisestä näkökulmasta. Tutkimusongelma on kaksitasoinen.Yksilön tasolla tarkastelu kohdistuu Eläinsuojeluliitto Animaliassa aktiivisesti toimivien eläinsuojelijoiden elämäntapoihin, mielipiteisiin, arvoihin ja ihanteisiin. Liikkeen tasolla tarkastellaan eläinasialiikettä ja sen oletettua jakautumista eläinsuojelu- ja eläinoikeusliikkeisiin. Tutkimuksen taustateorioina ovat Giddensin teoria elämänpolitiikasta sekä filosofi Peter Singerin ja filosofi Tom Reganin teoriat eläinten hyvinvoinnista ja oikeuksista. Suomalaista näkökulmaa eläinasian teoriaan edustavat filosofi Leena Vilkan pohdinnat. Tutkimuksen primääriaineiston muodostavat 12 eläinsuojelijan yksilö- ja ryhmähaastatteluina toteutetut teemahaastattelut sekä 22 eläinsuojelijan lomakekyselynä kerätyt taustatiedot. Sekundääriaineisto koostuu eläinsuojelijoille tehdyistä taustatieto- ja sähköpostihaastatteluista, havainnointiin perustuvasta kenttäpäiväkirjasta, eläinasialiikkeen kirjallisesta materiaalista sekä tutkimusaiheeseen liittyvästä aikaisemmasta tutkimuksesta ja kirjallisuudesta. Tutkimuksen perusteella elämänpolitiikan teoria on käyttökelpoinen arvotutkimuksessa. Eläinsuojelijoiden elämänpolitiikkaa luonnehtivat reflektiivisyys; elämäntavan käyttäminen vaikutuskeinona puoluepolitiikan ohella; yhteiskuntatieteilijä Ronald Inglehartin määrittelyn mukaiset post-materialistiset arvot; tilanne- ja tuotekohtaisesti kontrolloitu tapa kuluttaa; argumentoiva ja vaativa suhtautuminen traditioihin; pyrkimys eroon hierarkioista; paikallisuus toiminnassa ja tavoitteissa; pyrkimys vaikuttaa ihmisten, eläinten ja ympäristön tulevaisuuteen ja kaksijakoinen suhtautuminen asiantuntijoihin. Tutkimuksessa asetetaan kyseenalaiseksi kahden erillisen, suomalaisen eläinasialiikkeen olemassaolo ja osoitetaan, että Suomessa voidaan puhua eläinasialiikkeestä, jossa eri aikakausina, yksilö- ja järjestökohtaisesti, painotetaan aiheittain joko maltillisia tai radikaaleja näkökulmia. Avainsanat: elämänpolitiikka, eläinsuojelu, eläinasialiike, elämäntapa, mielipiteet, arvot, ihanteet

Salaisen evankelistan salaliitto : Uusin keskustelu Klemens Aleksandrialaisen kirjeestä Theodorokselle

