137 resultados para Fandering Jew.
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Resumo:
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Resumo:
Standing at the corner of Tenth and O streets in the city of Lincoln, Nebraska, any week-day morning between 7:30 and 8 o'clock, you may see pass by you from ten to twenty women with little black woolen shawls on their heads. Ask any citizen who they are, and ninety-nine times in one hundred he will tell you they are "Russians" who live down on the bottoms, that they are going out into the offices and homes to wash and scrub and clean house, and that their husbands are street laborers or work for the railroad. He may then grow confidential and tell you that he "has no use for these people", that "they are only half human", and that he "would just as soon see the Chinese come here as those people". As a matter of fact the greater part of his information is incorrect, partly through race prejudice but chiefly through ignorance of their history. These people, of whom there are about 4,000 in the city (Including "beet fielders"), are Germans, not Russians: they are Teutons, not Slavs; they are Lutheran and Reformed, not Greek Catholics. To be sure they and their ancestors lived in Russia for over one hundred years and they came here directly from the realm of the Czar whoso bona fide citizens they were—but they never spoke the Russian language, never embraced the Greek religion, never intermarried with the Russians, and many of their children never saw a Russian until they left their native village for the new home in America. They despise being called "Russians" just as an Italian resents "Dago"; a Jew, "Sheeny"; and a German, "Dutchman". Ask them where they came from and most of the children and not a few of the grown people will say, "Germany". If you pursue your questioning as to what part of Germany, they will tell you "Saratov" or "Samara" - two governments in the eastern part of Russia on the lower course of the Volga river. The misconceptions concerning the desirability of these German-Russians as citizens arise from their unprogressiveness as compared with those Germans who come to us directly from the mother country. During their century's sojourn in Russia they have been out of the main current of civilization, a mere eddy in the stream of progress. They present a concrete example of arrested development, The characteristics which differentiate them from other Germans are not due to an inherent lack of capacity but to different environment. Notwithstanding this, the German- Russians have some admirable qualities. They bring us large stores of physical energy and an almost unlimited capacity for work. The majority of them are literate although the amount of their education is limited. They are thrifty and independent, almost never applying for public aid. They are law abiding, their chief offenses being those which are traceable to their communal life in Russia. They are extremely religious, all their social as well as spiritual life being bound up in the church which they support right royally. To be sure, the saloon gets their vote (the prohibition vote among them is increasing); but "was not the first miracle that Christ performed the turning of water into wine? If they would shut up the shows (theaters), they wouldn't need to shut up the saloons". The object of this paper is to give the historical setting in which the German-Russians have lived as one means to a better understanding and appreciation of them by our own citizens.
Resumo:
The aim of this thesis is to elucidate the tension between feminism and nationalism in Israel and to investigate the ways by which such discursive currents mark the identities of Israeli women. The specific field of investigation is Israeli theatre, and the identities examined are dramatic characters created by the Israeli playwright Miriam Kainy. Also examined is the character of the playwright herself. Theatre is being observed as a specific field of society in which the position of women can be clarified. What kind of women characters the Israeli theatre produces is therefore a leading question for this study. Feminist theories, focusing on gender aspects of power relations, together with the postcolonial perspective, which considers power relations by focusing on ethnicity and geopolitical aspects, provide the theoretical tools. The social constructionist viewpoint is used since it provides an appropriate understanding of important notions for the thesis, such as nation and identity, considering them as constructions created by discourse. The discourses focused upon are the national v. the feminist discourse and theatre is viewed as a discourse mediator, which is why the dramatic text is the object of the analysis. The specific method of analysis is inspired by Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis. The main part of the thesis consists of a discursive analysis of five women characters, constructed within a period of about five decades, namely between the 1950s and 1990s. Each one of these characters consists of an articulation which is considered representative of a specific time-relevant discursive struggle between the two discourses in question. One of the central assumptions of the thesis is that the Israeli national identity is thoroughly masculine. The identity problems it has been causing Israeli women since the time of the pioneers until today are clearly illuminated throughout the analysis. The conclusion emphasises that the subjectpositions being introduced by Israeli national discourse, namely the ways of being a New Jew, an Israeli, collide with those introduced by feminist discourse, i.e. ways of being an independent woman subject. Nevertheless, each and every character demonstrates creative ways of transforming the discourses by aiming at a hybrid formation.
