Tapping the innovation potential of corporate engagement with stakeholders

Summary This dissertation explores how stakeholder dialogue influences corporate processes, and speculates about the potential of this phenomenon - particularly with actors, like non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other representatives of civil society, which have received growing attention against a backdrop of increasing globalisation and which have often been cast in an adversarial light by firms - as a source of teaming and a spark for innovation in the firm. The study is set within the context of the introduction of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) in Europe. Its significance lies in the fact that scientific developments and new technologies are being generated at an unprecedented rate in an era where civil society is becoming more informed, more reflexive, and more active in facilitating or blocking such new developments, which could have the potential to trigger widespread changes in economies, attitudes, and lifestyles, and address global problems like poverty, hunger, climate change, and environmental degradation. In the 1990s, companies using biotechnology to develop and offer novel products began to experience increasing pressure from civil society to disclose information about the risks associated with the use of biotechnology and GMOs, in particular. Although no harmful effects for humans or the environment have been factually demonstrated even to date (2008), this technology remains highly-contested and its introduction in Europe catalysed major companies to invest significant financial and human resources in stakeholder dialogue. A relatively new phenomenon at the time, with little theoretical backing, dialogue was seen to reflect a move towards greater engagement with stakeholders, commonly defined as those "individuals or groups with which. business interacts who have a 'stake', or vested interest in the firm" (Carroll, 1993:22) with whom firms are seen to be inextricably embedded (Andriof & Waddock, 2002). Regarding the organisation of this dissertation, Chapter 1 (Introduction) describes the context of the study, elaborates its significance for academics and business practitioners as an empirical work embedded in a sector at the heart of the debate on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Chapter 2 (Literature Review) traces the roots and evolution of CSR, drawing on Stakeholder Theory, Institutional Theory, Resource Dependence Theory, and Organisational Learning to establish what has already been developed in the literature regarding the stakeholder concept, motivations for engagement with stakeholders, the corporate response to external constituencies, and outcomes for the firm in terms of organisational learning and change. I used this review of the literature to guide my inquiry and to develop the key constructs through which I viewed the empirical data that was gathered. In this respect, concepts related to how the firm views itself (as a victim, follower, leader), how stakeholders are viewed (as a source of pressure and/or threat; as an asset: current and future), corporate responses (in the form of buffering, bridging, boundary redefinition), and types of organisational teaming (single-loop, double-loop, triple-loop) and change (first order, second order, third order) were particularly important in building the key constructs of the conceptual model that emerged from the analysis of the data. Chapter 3 (Methodology) describes the methodology that was used to conduct the study, affirms the appropriateness of the case study method in addressing the research question, and describes the procedures for collecting and analysing the data. Data collection took place in two phases -extending from August 1999 to October 2000, and from May to December 2001, which functioned as `snapshots' in time of the three companies under study. The data was systematically analysed and coded using ATLAS/ti, a qualitative data analysis tool, which enabled me to sort, organise, and reduce the data into a manageable form. Chapter 4 (Data Analysis) contains the three cases that were developed (anonymised as Pioneer, Helvetica, and Viking). Each case is presented in its entirety (constituting a `within case' analysis), followed by a 'cross-case' analysis, backed up by extensive verbatim evidence. Chapter 5 presents the research findings, outlines the study's limitations, describes managerial implications, and offers suggestions for where more research could elaborate the conceptual model developed through this study, as well as suggestions for additional research in areas where managerial implications were outlined. References and Appendices are included at the end. This dissertation results in the construction and description of a conceptual model, grounded in the empirical data and tied to existing literature, which portrays a set of elements and relationships deemed important for understanding the impact of stakeholder engagement for firms in terms of organisational learning and change. This model suggests that corporate perceptions about the nature of stakeholder influence the perceived value of stakeholder contributions. When stakeholders are primarily viewed as a source of pressure or threat, firms tend to adopt a reactive/defensive posture in an effort to manage stakeholders and protect the firm from sources of outside pressure -behaviour consistent with Resource Dependence Theory, which suggests that firms try to get control over extemal threats by focussing on the relevant stakeholders on whom they depend for critical resources, and try to reverse the control potentially exerted by extemal constituencies by trying to influence and manipulate these valuable stakeholders. In situations where stakeholders are viewed as a current strategic asset, firms tend to adopt a proactive/offensive posture in an effort to tap stakeholder contributions and connect the organisation to its environment - behaviour consistent with Institutional Theory, which suggests that firms try to ensure the continuing license to operate by internalising external expectations. In instances where stakeholders are viewed as a source of future value, firms tend to adopt an interactive/innovative posture in an effort to reduce or widen the embedded system and bring stakeholders into systems of innovation and feedback -behaviour consistent with the literature on Organisational Learning, which suggests that firms can learn how to optimize their performance as they develop systems and structures that are more adaptable and responsive to change The conceptual model moreover suggests that the perceived value of stakeholder contribution drives corporate aims for engagement, which can be usefully categorised as dialogue intentions spanning a continuum running from low-level to high-level to very-high level. This study suggests that activities aimed at disarming critical stakeholders (`manipulation') providing guidance and correcting misinformation (`education'), being transparent about corporate activities and policies (`information'), alleviating stakeholder concerns (`placation'), and accessing stakeholder opinion ('consultation') represent low-level dialogue intentions and are experienced by stakeholders as asymmetrical, persuasive, compliance-gaining activities that are not in line with `true' dialogue. This study also finds evidence that activities aimed at redistributing power ('partnership'), involving stakeholders in internal corporate processes (`participation'), and demonstrating corporate responsibility (`stewardship') reflect high-level dialogue intentions. This study additionally finds evidence that building and sustaining high-quality, trusted relationships which can meaningfully influence organisational policies incline a firm towards the type of interactive, proactive processes that underpin the development of sustainable corporate strategies. Dialogue intentions are related to type of corporate response: low-level intentions can lead to buffering strategies; high-level intentions can underpin bridging strategies; very high-level intentions can incline a firm towards boundary redefinition. The nature of corporate response (which encapsulates a firm's posture towards stakeholders, demonstrated by the level of dialogue intention and the firm's strategy for dealing with stakeholders) favours the type of learning and change experienced by the organisation. This study indicates that buffering strategies, where the firm attempts to protect itself against external influences and cant' out its existing strategy, typically lead to single-loop learning, whereby the firm teams how to perform better within its existing paradigm and at most, improves the performance of the established system - an outcome associated with first-order change. Bridging responses, where the firm adapts organisational activities to meet external expectations, typically leads a firm to acquire new behavioural capacities characteristic of double-loop learning, whereby insights and understanding are uncovered that are fundamentally different from existing knowledge and where stakeholders are brought into problem-solving conversations that enable them to influence corporate decision-making to address shortcomings in the system - an outcome associated with second-order change. Boundary redefinition suggests that the firm engages in triple-loop learning, where the firm changes relations with stakeholders in profound ways, considers problems from a whole-system perspective, examining the deep structures that sustain the system, producing innovation to address chronic problems and develop new opportunities - an outcome associated with third-order change. This study supports earlier theoretical and empirical studies {e.g. Weick's (1979, 1985) work on self-enactment; Maitlis & Lawrence's (2007) and Maitlis' (2005) work and Weick et al's (2005) work on sensegiving and sensemaking in organisations; Brickson's (2005, 2007) and Scott & Lane's (2000) work on organisational identity orientation}, which indicate that corporate self-perception is a key underlying factor driving the dynamics of organisational teaming and change. Such theorizing has important implications for managerial practice; namely, that a company which perceives itself as a 'victim' may be highly inclined to view stakeholders as a source of negative influence, and would therefore be potentially unable to benefit from the positive influence of engagement. Such a selfperception can blind the firm from seeing stakeholders in a more positive, contributing light, which suggests that such firms may not be inclined to embrace external sources of innovation and teaming, as they are focussed on protecting the firm against disturbing environmental influences (through buffering), and remain more likely to perform better within an existing paradigm (single-loop teaming). By contrast, a company that perceives itself as a 'leader' may be highly inclined to view stakeholders as a source of positive influence. On the downside, such a firm might have difficulty distinguishing when stakeholder contributions are less pertinent as it is deliberately more open to elements in operating environment (including stakeholders) as potential sources of learning and change, as the firm is oriented towards creating space for fundamental change (through boundary redefinition), opening issues to entirely new ways of thinking and addressing issues from whole-system perspective. A significant implication of this study is that potentially only those companies who see themselves as a leader are ultimately able to tap the innovation potential of stakeholder dialogue.