This thesis is an assessment of the hoax hypothesis, mainly propagated in Stephen C. Carlson's 2005 monograph "The Gospel Hoax: Morton Smith's Invention of Secret Mark", which suggests that professor Morton Smith (1915-1991) forged Clement of Alexandria's letter to Theodore. This letter Smith claimed to have discovered as an 18th century copy in the monastery of Mar Saba in 1958. The Introduction narrates the discovery story of Morton Smith and traces the manuscript's whereabouts up to its apparent disappearance in 1990 following with a brief history of scholarship of the MS and some methodological considerations. Chapters 2 and 3 deal with the arguments for the hoax (mainly by Stephen C. Carlson) and against it (mainly Scott G. Brown). Chapter 2 looks at the MS in its physical aspects, and chapter 3 assesses its subject matter. I conclude that some of the details fit reasonably well with the hoax hypothesis, but on the whole the arguments against it are more persuasive. Especially Carlson's use of QDE-analysis (Questioned Document Examination) has many problems. Comparing the handwriting of Clement's letter to Morton Smith's handwriting I conclude that there are some "repeated differences" between them suggesting that Smith is not the writer of the disputed letter. Clement's letter to Theodore derives most likely from antiquity though the exact details of its character are not discussed in length in this thesis. In Chapter 4 I take a special look at Stephen C. Carlson's arguments which propose that Morton Smith hid clues of his identity to the MS and the materials surrounding it. Comparing these alleged clues to known pseudoscientific works I conclude that Carlson utilizes here methods normally reserved for building a conspiracy theory; thus Carlson's hoax hypothesis has serious methodological flaws in respect to these hidden clues. I construct a model of these questionable methods titled "a boisterous pseudohistorical method" that contains three parts: 1) beginning with a question that from the beginning implicitly contains the answer, 2) considering everything will do as evidence for the conspiracy theory, and 3) abandoning probability and thinking literally that everything is connected. I propose that Stephen C. Carlson utilizes these pseudoscientific methods in his unearthing of Morton Smith's "clues". Chapter 5 looks briefly at the literary genre I title "textual puzzle -thriller". Because even biblical scholarship follows the signs of the times, I propose Carlson's hoax hypothesis has its literary equivalents in fiction in titles like Dan Brown's "Da Vinci Code" and in academic works in titles like John Dart's "Decoding Mark". All of these are interested in solving textual puzzles, even though the methodological choices are not acceptable for scholarship. Thus the hoax hypothesis as a whole is alternatively either unpersuasive or plain bad science.

