Increasing popular participation in the treaty-making process : the legislative process of Section 190 of the 2007 Constitution of Thailand

Historically, the authority to conclude international treaties was exclusively exercised by administrative bodies (or the chief of state). However, recent studies pointed out that the present legislative bodies have come to play a more active role through ratification or the review of treaties in European and American countries. Harrington (2005) studied judicial reform in British dominions and criticized the past executive-dominant treaty-making process as a “democratic deficit” due to a fear that under this system the nation might be bound by international agreements for which a consensus had not been obtained. These studies indicated that people’s participation in the treaty-making process has increased on a global basis, but neither of them provides sufficient descriptive evidence regarding why and how such procedures were established. The present paper therefore attempts to solve these questions by analyzing the legislative and political process of the treaty-making procedure reform in Thailand’s 2007 constitution as a case study.

La deformación del tipo Construcción de bóvedas no-canónicas en España (siglos XVI-XVIII)

Una bóveda no canónica es una bóveda que se adapta a una forma distinta de aquella para la que ha sido inicialmente concebida. Bóvedas raras, anormales, no convencionales, habitualmente consideradas excepciones o casos particulares, resultan ser más frecuentes de lo inicialmente esperado. El interés por este tipo de bóvedas surge a raíz de una investigación inicial sobre las bóvedas empleadas para cubrir espacios de planta anular, como en el caso de las girolas de las iglesias. Sin embargo, el problema de la bóveda anular no puede ser abordado directamente, sino como parte de una investigación más general sobre bóvedas que se deforman para adaptarse a una situación anómala. El análisis de las posibilidades que un determinado tipo de bóveda brinda para resolver el abovedamiento de espacios de planta irregular, trascendiendo el problema de la planta anular, es lo que da origen a esta investigación. La cuestión de las bóvedas deformadas forma parte de un contexto mayor, el de la deformación en arquitectura abovedada. Ante una contradicción, la deformación de la bóveda es sólo una de las posibles opciones que esta arquitectura ofrece para resolver un problema de deformación. La tesis se estructura en dos partes: en la primera parte se analizan los conceptos de forma y deformación en el contexto de la arquitectura abovedada con objeto de sentar las bases para una teoría de las bóvedas no canónicas. El objetivo es establecer un punto de partida para la investigación en un campo que todavía no había sido abordado. En la segunda parte se analizan tres tipos de bóveda desde la perspectiva de las bóvedas no canónicas, a partir de un estudio de casos de bóvedas en España entre los siglos XVI y XVIII. El estudio de la deformación en arquitectura abovedada se centra en el problema de la girola, por tratarse de un caso generalizado de deformación, directamente relacionado con el problema de las bóvedas irregulares y cuyo estudio, llamativamente, no había sido llevado a cabo hasta la fecha. Se propone una primera aproximación al problema de la girola, desde un punto de vista puramente morfológico, al margen de consideraciones históricas. En el caso de las bóvedas deformadas, el análisis se centra en tres tipos de bóveda: la bóveda de crucería, la bóveda de arista y la bóveda baída. Estos tres tipos de bóveda, aunque basadas en criterios formales distintos, están íntimamente relacionados entre sí. Por un lado permiten resolver el mismo problema –planta cuadrada delimitada por arcos–, por otro lado es posible establecer una relación formal entre la bóveda de arista y la bóveda baída a través de la bóveda de crucería. El estudio de casos recogido en la segunda parte de la tesis se fundamenta en dos líneas de investigación, la primera sobre soluciones teóricas de bóvedas no convencionales propuestas en los manuscritos y tratados de cantería, y la segunda sobre bóvedas efectivamente construidas, tratado de establecer una comparación entre teoría y práctica, confrontando el grado de relación entre ambas. Sin embargo este doble análisis sólo se ha podido llevar a cabo en contadas ocasiones. Constatamos que las bóvedas no canónicas reflejadas en los tratados son pocas y apenas se han llevado a la práctica, mientras que las soluciones construidas no responden a modelos teóricos propuestos, manifestando un divorcio entre teoría y práctica. El estudio de estas bóvedas permite poner en cuestión la definición tradicional que relaciona los conceptos de ‘bóveda’ y ‘superficie’. Al iniciar el trabajo nos encontramos con un modelo teórico extremadamente rígido que deja fuera un gran número de bóvedas, obligando a agruparlas bajo el término «no canónicas». El trabajo realizado pone en evidencia lo limitado del modelo. El problema no está en la presencia de bóvedas anómalas, que no se adaptan al modelo tradicionalmente propuesto, sino en la extrema rigidez del modelo. ABSTRACT A non canonical vault is a vault adapted to a different form from that for which was originally conceived. These rare, abnormal, unconventional vaults are usually considered as exceptions or special cases. However they prove to be more frequent than it was initially expected. Interest in this type of vaults arises from an initial research on the vaults used to roof annular spaces, such as ambulatories. Nevertheless, the annular vault question cannot be addressed directly, but as a part of a broader research on distorted vaults; a research on vaults deformed to conform an anomalous layout. The analysis of the possibilities that a particular type of vault provides to solve the vaulting of an irregular layout, beyond the problem of the annular plan is the origin of this research. The argument of deformed vaults is part of a greater context, the context of deformation in vaulted architecture. Facing a contradiction, deforming a vault is just one of the options that vaulted architecture offers to solve a problem of deformation. This dissertation is organised in two parts: in the first part we analyse the concepts of form and deformation in the context of vaulted architecture in order to lay the foundations for a non canonical vaults theory. The objective is to establish a starting point for future research in a field that has not been addressed yet. In the second part, we analyse three types of vault from the perspective of non canonical vaults, based on a case study of Spanish vaults between the 16th and 18th Centuries. The analysis of deformation in vaulted architecture focuses on the question of the ambulatory, because it is a generalized example of deformation, directly related to the problem of irregular vaults. Remarkably, the analysis of these spaces had not been conducted to date. We propose a first approach to the question of the ambulatory, from a purely morphological point of view, setting aside historical considerations. The analysis of deformed vaults focuses on three types of vault: the groin vault, the ribbed vault and the sail vault. These three types of vault, although based on different formal criteria, are closely related between them. On the one hand, they allow to solve the same problem –a square perimeter limited by arcs-; on the other hand, it is possible to establish a formal relationship between the groin vault and the sail vault through the ribbed vault. The case study presented in the second part of this dissertation is based on two research lines: theoretical non conventional vaults solutions proposed on stonecutting treatises; and currently built vaults. The aim of this double analysis was to establish a comparison between theory and practice, comparing the degree of relationship between them. Nevertheless, this double analysis has only been carried out on rare occasions. It is noted that non canonical vaults reflected in treaties are few and hardly been employed, while the built solutions do not meet proposed theoretical models, expressing a divorce between theory and practice. The analysis of these vaults allows us to question the traditional definition that connects the concepts of 'vault' and 'surface'. When we began this research, we found an extremely rigid theoretical model that leaved out many vaults, forcing to group them under the term of «non canonical vaults». This research evidences the limitations of the model. The problem is not the presence of abnormal vaults, which cannot adapt to the traditional model, but in the very high stiffness of the model.

