Threshold Effects of Dismissal Protection Regulation and the Emergence of Temporary Work Agencies

Labour market regulations aimed at enhancing job-security are dominant in several OECD countries. These regulations seek to reduce dismissals of workers and fluctuations in employment. The main theoretical contribution is to gauge the effects of such regulations on labour demand across establishment sizes. In order to achieve this, we investigate an optimising model of labour demand under uncertainty through the application of real option theory. We also consider other forms of employment which increase the flexibility of the labour market. In particular, we are modelling the contribution of temporary employment agencies (Zeitarbeit) allowing for quick personnel adjustments in client firms. The calibration results indicate that labour market rigidities may be crucial for understanding sluggishness in firms´ labour demand and the emergence and growth of temporary work.

Reaalioptioiden ja binomimallm hyväksikäyttö strategisten tutkimus ja tuotekehitysinvestointien arvioimisessa

Tutkielman tavoitteena oli tutkia ja analysoida kirjallisuuden pohjalta reaalioptioteoriaa ja reaalioptioiden arvonmääritystapana binomimallia. Erityisenä painona tutkimuksessa oli reaalioptioiden hyväksikäyttö strategiaan ja tutkimus- ja tuotekehitysinvestointeihin. Tutkielma on toteutettu kirjallisuustutkimuksena. Tutkimusmetodologia on käsiteanalyyttinen. Lähdeaineistona on käytetty ulkomaisia tieteellisen aikakausijulkaisujen artikkeleita ja reaalioptioihin liittyviä kirjoja. Tutkielman tarkoituksena oli keskittyä reaalioptioteorian ja binomimallin ymmärtämiseen, perusteisiin ja käsitteistöön. Reaalioptiot tuovat hankkeiden arvonmääritykseen joustavuuden komponentin. Nykyajan kilpailullisilla markkinoilla on lisääntyvässä määrin epävarmuutta. Epävarmuuden hyödyntäminen on reaalioptioajattelun lähtökohta. Binomimalli on yksi tapa määrittää arvo reaalioptioille ja tähän malliin paneudutaan tutkielmassa syvemmin.

REAALIOPTIOT OSANA PÄÄOMASIJOITTAJAN PÄÄTÖKSENTEKOPROSESSIA

Tutkielman päätavoitteena oli selvittää kuinka pääomasijoittajat käyttävät tai voivat käyttää reaalioptioajattelua päätöksenteon apuna. Tutkielma jakaantui teoria- ja empiriaosaan. Teoriaosassa käytettiin tutkimusmetodologiana käsiteanalyyttista tutkimusotetta. Empiriaosa tehtiin kvalitatiivisena tutkimuksena, jossa teema-haastatteluna haastateltiin kahdeksaa pääomasijoittajaa. Tutkielman teoriaosassa tutkittiin alan tutkimusten avulla pääomasijoittajan päätöksentekoprosessia sekä niitä kriteereitä, jotka vaikuttavat sijoituspäätökseen. Lisäksi esiteltiin optiohinnoittelumalli, jonka avulla pääomasijoittaja voi laskea kohdeyrityksen tulevaisuuden arvon. Teoriaosassa tutkittiin myös reaalioptiota. Ulkomaisten sekä kotimaisen tutkimusten avulla selvitettiin miten yleisiä perinteiset investointilaskelmat ovat sekä mitä puutteita niissä on verrattuna reaalioptioihin. Haastatteluissa keskityttiin päätöksentekoprosessin kuvaamiseen sekä kriteereihin, joita pääomasijoittajat arvioivat ennen sijoituspäätöksen tekoa. Lisäksi kartoitettiin reaalioptioiden käyttöä. Pääomasijoittajat eivät käytä reaalioptioanalyysiä hyväksi sijoituskohteiden arvon määrittämisessä. Reaalioptioita sisältyy pääomasijoitustoimintaan ja reaalioptioanalyysi sopii pääomasijoitusten arvottamiseen. Sitä tulisikin käyttää muiden menetelmien rinnalla.

Reaalioptioteorian sovellettavuus tuotekehitysinvestointeihin liittyvässä päätöksenteossa.

