Amenity grasses for salt-affected parks in coastal Australia

In February 2004, Redland Shire Council with help from a Horticulture Australia research project was able to establish a stable grass cover of seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum) on a Birkdale park where the soil had previously proved too salty to grow anything else. Following on from their success with this small 0.2 ha demonstration area, Redland Shire has since invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in successfully turfing other similarly “impossible” park areas with seashore paspalum. Urban salinity can arise for different reasons in different places. In inland areas such as southern NSW and the WA wheatbelt, the usual cause is rising groundwater bringing salt to the surface. In coastal sites, salt spray or periodic tidal inundation can result in problems. In Redland Shire’s case, the issue was compacted marine sediments (mainly mud) dug up and dumped to create foreshore parkland in the course of artificial canal developments. At Birkdale, this had created a site that was both strongly acid and too salty for most plants. Bare saline scalds were interspersed by areas of unthrifty grass. Finding a salt tolerant grass is no “silver bullet” or easy solution to salinity problems. Rather, it buys time to implement sustainable long-term establishment and maintenance practices, which are even more critical than with conventional turfgrasses. These practices include annual slicing or coring in conjunction with gypsum/dolomite amendment and light topdressing with sandy loam soil (to about 1 cm depth), adequate maintenance fertiliser, weed control measures, regular leaching irrigation was applied to flush salts below the root zone, and irrigation scheduling to maximise infiltration and minimise run off. Three other halophytic turfgrass species were also identified, each of them adapted to different environments, management regimes and uses. These have been shortlisted for larger-scale plantings in future work.

A multisite managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm phenotyping

Field evaluation of germplasm for performance under water and heat stress is challenging. Field environments are variable and unpredictable, and genotype x environment interactions are difficult to interpret if environments are not well characterised. Numerous traits, genes and quantitative trait loci have been proposed for improving performance but few have been used in variety development. This reflects the limited capacity of commercial breeding companies to screen for these traits and the absence of validation in field environments relevant to breeding companies, and because little is known about the economic benefit of selecting one particular trait over another. The value of the proposed traits or genes is commonly not demonstrated in genetic backgrounds of value to breeding companies. To overcome this disconnection between physiological trait breeding and uptake by breeding companies, three field sites representing the main environment types encountered across the Australian wheatbelt were selected to form a set of managed environment facilities (MEFs). Each MEF manages soil moisture stress through irrigation, and the effects of heat stress through variable sowing dates. Field trials are monitored continuously for weather variables and changes in soil water and canopy temperature in selected probe genotypes, which aids in decisions guiding irrigation scheduling and sampling times. Protocols have been standardised for an essential core set of measurements so that phenotyping yield and other traits are consistent across sites and seasons. MEFs enable assessment of a large number of traits across multiple genetic backgrounds in relevant environments, determine relative trait value, and facilitate delivery of promising germplasm and high value traits into commercial breeding programs.

Water-use efficiency and productivity trends in Australian irrigated cotton: a review

The aim of this review is to report changes in irrigated cotton water use from research projects and on-farm practice-change programs in Australia, in relation to both plant-based and irrigation engineering disciplines. At least 80% of the Australian cotton-growing area is irrigated using gravity surface-irrigation systems. This review found that, over 23 years, cotton crops utilise 6-7ML/ha of irrigation water, depending on the amount of seasonal rain received. The seasonal evapotranspiration of surface-irrigated crops averaged 729mm over this period. Over the past decade, water-use productivity by Australian cotton growers has improved by 40%. This has been achieved by both yield increases and more efficient water-management systems. The whole-farm irrigation efficiency index improved from 57% to 70%, and the crop water use index is >3kg/mm.ha, high by international standards. Yield increases over the last decade can be attributed to plant-breeding advances, the adoption of genetically modified varieties, and improved crop management. Also, there has been increased use of irrigation scheduling tools and furrow-irrigation system optimisation evaluations. This has reduced in-field deep-drainage losses. The largest loss component of the farm water balance on cotton farms is evaporation from on-farm water storages. Some farmers are changing to alternative systems such as centre pivots and lateral-move machines, and increasing numbers of these alternatives are expected. These systems can achieve considerable labour and water savings, but have significantly higher energy costs associated with water pumping and machine operation. The optimisation of interactions between water, soils, labour, carbon emissions and energy efficiency requires more research and on-farm evaluations. Standardisation of water-use efficiency measures and improved water measurement techniques for surface irrigation are important research outcomes to enable valid irrigation benchmarks to be established and compared. Water-use performance is highly variable between cotton farmers and farming fields and across regions. Therefore, site-specific measurement is important. The range in the presented datasets indicates potential for further improvement in water-use efficiency and productivity on Australian cotton farms.

