Discurso pronunciado por el Dr. Raúl Prebisch, Director Principal a cargo de la Secretaría Ejecutiva de la Comisión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL)

Publicado también en: Boletín Económico Interamericano, v. 1, No 2, p. 26-30, octubre 1959

Exposición del Dr. Prebisch, Director Principal a cargo de la Secretaría Ejecutiva, en la primera sesión plenaria, el día 11 de mayo de 1959

Documento Informativo, No 4. Publicado separadamente en cada idioma; y en: CEPAL. Mercado Común Latinoamericano. México, 1959, p. 113-116, E/CN.12/531, No de venta: 59.II.G.4; ECLA: Latin American Commun Market. New York, 1959, p. 130-133, E/CN.12/531, No de venta: 59.II.G.4

Exposición del Dr. Prebisch, Subsecretario de las Naciones Unidas a cargo de la Secretaría Ejecutiva de la CEPAL, en la sesión plenaria del 27 de octubre de 1961

Publicado también en: Comercio Exterior, México, DF, v. 11, No 11, p. 650- 652, noviembre 1961, con el título: Reflexiones sobre la integración económica latinoamericana; Revista de Economía y Estadística, v. 6, No 1, p. 175-188, primer trimestre 1962; y en: Industria, v. 77, No 10, p. 49-53

Rol de Europa en los programas de desarrollo económico de América Latina: charla pronunciada durante la feria de Hannover, Alemania, por el Dr. Prebisch, Director Principal a cargo de la Secretaría Ejecutiva de la CEPAL

También en: Comercio Exterior, México, DF, No 5, p. 312-314, mayo 1962

Exposición del Dr. Prebisch, Subsecretario de las Naciones Unidas a cargo de la Secretaría Ejecutiva de la CEPAL, en la sesión inaugural el 5 de marzo de 1962; texto provisional

Documento Informativo, No 4

Cargo unitization in the light of institutional requirements for its support

Includes bibliography

Chile: Port congestion and efficient rationing in cargo transfer operations

Includes bibliography.

O agravo de petição como provimento recursal adequado para impugnar sentenças, decisões interlocutórias e despachos-decisórios na execução trabalhista

A idéia central nasceu em função da atividade profissional. Assistindo no dia-a-dia a dificuldade daqueles que, inconformados com um ato praticado na fase de execução de um processo do trabalho, não encontram, com a segurança desejada, um provimento judicial adequado para submeter a apreciação de tal ato a uma decisão colegiada. Cabe agravo de petição, no prazo de 8 (oito) dias, das decisões do Juiz ou Presidente, nas execuções. Isso é o que consta da legislação específica. Problema dos mais sérios na interpretação desse comando é saber o que são “decisões” proferidas na execução trabalhista, que podem ser impugnadas por meio do recurso de agravo de petição. Essa problemática encontra-se inserida dentro de um contexto processual, daí porque tivemos que seguir um roteiro iniciando com noções básicas de processo, como instrumento utilizado pelo Estado para o exercício de sua função jurisdicional. Saindo do geral para o particular, chegamos no processo do trabalho e suas fases, nos atendo mais na de execução, como ela inicia e termina. O cerne da questão é a reação à execução, os meios reagentes, em especial o recurso, como uma decorrência do princípio do duplo grau de jurisdição, sendo ou não uma garantia constitucional. De acordo com a previsão legal, esse recurso é o agravo de petição. Tratamos dele e dos atos que o juiz pode praticar na execução trabalhista, dizendo da natureza de cada um deles. Cuidamos das decisões interlocutórias, registrando nossa preocupação quanto à dificuldade que temos para sua identificação, mormente na fase de execução. Abordamos, na parte final do trabalho, a matéria relacionada com a possibilidade ou não de recurso contra uma decisão interlocutória, ilustrando esse estudo com alguns exemplos baseados em casos concretos e a solução que foi dada a cada um deles.

Funções e formas de provimento dos diretores das redes estaduais paulista e paranaense

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Skin repair optimization for the airbus A350XWB cargo door surround

The aim of the thesis is to design and verify a doubler for the Airbus A350XWB cargo door surround. The software used for the design is Catia and the software used for the doubler verification are Patran and Nastran.