Plan de finance, pour être présenté aux Etats Généraux ([Reprod.]) / par M. Desmarest,...

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 10.1.46

Behavioral changes in brain-injured critical care adults with different levels of consciousness during nociceptive stimulation: an observational study.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to describe the frequency of behaviors observed during rest, a non-nociceptive procedure, and a nociceptive procedure in brain-injured intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different levels of consciousness (LOC). Second, it examined the inter-rater reliability and discriminant and concurrent validity of the behavioral checklist used. METHODS: The non-nociceptive procedure involved calling the patient and shaking his/her shoulder. The nociceptive procedure involved turning the patient. The frequency of behaviors was recorded using a behavioral checklist. RESULTS: Patients with absence of movement, or stereotyped flexion or extension responses to a nociceptive stimulus displayed more behaviors during turning (median 5.5, range 0-14) than patients with localized responses (median 4, range 0-10) or able to self-report their pain (median 4, range 0-10). Face flushing, clenched teeth, clenched fist, and tremor were more frequent in patients with absence of movement, or stereotyped responses to a nociceptive stimulus. The reliability of the checklist was supported by a high intra-class correlation coefficient (0.77-0.92), and the internal consistency was acceptable in all three groups (KR 20, 0.71-0.85). Discriminant validity was supported as significantly more behaviors were observed during nociceptive stimulation than at rest. Concurrent validity was confirmed as checklist scores were correlated to the patients' self-reports of pain (r s = 0.53; 95 % CI 0.21-0.75). CONCLUSION: Brain-injured patients reacted significantly more during a nociceptive stimulus and the number of observed behaviors was higher in patients with a stereotyped response.