Resumo:
In 1936, the African-American intellectual W.E.B. Du Bois visited Nazi Germany for a period of five months. Two years later, the eleven-year-long American exile of the German philosopher Theodor W. Adorno began. From the latter’s perspective, the United States was the “home” of the Culture Industry. One intuitively assumes that these sojourns abroad must have amounted to “hell on earth” for both the civil rights activist W.E.B. Du Bois and the subtle intellectual Adorno. But was this really the case? Or did they perhaps arrive at totally different conclusions? This thesis deals with these questions and attempts to make sense of the experiences of both men. By way of a systematic and comparative analysis of published texts, hitherto unpublished documents and secondary literature, this dissertation first contextualizes Du Bois’s and Adorno’s transatlantic negotiations and then depicts them. The panoply of topics with which both men concerned themselves was diverse. In Du Bois’s case it encompassed Europe, science and technology, Wagner operas, the Olympics, industrial education, race relations, National Socialism and the German Africanist Diedrich Westermann. The opinion pieces which Du Bois wrote for the newspaper “Pittsburgh Courier” during his stay in Germany serve as a major source for this thesis. In his writings on America, Adorno concentrated on what he regarded as the universally victorious Enlightenment and the predominance of mass culture. This investigation also sheds light on the correspondences between the philosopher and Max Horkheimer, Thomas Mann, Walter Benjamin, Siegfried Kracauer and Oskar and Maria Wiesengrund. In these autobiographical texts, Adorno’s thoughts revolve around such diverse topics as the American landscape, his fears as German, Jew and Left-Hegelian as well as the loneliness of the refugee. This dissertation has to refute the intuitive assumption that Du Bois’s and Adorno’s experiences abroad were horrible events for them. Both men judged the foreign countries in which they were staying in an extremely differentiated and subtle manner. Du Bois, for example, was not racially discriminated against in Germany. He was also delighted by the country’s rich cultural offerings. Adorno, for his part, praised the U.S.’s humanity of everyday life and democratic spirit. In short: Although both men partly did have to deal with utterly negative experiences, the metaphor of “hell on earth” is simply untenable as an overall conclusion.
Resumo:
befunden und widerleget von Johann Georg Wachter
Resumo:
Text teilw. hebr.
Resumo:
Filón de Alejandría (30?a. C.-50? d. C.) es una figura clave para conocer la profunda relación entre Judaísmo y Helenismo en el siglo I d. C. Judío practicante, su profundo dominio de la lengua, la literatura y, de modo especial, la retórica griegas lo convierten en una personalidad extraordinaria de su tiempo, tanto por su exégesis de la Torá (o Pentateuco) como por sus escritos apologéticos, históricos y filosóficos. Su testimonio es de gran valor para todo estudioso de la Antigüedad clásica por los muchos datos que aporta acerca de la filosofía, el pensamiento, la educación y la tradición clásica en el momento histórico que le tocó vivir, precisamente en un centro cultural de excepcional importancia dentro del Imperio romano
Resumo:
Filón de Alejandría (30?a. C.-50? d. C.) es una figura clave para conocer la profunda relación entre Judaísmo y Helenismo en el siglo I d. C. Judío practicante, su profundo dominio de la lengua, la literatura y, de modo especial, la retórica griegas lo convierten en una personalidad extraordinaria de su tiempo, tanto por su exégesis de la Torá (o Pentateuco) como por sus escritos apologéticos, históricos y filosóficos. Su testimonio es de gran valor para todo estudioso de la Antigüedad clásica por los muchos datos que aporta acerca de la filosofía, el pensamiento, la educación y la tradición clásica en el momento histórico que le tocó vivir, precisamente en un centro cultural de excepcional importancia dentro del Imperio romano
Resumo:
Filón de Alejandría (30?a. C.-50? d. C.) es una figura clave para conocer la profunda relación entre Judaísmo y Helenismo en el siglo I d. C. Judío practicante, su profundo dominio de la lengua, la literatura y, de modo especial, la retórica griegas lo convierten en una personalidad extraordinaria de su tiempo, tanto por su exégesis de la Torá (o Pentateuco) como por sus escritos apologéticos, históricos y filosóficos. Su testimonio es de gran valor para todo estudioso de la Antigüedad clásica por los muchos datos que aporta acerca de la filosofía, el pensamiento, la educación y la tradición clásica en el momento histórico que le tocó vivir, precisamente en un centro cultural de excepcional importancia dentro del Imperio romano
Resumo:
