Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial

This study aimed to compare the totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques regarding their rates of success and complications in patients with kidney stones. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Forty-four patients (24 men; mean age: 50.40±2.02 years) received totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL; no nephrostomy catheter or ureteral catheter after PCNL) and 40 patients (18 men; mean age: 49.95±13.38 years) underwent standard PCNL (a nephrostomy catheter and ureteral catheter were used after PCNL). All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. Postoperative changes in hemoglobin, the blood transfusion rate, changes in creatinine levels, operation time, analgesic need, hospitalization time, and complication rate were compared between the groups. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, stone size, and surgery side between the groups (P<0.05). The operation time was significantly lower in the totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (P=0.005). Pethidine requirements were significantly higher in the standard PCNL group than the totally tubeless PCNL group (P=0.007). Hospitalization time was significantly higher in the standard PCNL group than in the totally tubeless PCNL group (P<0.0001). The complication rate was 15% in the standard PCNL group and 9.1% in the totally tubeless PCNL group (P=0.73). The totally tubeless PCNL technique is safe and effective, even for patients with staghorn stones. This technique is associated with decreased pain, analgesic needs, and operative and hospitalization time. We believe that a normal peristaltic ureter is the best drainage tube.

Making home rules for mother tongues : the legal implications of linguistic diversity in the design of autonomy regimes

Principen om nationalismen där det politiska och det nationella är samspelt kan vara av markant betydelse för uppbyggande av autonomiska regimer. Likaså tillåter decentralicering och delegering av befogenheter för språk och utbildning (officiellt erkännande av språk, standardisering av språk, undervisningsspråk och relaterade läroplaner) formning av identiteter inom dessa autonomiska regimer. Resultatet är en ofullkomlig cirkulär relation där språk, samfund och politiska institutioner ömsesidigt och kontinuerligt formar varandra: lingvistiskt mångfald prägar och formger autonomiska ordningar och vice-versa. De juridiska implikationerna av territoriella och icke-territoriella former av autonomi är dock av en annan art. Emedan territoriell autonomi bygger på idéen om ett eventuellt inkluderande hemland för lingvistiska grupper, vars vistelseort är avgörande, förstärker den icke-territoriella autonomin idéen om ett exclusivt samfund bestående av själv-identifierade medlemmar som är kapabla till självstyre oavsett territoriella gränser. Denna avhandling utgör an analys av sådana juridiska implikationer genom komparativa och institutionella analyser. Avhandlingen föreslår som resultat en serie av normativa och pragmatiska rekommendationer inriktade på att främja demokratiseringsprocesser i linje med principer om multikulturalism.

Isotope analysis (δ13C) of pulpy whole apple juice

The objectives of this study were to develop the method of isotope analysis to quantify the carbon of C3 photosynthetic cycle in pulpy whole apple juice and to measure the legal limits based on Brazilian legislation in order to identify the beverages that do not conform to the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA). This beverage was produced in a laboratory according to the Brazilian law. Pulpy juices adulterated by the addition of sugarcane were also produced. The isotope analyses measured the relative isotope enrichment of the juices, their pulpy fractions (internal standard) and purified sugar. From those results, the quantity of C3 source was estimated by means of the isotope dilution equation. To determine the existence of adulteration in commercial juices, it was necessary to create a legal limit according to the Brazilian law. Three brands of commercial juices were analyzed. One was classified as adulterated. The legal limit enabled to clearly identify the juice that was not in conformity with the Brazilian law. The methodology developed proved efficient for quantifying the carbon of C3 origin in commercial pulpy apple juices.

Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation

Introduction: Continuous exposition of the peritoneal membrane to conventional dialysis solutions is an important risk factor for inducing structural and functional alterations. Objective: To compare in vitro mouse fibroblast NIH-3T3 cell viability after exposition to a neutral pH dialysis solution in comparison to cells exposed to a standard solution. Methods: Experimental study to compare the effects of a conventional standard or a neutral-pH, low-glucose degradation products peritoneal dialysis solution on the viability of exposed fibroblasts in cell culture. Both solutions were tested in all the commercially available glucose concentrations. Cell viability was evaluated with tetrazolium salt colorimetric assay. Results: Fibroblast viability was significantly superior in the neutral pH solution in comparison to control, in all three glucose concentrations (Optical density in nm-means ± SD: 1.5% 0.295 ± 0.047 vs. 0.372 ± 0.042, p < 0.001; 2.3% 0.270 ± 0.036 vs. 0.337 ± 0.051, p < 0.001; 4.25% 0.284 ± 0.037 vs. 0.332 ± 0.032, p < 0.001; control vs. neutral pH respectively, Student t Test). There was no significant difference in cell viability between the three concentrations of glucose when standard solution was used (ANOVA p = 0.218), although cell viability was higher after exposition to neutral pH peritoneal dialysis fluid at 1.5% in comparison to 2.3 and 4.25% glucose concentrations (ANOVA p = 0.008: Bonferroni 1.5% vs. 2.3% p = 0.033, 1.5% vs. 4.25% p = 0.014, 2.3% vs. 4.25% p = 1.00). Conclusion: Cell viability was better in neutral pH dialysis solution, especially in the lower glucose concentration. A more physiological pH and lower glucose degradation products may be responsible for such results.

