Galaxy distribution and evolution around a sample of 2dF groups

Context. We study galaxy evolution and spatial patterns in the surroundings of a sample of 2dF groups. Aims. Our aim is to find evidence of galaxy evolution and clustering out to 10 times the virial radius of the groups and so redefine their properties according to the spatial patterns in the fields and relate them to galaxy evolution. Methods. Group members and interlopers were redefined after the identification of gaps in the redshift distribution. We then used exploratory spatial statistics based on the the second moment of the Ripley function to probe the anisotropy in the galaxy distribution around the groups. Results. We found an important anticorrelation between anisotropy around groups and the fraction of early-type galaxies in these fields. Our results illustrate how the dynamical state of galaxy groups can be ascertained by the systematic study of their neighborhoods. This is an important achievement, since the correct estimate of the extent to which galaxies are affected by the group environment and follow large-scale filamentary structure is relevant to understanding the process of galaxy clustering and evolution in the Universe.

Perceptions of a media campaign: The role of social identity and the changing intergroup context

This study examined the effects of political identity and the changing intergroup context on communication perceptions during an election campaign. Perceptions of media bias and of campaign impact on self and others were assessed before and after the election. The responses of politically aligned voters reflected their membership in a dominant or subordinate group preelection and in a losing or winning group postelection. Dominant group members were initially less biased in their views of the campaign and its impact but sought to blame their party's loss on media bias and on the gullibility of political out-group members and voters in general. Subordinate group members initially showed strong in-group-serving biases but were less critical of the media and the electorate after their party had won. Results highlight the dynamic, intergroup, nature of media perceptions.

Malevolence, stigma, and social distance: Maximizing intergroup differences in HIV/AIDS discourse

This study examined the intergroup language used by young heterosexual Australians in conversations about HIV/AIDS and safe sex. Sixty male and 72 female heterosexuals participated in four-person facilitated conversations (same-sex or mixed-sex) about HIV/AIDS and safe sex, which were recorded and transcribed. We focused on extracts concerning strangers or malevolent individuals who appear to be group members, along with extracts involving foreign national groups. Discourse analysis showed that groups at lower levels of social distance were constructed mainly in terms of individual responsibility. At moderate social distance, stereotypes were more negative, but sub-typing was common, whereas at the highest levels, people were constructed entirely in intergroup terms. The findings of this study suggest that HN prevention programs should make reference to all salient outgroups, so as to neutralize communicative strategies that strengthen intergroup boundaries as a means of reducing perceived personal threat of HIV infection.

'You can criticise because you care': Identification, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect

Group criticisms judged to be reasonable in the mouth of an ingroup member are aggressively rejected when they stem from an outgroup member (the intergroup sensitivity effect). Mediational analyses suggest that this phenomenon is underpinned by an attributional bias; criticisms from insiders are more likely to be perceived as being motivated for constructive reasons than are criticisms from outsiders, thus arousing lower levels of defensiveness. But what if group members were to receive information that called into question the ingroup critic's commitment to the group? For example, if the ingroup critic was known to be a low identifier with their group, or used language to suggest that they were psychologically distancing themselves from their group, we might expect that ingroup critics will be downgraded as strongly as outgroup critics. Furthermore, it might be possible for people to turn an outgroup criticism into an ingroup criticism by making salient their shared identity at the superordinate level. Three experiments are described that provide support for each of these propositions.

'You can criticise because you care': How attributions affect responses to ingroup and outgroup critics

There are times when people feel compelled to stand up and articulate their group's shortcomings, an act that carries with it enormous social risks. Indeed, a mechanistic reading of social identity theory might lead one to believe that ingroup critics are doomed to face hostility because they are attacking a fundamental part of people's self-concept. But often ingroup critics are doing more than attacking their group — they are trying to incite positive change. Criticism is the cornerstone of protest, and it is difficult to imagine how a group can be reinvigorated, reinvented, or reformed without some process of critical self-reflection. Thus, although the ingroup critic might create tension within the group, it is possible that internal criticism could be seen by other group members as beneficial in terms of promoting positive change and stimulating innovation, creativity, and flexibility in decision making. In this talk I examine the 'identity rules' that ingroup critics need to follow to avoid defensiveness, and look at empirical evidence of how factors such as language, the intergroup context, and choice of audience shape people's attributions regarding criticism and their subsequent evaluations of critics.