ESCREVENDO CARTAS PARA UM PROGRAMA DE TV: CARTAS NA CONTEMPORANEIDADE

As cartas são uma das formas de comunicação a distância mais antigas de que se tem notícia. Além disso, há séculos são feitos tratados e estudos de como as cartas são e de como devem ser escritas. Este estudo enfoca as cartas enviadas ao programa televisivo Globo Rural, da TV Globo no ano de 2005, data de seu 25º aniversário. Em um primeiro momento, através de um banco de dados, composto por 418 cartas, delineou-se a identidade e as demandas dos telespectadores que escreveram ao programa. Percebeu-se, entre outras questões, que além das pessoas residentes em áreas rurais e que mantêm relação com o campo, muitos telespectadores de áreas urbanas e profissionais de áreas de conhecimento não-rurais também entram em contato com o programa através de cartas. Em um segundo momento, através de escolhas intencionais, com uma abordagem qualitativa, sem intenção de generalização, discutiu-se algumas características atuais da maneira de se escrever cartas. Ao comparar com antigos tratados datados da Era Antiga pode-se concluir que as cartas analisadas ainda mantêm muitos traços discursivos definidos desde então.(AU)

ESCREVENDO CARTAS PARA UM PROGRAMA DE TV: CARTAS NA CONTEMPORANEIDADE

As cartas são uma das formas de comunicação a distância mais antigas de que se tem notícia. Além disso, há séculos são feitos tratados e estudos de como as cartas são e de como devem ser escritas. Este estudo enfoca as cartas enviadas ao programa televisivo Globo Rural, da TV Globo no ano de 2005, data de seu 25º aniversário. Em um primeiro momento, através de um banco de dados, composto por 418 cartas, delineou-se a identidade e as demandas dos telespectadores que escreveram ao programa. Percebeu-se, entre outras questões, que além das pessoas residentes em áreas rurais e que mantêm relação com o campo, muitos telespectadores de áreas urbanas e profissionais de áreas de conhecimento não-rurais também entram em contato com o programa através de cartas. Em um segundo momento, através de escolhas intencionais, com uma abordagem qualitativa, sem intenção de generalização, discutiu-se algumas características atuais da maneira de se escrever cartas. Ao comparar com antigos tratados datados da Era Antiga pode-se concluir que as cartas analisadas ainda mantêm muitos traços discursivos definidos desde então.(AU)

A integração da indústria de energia elétrica na América do Sul: análise dos modelos técnicos e de regulamentação.