Monitoring bank performance in the presence of risk

This paper proposes a managerial control tool that integrates risk in efficiency scores. Building on existing efficiency specifications, our proposal reflects the real banking technology and accurately models the relationship between desirable and undesirable outputs. Specifically, the undesirable output is defined as non-performing loans to capture credit risk, and is linked only to the relevant dimension of the output set. We empirically illustrate how our efficiency measure functions for managerial control purposes. The application considers a unique dataset of Costa Rican banks during 1998-2012. Efficiency scores? implications are mostly discussed at bank-level, and their interpretations are enhanced by using accounting ratios. We also show the usefulness of our tool for corporate governance by examining performance changes around executive turnover. Results confirm that appointing CEOs from outside the bank significantly improves performance, thus suggesting the potential benefits of new organisational practices.

Managing Subsidiary Integration During Corporate Expansion in Russia

Kansallisten rajojen yli laajentuvat yritykset kohtaavat kasvavia paineita yhtenäistää eri yksiköiden toimintatapoja, prosesseja ja järjestelmiä. Hyvin toteutettuna organisaation sisäinen integrointi voi johtaa tytäryritysten tuottavuuden parantumiseen ja strategisiin mittakaavaetuihin, kun taas huonosti toteutettuna integrointi voi johtaa lisääntyviin konflikteihin ja emoyhtiön kontrollin katoamiseen. Integroinnin kannalta Venäjälle perustettavat tytäryritykset asettavat suuria haasteita. Kasvava ja kehittyvä kansantalous on jatkuvassa muutoksessa kohti edistyneempiä ja tuottavampia toimintamalleja, mutta toisaalta yritystoiminnantaustalla vaikuttaa edelleenkin Neuvostoajan perinnöt, jotka muokkaavat yritysten johtamisrakenteita ja prosesseja. Nämä taustavaikuttajat vaikeuttavat kansainvälisen yrityksen yhtenäistämistä, mutta toisaalta tarjoavat suuria mahdollisuuksia yrityksille, jotka oppivat elämään Venäjän markkinoiden ehdoilla. Tämä tutkimus käyttää apunaan konstruktiivista tutkimustyötä ratkoakseenYIT:n Venäjälle perustettavien yritysten integrointiin liittyviä ongelmia ja mahdollisuuksia. Työn lopputuloksena syntyy oppimiseen pohjautuva integraatiostrategia ja tätä strategiaa tukeva integroinnin johtamisjärjestelmä.

Personality traits, behavioral and psychological symptoms and cognitive decline in patients at an early stage of Alzheimer's disease

The aim of this doctoral thesis was to study personality characteristics of patients at an early stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and more specifically to describe personality and its changes over time, and to explore its possible links with psychological and symptoms (BPS) and cognitive level. The results were compared to those of a group of participants without cognitive disorder through three empirical studies. In the first study, the findings showed significant personality changes that follow a specific trend in the clinical group. The profil of personality changes showed an increase in Neuroticism and a decrease in Extraversion, Openess to experiences, and Conscientiousness over time. The second study highlighted that personality and BPS occur early in the cours of AD. Recognizing them as possible precoce signs of neurodegeneration may prove to be a key factor for early detection and intervention. In the third study, a significant association between personality changes and cognitive status was observed in the patients with incipient AD. Thus, changes in Neuroticism and Conscientiousness were linked with cognitive deterioration, whereas decreased Openness to experiences and Conscientiousness over time predicted loss of independence in daily functioning. Other well-known factors such as age, education level or civil status were taken into account to predict cognitive decline. The three studies suggested five important implications: (1) cost-effective screening should take into account premorbid and specific personality changes; (2) psycho-educative interventions should provide information on the possible personality changes and BPS that may occur at the beginning of the disease; (3) using personality traits alongside other variables in the future studies on prevention might help to better understand AD's etiology; (4) individual treatment plans (psychotherapeutic, social, and pharmacological) might be adapted to the specific changes in personality profiles; (5) more researches are needed to study the impact of social-cultural and lifestyle variables on the development of AD.