Factors influencing organisational silence

Organisadonal silence is a recendy introduced area of business research that seeks to address why employees fail to express ideas, informadon and opinions that can effecdvely improve organisadonal effecdveness. In making a start to understand silence, the majority of frameworks have suggested that employees withhold valuable input from management because they believe that it is too personally cosdy to speak up, and/or management are unMkely to take acdon about their ideas or concerns. Because today's workforce are largely required to work in groups or teams, one of the primary aims of this paper is to provide a deeper understanding of this phenomenon by focusing on group process factors that are likely to drive silence. Research that consider the group perspecdve indicate that one's ingroup posidon (i,e,, pro to typicality), and the accumuladon of idiosyncrasy credits (i,e,, leeway to offer innovadve ideas) are likely to play a role in whether (or not) people speak up. For example, those on the periphery of the group or less prototypical group members may need to conform strenuously to group norms in order to improve their ingroup posidon. Similarly, those who have accrued few idiosyncrasy credits may need to conform to group expectadons in order to accumulate sufficient "resources" to deviate from group norms, and be taken seriously by other group members. Thus, the conceptual framework proposed is underpinned by the social idendty perspecdve as well as the nodon of idiosyncrasy credits.

Participatory ergonomics: Understanding the contributions of reflection groups in a hospital food service

Aim: To identify how the methodology of Reflection Groups (RG) can contribute to approach social-psychological problems, so often observed as obstacles in PE efforts. The objective was also to verify the contributions from RG to the implementation of ergonomics recommendations, which were a starting point and organized group discussions. Method: A concrete case was used as an illustration, and studied in depth: RG with administration and production workers` representatives from the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics of a cardiologic hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. RG are temporary thinking groups, taking place outside the workplace and having delegative and consultive participation. They make use of Operative Groups, an adapted form of tripartite group, activity as an instrumental resource, group dynamic techniques and videotaping. In 2007, 31 meetings took place during paid working hours with 7 groups of different composition, ranging from 1.5 h to 3 h. Results: Additionally to the positive effects in communication and psychosocial environment, RG could also contribute to changes in interpersonal relationships, cooperation, personal and work behaviours. By dealing with aspects which could hinder the explicit task: fears, conflicts, and stereotyped beliefs and behaviours; resistance to change could be broken and group members could learn. RG allowed input about new risks; continuous information and feedback about ongoing ergonomics interventions so that immediate corrective action could be taken. The main form of participation was in administrative, organizational, and psychosocial problems which required a better clarification and identification of their real causes, commitment, and elaboration of strategies and negotiation of different stakeholders in their solution. Conclusion: RG takes advantage of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups, in face to face communication. The interactions in the groups are task-oriented (explicit task) but attaining groups` goals depends on a relational interaction (implicit task). Relevance to industry: Reflection groups can bring important contributions to ergonomics and industry because they favour the discussion, disclosure of problems and incorporation of solutions, enabling interventions in working organization, psychosocial environment and relationships in a collective and participatory approach, promoting health and social integration. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Resolving the puzzle of productive and destructive conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups: A communication accommodation theory approach

This study presents an investigation of the communicative behaviors and strategies employed in the stimulation and management of productive and destructive conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups. Using communication accommodation theory (CAT), we argue that the type and course of conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups is impacted by the communicative behaviors and strategies employed by group members during interactions. Analysis of data from participant observations, non-participant observations, semi-structured interviews, and self-report questionnaires support CA T-based predictions and provide fresh insights into the triggers and management strategies associated with conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups. In particular, results indicated that the more groups used discourse management Strategies, the more they experienced productive conflict. In addition, the use of explanation and checking of own and others' understanding was a major feature of productive conflict, while speech interruptions emerged as a strategy leading to potential destructive conflict. Groups where leaders emerged and assisted in reversing communication breakdowns were better able to manage their discourse, and achieved consensus On task processes. Contributions to the understanding of the triggers and the management of productive conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups are discussed.