Os recursos energéticos naturais não estão distribuídos uniformemente pelo globo terrestre, e são raros os países que os têm na quantidade e na qualidade que necessitam para atender as suas necessidades. Ante a essa realidade, o comércio de energéticos tem sido a forma principal de acesso dos países que não os dispõem em relação as suas necessidades. Esse comércio, que muitas vezes é regido por tratados ou acordos firmados entre países ou blocos econômicos regionais, diversificou-se, traspassou fronteiras e, atualmente, tornou-se um item significativo nas pautas de exportações de vários países. A evolução desse comércio tem a favor a alternativa de integração por meio de interconexões estratégicas de redes e da constituição de mercados comuns, que viabilizam a exploração do potencial de complementariedade energética de forma mais racional. Diante desse contexto, esta dissertação apresenta um estudo exploratório que avalia o estado da arte da integração energética sul-americana e faz análises dos modelos técnicos, das regulamentações, das regulações regionais e multilaterais estabelecidas pelos blocos econômicos sul-americanos e pela Organização Mundial do Comércio. De forma complementar, o estudo verifica e apresenta os fatores que podem comprometer o avanço e a instituição de um futuro mercado comum de energia no continente, conclui pela viabilidade do prosseguimento de ações em prol da ampliação da integração da indústria de energia elétrica na América do Sul e tece recomendações. Os resultados e as recomendações deste trabalho oferecem um embasamento procedimental para a gestão e a atuação institucional dos envolvidos no processo de integração energética da indústria de energia elétrica da região sul americana.

Pharmacopea de la Armada (1760), un libro singular para uso de los sanitarios navales del siglo XVIII

La Pharmacopea de la Armada, obra de Leandro de Vega, publicada en 1760 para uso de médicos y cirujanos de los buques y hospitales de la marina española a lo largo del siglo XVIII, está considerada como la primera farmacopea naval española. Su autor la define con un «catálogo de medicamentos pertenecientes a las enfermedades médicas», en definitiva un nomenclátor de fórmulas para la preparación de los medicamentos de mayor utilidad para los navegantes de la época, tanto de uso interno como externo. En el presente artículo se analiza en profundidad esta obra, reconocida su relevancia de fuente primaria, situándola en su contexto histórico, detallando el contenido de sus tratados, así como dando noticia biográfica de su autor e informando de la posición profesional y misión de sus destinatarios.

Límites a la interpretación dinámica de los convenios de doble imposición internacional: el caso ING

El presente trabajo contiene algunas reflexiones críticas sobre el valor hermenéutico de los Comentarios al Convenio Modelo de la OCDE y su interpretación dinámica, más o menos matizada, al hilo de la Sentencia de la Audiencia Nacional de 10 de julio de 2015, dictada en el Caso ING. La interpretación de los convenios de doble imposición internacional ha concitado desde antiguo posturas encontradas tanto en el plano doctrinal como jurisprudencial; discusión que cobra hoy renovada importancia en relación con el soft law en general, y las recomendaciones del Proyecto BEPS de la OCDE, en particular.

Rehabilitating, repairing and restoring against demolishing, tearing down and destroying: the recovery of the military fort for the Santa Pola town museum

This communication develops the process of interventions of the Renaissance fortress of a new plant built in 1554–57 in Santa Pola. It is one of the earliest examples built with reference to military architecture theoretical treaties (XV–XVI) and best preserved. The study runs its own story from its initial military use, through the use of civil equipment until the final cultural and Museum Center. First, the project of Italian origin is examined and its use as barracks for troops for a duration of three centuries (1557–1850), pointing out the architectural constants of war machinery in a defense position and its origin as a rainwater collector and cistern: a perfect square with two bastions in which a plan of the uprising is preserved (1778). Secondly, we study the changes in the mentioned architecture throughout a century and a half (1850–1990) after its change of ownership (from the state to the municipality), and as a result of the new use as a city hall and public endowment: a market and health and leisure centre, which meant the demolition of defensive elements and the opening up to the outside of the inner parade ground. And thirdly, the new transfer of the municipal offices brings in the beginning of a project of transformations (1990–2015) that retrieves the demolished elements at the same time as it assigns the entire fort for a cultural centre: exhibition, research and history museum, promoting the identity between the citizens and the building which stands in the foundations of their city. The conclusions take us through an interesting route that goes from the approach of defensive tactics, its use as administrative headquarters to the current cultural policy of preservation. In addition, all the known plans of the fort are recovered (of military, civil and cultural use), some unpublished, as well as the project of the North wing that has guided the last operation and which has been set as a pattern of reference.