Tutkielman tavoitteena oli tutkia ja analysoida kirjallisuuden pohjalta reaalioptioteoriaa ja sen käyttömahdollisuuksia reaali-investointien arvioinnisa yleensä ja erityisesti aineettomien investointien ryhmään kuuluvaan tutkimus- ja tuotekehitysinvestointeihin liittyvässä päätöksenteossa. Näkökulmana oli, että tuotekehityshankkeet nähdään investointeina. Tutkielma toteutettiin teoreettisena kirjallisuustutkimuksna ja tutkimusmetodologia oli lähinnä käsiteanalyyttinen. Lähdeaineistona käytettiin pääasiassa ulkomaisten tieteellisten aikakausjulkaisujen artikkeleita sekä investointi- ja rahoitusalan oppikirjoja. Reaalioptioteorian mahdollisuudet reaali-investointien, ja erityisesti tuotekehityshankkeiden, arviointiin näyttävät hyvin lupaavilta monien alan tutkijoiden mukaan. Esille nousi kuitenkin erilaisia ongelmia sovellettaessa teoriaa käytännön tilanteisiin. Teorian ja käytännön tuleekin vielä lähestyä toisiaan.

Innovation Processes: Case M-real

Tässä työssä on tutkittu innovaatiota kirjallisuudessa ja M-realissa. Tekninen kehitys johtuu innovaatioista. Innovaatio on luonteeltaan epävarmaa, polkusidonnaista ja sisältää eri teknologioita. Innovaation vaikutukset ulottuvat usein myös asiakkaisiin ja toimittajiin. Yrityksen eri funktioita ja hierarkiatasoja tarvitaan kaupallistamaan uusi idea tai keksintö. Dynaamiset kyvykkyydet erottavat muutokset ympäristöstä ja niitä tarvitaan innovaatioiden toteuttamisessa. Yrityksen ympäristö muuttuu ja joustavuutta tarvitaan projektien toteuttamisessa. Reaalioptiot tarjoavat joustavuutta projektien toteuttamisessa. M-realissa on vahva tekninen osaaminen, mutta asiakkaat ovat jääneet vähälle huomiolle innovaatioprosessissa. Innovaatiota ei myöskään ajateltu koko yrityksen tehtävänä. Tästä johtuu osittain vaikeudet saada ekstravoittoja. Paino M-realissa on kehittää palveluinnovaatioita.

Pankin reaalioptiot kriisiytyneiden asiakasyrityksien riskienhallinnallisessa lisäluototuksessa

Tämän tutkielman tarkoituksena on ollut tutkia pankin mahdollisuuksia soveltaa reaalioptioajattelua kriisiyrityksien käyttöpääomaan liittyvissä lisäluototusprosesseissa. Kohdepankin rahoitusasiantuntijoita haastattelemalla ja esimerkkitapauksiin tutustumalla tutkia on tutkittu pk-yritysten lisäluototusprosessia ja reaalioptioteorian soveltuvuutta luottoriskinhallintaan. Tutkimuksessa saatiin selville, että pankin luottoprosessin päätöksentekologiikassa on selkeitä yhteneväisyyksiä reaalioptioajattelun kanssa, mutta tietoisesti pankin asiantuntijat eivät sovella reaalioptioteoriaa toimintaansa. Tutkimuksessa havaittiin myös, että tiedostamattoman reaalioptioajattelun hyödyntämisaktiivisuus lisääntyy pankissa sitä mukaa, kun asiakaskohtainen riski kasvaa. Lisäksi kohdepankin asiantuntijat suhtautuivat luottoprosessissa kriisiyrityksille myönnettyihin lisäluottoihin suojautumisoption kaltaisen ajattelumallin tavoin. Toisin sanoen lisäluotto katsottiin asiakasyrityksen toiminnan jatkumisen mahdollistavana tekijänä, jonka avulla pitkän tähtäimen luottoriskin laskeminen on todennäköistä. Reaalioptioteorian tietoinen hyödyntäminen saattaisi tarjota lisätyökaluja asiakasyrityksien skenaarioiden arviointiin ja tukea sitä kautta luottopäätöksen tekemistä ja riskienhallintaa. Reaalioptiot voisivat tuoda joustavuutta ja lisäarvoa sellaisiin tilanteisiin, joissa asiakasyrityksen osalta ei ole olemassa laajaa historiatietoa tai asiakastuntemusta. Reaalioptioiden mahdollistaman joustavuuden sovittaminen säädösten mukaisiin proseduureihin saattaisi olla merkittävä keino pankin prosessin kehittämiseksi ja sisäisen viestinnän tehostamiseksi.