Effective corporate governance : experimental evidence on international auditors'judgments and the contribution of financial accounting education

1 Summary This dissertation deals with two major aspects of corporate governance that grew in importance during the last years: the internal audit function and financial accounting education. In three essays, I contribute to research on these topics which are embedded in the broader corporate governance literature. The first two essays consist of experimental investigations of internal auditors' judgments. They deal with two research issues for which accounting research lacks evidence: The effectiveness of internal controls and the potentially conflicting role of the internal audit function between management and the audit committee. The findings of the first two essays contribute to the literature on internal auditors' judgment and the role of the internal audit function as a major cornerstone of corporate governance. The third essay theoretically examines a broader issue but also relates to the overall research question of this dissertation: What contributes to effective corporate governance? This last essay takes the perspective that the root for quality corporate governance is appropriate financial accounting education. r develop a public interest approach to accounting education that contributes to the literature on adequate accounting education with respect to corporate governance and accounting harmonization. The increasing importance of both the internal audit function and accounting education for corporate governance can be explained by the same recent fundamental changes that still affect accounting research and practice. First, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX, 2002) and the 8th EU Directive (EU, 2006) have led to a bigger role for the internal audit function in corporate governance. Their implications regarding the implementation of audit committees and their oversight over internal controls are extensive. As a consequence, the internal audit function has become increasingly important for corporate governance and serves a new master (i.e. the audit committee) within the company in addition to management. Second, the SOX (2002) and the 8th EU Directive introduced additional internal control mechanisms that are expected to contribute to the reliability of financial information. As a consequence, the internal audit function is expected to contribute to a greater extent to the reliability of financial statements. Therefore, effective internal control mechanisms that strengthen objective judgments and independence become important. This is especially true when external- auditors rely on the work of internal auditors in the context of the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 610 and the equivalent US Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 65 (see IFAC, 2009 and AICPA, 1990). Third, the harmonization of international reporting standards is increasingly promoted by means of a principles-based approach. It is the leading approach since a study of the SEC (2003) that was required by the SOX (2002) in section 108(d) was in favor of this approach. As a result, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) commit themselves to the development of compatible accounting standards based on a principles-based approach. Moreover, since the Norwalk Agreement of 2002, the two standard setters have developed exposure drafts for a common conceptual framework that will be the basis for accounting harmonization. The new .framework will be in favor of fair value measurement and accounting for real-world economic phenomena. These changes in terms of standard setting lead to a trend towards more professional judgment in the accounting process. They affect internal and external auditors, accountants, and managers in general. As a consequence, a new competency set for preparers and users of financial statements is required. The basil for this new competency set is adequate accounting education (Schipper, 2003). These three issues which affect corporate governance are the initial point of this dissertation and constitute its motivation. Two broad questions motivated a scientific examination in three essays: 1) What are major aspects to be examined regarding the new role of the internal audit function? 2) How should major changes in standard setting affect financial accounting education? The first question became apparent due to two published literature reviews by Gramling et al. (2004) and Cohen, Krishnamoorthy & Wright (2004). These studies raise various questions for future research that are still relevant and which motivate the first two essays of my dissertation. In the first essay, I focus on the role of the internal audit function as one cornerstone of corporate governance and its potentially conflicting role of serving both management and the audit committee (IIA, 2003). In an experimental study, I provide evidence on the challenges for internal auditors in their role as servant for two masters -the audit committee and management -and how this influences internal auditors' judgment (Gramling et al. 2004; Cohen, Krishnamoorthy & Wright, 2004). I ask if there is an expectation gap between what internal auditors should provide for corporate governance in theory compared to what internal auditors are able to provide in practice. In particular, I focus on the effect of serving two masters on the internal auditor's independence. I argue that independence is hardly achievable if the internal audit function serves two masters with conflicting priorities. The second essay provides evidence on the effectiveness of accountability as an internal control mechanism. In general, internal control mechanisms based on accountability were enforced by the SOX (2002) and the 8th EU Directive. Subsequently, many companies introduced sub-certification processes that should contribute to an objective judgment process. Thus, these mechanisms are important to strengthen the reliability of financial statements. Based on a need for evidence on the effectiveness of internal control mechanisms (Brennan & Solomon, 2008; Gramling et al. 2004; Cohen, Krishnamoorthy & Wright, 2004; Solomon & Trotman, 2003), I designed an experiment to examine the joint effect of accountability and obedience pressure in an internal audit setting. I argue that obedience pressure potentially can lead to a negative influence on accountants' objectivity (e.g. DeZoort & Lord, 1997) whereas accountability can mitigate this negative effect. My second main research question - How should major changes in standard setting affect financial accounting education? - is investigated in the third essay. It is motivated by the observation during my PhD that many conferences deal with the topic of accounting education but very little is published about what needs to be done. Moreover, the Endings in the first two essays of this thesis and their literature review suggest that financial accounting education can contribute significantly to quality corporate governance as argued elsewhere (Schipper, 2003; Boyce, 2004; Ghoshal, 2005). In the third essay of this thesis, I therefore focus on approaches to financial accounting education that account for the changes in standard setting and also contribute to corporate governance and accounting harmonization. I argue that the competency set that is required in practice changes due to major changes in standard setting. As the major contribution of the third article, I develop a public interest approach for financial accounting education. The major findings of this dissertation can be summarized as follows. The first essay provides evidence to an important research question raised by Gramling et al. (2004, p. 240): "If the audit committee and management have different visions for the corporate governance role of the IAF, which vision will dominate?" According to the results of the first essay, internal auditors do follow the priorities of either management or the audit committee based on the guidance provided by the Chief Audit executive. The study's results question whether the independence of the internal audit function is actually achievable. My findings contribute to research on internal auditors' judgment and the internal audit function's independence in the broader frame of corporate governance. The results are also important for practice because independence is a major justification for a positive contribution of the internal audit function to corporate governance. The major findings of the second essay indicate that the duty to sign work results - a means of holding people accountable -mitigates the negative effect of obedience pressure on reliability. Hence, I found evidence that control .mechanisms relying on certifications may enhance the reliability of financial information. These findings contribute to the literature on the effectiveness of internal control mechanisms. They are also important in the light of sub-certification processes that resulted from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the 8th EU Directive. The third essay contributes to the literature by developing a measurement framework that accounts for the consequences of major trends in standard setting. Moreovér, it shows how these trends affect the required .competency set of people dealing with accounting issues. Based on this work, my main contribution is the development of a public interest approach for the design of adequate financial accounting curricula. 2 Serving two masters: Experimental evidence on the independence of internal auditors Abstract Twenty nine internal auditors participated in a study that examines the independence of internal auditors in their potentially competing roles of serving two masters: the audit committee and management. Our main hypothesis suggests that internal auditors' independence is not achievable in an institutional setting in which internal auditors are accountable to two different parties with potentially differing priorities. We test our hypothesis in an experiment in which the treatment consisted of two different instructions of the Chief audit executive; one stressing the priority of management (cost reduction) and one stressing the priority of the audit committee (effectiveness). Internal auditors had to evaluate internal controls and their inherent costs of different processes which varied in their degree of task complexity. Our main results indicate that internal auditors' evaluation of the processes is significantly different when task complexity is high. Our findings suggest that internal auditors do follow the priorities of either management or the audit committee depending on the instructions of a superior internal auditor. The study's results question whether the independence of the internal audit function is actually achievable. With our findings, we contribute to research on internal auditors' judgment and the internal audit function's independence in the frame of corporate governance.