Reinhold Niebuhrin syntikäsitys

Reinhold Niebuhrin syntikäsitys rakentuu hänen ihmiskäsitykseensä kuuluvan dikotomian henki-luonto, sekä sitä sisällöllisesti vastaavan käsiteparin vapaus-rajallisuus, varaan. Ihmisen hengen kykyjä ovat transsendenssi yli luonnon, itsetranssendenssi sekä vapaus. Toisaalta ihminen on luontonsa kautta sidottu elollisen luonnon rajallisuuteen, vajavaisuuteen ja kuolevaisuuteen. Ihmisen rajallisuus on hengen kykyjen tavoin Jumalan luomisessa ihmiselle antama ominaisuus, ja siksi hyvä. Ihmisen asema rajallisena ja vapaana, eli ihmisen ristiriita antaa hänelle aiheen synnin tekemiseen. Tämä ihmisen ristiriita ei kuitenkaan ole synnin syy. Ihmisen asema luonnon ja hengen rajapinnassa saa hänet levottomaksi. Levottomuus on ihmisen ristiriidan väistämätön seuralainen ja samalla synnin sisäinen ennakkoehto. Raamatun lankeemuskertomus on Niebuhrin mukaan myytti, joka kuvaa symbolisesti ihmisen lankeamista syntiin. Lankeemusmyyttiä ei pidä tulkita kirjaimellisesti eikä kausaalisesti, sillä tällöin se menettää todellisen merkityksensä. Lankeemusmyytin mukaan ihmisen pahaa edeltää pahan voima, eli paholainen. Koska paholainen lankesi ennen ihmistä, ihmisen synti ei seuraa väistämättä ihmisen tilanteesta vapaana ja rajallisena. Ihmisen synti ei myöskään ole silkkaa perverssiyttä, tietoista pahan tekemistä ja Jumalan vastaista uhmaa. Ihmisen vapaus ja rajallisuus muuttuvat kiusaukseksi vasta, kun ne on tulkittu väärin. Ihmisen tekoa edeltävä pahan voima ehdottaa tätä tulkintaa ihmiselle. Niebuhr kuvaa Kierkegaardilta lainaamillaan ilmauksilla, kuinka 'synti asettaa itsensä' ja 'synti edellyttää itsensä'. Hän puhuu myös 'synnin laadullisesta hypystä'. Syntiä ei koskaan voi johtaa tietystä tilanteesta nousevasta kiusauksesta. Itsensä asettava synti on ihmisen oma synti. Synti edellyttää itsensä tarkoittaa, että kaikkea syntiä edeltää epäuskon synti. Ilman epäuskoa ihmisen levottomuus ei johtaisi syntiin. Niebuhrin metodinen tukeutuminen Kierkegaardiin ei ole johdonmukaista, mistä osittain johtuu, että hänen käsityksensä ihmisen syntiin lankeamisesta on ristiriitainen. Niebuhr sotkee myytti- ja historiapuheen keskenään. Ihmisen tietoisuus ja vapaus ovat edellytys sille, että ihminen ylipäänsä voi tehdä syntiä. Niebuhr torjuu perinteisen kristillisen näkemyksen, jonka mukaan lankeemus merkitsi radikaalia muutosta ihmisen tahdon vapauteen. Ihmisen huomio, ettei hän kykene tekemään valintaa hyvän ja pahan välillä, on Niebuhrin mukaan merkittävin osoitus ihmisen vapaudesta. Ihmisen tietoisuus synnistään ei koskaan ole täydellistä. Ihminen ei tee syntiä täysin tietoisesti ja harkitusti. Toisaalta ihmisen osittainen tietämättömyys synnistään on synnin seuraus. Voidakseen jatkaa synnin tekemistä, eli voidakseen pitäytyä kohtuuttomassa itserakkaudessaan, ihmisen on petettävä ensin itseään, sitten toisia ihmisiä. Niebuhr määrittelee hyvin pidättyväisesti näkemyksensä perisynnistä. Perisynti on ennen kaikkea ihmisen taipumus synnin tekemiseen. Synti on peräisin ihmisen tahdon viasta. Toisaalta Niebuhrin mukaan ihminen tekee väistämättä syntiä. Niebuhr on muutamissa yhteyksissä varovaisesti sillä kannalla, että ihmisen luonto on synnin seurauksena turmeltunut. Toisissa yhteyksissä hän torjuu tällaisen näkemyksen. Niebuhrin näkemys synnin väistämättömyydestä sekä näkemys ihmisen tahdon viasta jäävät jossain määrin irrallisiksi osiksi hänen ihmiskäsityksessään. Ihmisen synti on ylpeyttä ja aistillisuutta. Ihmisellä on taipumus kieltää joko rajallisuutensa tai vapautensa. Kieltäessään rajallisuutensa hän lankeaa ylpeyteen. Kieltäessään vapautensa hän lankeaa aistillisuuteen. Ylpeyden muotoja on neljä: vallanylpeys, tiedonylpeys, moraalinen ylpeys ja hengellinen ylpeys. Aistillisuudessa on kolme vaihetta. Aistillisuus on itserakkautta, yritystä paeta itseä toiseen ihmiseen tai luontoon sekä kolmanneksi pakoa tyhjyyteen ja tiedostamattomuuteen. Synti ja syyllisyys liittyvät väistämättä seksiin. Seksi on aistillisuuden elävin ilmaus ja samalla ihmisen luovuuden kliimaksi. Niebuhr pitää ihmisyhteisöjä yksilöiden ohella rajallisessa mielessä synnin subjekteina. Yhteisöillä on yksilöiden tavoin henki ja luonto, sekä itsetranssendenssin elimiä. Niebuhr pitää yhteisöjä yksilöitä moraalisesti pahempina. Yhteisöt aiheuttavat yksilöitä enemmän objektiivista pahaa. Niebuhr kritisoi syntikäsityksensä pohjalta liberalismiksi kutsumaansa ajattelua. Liberalismin perustana on Niebuhrin mukaan kehityksen idea, joka on perusteetonta optimistista uskoa täydellistyvään maailmaan ja uskoa historiaan itsensä lunastavana prosessina. Niebuhrin mukaan kaikki vallankäyttö elämässä johtaa sortoon ja epäoikeudenmukaisuuteen. Sen vuoksi yhteisöjä on hallittava voimien balanssilla sekä hallituksella. Nämä tekijät on mahdollista ottaa pätevästi huomioon vain demokratiassa. Niebuhr näkee kirkon silkkana ihmisyhteisönä, jolle on kuitenkin suotu evankeliumi. Hän korostaa kirkon syntisyyttä, muttei ollenkaan sen pyhyyttä.