The Pay-Off Method as a Tool for Evaluating the Risk and Profitability of Public Real Estate Investments

Real option valuation, in particular the fuzzy pay-off method, has proven to be useful in defining risk and visualizing imprecision of investments in various industry applications. This study examines whether the evaluation of risk and profitability for public real estate investments can be improved by using real option methodology. Firstly, the context of real option valuation in the real estate industry is examined. Further, an empirical case study is performed on 30 real estate investments of a Finnish government enterprise in order to determine whether the presently used investment analysis system can be complemented by the pay-off method. Despite challenges in the application of the pay-off method to the case company’s large investment base, real option valuation is found to create additional value and facilitate more robust risk analysis in public real estate applications.

Strategisten reaalioptioiden tunnistamiskyky suomalaisissa pk-yrityksissä. Merkitys, haasteet, käytäntö.

Tämän Pro Gradu –tutkielman aiheena on strategisten reaalioptioiden tunnistamiskyky suomalaisissa pk-yrityksissä. Tunnistamiskykyä tutkitaan kolmen alakysymyksen kautta ja näiden myötä voidaan muodostaa näkemys tunnistamiskyvyn merkityksestä, haasteista ja käytännöstä. Tutkimusstrategiana on kvalitatiivinen tutkimus ja tutkimusmetodina puolistrukturoimaton haastattelu. Tutkimus suoritetaan ilman selkeitä ennakkohypoteeseja. Laajan viitekehyksen tutkimukselle antaa reaalioptioajattelun teoria. Tutkimuksessa johdetaan strategisten reaalioptioiden tunnistamiskyvyn määritelmä taustateoriaan pohjautuen. Empiiristen tutkimustulosten mukaan strategisten reaalioptioiden tunnistamiskyvyn käytäntö ja haasteet nivoutuvat kolmen laajan teeman sisään. Näitä teemoja ovat yritysjohdon jatkuva valppaus mielentilana, tunnistamiskyky asiakas-, verkosto- ja kumppanuussuhteissa sekä henkilöstön kompetenssien rakentaminen. Tutkimuksen myötä vahvistuu näkemys, jonka mukaan reaalioptioajattelun omaksuminen voi kehittää merkittävästi yritysjohdon strategista ajattelukykyä sekä koko yrityksessä vallitsevaa toimeenpanokykyä. Strategisten reaalioptioiden tunnistamiskyky on puolestaan reaalioptioajattelun yksi tärkeä osa-alue, koska sillä mitä päädymme tunnistamaan, on tyypillisesti kauaskantoiset seuraukset.

Public-private partnership investments in dry ports – Russian logistics markets and risks

