COMP1205 Student Presentations A-D

Tuesday 6th May Building 34 room 3001, 16.15-18.00 Presenting: Groups: A, B, C, D Marking Groups: E, F, G, H 16.20 Group A: The online workplace: virtuality 16.40 Group B: Open innovation and novel business practices 17.00Group C: Banter, jokes, freedom of speech and defamation 17.20 Group D: Security and privacy – legal overview

COMP1205 Student Presentations I-L

Thursday 8th May Building 6 (Eustace) Room 1007, 15.00-16.40 Su & Elena Presenting: Groups: I, J, K, L Marking Groups: M, N, O, P Schedule and Topics 15.00-15.05: Introduction and protocol for the session 15.05-15.25 Group I: Sustainablity – responsiblities and legislation 15.25-15.45 Group J: Green IT – solutions and benefits 16.45-16.05 Group K: Open and linked data 16.05-16.25 Group L: What is Web Science? 16.25-16.45: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

COMP1205 Student Presentations E-H

Monday 12th May Building 34 Room 3001, 12.00-13.45 Su & Rikki Presenting: Groups: E, F, G, H Marking Groups: I, J, K, L Schedule and Topics 12.00-12.05: Introduction and protocol for the session 12.05-12.25 Group E: Creative commons, open source, open movements 12.25-12.45 Group F: Trolling, Banter, Cyber Hate, Online Bullying 12.45-13.05 Group G: Personal Privacy and Security 13.05-13.25 Group H: Crime online; cyber security 13.25-13.45: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

COMP1205 Student Presentations M-P

Tuesday 13th May Building 34 Room 3001, 16.15-17.45 Elena & Rikki/Jian Presenting: Groups: M, N, O, P Marking Groups: Q, R, S, T Schedule and Topics 16.15-16.20: Introduction and protocol for the session 16.20 Group M: Serious games – gaming as a driver for applications online 16.40 Group N: Open Education OERs 17.00 Group O: Big Data – the big picture 17.20 Group P: Rights and equality in the workplace 17.40-18.00: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

COMP1205 Student Presentations Q-T

Monday 12th May Building 34 Room 3001, 10.00-12.45 Su & Rikki Presenting: Groups: Q, R, S, T Marking Groups: U, V, W, X Schedule and Topics 10.00-10.05: Introduction and protocol for the session 10.05-10.25 Group Q: Disablitites and rights – legal responsibilities 10.25-10.45 Group R: Computer Ethics, Professional bodies and accreditation 10.45-11.05 Group S: Digital divide 11.05-11.25 Group T: How the web is chaning the world: co-operation, co-creation, crowd funding and crowd sourcing 11.25-11.45: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

COMP1205 Student Presentations U-X

Thursday 15th May Building 02A Room 2077, 15.00-16.45 Elena & Rikki Presenting: Groups: U, V, W, X Marking Groups: A, B, C, D Schedule and Topics 15.00-15.05: Introduction and protocol for the session 15.05-15.25 Group U: Digital Literacies 15.25-15.45 Group V: Will MOOCs destroy face-to-face University Education? 15.45-16.05 Group W: Groupwork and leadership skills in MMORPGs 16.05-16.25 Group X: Tools and techniques for agile project management 16.25-16.45: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

ResponseWare student guide 2016

This document describes how students can access polls using their own device (laptop, tablet or phone) using either a web browser or an iOS or Android app.

De lo micro a lo macro prudencial: Un análisis de la supervisión bancaria desde la econometría espacial

La crisis que se desató en el mercado hipotecario en Estados Unidos en 2008 y que logró propagarse a lo largo de todo sistema financiero, dejó en evidencia el nivel de interconexión que actualmente existe entre las entidades del sector y sus relaciones con el sector productivo, dejando en evidencia la necesidad de identificar y caracterizar el riesgo sistémico inherente al sistema, para que de esta forma las entidades reguladoras busquen una estabilidad tanto individual, como del sistema en general. El presente documento muestra, a través de un modelo que combina el poder informativo de las redes y su adecuación a un modelo espacial auto regresivo (tipo panel), la importancia de incorporar al enfoque micro-prudencial (propuesto en Basilea II), una variable que capture el efecto de estar conectado con otras entidades, realizando así un análisis macro-prudencial (propuesto en Basilea III).

Reflections About the Teaching Methodology Processes Related with the Cognition of the Superior Education Student

In concordance whit permanent global and local changes in superior education, not only in Colombia but in the world, and having in account the relevance of pedagogical actions and their incidence in the student’s cognitive level, it’s necessary analyze and to reflect about the mecanism involved in the learning processes, in order to improve the curriculums and inside of them, the teaching methodologies, pedagogy an didacts that promote better the students cognition. In the present article an analysis is made of teaching methodologies developed in Institutions of superior education with subsequent learnings that not always facilitate the cognitive development of the student, as well as a proposal of educative innovation elements aimed to guide the teachers into a careful consideration of their pedagogical practice.

The teacher-student relationship

--

Paradoxes of resilience: lessons learnt from a comparison between Columbia and France

This paper investigates a discrepancy concerning resilience. International institutions such as ISDR try to promote resilience as a notion useful for preventing disasters. And some searchers, mainly coming from ecology, such as Resilience Alliance group, found the notion relevant enough to promote it as a brand for their studies on disaster prevention. Yet, the second part of the paper will verify how other searchers are still not convinced by the relevance of the notion. Territorial managers are reluctant as well, in line with the poor number of policies trying to bring resilience to reality, be it in Columbia or in France. How can we make sense of this discrepancy? The paper will stress on various political, institutional and cultural conditionings hidden behind the notion. It will also enlighten the contradictions embedded within the notion, because resilience, as disaster, depends on the scales and the actors the analysis relies on first. Which resilience to whom and at what scale? These are critical questions that should be addressed in order to give sense to these contradictions. Resilience has no absolute meaning. However, it helps identifying trends towards future disasters. This is one of the main reasons why it may be found useful.

Relación entre los estilos de liderazgo y los niveles de resiliencia de los subordinados

El presente documento hace un análisis de la influencia que ejercen los diferentes tipos de liderazgo, carismático y transaccional, de un directivo de una organización sobre los subordinados de la misma, que a su vez afecta positiva o negativamente el nivel de resiliencia de los mismos. De la misma forma, se ha identificado la relación que existe entre el nivel de resiliencia de los subordinados de una organización y el cumplimiento de objetivos corporativos de la misma. Todo lo anterior se justifica en la economía globalizada de la que ahora hacemos parte que obliga a las empresas a generar nuevas estrategias de competitividad dentro de ambientes turbulentos y cambiantes donde, el desarrollar y motivar el recurso humano de la organización toma importancia para la ejecución exitosa de estrategias diferenciales.

C??mo aplicar las pruebas param??tricas bivariadas 't' de Student y ANOVA en SPSS : caso pr??ctico

Resumen tomado de la publicaci??n