Analysis and guidelines for implementation of EN 1090-2 Standard to assist execution class assignment of steel structures

Finnish design and consulting companies are delivering robust and cost-efficient steel structures solutions to a large number of manufacturing companies worldwide. Recently introduced EN 1090-2 standard obliges these companies to specify the execution class of steel structures for their customers. This however, requires clarifying, understanding and interpreting the sophisticated procedure of execution class assignment. The objective of this research is to provide a clear explanation and guidance through the process of execution class assignment for a given steel structure and to support the implementation of EN 1090-2 standard in Rejlers Oy, one of Finnish design and consulting companies. This objective is accomplished by creating a guideline for designers that elaborates on the four-step process of the execution class assignment for a steel structure or its part. Steps one to three define the consequence class (projected consequences of structure failure), the service category (hazards associated with the service use exploitation of steel structure) and the production category (manufacturing process peculiarities), based on the ductility class (capacity of structure to withstand deformations) and the behaviour factor (corresponds to structure seismic behaviour). The final step is the execution class assignment taking into account results of previous steps. Main research method is indepth literature review of European standards family for steel structures. Other research approach is a series of interviews of Rejlers Oy representatives and its clients, results of which have been used to evaluate the level of EN 1090-2 awareness. Rejlers Oy will use the developed novel coherent standard implementation guideline to improve its services and to obtain greater customer satisfaction.

The legal framework for energy provisions in the European Union – With special regard to providing of energy provisions within the scope of Article 194(2) TFEU

The thesis interprets the caveat of Article 194(2) TFEU in order to assess the use of the Article as a legal basis for energy provisions provided by the European Union. The research subject is the Energy Title in the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union and the possibilities of the application of the legal basis provided therein. The purpose is analysis of the possibilities for providing of provisions within the scope of the caveat found in Article 194(2) TFEU with special regard to the possibilities of providing renewable energy legislation. The purpose of the thesis is on one hand to provide an overview of the premises for providing of energy provisions in the EU, and on the other hand to analyse the Treaty text in order to determine the legal basis for energy provisions. The ultimate objective is to determine the correct legal basis for renewable energy provisions, aimed at the mitigation of climate change. According to Article 194(2) TFEU, the practice of the shared legislative powers in the field of energy are restricted by the retention of certain energy matters within the power of the Member States. The wording of the caveat containing the restrictions is open to interpretation and has been a subject of extensive discussion. Many scholars have argued that the caveat in Article 194(2) TFEU might obstruct decision-making in energy matters. This argument is contested, and the factual impact of the codification of the energy competences is analysed. The correct legal basis for energy provisions depends on the final interpretation of the text of the caveat and the level of significance of the effect of the measure. The use of Article 194(2) TFEU as a legal basis might not be the only option. There is a possibility that the legal bases within the Environmental Title might be used as legal bases for energy provisions in addition to Article 194(2) TFEU.

Political Legitimacy and Ethnocultural Justice. Essays on Public Reason, Democratic Citizenship, and the Rights of Cultural Minorities

In this thesis, I argue that there are public cultural reasons that can underpin public justifications of minority rights of indigenous and national minorities in a constitutionaldemocracy. I do so by tackling diverse issues facing a liberal theory of multiculturalism. In the first essay, I criticize Will Kymlicka’s comprehensive liberal theory of minority rights and propose a political liberal alternative. The main problem of Will Kymlicka’s theory is that it builds on the contestable liberal value of individual autonomy and thus fails to take diversity seriously. In the second essay, I elaborate on the Rawlsian political liberalism assumed here by criticizing Chandran Kukathas’s version of political liberalism as overly accommodating to diversity. In the third essay, I discuss questions of method that arise for a political liberal approach to the moral-political foundations of multiculturalism, and propose a certain understanding of the political liberal enterprise and its crucial standard of reasonableness. In the fourth essay, I dwell on the political liberal ethic of citizenship and propose a strongly inclusionist interpretation of the duty of civility. In the fifth and last essay, I introduce a certain understanding of ethnocultural justice and propose a view on certain cultural reasons as public cultural reasons. Cultural reasons are public when they are based on necessarily established cultural marks of a democratic polity, as specified by the cultural establishment view; and when they are crucial for the societal cultural bases of self-respect of citizens. The arguments in this thesis support, and help to spell out, moral-political rights of indigenous and national minorities as formulated in international legal documents, such as the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (United Nations 2007) or the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (United Nations 1966).