The investments have always been considered as an essential backbone and so-called ‘locomotive’ for the competitive economies. However, in various countries, the state has been put under tight budget constraints for the investments in capital intensive projects. In response to this situation, the cooperation between public and private sector has grown based on public-private mechanism. The promotion of favorable arrangement for collaboration between public and private sectors for the provision of policies, services, and infrastructure in Russia can help to address the problems of dry ports development that neither municipalities nor the private sector can solve alone. Especially, the stimulation of public-private collaboration is significant under the exposure to externalities that affect the magnitude of the risks during all phases of project realization. In these circumstances, the risk in the projects also is becoming increasingly a part of joint research and risk management practice, which is viewed as a key approach, aiming to take active actions on existing global and specific factors of uncertainties. Meanwhile, a relatively little progress has been made on the inclusion of the resilience aspects into the planning process of a dry ports construction that would instruct the capacity planner, on how to mitigate the occurrence of disruptions that may lead to million dollars of losses due to the deviation of the future cash flows from the expected financial flows on the project. The current experience shows that the existing methodological base is developed fragmentary within separate steps of supply chain risk management (SCRM) processes: risk identification, risk evaluation, risk mitigation, risk monitoring and control phases. The lack of the systematic approach hinders the solution of the problem of risk management processes of dry port implementation. Therefore, management of various risks during the investments phases of dry port projects still presents a considerable challenge from the practical and theoretical points of view. In this regard, the given research became a logical continuation of fundamental research, existing in the financial models and theories (e.g., capital asset pricing model and real option theory), as well as provided a complementation for the portfolio theory. The goal of the current study is in the design of methods and models for the facilitation of dry port implementation through the mechanism of public-private partnership on the national market that implies the necessity to mitigate, first and foremost, the shortage of the investments and consequences of risks. The problem of the research was formulated on the ground of the identified contradictions. They rose as a continuation of the trade-off between the opportunities that the investors can gain from the development of terminal business in Russia (i.e. dry port implementation) and risks. As a rule, the higher the investment risk, the greater should be their expected return. However, investors have a different tolerance for the risks. That is why it would be advisable to find an optimum investment. In the given study, the optimum relates to the search for the efficient portfolio, which can provide satisfaction to the investor, depending on its degree of risk aversion. There are many theories and methods in finance, concerning investment choices. Nevertheless, the appropriateness and effectiveness of particular methods should be considered with the allowance of the specifics of the investment projects. For example, the investments in dry ports imply not only the lump sum of financial inflows, but also the long-term payback periods. As a result, capital intensity and longevity of their construction determine the necessity from investors to ensure the return on investment (profitability), along with the rapid return on investment (liquidity), without precluding the fact that the stochastic nature of the project environment is hardly described by the formula-based approach. The current theoretical base for the economic appraisals of the dry port projects more often perceives net present value (NPV) as a technique superior to other decision-making criteria. For example, the portfolio theory, which considers different risk preference of an investor and structures of utility, defines net present value as a better criterion of project appraisal than discounted payback period (DPP). Meanwhile, in business practice, the DPP is more popular. Knowing that the NPV is based on the assumptions of certainty of project life, it cannot be an accurate appraisal approach alone to determine whether or not the project should be accepted for the approval in the environment that is not without of uncertainties. In order to reflect the period or the project’s useful life that is exposed to risks due to changes in political, operational, and financial factors, the second capital budgeting criterion – discounted payback period is profoundly important, particularly for the Russian environment. Those statements represent contradictions that exist in the theory and practice of the applied science. Therefore, it would be desirable to relax the assumptions of portfolio theory and regard DPP as not fewer relevant appraisal approach for the assessment of the investment and risk measure. At the same time, the rationality of the use of both project performance criteria depends on the methods and models, with the help of which these appraisal approaches are calculated in feasibility studies. The deterministic methods cannot ensure the required precision of the results, while the stochastic models guarantee the sufficient level of the accuracy and reliability of the obtained results, providing that the risks are properly identified, evaluated, and mitigated. Otherwise, the project performance indicators may not be confirmed during the phase of project realization. For instance, the economic and political instability can result in the undoing of hard-earned gains, leading to the need for the attraction of the additional finances for the project. The sources of the alternative investments, as well as supportive mitigation strategies, can be studied during the initial phases of project development. During this period, the effectiveness of the investments undertakings can also be improved by the inclusion of the various investors, e.g. Russian Railways’ enterprises and other private companies in the dry port projects. However, the evaluation of the effectiveness of the participation of different investors in the project lack the methods and models that would permit doing the particular feasibility study, foreseeing the quantitative characteristics of risks and their mitigation strategies, which can meet the tolerance of the investors to the risks. For this reason, the research proposes a combination of Monte Carlo method, discounted cash flow technique, the theory of real options, and portfolio theory via a system dynamics simulation approach. The use of this methodology allows for comprehensive risk management process of dry port development to cover all aspects of risk identification, risk evaluation, risk mitigation, risk monitoring, and control phases. A designed system dynamics model can be recommended for the decision-makers on the dry port projects that are financed via a public-private partnership. It permits investors to make a decision appraisal based on random variables of net present value and discounted payback period, depending on different risks factors, e.g. revenue risks, land acquisition risks, traffic volume risks, construction hazards, and political risks. In this case, the statistical mean is used for the explication of the expected value of the DPP and NPV; the standard deviation is proposed as a characteristic of risks, while the elasticity coefficient is applied for rating of risks. Additionally, the risk of failure of project investments and guaranteed recoupment of capital investment can be considered with the help of the model. On the whole, the application of these modern methods of simulation creates preconditions for the controlling of the process of dry port development, i.e. making managerial changes and identifying the most stable parameters that contribute to the optimal alternative scenarios of the project realization in the uncertain environment. System dynamics model allows analyzing the interactions in the most complex mechanism of risk management process of the dry ports development and making proposals for the improvement of the effectiveness of the investments via an estimation of different risk management strategies. For the comparison and ranking of these alternatives in their order of preference to the investor, the proposed indicators of the efficiency of the investments, concerning the NPV, DPP, and coefficient of variation, can be used. Thus, rational investors, who averse to taking increased risks unless they are compensated by the commensurate increase in the expected utility of a risky prospect of dry port development, can be guided by the deduced marginal utility of investments. It is computed on the ground of the results from the system dynamics model. In conclusion, the outlined theoretical and practical implications for the management of risks, which are the key characteristics of public-private partnerships, can help analysts and planning managers in budget decision-making, substantially alleviating the effect from various risks and avoiding unnecessary cost overruns in dry port projects.

