Resolving conflict : --following the light of personal behavior /

"NAVPERS 15620."

Cost-benefit analyses for your group and yourself: The rationality of decision-making in conflict

Two studies in the context of English-French relations in Québec suggest that individuals who strongly identify with a group derive the individual-level costs and benefits that drive expectancy-value processes (rational decision-making) from group-level costs and benefits. In Study 1, high identifiers linked group- and individual-level outcomes of conflict choices whereas low identifiers did not. Group-level expectancy-value processes, in Study 2, mediated the relationship between social identity and perceptions that collective action benefits the individual actor and between social identity and intentions to act. These findings suggest the rational underpinnings of identity-driven political behavior, a relationship sometimes obscured in intergroup theory that focuses on cognitive processes of self-stereotyping. But the results also challenge the view that individuals' cost-benefit analyses are independent of identity processes. The findings suggest the importance of modeling the relationship of group and individual levels of expectancy-value processes as both hierarchical and contingent on social identity processes

Managing conflict in user-oriented development environments: Effects on information systems success

Today, many organizations are turning to new approaches to building and maintaining information systems (I/S) to cope with a highly competitive business environment. Current anecdotal evidence indicates that the approaches being used improve the effectiveness of software development by encouraging active user participation throughout the development process. Unfortunately, very little is known about how the use of such approaches enhances the ability of team members to develop I/S that are responsive to changing business conditions.^ Drawing from predominant theories of organizational conflict, this study develops and tests a model of conflict among members of a development team. The model proposes that development approaches provide the relevant context conditioning the management and resolution of conflict in software development which, in turn, are crucial for the success of the development process.^ Empirical testing of the model was conducted using data collected through a combination of interviews with I/S executives and surveys of team members and business users at nine organizations. Results of path analysis provide support for the model's main prediction that integrative conflict management and distributive conflict management can contribute to I/S success by influencing differently the manifestation and resolution of conflict in software development. Further, analyses of variance indicate that object-oriented development, when compared to rapid and structured development, appears to produce the lowest levels of conflict management, conflict resolution, and I/S success.^ The proposed model and findings suggest academic implications for understanding the effects of different conflict management behaviors on software development outcomes, and practical implications for better managing the software development process, especially in user-oriented development environments. ^

The game to play: expanding the co-opetition proposal through the strategic games matrix

Purpose - Using Brandenburger and Nalebuff`s 1995 co-opetition model as a reference, the purpose of this paper is to seek to develop a tool that, based on the tenets of classical game theory, would enable scholars and managers to identify which games may be played in response to the different conflict of interest situations faced by companies in their business environments. Design/methodology/approach - The literature on game theory and business strategy are reviewed and a conceptual model, the strategic games matrix (SGM), is developed. Two novel games are described and modeled. Findings - The co-opetition model is not sufficient to realistically represent most of the conflict of interest situations faced by companies. It seeks to address this problem through development of the SGM, which expands upon Brandenburger and Nalebuff`s model by providing a broader perspective, through incorporation of an additional dimension (power ratio between players) and three novel, respectively, (rival, individualistic, and associative). Practical implications - This proposed model, based on the concepts of game theory, should be used to train decision- and policy-makers to better understand, interpret and formulate conflict management strategies. Originality/value - A practical and original tool to use game models in conflict of interest situations is generated. Basic classical games, such as Nash, Stackelberg, Pareto, and Minimax, are mapped on the SGM to suggest in which situations they Could be useful. Two innovative games are described to fit four different types of conflict situations that so far have no corresponding game in the literature. A test application of the SGM to a classic Intel Corporation strategic management case, in the complex personal computer industry, shows that the proposed method is able to describe, to interpret, to analyze, and to prescribe optimal competitive and/or cooperative strategies for each conflict of interest situation.

Auto-regulação na gestão de conflitos em retalho

Mestrado em Engenharia Informática

Método multicritério como apoio a um processo de negociação numa empresa de serviços médicos

O processo de negociação tem ganho relevância como uma das formas de gestão de conflitos. Verifica-se que nas organizações a negociação é um processo omnipresente, que tem sido alvo de muito estudo e investigação, e as capacidades de negociação são consideradas determinantes para o sucesso. Em consequência dessas tendências, surgem propostas de modelos de negociação bastantes flexíveis e que visam colaboração entre as partes interessadas, modelos que se adequam aos contextos organizacionais em que predominam relações estáveis e de longo prazo. Estas propostas procuram a solução óptima para as partes interessadas. No entanto, faltam frequentemente os mecanismos e procedimentos que garantam um processo estruturado para elaborar e analisar os diversos cenários na negociação, considerando um conjunto de aspectos relevantes para ambas as partes. No presente trabalho de dissertação formula-se uma proposta baseada no modelo de negociação Win Win Quantitativa, em que foi utilizada uma abordagem do método multicritério Analitic Hierarchy Process (AHP) para seleccionar a melhor opção de serviço para uma determinada empresa. Para o caso de estudo, num contexto real, foi necessário desenvolver uma aplicação Excel que permitisse analisar, de uma forma clara, as diversas alternativas perante os critérios mencionados. A aplicação do método AHP permite aos clientes tomar uma decisão potencialmente mais acertada. A aplicação informática procura optimizar os custos inerentes à prestação de serviços, oferecendo aos clientes um custo reduzido e assim tornando a empresa mais competitiva e atractiva para os potenciais clientes.

O papel do adulto na resolução de conflitos entre crianças do jardim de infância

Relatório da Prática Profissional Supervisionada Mestrado em Educação Pré-Escolar

O papel das crianças e do educador na gestão de conflitos interpessoais

Relatório da Prática Profissional Supervisionada Mestrado em Educação Pré-Escolar

O desenvolvimento de competências sociais na educação de infância: os contributos da brincadeira e das atividades de pequenos grupos

Relatório da Prática Profissional Supervisionada Mestrado em Educação Pré-Escolar

O diário de turma no 4º ano de escolaridade

Relatório de Estágio apresentado à Escola Superior de Educação de Lisboa para obtenção de grau de mestre em Ensino do 1.º e 2.ºCiclo do Ensino Básico