959 resultados para administrative courts


Relevância:

70.00% 70.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The question of how far pre-revolutionary Russia was from the ideal of a lawful state has received little academic attention, particularly as relates to the legal regulation of relations between person, society and state within the state administration. Pravilova explored the methods of settling disputes between individuals and the administration, and the emergence of legal controls of the administration, analysed projects for the organisation of administrative justice and studied the particular nature of concepts from Russian administrative justice. The idea of an organisation of special bodies examining complaints by private persons against the actions of officials and state bureaucratic organs first appeared in the early 1860s. In the 1870s-1890s various projects for the reform of administrative justice (reorganisation of the Senate and local administrative institutions) were proposed by the Ministries of Justice and Finance, but none of these was put into practice, largely due to resistance from the bureaucracy. At the same time, however, the rapid development of private enterprise, the activities of the zemstvo and self-government produced new norms and mechanisms for the regulation of authorities and social relations. Despite the lack of institutional conditions, the Senate did consider complaints from private persons against illegal actions by administrative officials, playing a role similar to that of the supreme administrative courts in France and Germany. The spread of concepts of a 'lawful state' aroused support for a system of administrative justice and the establishment of administrative tribunals was seen as a condition of legality and a guarantee of human rights. The government was forced to understand that measures to maintain legality were vital to preserve the stability of the system of state power, but plans for liberal reforms were pushed into the background by constitutional reforms. The idea of guarantees of human rights in relations with the authorities was in contradiction with the idea of the monarchy and it was only when the Provisional Government took power in 1917 that the liberal programme of legal reforms had any chance of being put into practice. A law passed in June 1917 ordained the organisation of local administrative justice bodies, but its implementation was hampered by the war, the shortage of qualified judges and the existing absolute legal illiteracy, and the few administrative courts that were set up were soon abolished by the new Soviet authorities. Pravilova concluded that the establishment of a lawful state in pre-revolutionary Russia was prevented by a number of factors, particularly the autocratic nature of the supreme authority, which was incompatible with the idea of administrative justice as a guarantee of the rights of citizens in their relations with the state.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

En esta tesis se investigó lo relativo al cumplimiento de los fallos dictados en primera instancia por los tribunales administrativos y en segunda instancia por el Consejo de Estado de las acciones populares en materia de aguas, desde el año 1998 hasta el año 2007 aproximadamente de acuerdo con la disponibilidad de los expedientes que reposan en la entidad encargada legalmente de llevar el registro de dichas acciones. Dentro de la investigación se encontró que del porcentaje total de las acciones presentadas, únicamente el 22% es favorable en las dos instancias para los actores y de ese porcentaje se desprendieron los demás ítems analizados, tales como: seguimiento, forma de cumplimiento, tiempo de cumplimiento entre otros. Así mismo se estudiaron los aspectos relevantes del derecho humano al agua y su incidencia en las políticas públicas actuales. Finalmente se presentan unas conclusiones enfocadas al cumplimiento de las acciones populares en materia de aguas y al seguimiento que deben hacer los actores de las mismas, con el fin de que se retome el carácter esencial de éstas y no sean acciones netamente pecuniarias.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Esta dissertação partiu da constatação de que diversos centros administrativos possuem, hoje, por determinações legais, atividade precípua decisória, como verdadeiros tribunais administrativos. Investigou-se, a fim de entender o funcionamento destes centros de produção de decisão – para além da discussão do desempenho das suas competências –, o comportamento de fato destes tribunais administrativos. Para tanto, o trabalho adotou como recorte o estudo da aplicação de precedentes administrativos como meio de fundamentação das decisões do Tribunal Administrativo do Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade). O estudo contribui para este debate pelos seguintes motivos: (i) identificadas a existência e a aplicação de um instituto reconhecido como precedente administrativo no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, vislumbra-se, necessariamente, uma preocupação, no âmbito da função administrativa, na produção de segurança jurídica extrajudicial a partir da sistematização de decisões administrativas; e (ii) há um interesse em racionalizar as decisões de modo a deixar claro os posicionamentos destes tribunais administrativos aos cidadãos, impossibilitando, também, que nas mesmas circunstâncias existam decisões diferentes e, ainda, sejam produzidas decisões conflitantes. Nesta dissertação, demonstrou-se que a produção da segurança jurídica não dependente única e exclusivamente da atividade judicial. Ao contrário, a vasta atividade produzida pelo direito, inclusive interpretativa, acontece para além da atividade judicial. O estudo da atuação do Tribunal Administrativo do Cade é relevante neste sentido, haja vista o protagonismo deste tribunal no dia a dia do antitruste brasileiro. Esta dissertação possui viés empírico, uma vez que buscou entender como os precedentes administrativos são utilizados num ordenamento jurídico que não possui sistematização organizada e nem mesmo tradição na aplicação de precedentes. O intuito principal desta investigação foi desenvolver uma metodologia (mapas de citação) para o estudo da aplicação do precedente, sobretudo para identificá-los; posteriormente, verificou-se como a produção extrajudicial da segurança jurídica pode ou não ocorrer com a sistematização e o respeito aos precedentes administrativos.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