Capturing UK real estate volitility

Volatility, or the variability of the underlying asset, is one of the key fundamental components of property derivative pricing and in the application of real option models in development analysis. There has been relatively little work on volatility in real terms of its application to property derivatives and the real options analysis. Most research on volatility stems from investment performance (Nathakumaran & Newell (1995), Brown & Matysiak 2000, Booth & Matysiak 2001). Historic standard deviation is often used as a proxy for volatility and there has been a reliance on indices, which are subject to valuation smoothing effects. Transaction prices are considered to be more volatile than the traditional standard deviations of appraisal based indices. This could lead, arguably, to inefficiencies and mis-pricing, particularly if it is also accepted that changes evolve randomly over time and where future volatility and not an ex-post measure is the key (Sing 1998). If history does not repeat, or provides an unreliable measure, then estimating model based (implied) volatility is an alternative approach (Patel & Sing 2000). This paper is the first of two that employ alternative approaches to calculating and capturing volatility in UK real estate for the purposes of applying the measure to derivative pricing and real option models. It draws on a uniquely constructed IPD/Gerald Eve transactions database, containing over 21,000 properties over the period 1983-2005. In this first paper the magnitude of historic amplification associated with asset returns by sector and geographic spread is looked at. In the subsequent paper the focus will be upon model based (implied) volatility.

Opções reais em decisões de investimento de exploração e produção

Este trabalho faz uma revisão dos principais conceitos que definem a Teoria de Opções Reais. Tem como objetivo discutir o problema da decisão de investimento sob incerteza aplicado a problemas de Exploração e Produção de petróleo (E&P). Foram priorizados modelos simples que podem ser facilmente implantados no dia a dia de uma empresa, incluindo o clássico de Paddock, Siegel e Smith (1988). Os modelos discutidos são elaborados com Movimento Geométrico Browniano, que pode ser uma aproximação razoável para a modelagem de preços, a depender dos parâmetros considerados. Em particular, é apresentado um modelo de opção composta para exploração, que se revela mais apropriado por considerar o risco geológico e os estágios da opção com expiração diferenciada. A priorização de investimentos com auxílio de OR para uma carteira representativa de um portfolio de projetos de Produção também é testada, resultando numa maior relação VPL / Investimento da carteira selecionada.

A utilização da teoria de opções reais na determinação do valor econômico de investimentos em empresas e projetos

Este trabalho objetivou estudar o modelo de avaliação de empresas e projetos fundamentado na Teoria de Opções Reais. Foi demonstrado que, dado a existência de incertezas sobre os acontecimentos futuros e a possibilidade de os investidores modificarem suas decisões no decorrer do tempo, os modelos tradicionais de avaliação erram, pois desconsideram as modificações que a taxa de desconto utilizada sofre em função de uma decisão tomada sobre uma opção qualquer existente. Por outro lado, com a utilização da Teoria de Opções Reais é possível identificar estas opções e avaliá-las de forma correta. Apresentou-se um exemplo em que determinado investimento foi avaliado pelo modelo de Desconto dos Fluxos de Caixa e pela Teoria de Opções Reais, o qual demonstrou que os modelos tradicionais erram ao não considerar e valorar as opções reais existentes, confirmando desta forma a proposição inicial do trabalho.