Pienten yhtiöiden tilintarkastusstandardin arvioitu vaikutus tilintarkastuksen hyötyihin – Standard for Audits of Small Entities, SASE

Suomessa ja muissa Pohjoismaissa on tunnistettu haasteita kansainvälisten tilintarkastusstandardien eli ISA-standardien soveltamisessa pienten yhtiöiden tilintarkastuksiin. ISA-standardien on kritisoitu sisältävän liian yksityiskohtaisia ja jopa epärealistisia vaatimuksia ajatellen pienien yhtiöiden tilintarkastuksia. Pohjoismaisella yhteistyöllä onkin alettu kehittää omaa standardia pienten yhtiöiden tilintarkastuksiin. Niin sanotun SASE-standardin on raportoitu muun muassa korostavan tilintarkastajan ammatillista harkintaa ja keventävän pienten yhtiöiden tilintarkastuksen vaatimuksia. Koska kuitenkin aikaisemmin sääntelyn lisäämisellä on pyritty muun muassa lisääntyneeseen tilintarkastuksen luotettavuuteen, josta myös pienten yhtiöiden on itse tutkittu hyötyvän, on tutkimuksessa haluttu selvittää, miten kehitteillä olevan SASE-standardin arvioidaan vaikuttavan yleisesti pienten yhtiöiden tilintarkastuksella saavutettaviin hyötyihin. Tutkimus on toteutettu toiminta-analyyttisena laadullisena tutkimuksena, ja tutkimusmetodina on käytetty tilintarkastajien ja yliopiston tutkijatohtorin haastatteluja. Tutkimuksen tulosten mukaan kehitteillä olevan SASE-standardin arvioidaan vaikuttavan pienten yhtiöiden tilintarkastuksen hyötyihin kaksisuuntaisesti. Toisaalta SASE-standardi voi lisätä tilintarkastuksen hyötyjä, koska tilintarkastaja voisi keskittyä tarkastuskohteen kannalta olennaisempiin asioihin, hyödyntää hiljaista tietoaan sekä lisätä vuorovaikutusta yhtiön omistajajohdon kanssa. SASE-standardin ei arvioida muuttavan juurikaan käytännön tilintarkastustyötä ja periaatteessa olennaisuuksiin keskittymisen ja riskien tehokkaamman tunnistamisen tulisi hyödyttää myös tilintarkastuskohteen ulkoisia sidosryhmiä, kuten rahoittajia. Kuitenkin tutkimuksessa nousi esiin SASE-standardin mahdollinen heikko maine. Mikäli SASE-standardia pidettäisiin vähäpätöisempänä tai epäluotettavampana kuin aikaisempaa käytäntöä, luottamus tilintarkastusta ja tarkastuskohdetta kohtaan heikkenisi ja sitä kautta myös tilintarkastuksen hyödyt pienenisivät. Tutkimuksen johtopäätöksenä voidaan esittää, että tilintarkastuksen sääntelyn keventämisen vaikutus tilintarkastuksen hyötyihin ei niinkään synny käytännön työn kautta. Tilintarkastuksen hyötyihin pikemminkin vaikuttavat maineeseen, viestintään ja vuorovaikutukseen liittyvät seikat. Toimivalla vuorovaikutuksella yhtiön omistajajohdon ja tilintarkastajan välillä voidaan tilintarkastuksen hyötyjä korostaa, ja toisaalta taas riittävällä ulkoisiin sidosryhmiin kohdistuvalla tiedottamisella voidaan hyötyjen heikkenemistä ehkäistä. Keskeiseksi seikaksi tutkimuksessa nousee se, että tilintarkastuksen luotettavuuden ja tason säilyminen on pystyttävä todistamaan.

The legal framework for energy provisions in the European Union – With special regard to providing of energy provisions within the scope of Article 194(2) TFEU

The thesis interprets the caveat of Article 194(2) TFEU in order to assess the use of the Article as a legal basis for energy provisions provided by the European Union. The research subject is the Energy Title in the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union and the possibilities of the application of the legal basis provided therein. The purpose is analysis of the possibilities for providing of provisions within the scope of the caveat found in Article 194(2) TFEU with special regard to the possibilities of providing renewable energy legislation. The purpose of the thesis is on one hand to provide an overview of the premises for providing of energy provisions in the EU, and on the other hand to analyse the Treaty text in order to determine the legal basis for energy provisions. The ultimate objective is to determine the correct legal basis for renewable energy provisions, aimed at the mitigation of climate change. According to Article 194(2) TFEU, the practice of the shared legislative powers in the field of energy are restricted by the retention of certain energy matters within the power of the Member States. The wording of the caveat containing the restrictions is open to interpretation and has been a subject of extensive discussion. Many scholars have argued that the caveat in Article 194(2) TFEU might obstruct decision-making in energy matters. This argument is contested, and the factual impact of the codification of the energy competences is analysed. The correct legal basis for energy provisions depends on the final interpretation of the text of the caveat and the level of significance of the effect of the measure. The use of Article 194(2) TFEU as a legal basis might not be the only option. There is a possibility that the legal bases within the Environmental Title might be used as legal bases for energy provisions in addition to Article 194(2) TFEU.

