Soziale Gruppenarbeit als Alternative zur geschlossenen Unterbringung strafunmündiger Kinder

Wenn 12- bis 13-jährige Kinder mit diversen von ihnen begangenen Straftaten die Öffentlichkeit in Aufruhr versetzen, wird - besonders nach schweren Fällen - oft eine härtere Gangart gefordert. Doch längst nicht so viele Kinder, wie die Medien uns weis machen wollen, sind delinquent. Und anstatt zu fragen, ob und wie man problematischen Kindern und Jugendlichen bereits zu Beginn ihrer Jugendhilfekarrieren sinnvoll helfen kann, diskutiert die Politik über geschlossene Unterbringung und andere Formen strengerer Settings von sogenannten "Monsterkids". In dieser Diplomarbeit wird soziale Gruppenarbeit als Alternative diskutiert.

Address delivered by Chief Justice Eugene B. Gary, L.L.D. at the dedication of the Court House, McCormick County, September 27th, 1923

This document is an address by Chief Justice Eugene B. Gary that discusses the civilization of America in two contexts. The first context is the principles of civilization applicable to their democratic form of government. The second context is the dangers that threaten to destroy the very foundation of their government.

Characterization of alternative biomarkers to control n-hexane exposure and prevent 2,5-hexanedione toxicity

Tese de doutoramento, Farmácia (Toxicologia), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Farmácia, 2015

Labirintos da justiça na escola : representações e práticas de alunos e professores

Tese de doutoramento, Educação (Supervisão e Orientação da Prática Profissional), Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Educação, 2015

Mudanças climáticas e económicas na costa portuguesa: percepções das comunidades, justiça social e democratização

O litoral português, onde se concentra mais de 80% da população e da produção de riqueza do país, é um dos mais vulneráveis da Europa no que respeita à erosão costeira. Queda de arribas, perda de areia das praias e recuo acentuado da linha de costa têm obrigado a avultados investimentos em infra-estruturas e medidas de protecção. Esta concentração populacional na zona litoral ocorreu em apenas algumas décadas, a um ritmo acelerado, perante um sistema institucional e de gestão que se revelou incapaz de restringir a proliferação de construções em áreas de risco. Actualmente, as populações e economias costeiras enfrentam dois enormes desafios: a crise climática e a crise económica. Nas próximas décadas, prevê-se que as alterações climáticas venham acentuar a perda de território pelo recuo da linha de costa, devido a um conjunto de factores, em particular a subida do nível médio do mar. Por outro lado, a crise económica pode inviabilizar a continuação de dispendiosas intervenções para conter o avanço do mar, incluindo a construção de esporões e paredões e o enchimento artificial das praias. Cada vez mais se ponderam estratégias alternativas de adaptação, inclusive a eventual deslocação de populações para áreas mais recuadas. A necessidade de tomar medidas mais drásticas, a génese ilegal de muitas das construções agora em risco na orla costeira, a diversidade de culturas e de modos de vida, assim como de interesses económicos, que nela convergem, fazem antever conflitualidades e problemas de justiça social.O desafio da sustentabilidade das zonas costeiras passa por criar processos de decisão e de gestão com a participação activa das populações locais e por uma abordagem inovadora face às estratégias de adaptação e ao seu próprio financiamento. Esta procura de modelos de gestão costeira mais sustentáveis não dispensa uma abordagem sociológica das problemáticas mencionadas. A partir de três casos de estudo na costa portuguesa – Vagueira, Costa da Caparica e Quarteira – nesta comunicação analisam-se os resultados de um inquérito aplicado a uma amostra representativa das populações aí residentes, bem como um conjunto de entrevistas realizadas aos stakeholders locais. Procuramos explorar as avaliações sobre os riscos costeiros e a disponibilidade dos actores locais para a participação em modelos alternativos de gestão e financiamento.

Spatial justice: law and the geography of withdrawal

While spatial justice could be the most radical offspring of law’s recent spatial turn, it remains instead a geographically informed version of social justice. The majority of the existing literature on the subject has made some politically facile assumptions about space, justice and law, thereby subsuming the potentially radical into the banal. In this article, I suggest that the concept of spatial justice is the most promising platform on which to redefine, not only the connection between law and geography, but more importantly, the conceptual foundations of both law and space. More concretely, the article attempts two things: first, a radical understanding of legal spatiality. Space is not just another parameter for law, a background against which law takes place, or a process that the law needs to take into consideration. Space is intertwined with normative production in ways that law often fails to acknowledge, and part of this article is a re-articulation of the connection. Second, to suggest a conception of spatial justice that derives from a spatial law. Such a conception cannot rely on given concepts of distributive or social justice. Instead, the concept of spatial justice put forth here is informed by post-structural, feminist, post-ecological and other radical understandings of emplacement and justice, as well as arguably the most spatial of philosophical discourses, that of Deleuze–Guattari and the prescribed possibilities of space as manifold.

Law’s spatial turn: geography, justice and a certain fear of space

This is a critical reading of the current literature on law and geography. The article argues that the literature is characterized by an undertheorization of the concept of space. The focus is either on the specific geography of law in the form of jurisdiction, or as a simple terminological innovation. Instead, the article suggests that law’s spatial turn ought to consider space as a singular parameter to the hitherto legal preoccupation with time, history and waiting. This forces law into dealing with a new, peculiarly spatial kind of uncertainty in terms of simultaneity, disorientation, materiality and exclusionary corporeal emplacement. The main area in which this undertheorization forcefully manifests itself is that of spatial justice. Despite its critical potential, the concept has been reduced by the majority of the relevant literature into another version of social, distributive or regional justice. On the contrary, if the peculiar characteristics of space are to be taken into account, a concept of justice will have to be rethought on a much more fundamental level than that.

Giving guilt: the aneconomy of law and justice

The concept of guilt is seen here as debt beyond repayment. Following Derrida, the gesture of giving is placed in the economy of gift, an aneconomical gift that is not part of the exchange cycle. At the same time, guilt is linked to desire, the desire to give and to be free from guilt. Desire is described as the urge to cross over, to apprehend the non-identical and to give oneself away. In this reinforced crossing, where the improbability of giving conditions the improbability of reaching out, guilt and its impetus are found locked up in claustrophobic self-reference. For this reason, the author consults Kierkegaard and Luhmann whose contributions show that the gesture of giving acquires its relevance not so much on account of its recipient, but precisely because of the absence of such a recipient. The combination of an absent recipient and an absented giver fills the gift with an emptiness that can only be channelled back upon itself, in the autopoietics of guilt. This is exactly the fate of the law, which can deal with the guilty but never with guilt (in the above sense). In its attempt to give away guilt, the law attempts to become other than itself: justice. The improbability of crossing over becomes more obvious than ever.