Australasian partnership in a first-year engineering course: Deakin University and Wuhan University of Science and Technology

This paper presents the results of domestic Chinese undergraduate engineering course taught by international Australasian teaching staff. The project is a part of a teaching collaboration between Deakin University and Wuhan University of Science and Technology. The cohort of students from Wuhan was a freshman undergraduate engineering course in mechanical engineering. The particular subject was a freshman engineering-materials course taught in English. The course covered an introduction to material-science principles and practices. A survey was used for evaluating student perceptions. It is aimed that this study will help academics from Deakin University to better understand student experiences, and to identify the current challenges and barriers faced in student learning. Analysis of the survey has shown that 90% of students agreed that they were motivated to learn and achieve the learning goals through this collaborative program. Around 90% of students found that group-based practical activities were helpful in achieving learning goals. Overall, 90% of students strongly agreed they were satisfied with the method of teaching.

2016 Title V Needs Assessment Report: Final Report, May 15, 2015

The Iowa Department of Public Health’s (IDPH) Bureau of Family Health (BFH) and the Oral Health Center (OHC), along with partners at the University of Iowa Division of Child and Community Health (UI-DCCH) collaborated to conduct the five-year Needs Assessment (NA) for the FFY2016 Title V Maternal and Child Health Block Grant.

Terminology Cross-Domain Final Report

The InterPARES 2 Terminology Cross-Domain has created three terminological instruments in service to the project, and by extension, Archival Science. Over the course of the five-year project this Cross-Domain has collected words, definition, and phrases from extant documents, research tools, models, and direct researcher submission and discussion. From these raw materials, the Cross-Domain has identified a systematic and pragmatic way establishing a coherent view on the concepts involved in dynamic, experiential, and interactive records and systems in the arts, sciences, and e-government.The three terminological instruments are the Glossary, Dictionary, and Ontologies. The first of these is an authoritative list of terms and definitions that are core to our understanding of the evolving records creation, keeping, and preservation environments. The Dictionary is a tool used to facilitate interdisciplinary communication. It contains multiple definitions for terms, from multiple disciplines. By using this tool, researchers can see how Archival Science deploys terminology compared to Computer Science, Library and Information Science, or Arts, etc. The third terminological instrument, the Ontologies, identify explicit relationships between concepts of records. This is useful for communicating the nuances of Diplomatics in the dynamic, experiential, and interactive environment.All three of these instruments were drawn from a Register of terms gathered over the course of the project. This Register served as a holding place for terms, definitions, and phrases, and allowed researchers to discuss, comment on, and modify submissions. The Register and the terminological instruments were housed in the Terminology Database. The Database provides searching, display, and file downloads – making it easy to navigate through the terminological instruments.Terminology used in InterPARES 1 and the UBC Project was carried forward to this Database. In this sense, we are building on our past knowledge, and making it relevant to the contemporary environment.

Análisis de tecnologías eco eficientes para la disposición final de residuos sólidos en las empresas Coraseo S.A y Seacor S.A

Los residuos sólidos como consecuencia directa de las actividades humanas, han representado un reto desde sus inicios, de ahí se empezaron a desarrollar técnicas y prácticas para garantizar una adecuada gestión de los residuos, nuestros primeros ancestros encontraron en los botaderos a cielo abierto la solución más fácil para disponer los desechos de animales y residuos de comida en sitios cercanos a sus viviendas, por ejemplo, los griegos poseen registros de la inauguración del primer relleno municipal en la ciudad de Atenas hace más de 2000 años. La evolución de las culturas, la revolución industrial y el crecimiento poblacional acelerado han modificado no solo la composición sino también la cantidad de los residuos sólidos producidos, haciendo cada día más difícil su adecuada gestión debido a su alto grado de toxicidad, la ausencia de materiales biodegradables y su volumen, traduciendo esto en un gran impacto. El panorama no es muy alentador y los pronósticos emitidos por el Banco Mundial prevén que para el año 2025 los niveles mundiales de residuos sólidos urbanos alcanzaran 2,2 millones de toneladas por año. Basada en el interés por la adecuada gestión de los residuos y la disminución del impacto ambiental de las empresas Coraseo S.A y Seacor S.A, la presente investigación busca seleccionar la metodología y/o tecnología más apropiada teniendo en cuenta las condiciones económicas, logísticas y de infraestructura de la empresa y la comunidad involucrada. En primera instancia se estudió en profundidad el panorama empresarial y posteriormente se seleccionó un grupo de cuatro propuestas para la transformación y aprovechamiento de los residuos sólidos que fueron evaluadas a nivel económico, normativo, medio ambiental. Los datos analizados sugieren entre otras cosas, un robustecimiento del marco legal ambiental colombiano y mundial, una mayor colaboración económica de los organismos internacionales y las entidades bancarias y finalmente una reducción en los costos de las tecnologías disponibles para el aprovechamiento de los residuos sólidos, haría posible el sueño de las sociedades de gestionar efectivamente los residuos sólidos generando el menor impacto ambiental posible y en el caso del grupo empresarial Cordobés lograr innovar y emprender con un proyecto eco eficiente como el que se evaluó.

Exploring first-year academic achievement through structural equation modelling

The purpose of this research was to develop and test a multicausal model of the individual characteristics associated with academic success in first-year Australian university students. This model comprised the constructs of: previous academic performance, achievement motivation, self-regulatory learning strategies, and personality traits, with end-of-semester grades the dependent variable of interest. The study involved the distribution of a questionnaire, which assessed motivation, self-regulatory learning strategies and personality traits, to 1193 students at the start of their first year at university. Students' academic records were accessed at the end of their first year of study to ascertain their first and second semester grades. This study established that previous high academic performance, use of self-regulatory learning strategies, and being introverted and agreeable, were indicators of academic success in the first semester of university study. Achievement motivation and the personality trait of conscientiousness were indirectly related to first semester grades, through the influence they had on the students' use of self-regulatory learning strategies. First semester grades were predictive of second semester grades. This research provides valuable information for both educators and students about the factors intrinsic to the individual that are associated with successful performance in the first year at university.

Engaging Students in the Implementation of Criterion Referenced Assessment in First Year Law

The Queensland University of Technology (QUT) University Academic Board approved a new QUT Assessment Policy in September 2003, which requires a criterion-referenced approach as opposed to a norm-referenced approach to assessment across the university(QUT,MOPP,2003). In 2004, the QUT Law School embarked upon a process of awareness raising about criterion-referenced assessment amongst staff and from 2004 – 2005 staggered the implementation of criterion-referenced assessment in all first year core undergraduate law units. This paper will briefly discuss the benefits and potential pitfalls of criterion referenced assessment and the context for implementing it in the first year law program, report on student’s feedback on the introduction of criterion referenced assessment and the strategies adopted in 2005 to engage students more fully in criterion referenced assessment processes to enhance their learning outcomes.