Es, en el encuentro de los edificios con el terreno, donde el suelo como realidad se transforma en cualidad arquitectónica. La presente tesis aborda el estudio del plano del suelo, haciendo una revisión crítica de la arquitectura como mecanismo de pensamiento proyectual. Este análisis se enmarca a partir de los años sesenta, por considerar que es cuando comienza a evidenciarse la ruptura respecto a la herencia del Movimiento Moderno. Es entonces cuando la arquitectura marca un punto de inflexión, y empiezan a surgir diferentes actitudes metodológicas respecto al suelo, totalmente nuevas. Las clásicas acciones de encuentro como posar, elevar o enterrar fueron poco a poco sustituidas por otras más complejas como plegar, inclinar o esponjar. Utilizando como marco de restricción los encuentros o desencuentros del objeto arquitectónico con el terreno, se analiza el suelo como estrategia arquitectónica tratando de demostrar como su manipulación puede ser una eficaz herramienta con la que establecer relaciones específicas con el lugar. La capacidad que presenta el suelo, como elemento arquitectónico, de explorar y modificar las características de cada entorno, hacen de esta superficie una eficiente forma de contextualización. Por tanto, la manipulación del suelo que aquí se plantea, opera transcodificando los elementos específicos de cada lugar y actúa como estrategia arquitectónica que pone en relación al edificio con el contexto, modificando las particularidades formales de dicho plano. Frente a la tendencia que reduce la expresión arquitectónica a una simple apariencia formal autónoma, se plantea la manipulación del plano del suelo como mecanismo de enraizamiento con el lugar, enfatizando para ello la condición terrestre de la arquitectura. El plano del suelo es el que ata al edificio mediante la gravedad a la corteza terrestre. En realidad se trata de realzar el carácter mediador del suelo en la arquitectura, definiendo para ello el establecimiento de elementos comunes entre realidades distintas, potenciando el valor del suelo como herramienta que puede transcodificar el entorno, trasformando su datos en elementos arquitectónicos concretos. En este proceso de traducción de información, el suelo pasa de ser un objeto pasivo a ser uno operativo, convirtiéndose en parte activa de las acciones que sobre él se ejercen. La tesis tiene también como propósito demostrar cómo, la clave de la rápida evolución que el suelo como estrategia arquitectónica ha sufrido en los últimos años, mucho debe a la expansión del suelo en otras artes como en la escultura, y mas concretamente en el landart. Surgen entonces nuevas disciplinas, en las que se propone la comprensión del lugar en los proyectos desarrollando una visión integral del mundo natural, convirtiéndolo en un tejido viviente y conector que pone en relación las actividades que sustenta. También encontramos en Utzon, y sus plataformas geológicas, al precursor de la importancia que más tarde se le daría al plano del suelo en la arquitectura, ya que inicia cierta actitud crítica, que hizo avanzar hacia una arquitectura más expresiva que requería nuevos mecanismos que la relacionasen con el suelo que los soportaba, proponiendo con sus plataformas una transformación infraestructural del suelo. Con su interpretación transcultural de las estructuras espaciales arquetípicas mayas, chinas y japonesas, irá enriqueciendo el panorama arquitectónico, adquiriendo de este modo más valor el contexto que acabará por ser entendido de forma más compleja. Los proyectos de arquitectura en muchas ocasiones se han convertido en territorios propicios de especulación donde construir teoría arquitectónica. Desde este contexto se analizan cuatro estrategias de suelo a través del estudio de cuatro posiciones arquitectónicas muy significativas desde el punto de vista de la manipulación del plano del suelo, que construyen una interesante metodología proyectual con la que operar. Los casos de estudio, propuestos son; la Terminal Pasajeros (1996-2002) en Yokohama del estudio FOA, la Casa de la Música (1999-2005) de OMA en Oporto, el Memorial Judío (1998-2005) de Berlín de Peter Eisenman, y por último el Museo MAXXI (1998-2009) de Zaha Hadid en Roma. Descubrir las reglas, referencias y metodologías que cada uno nos propone, nos permite descubrir cuáles son los principales posicionamientos en relación al proyecto y su relación con el lugar. Las propuestas aquí expuestas abordan una nueva forma de entender el suelo, que hizo avanzar a la arquitectura hacia nuevos modos de encuentro con el terreno. Nos permite también establecer cuáles son las principales aportaciones arquitectónicas del suelo, como estrategia arquitectónica, que han derivado en su reformulación. Dichas contribuciones abren nuevas formas de abordar la arquitectura basadas en el movimiento y en la flexibilidad funcional, o en la superposición de flujos de información y circulación. También plantean nuevas vías desdibujando la figura contra el fondo, y refuerzan la idea del suelo como plataforma infraestructural que ya había sido enunciada por Utzon. Se trata en definitiva de proponer la exploración de la superficie del suelo como el elemento más revelador de las formas emergentes del espacio. ABSTRACT Where the building hits the ground, it is where the latter as reality becomes architectural quality. This thesis presents the study of the ground plane, making a critical review of architecture as a mechanism of projectual thought. This