Managing Business Processes in Corporate Expansion

Yrityksen laajentuessa kansainvälisesti, olemassa olevat rutiinit jäävät vanhoiksi ja liiketoimintaprosessien johtaminen muuttuu. Kyseisten prosessien täytyy olla läpinäkyviä ja tietovirtojen hyvin suunniteltuja. Prosessien harmonisointi aiheuttaa haasteita yrityksessä ja konsernin etu tulee ottaa huomioon. Ahlstrom konserni laajentuu merkittävästi kaikilla liiketoiminta-alueillaan ja kansainvälinen laajentuminen vie Ahlstrom Glassfibre Oy:n täysin uuteen tilanteeseen. Liiketoimintaprosessien johtamiseen vaikuttavat konsernin ohjaus, mahdollisuudet muutosten implementoimiseksi, toimintaympäristön tekijät ja järjestelmien muodostama arkkitehtuuri. Tässä tutkimuksessa keskitytään ydinprosessien tietovirtoihin ja työ on tehty Karhulan tehtaalla Suomessa. Johtamismallin luomiseksi vaaditaan yrityksessä ongelmia määrittelevää työskentelyä. Tämä ongelmanmääritys oli työn tärkein tavoite. Ongelma-alueiden tutkimuksen pohjalta muodostettiin ratkaisu, jossa käsiteltiin systemaattisen liiketoimintaprosessien johtamisen mahdollisuuksia ja vaatimuksia. Lopputuloksena voidaan todeta, että suurin painopiste löytyy informaatioteknologian ja liiketoiminnan rajapinnoista. Tähän työhön liittyvät myös prossien harmonisointi ja integrointi.