As definições teóricas de direitos humanos de Jürgen Habermas: o princípio legal e as correções morais[ign] [title language="en"]The theoretical definitions of human rights of Jürgen Habermas[ign]: [subtitle]legal principle and moral corrections

No entendimento de Habermas, "direito", na expressão "direitos humanos", é um conceito jurídico, donde direitos humanos, para ele, serem direitos jurídicos, normas legais declaradas em atos de fundações do Estado ou anunciadas em convenções do direito internacional e/ou constituições estatais. Ao conceber assim os direitos e tematizar os direitos humanos numa abordagem tríplice (focando-os entre moral, direito e política), ele fornece diferentes definições teóricas dos direitos humanos. O texto apresenta uma exposição sistemática dessas definições e focaliza os diferentes problemas que motivaram Habermas a alterar e ampliar suas concepções de direitos humanos.

Has social justice any legitimacy in Kant's theory of right? The empirical conditions of the legal state as a civil union

This paper aims at shedding light on an obscure point in Kant's theory of the state. It discusses whether Kant's rational theory of the state recognises the fact that certain exceptional social situations, such as the extreme poverty of some parts of the population, could request institutional state support in order to guarantee the attainment of a minimum threshold of civil independence. It has three aims: 1) to show that Kant's Doctrine of Right can offer solutions for the complex relation between economics and politics in our present time; 2) to demonstrate the claim that Kant embraces a pragmatic standpoint when he tackles the social concerns of the state, and so to refute the idea that he argues for an abstract conception of politics; and 3) to suggest that a non-paternalistic theory of rights is not necessarily incompatible with the basic tenets of a welfare state.

Yllättävä ja ankara ehto verkossa tehtävässä vakiosopimuksessa

Tässä työssä tutkitaan verkossa tehtävän vakiosopimuksen ehtoja sopimuksen ollessa elinkeinonharjoittajien välinen. Kun sopimuksen on laatinut neuvotteluasemaltaan vahvempi osapuoli, ei toisella osapuolella ole muuta mahdollisuutta kuin hyväksyä tai hylätä sopimus. Tällainen sopimus on nimeltään liittymissopimus. Epätasaisen neuvotteluvoiman johdosta vahvempi osapuoli voi sopimuksen ehtoja laatiessaan pyrkiä puoltamaan omaa etuaan. Tämä voi johtaa tilanteeseen, jossa sopimuksen ehtoihin sisältyy yllättäviä ja ankaria ehtoja. Tarkoituksena on selvittää oikeuskirjallisuuden perusteella millaiset ehdot voivat olla lähtökohtaisesti yllättäviä ja ankaria. Jotta tällaiset ehdot tulisivat sitovasti sopimuksen osaksi, niitä tulee korostaa. Empiirisen tutkimuksen avulla halutaan selvittää miten edellä mainittujen ehtojen korostaminen onnistuu mobiilisovelluskehittäjien jakelusopimuksissa. Verkossa toteutettu kyselytutkimus suunnattiin suomalaisille mobiilisovelluskehittäjille. Tutkimuksen mukaan on selvää, ettei suurin ongelma ole sopimusehdoissa, vaan suurin ongelma on sopimuksen lukemisen transaktiokustannus. Tämän seurauksena liityntäsopimuksen hyväksyjät ovat tietämättömiä sopimuksen solmimisen seurauksena heihin kohdistuneista vastuista ja velvoitteista. Koska sovelluskehittäjät näkevät itsensä jo lähtökohtaisesti sopimuksen osapuolina ilman neuvotteluvoimaa, eivät he koe hyötyvänsä sopimuksen lukemisesta. Johtopäätöksenä todetaan, että tiedon epäsymmetrisyyteen tulisi vaikuttaa. Järjestäytymällä sovelluskehittäjien olisi mahdollista kasvattaa neuvotteluvoimaa, mutta myös lisätä tietoisuuttaan sopimusehtojen sisällöstä. Sopimusehtoihin vaikuttaminen ei ole mahdollista tällä hetkellä ennen kuin useammat sopimuksen hyväksyjät lukevat sopimuksen.