Avaliação das Opções Reais de Conversão e Abandono para Uma Mineradora de Minério de Ferro Sob Cenário de Stress

O mercado de minério de ferro tem passado por um período de stress nos últimos meses. O arrefecimento dos investimentos chineses em infraestrutura resultou em perspectivas negativas para a demanda dessa commodity. Paralelamente, a entrada em operação de novos projetos com volume de produção relevante aumentou a oferta desse produto no mercado. Essa conjuntura de fatores resultou na queda do preço do minério de ferro no mercado mundial e em um cenário de retornos reduzidos para as mineradoras. Nesse contexto, o objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar a flexibilidade gerencial, disponível aos administradores de mineradoras operacionais, de suspender ou fechar o empreendimento dependendo do preço do minério de ferro. Essas decisões serão estudadas através da Teoria das Opções Reais, onde a opção de conversão será aplicada na situação de suspensão e reabertura da mina e a opção de abandono será aplicada na situação do seu fechamento. O processo estocástico a ser seguido pelo preço do minério de ferro será o Movimento Geométrico Browniano, implementado através de um Modelo Binomial conforme proposto por Cox, Ross e Rubinstein (1979). O resultado do trabalho comprova o valor das opções reais estudadas e indica que essas opções reais têm maior valor em cenários de stress, quando o preço do minério de ferro está desvalorizado.

O que fazer com o bagaço da cana de açúcar? Uma abordagem da teoria das opções reais aplicada a usinas de processamento de etanol e açúcar da região de Piracicaba

O uso de resíduos da indústria canavieira, em particular o bagaço, é tema que ganha relevância desde a retomada do mercado de biocombustíveis, quando a produção ampliou significativamente o volume daquela biomassa. Existem trabalhos que tratam de apresentar subprodutos e tecnologias alternativas para o uso deste material e um conjunto outro de trabalhos apresenta análise de cenários de viabilidade econômica destas tecnologias. O objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar pela perspectiva econômico-financeira o melhor uso do bagaço da cana em um caso real. Para isto foi utilizada a Teoria das Opções Reais, como forma de analisar a melhor destinação do bagaço no horizonte de tempo de cinco anos, em uma dada a região, em um estudo de caso de uma usina sucroenergética com possibilidade de produção de etanol de segunda geração e/ou venda do bagaço in natura. Desta forma concluiu-se no caso apresentado que a produção de etanol de segunda geração em escala industrial não atrai investimentos e, sob esta ótica, deve ser postergada pois requer significativa aumento de produtividade por tonelada de matéria seca, além de substancial redução no custo das enzimas de fermentação. Ainda, foi possível também identificar a necessidade de políticas de incentivo para atração de investimentos.

Utilização da opção de diferimento na avaliação de implantação de projeto de mecanismo de desenvolvimento limpo em uma empresa de cerâmica vermelha

A evolução da teoria de precificação de opções considera um conjunto de ferramentas necessárias para gerenciar e explorar o valor advindo da incerteza e da volatilidade que ampliam os parâmetros da geração de valor ao acrescentarem os conceitos de flexibilidade gerencial. Dentro deste contexto, o presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar economicamente a implantação do Mecanismo de Desenvolvimento Limpo em uma empresa de cerâmica vermelha localizada no Arranjo Produtivo de São Miguel do Guamá, nordeste do Pará. A avaliação pretendeu demonstrar o valor da flexibilidade gerencial de Diferimento conforme adaptações realizadas na metodologia proposta por Copeland & Antikarov (2001), a qual adiciona à avaliação tradicional de fluxo de caixa descontado a Opção Real – OR – que a pesquisa considerou; e que fundamentou-se por meio de revisão de literatura para formulação do método. Essa determinação seguiu um roteiro de etapas essenciais para a análise das variáveis que compreendem o modelo e que possibilitou a ordenação dos resultados quanto aos valores da OR considerada e do valor presente incluindo a flexibilidade gerencial; com a aplicação do método na empresa objeto da pesquisa. Finalmente, como resultado deste estudo conclui-se que a Teoria de Opções Reais por meio da Opção de Diferimento ou Adiamento contribui com informações que auxiliam nas decisões gerenciais de investimento em projetos quando comparados à metodologia tradicional de avaliação visto que são consideradas incertezas inerentes ao projeto, tal como o ambiente real.