The European Court of Justice and process-oriented review. Research Paper in Law, 01/2012

Structuralism is a theory of U.S. constitutional adjudication according to which courts should seek to improve the decision-making process of the political branches of government so as to render it more democratic.1 In words of John Hart Ely, courts should exercise their judicial-review powers as a ‘representation-reinforcing’ mechanism.2 Structuralism advocates that courts must eliminate the elements of the political decision-making process that are at odds with the structure set out by the authors of the U.S. Constitution. The advantage of this approach, U.S. scholars posit, lies in the fact that it does not require courts to second-guess the policy decisions adopted by the political branches of government. Instead, they limit themselves to enforcing the constitutional structure within which those decisions must be adopted. Of course, this theory of constitutional adjudication, like all theories, has its shortcomings. For example, detractors of structuralism argue that it is difficult, if not impossible, to draw the dividing line between ‘substantive’ and ‘structural’ matters.3 In particular, they claim that, when identifying the ‘structure’ set out by the authors of the U.S. Constitution, courts necessarily base their determinations not on purely structural principles, but on a set of substantive values, evaluating concepts such as democracy, liberty and equality. 4 Without claiming that structuralism should be embraced by the ECJ as the leading theory of judicial review, the purpose of my contribution is to explore how recent case-law reveals that the ECJ has also striven to develop guiding principles which aim to improve the way in which the political institutions of the EU adopt their decisions. In those cases, the ECJ decided not to second-guess the appropriateness of the policy choices made by the EU legislator. Instead, it preferred to examine whether, in reaching an outcome, the EU political institutions had followed the procedural steps mandated by the authors of the Treaties. Stated simply, I argue that judicial deference in relation to ‘substantive outcomes’ has been counterbalanced by a strict ‘process review’. To that effect, I would like to discuss three recent rulings of the ECJ, delivered after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, where an EU policy measure was challenged indirectly, i.e. via the preliminary reference procedure, namely Vodafone, Volker und Markus Schecke and Test-Achats.5 Whilst in the former case the ECJ ruled that the questions raised by the referring court disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of the challenged act, in the latter cases the challenged provisions of an EU act were declared invalid.

Member State BITS after the Treaty of Lisbon: solid foundation or first victims of EU investment policy? Research Paper in Law, 02/2012

[Introduction.] This paper discusses the uncertain future of Member State BITs with third countries in the light of the developing EU investment policy. The question will be examined on the basis of the proposed Regulation establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries presented by the Commission on 7 July 20101 and the European Parliament’s Position adopted at first reading on 10 May 2011.2 The proposed Regulation and the Commission Communication of the same day are meant to be the “first steps in the development of an EU international investment policy”.3 The first chapters present the legal framework relevant for this question and its evolution to better understand the particular challenges of this transition process. The second chapter examines the relationship of EU law and investment law, with a brief introduction of the notion of investment law and the scope of the EU’s new investment competence. The third chapter outlines the legal framework for the continuation and termination of treaties under international and EU law. The fourth chapter concerns BITs, first covering the particular nature of BITs and then the CJEU’s judgments in the BIT Cases of 2009. The fifth chapter consists of a step by step analysis of the different provisions of the proposed Regulation.

Reflections on the institutional balance, the Community Method and the interplay between jurisdictions after Lisbon. Research Papers in Law, 04/2012

[Introduction.] Over the last two years, not only inside but also outside the framework of the EU treaties, far reaching measures have been taken at the highest political level in order to address the financial and economic crisis in Europe and in particular the sovereign debt crisis in the Euro area. This has triggered debates forecasting the “renationalisation of European politics.” Herman Van Rompuy, the President of the European Council, countered the prediction that Europe is doomed because of such a renationalisation: “If national politics have a prominent place in our Union, why would this not strengthen it?” He took the view that not a renationalisation of European politics was at stake, but an Europeanization of national politics emphasising that post war Europe was never developed in contradiction with nation states.1 Indeed, the European project is based on a mobilisation of bundled, national forces which are of vital importance to a democratically structured and robust Union that is capable of acting in a globalised world. To that end, the Treaty of Lisbon created a legal basis. The new legal framework redefines the balance between the Union institutions and confirms the central role of the Community method in the EU legislative and judiciary process. This contribution critically discusses the development of the EU's institutional balance after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, with a particular emphasis on the use of the Community Method and the current interplay between national constitutional courts and the Court of Justice. This interplay has to date been characterised by suspicion and mistrust, rather than by a genuine dialogue between the pertinent judicial actors.