"It's OK if we say it, but you can't": responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism

Three experiments were conducted examining group members' responses to criticism from ingroup and outgroup members. In Experiment I a, Australians read scripts of a person making either negative or positive comments about Australia. The speaker was identified as coming from either Australia (ingroup member) or another country (outgroup member). Responses indicated an intergroup sensitivity effect; that is, while ingroup criticisms were tolerated surprisingly well, outgroup criticisms were met with sensitivity and defensiveness. This pattern was replicated using the identity of,university student' (Experiment 1b). Experiment 2 demonstrated that the intergroup sensitivity effect is driven by perceptions that ingroup criticisms are seen to be more legitimate and more constructive than are outgroup criticisms. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for intragroup and intergroup relations. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Being attuned to intergroup differences in mergers: The role of aligned leaders for low-status groups

The present research focused on responses of low-status group members to a merger with a high-status group. A study was conducted (N = 153) in which the alignment of the leader for the merged group (ingroup vs. outgroup) and leader behavior (equality, outgroup favoritism, ingroup favoritism, complementarity) were manipulated. The authors predicted that the leader, by his or her behavior, would play an important role in defining the new relationship between premerger groups. Overall, low-status ingroup leaders were evaluated more positively than high-status outgroup leaders. Ingroup leaders were evaluated more favorably and were more likely to engender a common identity in the merged group than were outgroup leaders when leaders behaved in an ingroup-favoring or complementary fashion. In contrast, evaluations of ingroup and outgroup leaders did not differ when the leader stressed equality or was outgroup favoring. The findings demonstrate the important role leaders can play in accentuating or de-emphasizing premerger status differences.

A coesão de grupo dentro de uma organização

RESUMO: Na organização do tecido empresarial a sociedade contemporânea alcança o seu sucesso mediante a Coesão do Grupo. A Coesão de Grupo é hoje decisiva para qualquer organização. Um grupo começa quando as pessoas se juntam pelo desejo de pertencer a esse mesmo grupo, para ajudar e contribuir para o bem-estar dessa própria equipa. A Coesão no seio do Grupo é fundamental para se alcançarem resultados positivos. Para Weinberg e Gould (2001) “a Coesão relacionada à tarefa reflecte o grau em que os membros de um grupo trabalham juntos para alcançar objectivos comuns”. A Coesão interna aumenta se a equipa trabalha em busca dos mesmos objectivos com uma entrega total e absoluta em todo o trabalho que realizam. Quanto maior a cordialidade e a confiança transmitida e criada no meio do grupo, consequentemente maior será a Coesão e a produtividade da equipa. Com a Coesão de Grupo existe uma relação de interdependência, em termos de trabalho, nos elementos do grupo. O modelo de Coesão de Grupo acentua as semelhanças entre cada elemento e oferece também a oportunidade de participarem em todas as decisões. A Coesão de Grupo permite ainda que os membros permaneçam juntos, que os membros confiem e sejam leais uns aos outros e que também se sintam seguros. Torna-se determinante frisar que a Coesão permite que os membros se tornem influenciados pelo grupo em si, o que aumenta significativamente a satisfação dos seus membros e, à medida que o trabalho se desenvolve, que a interacção entre os membros do grupo se intensifique. Só assim se consegue provocar, manter e consolidar a Coesão dentro da organização. ABSTRACT: In the organization of business, the contemporary society achieves its success through group cohesion. The Group Cohesion is very important today, for any organization. A group begins when people come together by the desire to belong, to help and contribute to the welfare of own team. The Cohesion within a team is central to achieving positive results. To Weinberg and Gould (2001) “related to task Cohesion reflects the degree to which the group members work together to achieve common goals”. The Cohesion within the Group increases if the team works toward the same objectives, with a total and absolute in all the work they do. The greater the friendship and trust created and transmitted through the group, consequent greater Cohesion and team productivity. With the Group Cohesion there is a relationship of interdependence, in terms of labor among group members. With the group cohesion there is something similar between the group members and also the opportunity to participate in all decisions. The Cohesion of the Group allows members to stay together, that the members trust and be loyal to each other and also feel safe. I can only stress that Cohesion allows members to become influenced by the group itself, which increases the signification and satisfaction of its members, as the work develops, and that the interaction between group members to intensify. Only thus could lead to, maintain and strengthen the Cohesion within the organization.