Corporate Layoff Announcements and Shareholder Value: Empirical Evidence from Finland

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on tutkia lyhyen aikavälin markkinareaktiota suomalaisten pörssiyhtiöiden irtisanomisilmoituksiin. Lisäksi tutkitaan poikkileikkausmenetelmän avulla, vaikuttavatko erilaiset yrityskohtaiset tekijät siihen miten osakemarkkinat suhtautuvat irtisanomisiin. Kolmantena tutkimuksen kohteena ovat maakohtaiset irtisanomisiin liittyvät tekijät sekä kuinka ekstensiivistä on yritysten tiedottaminen irtisanomisista. Aineisto sisältää 83 julkisesti annettua irtisanomistiedotetta viiden vuodenaikaväliltä (kesäkuu 2000 - kesäkuu 2005). Osakemarkkinoiden keskimääräistä reaktiota sekä kehitettyjä alihypoteeseja tutkittiin hyödyntämällä tapahtumatutkimusmetodia. Empiiriset tulokset osoittavat, että sijoittajat näkevät irtisanomisetkeskimääräisesti negatiivisina uutisina yhtiöiden markkina-arvon kannalta. Irtisanomisilmoituksia edeltävä markkinareaktio on negatiivinen tukien aiempia tutkimustuloksia Yhdysvaltojen ja Iso-Britannian markkinoilta. Erona aikaisempiin tutkimuksiin on kuitenkin se, että negatiivinen markkinareaktio on täysin hinnoiteltu jo ilmoitusta edeltävänä aikana. Tukea löytyi myös kaikille yrityskohtaisillealihypoteeseille, jotka selittävät sijoittajien reaktiota irtisanomisilmoituksiin: koko pääoman tuotto, suhdannesykli, corporate governance sekä yrityksen ja johdon maine.

Leasingsopimusten kirjaaminen tilinpäätökseen, case: Toyota Finance Finland Oy

Tutkielman pääaiheena on leasingsopimusten kirjaaminen tilinpäätökseen viiden eri tilinpäätösnormiston näkökulmasta. Tutkielman tavoitteena on selvittää viiden tilinpäätösnormiston, suomalaisen GAAP:n ja IFRS:n, UK GAAP:n, US GAAP:n sekä Japanin GAAP:n, eroavaisuuksia ja yhteneväisyyksiä ja keskittyä näissä varsinkin leasingsopimusten kirjanpidollisten käsittelytapojen eroavaisuuksien tarkasteluun. Lisäksi tutkielman alatavoitteena on selvittää näiden normistojen yleisiä kirjanpidon ja tilinpäätöksen periaatteita. Tutkielman empiria perustuu case-yritys Toyota Finance Finland Oy:n ja sen emoyritysten tilinpäätösten muodon sekä konsernitilinpäätösten sisällön ja leasingsopimusten käsittelyn tarkasteluun. Tutkielma on case-tutkimus mutta se perustuu myös ongelman teoreettiseen käsittelyyn lähdemateriaalin, caseyrityksestä saadun informaation ja oman päättelyn pohjalta. Tutkielma on deskriptiivistä ja sen tarkoituksena onpyrkiä saamaan vastauksia kysymyksiin 'miten on?' ja 'miksi on?'. Tutkielman edetessä voidaan havaita, että vaikka yleiset kirjanpito- ja tilinpäätösperiaatteet ovat aika lailla samansisältöisiä kaikissa viidessä tilinpäätösnormistossa, sisältävät tietyt tilinpäätösstandardit ja -periaatteet huomattaviakin eroavaisuuksia. Leasingsopimukset ovat hyvä esimerkki tilinpäätöseristä, joiden käsittelypoikkeaa huomattavasti toisistaan näiden viiden tilinpäätösnormiston välillä.Suurimman ongelman aiheuttavat käyttö- ja rahoitusleasingsopimusten erilaiset käsittelytavat eri tilinpäätösnormistoissa. Suomalaisen lainsäädännön mukaan käyttö- ja rahoitusleasingsopimukset käsitellään kirjanpidollisesti samalla tavalla mutta esimerkiksi IFRS-normiston, UK GAAP:n ja US GAAP:n mukaan leasingsopimukset tulee jaotella käyttö- ja rahoitusleasingsopimuksiksi niille annettujen luokittelukriteereiden perusteella. Leasingsopimuksen luonteen perusteella määräytyy myös sen kirjanpidollinen käsittely. Suurimman eron suomalaisen käytännön ja esimerkiksi IFRS-normiston välillä aiheuttaa se, että rahoitusleasingsopimukset viedään IFRS-normistossa vuokralle ottajan taseeseen omaisuudeksi ja rahoitusleasingsopimuksen myötä vuokralle ottajalle siirtyy myös kaikki leasinghyödykkeeseen liittyvät edut ja riskit. Suomalaisessa käytännössä rahoitusleasing käsitellään aivan kuin käyttöleasingsopimus, vuokralle antajan taseessa. Käyttöleasingsopimuksen kirjanpidollinen käsittelytapa on kaikissa normistoissa jokseenkin samankaltainen.