analysis starts from the sixties, because it is when the break begins to be demonstrated with regard to the inheritance of the Modern Movement. It is then when architecture marks a point of inflexion, and different, completely new methodological attitudes to the ground start to emerge. The classic meeting action like place, raise or bury are gradually replaced by more complex operations such as fold, bend or fluff up. Framing it within the meetings or disagreements between architectural object and ground, we analyzed it as architectural strategy trying to show how handling can be an effective tool to establish a specific relationship with the place. The capacity ground has, as an architectural element, to explore and modify the characteristics of each environment, makes this area an efficient tool for contextualization. Therefore, the manipulation of ground that is analyzed here, operates transcoding the specifics of each place and acts as architectural strategy that relates to the building with the context, modifying the structural peculiarities of such plane. Opposite to the reductive tendency of the architectural expression to a simple formal autonomous appearance, the manipulation of the ground plane is considered as a rooting mechanism place that emphasises the earthly condition of architecture. The ground plane is the one that binds the building by gravity to the earth’s crust. In fact, it tries to study the mediating character of the ground in architecture, defining for it to establish commonalities among different realities, enhancing the value of the ground as a tool that can transcode the environment, transforming its data into specific architectural elements. In this process of translating information, the ground goes from being a liability, to become active part of the actions exerted on the object. The thesis also tries to demonstrate how the key of the rapid evolution that the ground likes architectural strategy has gone through recently, much due to its use expansion in other arts such as sculpture. New disciplines arise then, in which one proposes the local understanding in the projects, developing an integral vision of the natural world and turning it into an element linking the activities it supports. We also find in Utzon, and his geological platforms, the precursor of the importance that later would be given to the ground plane in architecture, since it initiates a certain critical attitude, which advances towards a more expressive architecture, with new mechanisms that relate to the ground that it sits in, proposing with its platforms an infrastructural transformation of the ground. With his transcultural interpretation of the spatial archetypal structures, he will enrich the architectural discourse, making the context become understood in more complex ways. Architectural projects in many cases have become territories prone to architectural theory speculation. Within this context, four strategies are analyzed through the study of four very significant architectural positions, from the point of view of handling the ground plane, and the project methodology within which to operate. The case studies analyzed are; Passenger Terminal (1996-2002) in Yokohama from FOA, The House of the music (1999-2005) the OMA in Oporto, The Jew monument (1998-2005) in Berlin the Peter Eisenman, and finally the MAXXI Museum (1998-2009) the Zaha Hadid in Rome. Discovering the rules, references and methodologies that each of those offer, it allows to discover what the main positions are regarding the building and its relationship with the place where it is located. The proposals exposed here try to shed a different light on the ground, which architecture advancing in new ways on how meet it. The crossing of the different studied positions, allows us to establish what the main contributions of ground as architectural strategy are. Such contributions open up new approaches to architecture based on movement and functional flexibility, overlapping information flow and circulation, consider new ways that blur the figure against the background, and reinforce the idea of ground as infrastructural platform, already raised by Utzon. Summarizing, it tries to propose the exploration of the ground plane as the most revealing form of spatial exploration.
Resumo:
Historians have yet to realize the depth of artist Janet Sobel’s artistic aptitude and ingenuity. This paper focuses on understanding how unique Sobel and her art were due to her distinctive world experiences and her ability to express her feelings about these experiences through her art. It also demonstrates the importance of her Jewish and Ukrainian heritage, showing how this influenced her artistic development. Sobel immigrated to the United States at a young age and struggled with her identity. Her art was a way for her to define and accept her personal identity as an immigrant Eastern European Jew in America. In addition to this heritage, Sobel experienced many traumatic events in her early life. Her art therefore served as a way for Sobel to work through this past trauma and come to terms with it.
Resumo:
Short stories.