小麦实时控制灌溉的土壤水分含量探头合理埋设深度研究

利用室内控制试验研究了根据不同深度土壤水分传感器灌溉处理对冬小麦生物学性状及水分利用率等的影响。结果显示,以10 cm探头控制灌溉最为省水,同时冬小麦生物学性状及水分利用率等最佳。由于试验冬小麦处于生育前期,随着小麦生育期延伸,当根系超过30 cm深度时,根系吸水的深度增加,探头的埋设深度需要田间试验进行更详细的研究。

A Study on the Water Retention Characteristics of Soils and their Improvements

Soil moisture plays a cardinal role in sustaining eclological balance and agricultural development – virtually the very existence of life on earth. Because of the growing shortage of water resources, we have to use the available water most efficiently by proper management. Better utilization of rainfall or irrigation management depends largely on the water retention characteristics of the soil.Soil water retention is essential to life and it provides an ongoing supply of water to plants between periods of irrigation so as to allow their continued growth and survival.It is essential to maintain readily available water in the soil if crops are to sustain satisfactory growth. The plant growth may be retarded if the soil moisture is either deficient or excessive. The optimum moisture content is that moisture which leads to optimum growth of plant. When watering is done, the amount of water supplied should be such that the water content is equal to the field capacity that is the water remained in the saturated soil after gravitational drainage. Water will gradually be utilized consumptively by plants after the water application, and the soil moisture will start falling. When the water content in the soil reaches the value known as permanent wilting point (when the plant starts wilting) fresh dose of irrigation may be done so that water content is again raised to the field capacity of soil.Soil differ themselves in some or all the properties depending on the difference in the geotechnical and environmental factors. Soils serve as a reservoir of the nutrients and water required for crops.Study of soil and its water holding capacity is essential for the efficient utilization of irrigation water. Hence the identification of the geotechnical parameters which influence the water retention capacity, chemical properties which influence the nutrients and the method to improve these properties have vital importance in irrigation / agricultural engineering. An attempt in this direction has been made in this study by conducting the required tests on different types of soil samples collected from various locations in Trivandrum district Kerala, with and without admixtures like coir pith, coir pith compost and vermi compost. Evaluation of the results are presented and a design procedure has been proposed for a better irrigation scheduling and management.

Análise de crescimento do crisântemo de vaso, cultivar Puritan, irrigado em diferentes tensões de água em ambiente protegido

A irrigação é prática fundamental para o cultivo de crisântemo, porém seu manejo adequado tem sido negligenciado pelos produtores, resultando em prejuízos no crescimento vegetal e conseqüentes decréscimos na produtividade e na qualidade do produto final. Para melhorar a representatividade dos dados obtidos, o experimento foi desenvolvido na propriedade de um produtor tradicional, no Distrito de Holambra II, município de Paranapanema-SP (23º4'S e 49º00'W). O objetivo principal do trabalho foi identificar a tensão de água no substrato (potencial matricial) que resultasse em melhor crescimento e desenvolvimento do crisântemo em vaso, cultivar Puritan. Os tratamentos foram definidos por seis níveis de tensão de água no substrato: -2, -3, -4,- 6,-10 e -30 kPa. Conclui-se, que a melhor qualidade do crisântemo em vaso foi obtida nos potenciais de água no substrato de -2, -6 e -10 kPa e que a tensão de -30 kPa, embora tenha levado à redução na qualidade comercial do crisântemo, resultou em maior durabilidade pós- colheita.

Planilha eletrônica para auxilio à tomada de decisão em manejo de irrigação

The irrigation scheduling is basically the adoption of pre-established criteria to define the time and the amount of water to be applied through irrigation systems. Hence, the objective of this work was to develop and test a spreadsheet of easy comprehension, handling and interpretation by growers, which uses as inputs the physical-hydric soil attributes and tensiometer readings to the determination of irrigation depth and time. The spreadsheet enables the grower to make reading and to know in a fast way how much water to apply into the soil. The test of the spreadsheet was performed in an irrigated orchard of grapevines in Petrolina, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Soil water retention curves and tensiometer readings from the effective rooting depth were used as a basis for obtaining the soil water matric potential, soil water content, water availability, soil water content to be replaced, net and gross irrigation depth and irrigation time. The analysis of the use of the irrigation scheduling spreadsheet resulted in a shorter time for irrigation in relation to the irrigation scheduling based only on the crop evapotranspiration. The spreadsheet can be helpful to growers adjust irrigation depth when irrigation scheduling is based only on crop evapotranspiration.