Essays on Economic Integration and Labour Demand

This dissertation consists of an introductory section and three essays investigating the effects of economic integration on labour demand by using theoretical models and by empirical analysis. The essays adopt an intra-industry trade approach to specify a theoretical framework of estimation for determining the effects of economic integration on employment. In all the essays the empirical aim is to explore the labour demand consequences of European integration. The first essay analyzes how labour-demand elasticities with own price have changed during the process of economic integration. As a theoretical result, intensified trade competition increases labour-demand elasticity, whereas better advantage of economies of scale decreases labour-demand elasticity by decreasing the elasticity of substitution between differentiated products. Furthermore, if integration gives rise to an increase in input-substitutability and/or outsourcing activities, labour demand will become more elastic. Using data from the manufacturing sector from 1975 to 2002, the empirical results provide support for the hypothesis that European integration has contributed to increased elasticities of total labour demand in Finland. The second essay analyzes how economic integration affects the impact of welfare poli-cies on employment. The essay considers the viability of financing the public sector, i.e. public consumption and social security expenses, by general labour taxation in an economy which has become more integrated into international product markets. The theoretical results of the second essay indicate that, as increased trade competition crowds out better economies of scale, it becomes more costly to maintain welfare systems financed by labour taxation. Using data from European countries for the years 1975 to 2004, the empirical results provide inconsistent evidence for the hypothesis that economic integration has contributed to the distortion effects of welfare policies on employment. The third essay analyzes the impact of profit sharing on employment as a way to introduce wage flexibility into the process of economic integration. The results of the essay suggest that, in theory, the effects of economic integration on the impact of profit sharing on employment clearly depend on a trade-off between intensified competition and better advantage of economies of scale. If product market competition increases, the ability of profit sharing to improve employment through economic integration increases with moderated wages. While, the economic integration associating with market power in turn decrease the possibilities of profit sharing with higher wages to improve employment. Using data from the manufacturing sector for the years 1996 to 2004, the empirical results show that profit-sharing has a positive impact on employment during the process of European integration, but can have ambiguous effects on the stability of employment in Finland.

Tasa-arvo ja muutoksen rajat : Sukupuolten tasa-arvo poliittisena ongelmana Ranskan parité- ja Suomen kiintiökeskusteluissa

The study looks at the debates on gender equality in political decision-making in Finland and France in the 1990s and 2000s by analysing the argumentation for parité and quotas and the ways in which gender equality was constructed as a political problem. The focus of the study is on the parliamentary debates on the amendment of the electoral law in France in 2000 and the introduction of quota regulations into the Act on Equality in Finland in 1994 - 1995. The debates ended in the adoption of quota regulations in the electoral lists (France) and in the executive and preparatory bodies at the national and the local level (Finland). Apart from the analysis of the parliamentary debates, the study explores the political processes preceding the adoption of legislation as well as the debates on quotas and parity in Finnish and French societies in the 1980s and 1990s. The debates on gender equality are analysed as the sites of struggle and change with regard to the normative boundaries of gender equality, as well as of politics and citizenship. The cross-cultural perspective gives room to explore the ways in which gender equality and change can be imagined in different national contexts, and which kinds of discursive resources are available for the politicization of gender equality. Specific attention is paid to the discursive frames and agenda settings in the debates and how these set the limits of the imaginable and the possible in the promotion of gender equality. In both Finland and France, the promotion of equality was constructed as a national project, in which the main beneficiary was the society or the nation as a whole. In France, gender equality was an inherent part of the promotion of French democracy; in Finland, gender equality was regarded as a means to bring the expertise of both women and men to the benefit of the whole society. Furthermore, in both countries the promotion of gender equality was based on the harmonious cooperation of women and men and the temporal dimension of "nearly achieved" gender equality. In this kind of a context, gender equality served as a means towards the wider national ends, and there was little room to discuss the aspects of power and agency with regard to gender equality. However, the internationalisation of equality politics, as well as the conflicting interpretations of gender equality in the national political arenas, calls into question the existence of clearly defined and immutable boundaries of "Finnish" and "French" gender equality. At the same time, the rules of the game in politics, including the meaning of French republicanism and Finnish "expert oriented" politics were contested. In this way, the new equality legislation and the preceding political processes played a part in the transformation of the limits of gender equality, politics and citizenship.