Hallituksen riippumattomuus Suomen corporate governance -suosituksessa

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on tutkia, kuinka Suomen vuonna 2004 voimaan tullut corporate governance -suositus tukee hallituksen riippumattomuutta. Tutkimuksessa määritellään hallituksen riippumattomuuden käsite. Tämän määritelmän avulla tarkastellaan, kuinka Suomen corporate governance -suosituksessa ohjataan hallituksen riippumattomuutta. Tutkimus on kvalitatiivinen tutkimus, joka on luonteeltaan osittain teoreettinen ja osittain normatiivinen. Tutkimusstrategiassayhdistyvät deskriptiivisyys ja komparatiivisuus. Tutkimuksessa Suomen corporategovernance -suosituksen hallituksen riippumattomuutta koskevia suosituksia verrataan toisaalta päämies-agenttiteorian pohjalta muodostettuun riippumattoman hallituksen määritelmään ja toisaalta keskeisimpiin ulkomaisiin corporate governance -säännöstöihin. Riippumattomaksi hallitukseksi määriteltiin hallitus, jonka toimintaa toimiva johto tai merkittävä osakkeenomistaja ei voi suoraan tai välillisesti dominoida. Suomen suosituksessa voidaan nähdä pyrkimys kohti riippumaton-ta hallitusta. Suomen suositus ei kuitenkaan tue hallituksen riippumattomuutta parhaalla mahdollisella tavalla. Sekä toimivalle johdolle että yhtiön merkittäville osakkeenomistajille jää valtaa vaikuttaa hallituksen toimintaan enemmän kuin osakkeenomistajien etujen kannalta olisi suositeltavaa.

Corporate governance kasvuyritysten rahoituskelpoisuuden nostamisen välineenä

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää, mitä corporate governance on nuorten yritysten kohdalla ja miten he sillä voivat parantaa omia tulevaisuuden kasvumahdollisuuksia. Tutkimuksessa haastateltiin Lappeenrantalaisia kasvuyrityksiä ja pääomasijoittajien edustajia, minkä avulla saatiin tietoa siitä, mikä on tämän hetken tilanne hyvän hallintotavan suhteen. Tutkielmassa tutkittiin eri osa-alueita, jotka tämänhetkisessä tilanteessa on yhdistetty yritysten hyvän hallintotavan mukaiseen toimintaan. Näistä asioista nostetaan esille ne peruslinjaukset, joita nuorten yritysten tulisi noudattaa, jottaheidän toimintansa noudattaisi hyvää hallintotapaa. Tämän lisäksi tutkitaan pääomasijoittamista. Tutkimuksessa käydään läpi Suomessa toimivat erityyppiset pääomasijoittajat, heidän käyttämänsä sijoitusprosessit ja - kriteerit sekä arvonmääritys. Tutkimuksessa myös käsitellään pääomasijoittamisen merkitystä nuorille yrityksille ja sitä, mitä kohdeyrityksen hyvä hallintotapa voi pääomasijoittajillemerkitä. Corporate governance mielletään vielä suurten yritysten asiaksi, muttase on myös selkeästi käännettävissä pienille yrityksille sopivaksi. Mitään yksiselitteistä suositusten listaa ei voida antaa, mutta tärkeämpää olisi saada nuoret yritykset miettimään ja panostamaan oman yrityksen hyvän hallintotavan mukaiseen toimintaan. Tämän avulla on mahdollista parantaa yrityksen toimintaedellytyksiä ja torjua uhkia.

Transnational private authority and the participation of workers' organizations in the regulatory space surrounding the employment relationship

Most corporate codes of conduct and multi-stakeholder sustainability standards guarantee workers' rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining, but many authors are sceptical about the concrete impact of codes and standards of this kind. In this paper we use Hancher and Moran's (1998) concept of 'regulatory space' to assess the potential of private transnational regulation to support the growth of trade union membership and collective bargaining relationships, drawing on some preliminary case study results from a project on the impact of the International Finance Corporation's (IFC) social conditionality on worker organization and social dialogue. One of the major effects of neoliberal economic and industrial policy has been the routine exclusion of workers' organizations from regulatory processes on the grounds that they introduce inappropriate 'political' motives into what ought to be technical decision-making processes. This, rather than any direct attack on their capacity to take action, is what seems best to explain the global decline in union influence (Cradden 2004; Howell 2007; Howe 2012). The evidence we present in the paper suggests that private labour regulation may under certain conditions contribute to a reversal of this tendency, re-establishing the legitimacy of workers' organizations within regulatory processes and by extension the legitimacy of their use of economic and social power. We argue that guarantees of freedom of association and bargaining rights within private regulation schemes are effective to the extent that they can be used by workers' organizations in support of a claim for access to the regulatory space within which the terms and conditions of the employment relationship are determined. Our case study evidence shows that certain trade unions in East Africa have indeed been able to use IFC and other private regulation schemes as levers to win recognition from employers and to establish collective bargaining relationships. Although they did not attempt to use formal procedures to make a claim for the enforcement of freedom of association rights on behalf of their members, the unions did use enterprises' adherence to private regulation schemes as a normative point of reference in argument and political exchange about worker representation. For these unions, the regulation was a useful addition to the range of arguments that they could deploy as means to justify their demand for recognition by employers. By contrast, the private regulation that helps workers' organizations to win access to regulatory processes does little to ensure that they are able to participate meaningfully, whether in terms of technical capacity or of their ability to mobilize social power as a counterweight to the economic power of employers. To the extent that our East African unions were able to make an impact on terms and conditions of employment via their participation in regulatory space it was solely on the basis of their own capacities and resources and the application of national labour law.