Talking with the “pouvoir constituant” in times of constitutional reform: The European Court of Justice on Private Applicants’ Access to Justice. Research Paper in Law 3/2003

[From the Introduction]. European lawyers, at least those dealing predominantly with institutional matters, are living particularly interesting times since the setting-up of the “European Convention on the Future of Europe” in December 2001.1 As the Convention’s mandate, spelled out in rather broad terms in the European Council’s declaration of Laeken,2 is potentially unlimited, and as the future constitution of the European Union (EU) will be ultimately adopted by the subsequent Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), there appears to be a great possibility to clarify, to simplify and also to reform many of the more controversial elements in the European legal construction. The present debate on the future of the European constitution also highlights the relationship between the pouvoir constituant3 and the European Courts, the Court of Justice (ECJ) and its Court of First Instance (CFI), who have to interpret the basic rules and principles of the EU.4 In that light, the present article will focus on a classic theme of the Court’s case law: the relationship between judges and pouvoir constituant. In the EU, this relationship has traditionally been marked by the ECJ’s role as driving force in the “constitutionalisation” of the EC Treaties – which has, to a large extent, been accepted and even codified by the Member States in subsequent treaty revisions. However, since 1994, the ECJ appears to be more reluctant to act as a “law-maker.”5 The recent judgment in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores (UPA)6 – an important decision by which the ECJ refused to liberalize individuals’ access to the Community Courts – is also interesting in this context. UPA may be seen as another proof of judicial restraint - or even as indicator of the beginning of a new phase in the “constitutional dialogue” between the ECJ and the “Masters of the Treaties.”

Literaturas do Próximo Oriente Antigo na Bíblia: origens, aliança e sabedoria

Este trabalho tem como objetivo o estudo comparativo e situacional entre alguns temas e livros bíblicos e temas semelhantes tratados pelas literaturas do Próximo Oriente Antigo, nomeadamente as sumérias, acádicas, ugaríticas e egípcias. Os mitos de origem são o tema do primeiro capítulo, sendo tratados, de seguida, temas como a aliança entre Yahweh e o povo de Israel, tal como é descrita nos livros do Êxodo e Deuteronómio e a respetiva comparação com os tratados de vassalagem hititas. A finalizar, é abordada a grande área da literatura sapiencial e a sua base humanista em todas as literaturas em apreço.

A realistic bridge towards European banking union. Bruegel Policy Contribution 2013/09, June 2013

New obstacles to the European banking union have emerged over the last year, but a successful transition remains both necessary and possible. The key next step will be in the second half of 2014, when the European Central Bank (ECB) will gain supervisory authority over most of Europe’s banking system. This needs to be preceded by a rigorous balance sheet assessment that is likely to trigger significant bank restructuring, for which preparation has barely started. It will be much more significant than current discussions about a bank resolution directive and bank recapitalisation by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). The 2014 handover, and a subsequent change in the European treaties that will establish the robust legal basis needed for a sustainable banking union, together define the policy sequence as a bridge that can allow Europe to cross the choppy waters that separate it from a steady-state banking policy framework.

Bridging qualified majority and unanimity decision-making in the EU. IHS Political Science Series No. 132, February 2013

The EU has tried to bridge decision making by qualified majority and unanimity over the years by expanding qualified majorities (consensus) or by making unanimities easier to achieve. I call this decision-making procedure q-“unanimity” and trace its history from the Luxembourg compromise to the Lisbon Treaty, and to more recent agreements. I analyze the most recent and explicit mechanism of this bridging (article 31 (2) of the Lisbon Treaty) and identify one specific means by which the transformation of qualified majorities to unanimities is achieved: the reduction of precision or scope of the decision, so that different behaviors can be covered by it. I provide empirical evidence of such a mechanism by analyzing legislative decisions. Finally, I argue that this bridging is a ubiquitous feature of EU institutions, used in Treaties as well as in legislative decision-making.