Sistema de apoio à geração de ideias em grupo considerando as emoções e os aspectos sociais

As emoções dos indivíduos e o contexto social do grupo onde estes estão inseridos têm influência no seu desempenho no que se refere ao desenvolvimento de várias tarefas, incluindo as que são realizadas via electrónica. O processo de geração de ideias em grupo mediado por computador tem vantagens consideráveis em relação ao processo de geração de ideias em grupo tradicional, nomeadamente no que se refere ao aumento da sinergia entre os elementos do grupo, à existência da memória de grupo e à possibilidade dos elementos estarem dispersos no espaço e no tempo. Com isto em mente, o presente trabalho pretende analisar a importância do estado de espírito do participante e a influência que os vários aspectos sociais têm no participante, para assim ser possível tomar determinadas acções com o objectivo de potenciar o desempenho dos utilizadores ao longo da reunião de geração de ideias. Neste trabalho é analisada a influência que o estado de espírito dos participantes e o contexto social das reuniões podem ter no sucesso de uma reunião de geração de ideias electrónica. Considerando a influência de estes factores, é proposto um modelo que inclui essas variáveis no processo de geração de ideias em grupo mediado por computador. Com isto pretende-se demonstrar que a inclusão do modelo proposto numa ferramenta de apoio à geração de ideias em grupo permite melhorar o desempenho individual e consequentemente o desempenho do grupo, bem como a interacção entre todos os elementos. Assim, este trabalho pretende gerar sugestões com o objectivo de manter os participantes atentos e motivados para as tarefas que têm de realizar, nomeadamente a tarefa de geração de ideias. Com o objectivo de aplicar o modelo proposto é também apresentado neste trabalho uma nova ferramenta de geração de ideias em computador que considera o contexto emocional e social da reunião, o S-IGTAI (Social Idea Generation Tool for Ambient Intelligence). Através das interacções entre os participantes e a ferramenta S-IGTAI, é recolhida informação que será o input do modelo proposto, sendo que o output serão as sugestões enviadas para o facilitador. Estas sugestões têm o propósito que o facilitador realize recomendações aos participantes no sentido de manter os seus estados de espírito num nível positivo e eliminar a influência negativa dos vários aspectos sociais, potenciando dessa forma o desempenho de todos os participantes. Com a finalidade de validar o modelo proposto e a nova ferramenta (S-IGTAI) é apresentado um caso de estudo neste documento que permite realizar a avaliação do trabalho desenvolvido.

Des+construção sénior, sentimento e teatro : trabalho de projeto

Trabalho de Projecto submetido à Escola Superior de Teatro e Cinema para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Teatro - especialização em Teatro e Comunidade.

Virtual Communities of Practice: Design and Development of Support Platforms and Participation Fostering

Mestrado em Engenharia Informática - Área de Especialização em Sistemas Gráficos e Multimédia

Peer interaction and learning opportunities in cohesive and less cohesive L2 classrooms

The present study investigates peer to peer oral interaction in two task based language teaching classrooms, one of which was a self-declared cohesive group, and the other a self- declared less cohesive group, both at B1 level. It studies how learners talk cohesion into being and considers how this talk leads to learning opportunities in these groups. The study was classroom-based and was carried out over the period of an academic year. Research was conducted in the classrooms and the tasks were part of regular class work. The research was framed within a sociocognitive perspective of second language learning and data came from a number of sources, namely questionnaires, interviews and audio recorded talk of dyads, triads and groups of four students completing a total of eight oral tasks. These audio recordings were transcribed and analysed qualitatively for interactions which encouraged a positive social dimension and behaviours which led to learning opportunities, using conversation analysis. In addition, recordings were analysed quantitatively for learning opportunities and quantity and quality of language produced. Results show that learners in both classes exhibited multiple behaviours in interaction which could promote a positive social dimension, although behaviours which could discourage positive affect amongst group members were also found. Analysis of interactions also revealed the many ways in which learners in both the cohesive and less cohesive class created learning opportunities. Further qualitative analysis of these interactions showed that a number of factors including how learners approach a task, the decisions they make at zones of interactional transition and the affective relationship between participants influence the amount of learning opportunities created, as well as the quality and quantity of language produced. The main conclusion of the study is that it is not the cohesive nature of the group as a whole but the nature of the relationship between the individual members of the small group completing the task which influences the effectiveness of oral interaction for learning.This study contributes to our understanding of the way in which learners individualise the learning space and highlights the situated nature of language learning. It shows how individuals interact with each other and the task, and how talk in interaction changes moment-by-moment as learners react to the ‘here and now’ of the classroom environment.