Osakkeenomistajan suojaaminen vähemmistöosakkeiden hankinnassa - Oikeusvertaileva tarkastelu Suomen ja Delawaren käytännöistä

Tutkielmassa tarkastellaan osakkeenomistajien suojaamiskeinoja Suomessa ja Delawaressa. Oikeusvertailevaa metodia sovelletaan kolmella tasolla: lakien ja määräysten osalta, menettelyn osalta sekä suojaamiskeinojen osalta. Osakkeenomistajien katsotaan tarvitsevan suojaa vähemmistöosakkeiden hankinnan yhteydessä, sillä siinä osakkeiden vapaan vaihdettavuuden perusperiaate ja pakkolunastaminen kohtaavat. Suojaamiskeinot on jaettu etukäteisiin, menettelya koskeviin sekä hinnanmäärittelyyn liittyviin keinoihin. Etukäteisiin keinoihin voidaan laskea johdon vastuu, joka koostuu huolellisuus- ja lojaliteettivelvoitteista, ja yhtiöjärjestysmääräykset. Delawaressa johdon vastuu on määritelty Suomea tarkemmin. Yhtiöjärjestysmääräykset ovat ongelmallisia Suomessa, sillä ne saattavat olla arvopaperimarkkinalain vastaisia. Delawaressa niiden käyttö on runsasta. Menettelyyn liittyviaä suojakeinoja löytyi useita. Vähemmistönsuojaperiaatetta toteutetaan Suomessa yhdenvertaisuusperiaatetta noudattamalla sekä määräämällä lunastusoikeudesta tai -velvollisuudesta. Delawaressa vähemmistöllä on oikeus saada erityistuomioistuin Court of Chanceryn arviointi menettelyn oikeellisuudesta. Menettelyn oikeellisuutta pyritään kummassakin tutkimuskohteessa suojaamaan myös tiedonantovelvollisuudella. Lisäksi Delawaressa johdon on asetettava aina erikoiskomitea neuvottelemaan ostajan kanssa. Hinnanmäärittelyn osalta suojaa antavat käyvän hinnan vaatimus, sekä Suomessa taloudellisen yhdenvertaisuuden periaate ja Delawaressa vähemmistön oikeus saada Court of Chanceryn arviointi oikeasta hinnasta.

Disclosure of tax information -from tax reporting system to the financial statements, Case: Fortum Oyj

The main target of the study was to examine how Fortum’s tax reporting system could be developed in a way that it collects required information which is also easily transferable to the financial statements. This included examining disclosure requirements for income taxes under IFRS and US GAAP. By benchmarking some Finnish, European and US companies the purpose was to get perspective in what extend they present their tax information in their financial statements. Also material weakness, its existence, was under examination. The research method was qualitative, descriptive and normative. The research material included articles and literature of the tax reporting and standards relating to it. The interviews made had a notable significance. The study pointed out that Fortum’s tax reporting is in good shape and it does not require big changes. The biggest renewal of the tax reporting system is that there is only one model for all Fortum’s companies. It is also more automated, quicker, and more efficient and it reminds more the notes in its shape. In addition it has more internal controls to improve quality and efficiency of the reporting process.

Quantitative Sustainability Disclosure –An international comparison and its impact on investor valuation

This research focuses on the link between quantitative sustainability disclosure and information asymmetry. It builds upon previous research which links information asymmetry with voluntary disclosure. Stakeholders from the financial services sector claim that sustainability disclosure needs to be more numerical and comparable between companies. This research covers 111 firms from Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden from non-service industries and studies how quantitative their sustainability disclosure is, and whether or not there is a negative relation with information asymmetry. The results support the hypotheses, where two out of three information asymmetry proxies have a significant negative relation with quantitative disclosure. Size is supported as a moderating factor. Quantitativity also proves to have a significant link with third party sustainability ratings. The direct link between quantitativity and cost of capital is not however supported.

Open Environmental Information Upon Disclosure Request in China: The Paradox of Legal Mobilization

Taking a realist view that law is one form of politics, this dissertation studies the roles of citizens and organizations in mobilizing the law to request government agencies to disclose environmental information in China, and during this process, how the socio-legal field interacts with the political-legal sphere, and what changes have been brought about during their interactions. This work takes a socio-legal approach and applies methodologies of social science and legal analysis. It aims to understand the paradox of why and how citizens and entities have been invoking the law to access environmental information despite the fact that various obstacles exist and the effectiveness of the new mechanism of environmental information disclosure still remains low. The study is largely based on the 28 cases and eight surveys of environmental information disclosure requests collected by the author. The cases and surveys analysed in this dissertation all occurred between May 2008, when the OGI Regulations and the OEI Measures came into effect, and August 2012 when the case collection was completed. The findings of this study have shown that by invoking the rules of law made by the authorities to demand government agencies disclosing environmental information, the public, including citizens, organizations, law firms, and the media, have strategically created a repercussive pressure upon the authorities to act according to the law. While it is a top-down process that has established the mechanism of open government information in China, it is indeed the bottom-up activism of the public that makes it work. Citizens and organizations’ use of legal tactics to push government agencies to disclose environmental information have formed not only an end of accessing the information but more a means of making government agencies accountable to their legal obligations. Law has thus played a pivotal role in enabling citizen participation in the political process. Against the current situation in China that political campaigns, or politicization, from general election to collective actions, especially contentious actions, are still restrained or even repressed by the government, legal mobilization, or judicialization, that citizens and organizations use legal tactics to demand their rights and push government agencies to enforce the law, become de facto an alternative of political participation. During this process, legal actions have helped to strengthen the civil society, make government agencies act according to law, push back the political boundaries, and induce changes in the relationship between the state and the public. In the field of environmental information disclosure, citizens and organizations have formed a bottom-up social activism, though limited in scope, using the language of law, creating progressive social, legal and political changes. This study emphasizes that it is partial and incomplete to understand China’s transition only from the top-down policy-making and government administration; it is also important to observe it from the bottom-up perspective that in a realistic view law can be part of politics and legal mobilization, even when utterly apolitical, can help to achieve political aims as well. This study of legal mobilization in the field of environmental information disclosure also helps us to better understand the function of law: law is not only a tool for the authorities to regulate and control, but inevitably also a weapon for the public to demand government agencies to work towards their obligations stipulated by the laws issued by themselves.

The carbon disclosure project, an evolution in international environmental corporate governance : motivations and determinants of market response to voluntary disclosures

This paper examines the factors associated with Canadian firms voluntarily disclosing climate change information through the Carbon Disclosure Project. Five hypotheses are presented to explain the factors influencing management's decision to disclose this information. These hypotheses include a response to shareholder activism, domestic institutional investor shareholder activism, signalling, litigation risk, and low cost publicity. Both binary logistic regressions as well as a cross-sectional analysis of the equity market's response to the environmental disclosures being made were used to test these hypotheses. Support was found for shareholder activism, low cost publicity, and litigation risk. However, the equity market's response was not found to be statistically significant.