Essays in Philosophical Moral Psychology

The dissertation consists of four essays and a comprehensive introduction that discusses the topics, methods, and most prominent theories of philosophical moral psychology. I distinguish three main questions: What are the essential features of moral thinking? What are the psychological conditions of moral responsibility? And finally, what are the consequences of empirical facts about human nature to normative ethics? Each of the three last articles focuses on one of these issues. The first essay and part of the introduction are dedicated to methodological questions, in particular the relationship between empirical (social) psychology and philosophy. I reject recent attempts to understand the nature of morality on the basis of empirical research. One characteristic feature of moral thinking is its practical clout: if we regard an action as morally wrong, we either refrain from doing it even against our desires and interests, or else feel shame or guilt. Moral views seem to have a conceptual connection to motivation and emotions – roughly speaking, we can’t conceive of someone genuinely disapproving an action, but nonetheless doing it without any inner motivational conflict or regret. This conceptual thesis in moral psychology is called (judgment) internalism. It implies, among other things, that psychopaths cannot make moral judgments to the extent that they are incapable of corresponding motivation and emotion, even if they might say largely the words we would expect. Is internalism true? Recently, there has been an explosion of interest in so-called experimental philosophy, which is a methodological view according to which claims about conceptual truths that appeal to our intuitions should be tested by way of surveys presented to ordinary language users. One experimental result is that the majority of people are willing to grant that psychopaths make moral judgments, which challenges internalism. In the first article, ‘The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy’, I argue that these results pose no real threat to internalism, since experimental philosophy is based on a too simple conception of the relationship between language use and concepts. Only the reactions of competent users in pragmatically neutral and otherwise conducive circumstances yield evidence about conceptual truths, and such robust intuitions remain inaccessible to surveys for reasons of principle. The epistemology of folk concepts must still be based on Socratic dialogue and critical reflection, whose character and authority I discuss at the end of the paper. The internal connection between moral judgment and motivation led many metaethicists in the past century to believe along Humean lines that judgment itself consists in a pro-attitude rather than a belief. This expressivist view, as it is called these days, has far-reaching consequences in metaethics. In the second essay I argue that perhaps the most sophisticated form of contemporary expressivism, Allan Gibbard’s norm-expressivism, according to which moral judgments are decisions or contingency plans, is implausible from the perspective of the theory of action. In certain circumstances it is possible to think that something is morally required of one without deciding to do so. Morality is not a matter of the will. Instead, I sketch on the basis of Robert Brandom’s inferentialist semantics a weak form of judgment internalism, according to which the content of moral judgment is determined by a commitment to a particular kind of practical reasoning. The last two essays in the dissertation emphasize the role of mutual recognition in the development and maintenance of responsible and autonomous moral agency. I defend a compatibilist view of autonomy, according to which agents who are unable to recognize right and wrong or act accordingly are not responsible for their actions – it is not fair to praise or blame them, since they lacked the relevant capacity to do otherwise. Conversely, autonomy demands an ability to recognize reasons and act on them. But as a long tradition in German moral philosophy whose best-known contemporary representative is Axel Honneth has it, both being aware of reasons and acting on them requires also the right sort of higher-order attitudes toward the self. Without self-respect and self-confidence we remain at the mercy of external pressures, even if we have the necessary normative competence. These attitudes toward the self, in turn, are formed through mutual recognition – we value ourselves when those who we value value us. Thus, standing in the right sort of relations of recognition is indirectly necessary for autonomy and moral responsibility. Recognition and valuing are concretely manifest in actions and institutions, whose practices make possible participation on an equal footing. Seeing this opens the way for a kind of normative social criticism that is grounded in the value of freedom and automomy, but is not limited to defending negative rights. It thus offers a new way to bridge the gap between liberalism and communitarianism.