Detection of smuggled cocaine in cargo using MDCT

OBJECTIVE: Smuggling dissolved drugs, especially cocaine, in bottled liquids is an ongoing problem at borders. Common fluoroscopy of packages at the border cannot detect contaminated liquids. The objective of our study was to develop an MDCT screening method to detect cocaine-containing vessels that are hidden between uncontaminated ones in a shipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were performed on three wine bottles containing cocaine solutions that were confiscated at the Swiss border. Reference values were obtained by scans of different sorts of commercially available wine and aqueous solutions of dissolved sugar. All bottles were scanned using MDCT, and data evaluation was performed by measuring the mean peak of Hounsfield units. To verify the method, simulated testing was performed. RESULTS: Using measurements of the mean peak of Hounsfield units enables the detection of dissolved cocaine in wine bottles in a noninvasive and rapid fashion. Increasing opacity corresponds well with the concentration of dissolved cocaine. Simulated testing showed that it is possible to distinguish between cocaine-contaminated and uncontaminated wine bottles. CONCLUSION: The described method is an efficacious screening method to detect cocaine-contaminated bottles that are hidden between untreated bottles in cargo. The noninvasive examination of cargo allows a questionable delivery to be tracked without arousing the suspicion of the smugglers.

Automated load securing system for cargo vans

The use of lashing means, for example load securing straps or nets, is often time-consuming, especially for courier, express and parcel-services (CEP) using a lot stops. The following article describes the development of an automated load securing system with a three-dimensional-preformed net. Mainly two components interact in this system. On the one hand, an anti-skid system is integrated, which uses the advantages of a low-friction surface for loading and the anti-slip properties of an adhesive coating for the transport. On the other hand, a flexibly adaptive net consisting of high-performance synthetic fibers and integrated shorteners lash different sized transport units. Especially, the automatic lashing should increase the acceptance of the drivers for the new load securing system.

Designed cell penetrating peptide dendrimers efficiently internalize cargo into cells

Redesigning linear cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) into a multi-branched topology with short dipeptide branches gave cell penetrating peptide dendrimers (CPPDs) with higher cell penetration, lower toxicity and hemolysis and higher serum stability than linear CPPs. Their use is demonstrated by delivering a cytotoxic peptide and paclitaxel into cells.

Clinical usefulness of gene-expression profile to rule out acute rejection after heart transplantation: CARGO II.

AIMS A non-invasive gene-expression profiling (GEP) test for rejection surveillance of heart transplant recipients originated in the USA. A European-based study, Cardiac Allograft Rejection Gene Expression Observational II Study (CARGO II), was conducted to further clinically validate the GEP test performance. METHODS AND RESULTS Blood samples for GEP testing (AlloMap(®), CareDx, Brisbane, CA, USA) were collected during post-transplant surveillance. The reference standard for rejection status was based on histopathology grading of tissue from endomyocardial biopsy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), negative (NPVs), and positive predictive values (PPVs) for the GEP scores (range 0-39) were computed. Considering the GEP score of 34 as a cut-off (>6 months post-transplantation), 95.5% (381/399) of GEP tests were true negatives, 4.5% (18/399) were false negatives, 10.2% (6/59) were true positives, and 89.8% (53/59) were false positives. Based on 938 paired biopsies, the GEP test score AUC-ROC for distinguishing ≥3A rejection was 0.70 and 0.69 for ≥2-6 and >6 months post-transplantation, respectively. Depending on the chosen threshold score, the NPV and PPV range from 98.1 to 100% and 2.0 to 4.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION For ≥2-6 and >6 months post-transplantation, CARGO II GEP score performance (AUC-ROC = 0.70 and 0.69) is similar to the CARGO study results (AUC-ROC = 0.71 and 0.67). The low prevalence of ACR contributes to the high NPV and limited PPV of GEP testing. The choice of threshold score for practical use of GEP testing should consider overall clinical assessment of the patient's baseline risk for rejection.

Horacio. Odas. [Ed. bilingüe a cargo de Alejandro Bekes]. Buenos Aires, Losada, 2005, 529 pp.

Fil: lvars, Lorena Ángela.