Online retailing versus traditional stores in the purchasing decision making process

Due to proliferation of online stores prior expectations that retailing would move completely online were not fulfilled. Previous research about consumers’ preference of retailing channels suggested that online sales are driven by the convenience of online shopping, or as a natural extension of online searches. This paradigm has changed over the years. Changes in consumer behaviour are indicating that while consumers are searching online using various information sources to learn about products, ultimately when purchasing, consumers are shifting between online and offline retailing channels depending on various factors. Online shopping is still considered to be a convenient way to purchase goods, but the convenience is not the key factor. This qualitative research is based on 22 in-depth interviews with shoppers in Australia.

Regulating unilateral supermarket misconduct as customer/acquirer of goods and services

Supermarkets in Australia may have substantial market power as buyers in wholesale markets for grocery products. They may also have substantial bargaining power in negotiating contracts with their suppliers of grocery products. The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) regulates misconduct by supermarkets as customer/acquirers in three ways. First, s 46(1) of the CCA prohibits the ‘taking advantage’ of buyer power for the purpose of damaging a competitor, preventing entry or deterring or preventing competitive conduct. Secondly, s 21 of the ACL prohibits unconscionable conduct in business–to–business transactions. Thirdly, Pt IVB of the CCA provides for the promulgation of mandatory and voluntary industry codes of conduct. Since 1 July 2015 the conduct of supermarkets as customer/acquirers has been regulated by the Food and Grocery Industry Code of Conduct. This article examines these three different approaches. It considers them against the background of the misconduct at issue in ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd which the ACCC chose to litigate as an unconscionable conduct case, rather than a misuse of market power case. The article also considers the strengths and weaknesses of each of the three approaches and concludes that while the three approaches address different problems there is scope for overlap and all three should be retained for compete coverage.

Controlling routine front line service workers: an Australian retail supermarket case

Food retail is known for its use of flexible labour and for the centralisation of functions at head office, resulting in a reduction of managerial autonomy at store level. This article employs a typology of controls developed from labour process scholarship to explore how retail managers negotiate the control of their predominantly part-time workforce. Using an Australian supermarket chain as a case, and mixed methods, the article demonstrates that supermarkets use a multiplicity of forms of control across their workforce. For front line service workers, the article identifies a new configuration of controls which intersects with employment status and acts differentially for checkout operators on different employment contracts.

Predicting the last brand standing in the supermarket price wars

On January 26, 2011, grocery retailer Coles fired the first salvo in what would soon be dubbed the “supermarket price wars” by reducing the price of its own-brand milk to A$1 per litre. Woolworths immediately responded. In the three years since, grocery prices have been tumbling, with 85 cent bread being the latest “sacrificial lamb”. This period of intense competition has brought about not just lower grocery prices, but a senate enquiry, and increasing media and analyst interest.

Myymälämarkkinointi osana markkinointiviestintää – Kuluttajien arvostamat tekijät päivittäistavarakaupassa. CASE: K-supermarket Torpparinmäki

Tässä tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan K-supermarket Torpparinmäen asiakkaiden arvostuksia myymälän sisäisiin toimiin liittyen. Myymälän sisäisiin toimiin lasketaan tässä tutkimuksessa kuuluvan laaja kirjo asioita kuten hinnat, tarjoukset, valikoiman laajuus eri tuoteryhmissä, elämyksellisyys, hyllysijoittelu, kaupan selkeys, asiakaspalvelu sekä viihtyisyys. Myös merkityksellisten ja vähemmän merkityksellisten asioiden toteutumisesta kyseisessä myymälässä halutaan vastauksia. Tutkimuksessa nostetaan esille myös erilaiset tiedotuskanavat kaupan markkinoinnissa. Tämän lisäksi sivutaan aihetta kuluttajien päivittäistavarakaupan valintakriteereistä. Tutkimusote on kvantitatiivinen ja kysely suoritettiin survey-tutkimuksena. Tutkimuksessa haluttiin tämän lisäksi kerätä mahdollisimman paljon myös avoimia kommentteja sekä myymälästä että päivittäistavarakaupan valintaan liittyvistä kriteereistä. K-supermarket Torpparinmäen pahin kilpailija alueellaan on S-market Torpparinmäki. Asiakkailta haluttiin kysyä avoimesti, miksi asioivat juuri kyseisessä myymälässä. Kysely suoritettiin lauantaipäivänä K-supermarket Torpparinmässä asioineille 18-89-vuotiaille henkilöille. Kyselyyn vastasi 80 asiakasta, joista 65 % oli naisia ja 35 % miehiä. Tutkimuksen viitekehys jakaa myymälämarkkinoinnin neljään pääkategoriaan: viihtyvyystekijä, palvelutekijä, hintatekijä sekä valikoimatekijä. Näiden tekijöiden merkityksiä asiakkaille haluttiin tutkimuksessa asettaa tärkeysjärjestykseen. Myös näiden tekijöiden toteumaa K-supermarket Torpparinmäessä haluttiin selvittää. Tulosten analysoinnin perusteella edellä mainituista pääkategorioista tärkeimmäksi muodostui valikoimatekijä. Valikoimien monipuolisuutta pidettiin kaikista tärkeimpänä tekijänä myymälässä. Myös luomu- ja lähiruoan valikoimia pidettiin tärkeäpänä kuin valmisruokien. Toiseksi eniten asiakkaat arvostivat asiakaspalvelua ja vasta kolmannelle sijalle päätyi hintatekijä. Neljänneksi tärkeimpänä asiakkaat pitivät viihtyvyystekijää. Mikään tekijöistä ei erottunut suuresti toisistaan, mutta erot olivat kuitenkin selkeitä.

Informal fish retailing in rural Egypt: Opportunities to enhance income and work conditions for women and men

Poor rural consumers benefit from Egypt’s aquaculture sector through access to small and medium-sized farmed tilapia sold by informal fish retailers, many of whom are women. In fact, informal fish retail is the main, if not only, segment of the farmed fish value chain where women are found. This report aims to inform current and future strategies to improve conditions in informal fish retail by understanding in more depth the similarities and differences in employment quality and outcomes across different fish retailers. It is particularly focused on identifying whether and how gender inequality influences different dimensions of the work, and whether women and men have similar outcomes and employment conditions. This knowledge will help to design interventions to overcome gender-based constraints, as well as approaches that address shared obstacles and include both women and men in gender-responsive ways to ensure that all of those involved in the sector benefit.

Employment patterns in contemporary retailing:gender and work in five supermarkets

This article examines trends in patterns of employment within contemporary retailing. It focuses upon five supermarkets in the Lancaster area. In each store the proportion of part-timers had increased during the 1980s. There were marked differences in the proportions of female full-time and part-time employees who were married. Management reported similar perceptions of the relative advantages and disadvantages of employing married women within their stores. These belief systems coexisted with radically divergent recruitment strategies by these managements. These variations were embedded witnin typical recruitment strategies in each of the firms examined. -from Authors