Modeling ecological and evolutionary processes in spatially structured populations

Many species inhabit fragmented landscapes, resulting either from anthropogenic or from natural processes. The ecological and evolutionary dynamics of spatially structured populations are affected by a complex interplay between endogenous and exogenous factors. The metapopulation approach, simplifying the landscape to a discrete set of patches of breeding habitat surrounded by unsuitable matrix, has become a widely applied paradigm for the study of species inhabiting highly fragmented landscapes. In this thesis, I focus on the construction of biologically realistic models and their parameterization with empirical data, with the general objective of understanding how the interactions between individuals and their spatially structured environment affect ecological and evolutionary processes in fragmented landscapes. I study two hierarchically structured model systems, which are the Glanville fritillary butterfly in the Åland Islands, and a system of two interacting aphid species in the Tvärminne archipelago, both being located in South-Western Finland. The interesting and challenging feature of both study systems is that the population dynamics occur over multiple spatial scales that are linked by various processes. My main emphasis is in the development of mathematical and statistical methodologies. For the Glanville fritillary case study, I first build a Bayesian framework for the estimation of death rates and capture probabilities from mark-recapture data, with the novelty of accounting for variation among individuals in capture probabilities and survival. I then characterize the dispersal phase of the butterflies by deriving a mathematical approximation of a diffusion-based movement model applied to a network of patches. I use the movement model as a building block to construct an individual-based evolutionary model for the Glanville fritillary butterfly metapopulation. I parameterize the evolutionary model using a pattern-oriented approach, and use it to study how the landscape structure affects the evolution of dispersal. For the aphid case study, I develop a Bayesian model of hierarchical multi-scale metapopulation dynamics, where the observed extinction and colonization rates are decomposed into intrinsic rates operating specifically at each spatial scale. In summary, I show how analytical approaches, hierarchical Bayesian methods and individual-based simulations can be used individually or in combination to tackle complex problems from many different viewpoints. In particular, hierarchical Bayesian methods provide a useful tool for decomposing ecological complexity into more tractable components.

Below-ground processes in meadow soil under elevated ozone and carbon dioxide : - Greenhouse gas fluxes, N cycling and microbial communities

This thesis focuses on how elevated CO2 and/or O3 affect the below-ground processes in semi-natural vegetation, with an emphasis on greenhouse gases, N cycling and microbial communities. Meadow mesocosms mimicking lowland hay meadows in Jokioinen, SW Finland, were enclosed in open-top chambers and exposed to ambient and elevated levels of O3 (40-50 ppb) and/or CO2 (+100 ppm) for three consecutive growing season, while chamberless plots were used as chamber controls. Chemical and microbiological analyses as well as laboratory incubations of the mesocosm soils under different treatments were used to study the effects of O3 and/or CO2. Artificially constructed mesocosms were also compared with natural meadows with regards to GHG fluxes and soil characteristics. In addition to research conducted at the ecosystem level (i.e. the mesocosm study), soil microbial communities were also examined in a pot experiment with monocultures of individual species. By comparing mesocosms with similar natural plant assemblage, it was possible to demonstrate that artificial mesocosms simulated natural habitats, even though some differences were found in the CH4 oxidation rate, soil mineral N, and total C and N concentrations in the soil. After three growing seasons of fumigations, the fluxes of N2O, CH4, and CO2 were decreased in the NF+O3 treatment, and the soil NH4+-N and mineral N concentrations were lower in the NF+O3 treatment than in the NF control treatment. The mesocosm soil microbial communities were affected negatively by the NF+O3 treatment, as the total, bacterial, actinobacterial, and fungal PLFA biomasses as well as the fungal:bacterial biomass ratio decreased under elevated O3. In the pot survey, O3 decreased the total, bacterial, actinobacterial, and mycorrhizal PLFA biomasses in the bulk soil and affected the microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of L. pratensis, whereas the bulk soil and rhizosphere of the other monoculture, A. capillaris, remained unaffected by O3. Elevated CO2 caused only minor and insignificant changes in the GHG fluxes, N cycling, and the microbial community structure. In the present study, the below-ground processes were modified after three years of moderate O3 enhancement. A tentative conclusion is that a decrease in N availability may have feedback effects on plant growth and competition and affect the N cycling of the whole meadow ecosystem. Ecosystem level changes occur slowly, and multiplication of the responses might be expected in the long run.