Manejo da irrigação por gotejamento na cultura do café arábica

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Influência de manejo de irrigação sobre aspectos da ecofisiologia e produção da videira CV. Syrah

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Produção de mudas nativas sob diferentes manejos hídricos

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Coeficiente de cultura e lâmina ótima de irrigação para a melancia, na microrregião de Teresina, Pi

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Manejo da irrigação na cultura do crisântemo (Dendranthema grandiflorum Ramat Kitamura) de corte cultivado em ambiente protegido

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

New water use efficiency strategies to cope with climate change

Crop water requirements are important elements for food production, especially in arid and semiarid regions. These regions are experience increasing population growth and less water for agriculture, which amplifies the need for more efficient irrigation. Improved water use efficiency is needed to produce more food while conserving water as a limited natural resource. Evaporation (E) from bare soil and Transpiration (T) from plants is considered a critical part of the global water cycle and, in recent decades, climate change could lead to increased E and T. Because energy is required to break hydrogen bonds and vaporize water, water and energy balances are closely connected. The soil water balance is also linked with water vapour losses to evapotranspiration (ET) that are dependent mainly on energy balance at the Earth’s surface. This work addresses the role of evapotranspiration for water use efficiency by developing a mathematical model that improves the accuracy of crop evapotranspiration calculation; accounting for the effects of weather conditions, e.g., wind speed and humidity, on crop coefficients, which relates crop evapotranspiration to reference evapotranspiration. The ability to partition ET into Evaporation and Transpiration components will help irrigation managers to find ways to improve water use efficiency by decreasing the ratio of evaporation to transpiration. The developed crop coefficient model will improve both irrigation scheduling and water resources planning in response to future climate change, which can improve world food production and water use efficiency in agriculture.

Producción de maíz bajo diferentes regímenes de riego complementario en Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina. I. Rendimiento en grano de maíz y sus componentes

El maíz (Zea mays L.) es uno de los principales cultivos de la Pampa Húmeda de Argentina. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar los efectos del riego complementario sobre el rendimiento de grano y sus componentes. El mismo se llevó a cabo en el ciclo agrícola 2001-2002, en el campo experimental de la Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Se usó un diseño completamente al azar con 5 tratamientos y 4 repeticiones. Para efectuar la programación de los diferentes riegos se dividió el ciclo del cultivo en tres etapas: precrítico, crítico y poscrítico. Para la determinación del momento de riego se realizó un balance hídrico. El rendimiento de grano no mostró diferencias significativas en los cuatro tratamientos con riego, sin embargo, hubo diferencia significativa (α = 0,05) entre los tratamientos regados y no regados. En promedio el rendimiento en grano en los tratamientos regados fue de 72 % mayor que en el tratamiento sin riego. Los componentes del rendimiento fueron afectados significativamente (α = 0,05) por la falta de riego. La cantidad de agua aplicada varió entre 360 y 300 mm y el agua total consumida en el ciclo del cultivo (según el balance hídrico) fue para los tratamientos con riego, de 575 mm y para el testigo de 308 mm. La eficiencia del uso de agua para grano fue de 2.75 kg.m-3, en promedio.

Producción de maíz bajo diferentes regímenes de riego complementario en Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina. II. Producción de materia seca

El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el efecto del riego complementario sobre el rendimiento de materia seca del cultivo de maíz. Se usó un diseño completamente al azar con 5 tratamientos y 4 repeticiones. Para efectuar la programación de los diferentes tratamientos de riego se dividió el ciclo del cultivo en tres etapas (precrítico, crítico y poscrítico). Para la determinación del momento de riego se realizó un balance hídrico con datos climáticos obtenidos de la Estación Meteorológica ubicada en el lugar del ensayo. El riego se efectuó con un equipo presurizado de avance lateral. El maíz cumplió su ciclo en 138 días en todos los tratamientos y requirió 1660,6 grados día para alcanzar madurez fisiológica. El rendimiento de materia seca tuvo diferencias significativas (a = 0,05) entre los distintos tratamientos regados y entre éstos y el testigo. Los valores extremos de producción fueron de 34.628 kg.ha-1 en el tratamiento 1 y 20.414 kg.ha-1 en el tratamiento sin riego. La cantidad de agua aplicada varió entre 360 y 300 mm y el agua total consumida en el ciclo del cultivo, según el balance hídrico, fue para los tratamientos con riego de 575 mm ± 15 mm y para el testigo sin riego de 308 mm. La eficiencia de uso de agua para materia seca tuvo diferencias significativas (a = 0,05) entre los tratamientos regados (5,7 kg.m-3) y no regados (6,6 kg.m-3). El índice de cosecha fue de 0,49.