964 resultados para Justice scolaire
Gestes professionnels, communauté discursive disciplinaire scolaire et savoirs: le triangle infernal
Resumo:
Cette contribution s'interesse aux rapports entre activite enseignante et construction de significations par les eleves, rapport que nous reformulons, dans notre cadre theorique, en termes de liens entre geste professionnel et construction de communautes discursives disciplinaires scolaires dont nous pensons que l'institution est correlee aux apprentissages. En effet, la focalisation sur la seule activite des eleves nous semble insuffisante pour comprendre ce qui permet ou non leur inscription dans les disciplines scolaires et les deplacements cognitifs attendus par leurs enseignants. Des lors s'impose la necessite de comprendre l'activite enseignante qui oriente celle de l'eleve, ce qui nous a conduit a participer a l'elaboration d'un modele appele "l'agir enseignant" qui a pour fonctions de comprendre l'action des enseignants et d'organiser celle des formateurs
Resumo:
Nous présentons dans cette communication une expérimentation innovante basée sur l'enseignement des nanotechnologies. Débutée en 2006, elle s’inscrit sur une durée de 3 ans. Les élèves participant à ce projet pourront observer et mener des expériences à l’échelle moléculaire, comprendre les propriétés nouvelles de la matière liées à cette dimension de réduction dans le but d’application spécifiques, impliquant les outils mathématiques, physiques et chimie ainsi que la biologie. L’interdisciplinarité est un des fondements de ce projet qui a mobilisé la collaboration d'enseignants de diverses disciplines
Resumo:
--
Resumo:
How do we justify the practice of corrective justice for losses suffered during armed conflicts? This article seeks to show the force and relevance of this question, and to argue that, in cases of massively destructive wars, social justice should gain priority over corrective justice. Starting from a liberal Rawlsian conception of the relationship between corrective and social justice, it is argued that, paradoxically, the more destructive a war is, the less normative force corrective rights have and the higher priority policies of social justice, which guarantee basic rights to all citizens, should have.
Resumo:
The phenomenon of paramilitarism in Colombia has received an ambiguous treatment, balancing between political and criminal issues; an oscillation that has been intimately linked to the evolution of the Colombian internal conflict. This contribution analyzes the recent negotiations held with paramilitary groups by the administration of Alvaro Uribe Vélez (2002-2010). After a brief account of the dependency path that has determined this historical episode, I propose an assessment of the use of judicial categories by the various actors of the negotiations. The main argument is that those categories –war criminal, political criminal, drug smuggler, etc.– do not depend on the intrinsic nature of an armed actor, but are socially constructed by a conflictive process of material and symbolic struggles. The capacity to categorize private violence, as legitimate or illegitimate, political or criminal, appears as one of the basic manifestations of the state’s action, as well as one of the main conflicts presiding at the rocess of state formation.
Resumo:
Se identifican los principales problemas que aparecen en la enseñanza de la historia. El primero afecta a la transmisión del conocimiento entre profesor y alumno. La comunidad de historiadores, tras discusiones y debates, construyen un discurso científico solo apto para especialistas para a continuación reescribirlo en un discurso para principiantes. Otro problema, este específico de la enseñanza de la historia, es que la historia es producida también por multitud de agentes sociales a través de diferentes prácticas, como son celebraciones, ceremonias, monumentos, símbolos, novelas, canciones, etc. Esta historia no es científica. En las sociedades del siglo XXI diversos actores pueden intentar actuar intencionadamente sobre la historia. Uno de los más importantes es el Estado, que crea su historia oficial y la difunde, entre otros medios, a través de la enseñanza en la escuela. Así el profesor de historia se convierte en un instrumento de propagación del relato de los orígenes que el poder institucional quiere difundir en todo el mundo.
Resumo:
Resumen basado en el de la publicación
Resumo:
El artículo forma parte de una sección de la revista dedicada a intercambio de experiencias
Resumo:
Resumen tomado de la publicaci??n
Resumo:
L’objectif est de montrer que, naissent parfois pour gérer les hétérogénéités scolaires des propositions de nature à remettre en cause divers schèmes sur lesquels reposent des représentations usuelles des savoirs et de leur transmission, de la structure de l’intervention didactique et de la formation des enseignants
Resumo:
This paper reflects on the challenges facing the effective implementation of the new EU fundamental rights architecture that emerged from the Lisbon Treaty. Particular attention is paid to the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its ability to function as a ‘fundamental rights tribunal’. The paper first analyses the praxis of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg and its long-standing experience in overseeing the practical implementation of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Against this analysis, it then examines the readiness of the CJEU to live up to its consolidated and strengthened mandate on fundamental rights as one of the prime guarantors of the effective implementation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. We specifically review the role of ‘third-party interventions’ by non-governmental organisations, international and regional human rights actors as well as ‘interim relief measures’ when ensuring effective judicial protection of vulnerable individuals in cases of alleged violations of fundamental human rights. To flesh out our arguments, we rely on examples within the scope of the relatively new and complex domain of EU legislation, the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ), and its immigration, external border and asylum policies. In view of the fundamental rights-sensitive nature of these domains, which often encounter shifts of accountability and responsibility in their practical application, and the Lisbon Treaty’s expansion of the jurisdiction of the CJEU to interpret and review EU AFSJ legislation, this area can be seen as an excellent test case for the analyses at hand. The final section puts forth a set of policy suggestions that can assist the CJEU in the process of adjusting itself to the new fundamental rights context in a post-Lisbon Treaty setting.