Uuden osakeyhtiölain verovaikutukset

Suomen uusi osakeyhtiölaki tuli voimaan 1.9.2006. Tutkielmassa on selvitetty uuden osakeyhtiölain keskeisimpiä vaikutuksia osakeyhtiöiden ja niiden osakkaiden verotukseen. Tutkielmassa on tarkasteltu uuden osakeyhtiölain nimellisarvotonta pääomajärjestelmää, varojenjakotapoja sekä yritysjärjestelytilanteita yhtiö- ja vero-oikeudelliselta kannalta. Valtiovarainministeriön asettama yritysverotuksen kehittämistyöryhmä on muistiossaan ehdottanut muutoksia verolakeihin uuden osakeyhtiölain vuoksi. Työryhmä on ehdottanut mm. osinkoverotuksen alaa ja peitellyn osingonjaonverottamista laajennettavaksi ja laittoman varojenjaon verotusta kiristettäväksi. Tutkielmassa on tarkasteltu työryhmän ehdotuksia ja pohdittu ehdotusten vaikutusta käytännön yritystoimintaan elinkeinoverolain näkökulmasta. Työryhmän ehdotukset eivät kuitenkaan kata kaikkia tilanteita. OYL:ssa mahdollistetut uudet yritysmuodonmuutos- ja yritysjärjestelytilanteet eivät toistaiseksi ole toteutettavissa veroneutraalisti. Verolainsäädännön joustamattomuuden vuoksi useat uuden lain mahdollistamattoimintavaihtoehdot eivät ole yhtiöiden käytettävissä. Muutoksia verolakeihin on odotettavissa aikaisintaan vuoden 2007 eduskuntavaalien jälkeen. Ennen verolakien uudistamista verotuskäytäntö on epävarmaa, mikä tehokkaasti estää uusien toimintamahdollisuuksien toteuttamisen.

Corporate governancen vaikutus osuustoiminnallisten yritysten riskienhallintaan

Tutkimuksen tarkoituksena on osallistua corporate governance -keskusteluun tuomalla esiin riskienhallinnan näkökulma osuustoiminnallisessa yritystoiminnassa. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on kuvata corporate governancen vaikutuksia tuottajaosuustoiminnallisten yritysten riskienhallintaan, selvittää tuottajaosuustoiminnan riskienhallinnan tilaa ja toteutusta ja siihen vaikuttavia tekijöitä sekä tuoda esille näkökulmia riskienhallinnan kehittämiseksi tuottajaosuustoiminnallisissa yrityksissä. Tutkimus on luonteeltaan laadullinen tapaustutkimus. Tutkimuksen empiirinen aineisto kerättiin haastattelemalla kolmea osuustoiminnan asiantuntijaa ja seitsemää riskienhallinnan ja hallinnon vastuuhenkilöä. Haastattelut tehtiin vuoden 2006 kesän ja alkusyksyn aikana. Tutkimuksen perusteella corporate governancen vaikutus organisaatioiden riskienhallintaan on ollut rajallinen. Myös riskienhallintaan sidoksissa olevien toimi- ja hallintoelinten osalta suosituksilla on ollut vähäinen vaikutus. Huolimatta corporate governancen ja riskienhallinnan merkityksen lisääntymisestä tuottajaosuustoiminnallisissa yrityksissä, konkreettisella tasolla riskienhallinta ei toteudu corporate governance -periaatteiden edellyttämällä tavalla niin, että riskienhallintaa voisi kuvata kokonaisvaltaiseksi, periaatteiltaan määritellyksi ja suunnitelmalliseksi prosessiksi. Tutkimuksessa on myös pyritty nostamaan esiin riskienhallinnan eroja eri organisaatiomallien välillä. Tarkastelussaolleiden perusosuuskuntien sekä hybridimallien väliset erot liittyvät lähinnä yritysten resurssien ja koon vaikutuksista syntyviin eroihin riskienhallinnan toteutuksessa ja organisoinnissa. Merkittävään rooliin tuottajaosuustoiminnallistenyritysten riskienhallinnassa nousee erillisen riskienhallintatoiminnon osaaminen ja sen hyödyntäminen organisaatioiden riskienhallintatyössä.