DISSERTAÇÃO DE MESTRADO - ESCOLA DE DIREITO DE SÃO PAULO DA FUNDAÇÃO GETULIO VARGAS.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Life is full of uncertainties. Legal rules should have a clear intention, motivation and purpose in order to diminish daily uncertainties. However, practice shows that their consequences are complex and hard to predict. For instance, tort law has the general objectives of deterring future negligent behavior and compensating the victims of someone else's negligence. Achieving these goals are particularly difficult in medical malpractice cases. To start with, when patients search for medical care they are typically sick in the first place. In case harm materializes during the treatment, it might be very hard to assess if it was due to substandard medical care or to the patient's poor health conditions. Moreover, the practice of medicine has a positive externality on the society, meaning that the design of legal rules is crucial: for instance, it should not result in physicians avoiding practicing their activity just because they are afraid of being sued even when they acted according to the standard level of care. The empirical literature on medical malpractice has been developing substantially in the past two decades, with the American case being the most studied one. Evidence from civil law tradition countries is more difficult to find. The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the empirical literature on medical malpractice, using two civil law countries as a case-study: Spain and Italy. The goal of this thesis is to investigate, in the first place, some of the consequences of having two separate sub-systems (administrative and civil) coexisting within the same legal system, which is common in civil law tradition countries with a public national health system (such as Spain, France and Portugal). When this holds, different procedures might apply depending on the type of hospital where the injury took place (essentially whether it is a public hospital or a private hospital). Therefore, a patient injured in a public hospital should file a claim in administrative courts while a patient suffering an identical medical accident should file a claim in civil courts. A natural question that the reader might pose is why should both administrative and civil courts decide medical malpractice cases? Moreover, can this specialization of courts influence how judges decide medical malpractice cases? In the past few years, there was a general concern with patient safety, which is currently on the agenda of several national governments. Some initiatives have been taken at the international level, with the aim of preventing harm to patients during treatment and care. A negligently injured patient might present a claim against the health care provider with the aim of being compensated for the economic loss and for pain and suffering. In several European countries, health care is mainly provided by a public national health system, which means that if a patient harmed in a public hospital succeeds in a claim against the hospital, public expenditures increase because the State takes part in the litigation process. This poses a problem in a context of increasing national health expenditures and public debt. In Italy, with the aim of increasing patient safety, some regions implemented a monitoring system on medical malpractice claims. However, if properly implemented, this reform shall also allow for a reduction in medical malpractice insurance costs. This thesis is organized as follows. Chapter 1 provides a review of the empirical literature on medical malpractice, where studies on outcomes and merit of claims, costs and defensive medicine are presented. Chapter 2 presents an empirical analysis of medical malpractice claims arriving to the Spanish Supreme Court. The focus is on reversal rates for civil and administrative decisions. Administrative decisions appealed by the plaintiff have the highest reversal rates. The results show a bias in lower administrative courts, which tend to focus on the State side. We provide a detailed explanation for these results, which can rely on the organization of administrative judges career. Chapter 3 assesses predictors of compensation in medical malpractice cases appealed to the Spanish Supreme Court and investigates the amount of damages attributed to patients. The results show horizontal equity between administrative and civil decisions (controlling for observable case characteristics) and vertical inequity (patients suffering more severe injuries tend to receive higher payouts). In order to execute these analyses, a database of medical malpractice decisions appealed to the Administrative and Civil Chambers of the Spanish Supreme Court from 2006 until 2009 (designated by the Spanish Supreme Court Medical Malpractice Dataset (SSCMMD)) has been created. A description of how the SSCMMD was built and of the Spanish legal system is presented as well. Chapter 4 includes an empirical investigation of the effect of a monitoring system for medical malpractice claims on insurance premiums. In Italy, some regions adopted this policy in different years, while others did not. The study uses data on insurance premiums from Italian public hospitals for the years 2001-2008. This is a significant difference as most of the studies use the insurance company as unit of analysis. Although insurance premiums have risen from 2001 to 2008, the increase was lower for regions adopting a monitoring system for medical claims. Possible implications of this system are also provided. Finally, Chapter 5 discusses the main findings, describes possible future research and concludes.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Come si evince dal titolo della tesi, la ricerca effettuata dal presente candidato nel corso del dottorato di ricerca ha avuto ad oggetto l’analisi delle competenze che, a diverso livello, comunitario, nazionale e regionale, sono attribuite agli enti in materia di rilascio di concessioni di servizi in abito interportuale, portuale e demaniale marittimo. L’attenzione, pertanto, ha dovuto innanzitutto essere rivolta ai compiti ed alle facoltà che, in forza del trattato che istituisce la Comunità Europea, sono attribuite alla Comunità stessa. Si è provveduto, pertanto, ad analizzare l’evoluzione della normativa per giungere all’attuale sistema giuridico. Gli aspetti della disciplina delle concessioni, oggetto di ricerca, hanno dovuto ripercorrere i vari procedimenti di infrazione comminati dalla Corte Europea, per i quali il sistema giuridico nazionale si è dovuto adattare con non poche difficoltà, soprattutto per la presenza di posizioni e prassi, negli anni, divenute consolidate.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A acção de condenação à prática de acto devido corresponde à concretização, com o Código de Processo nos Tribunais Administrativos, do princípio da tutela jurisdicional efectiva previsto no art. 268º/4 da Constituição da República Portuguesa, assegurando aos particulares a obtenção de uma pronúncia condenatória na prática do acto administrativo que tenha sido recusado ou omitido. Esta pronúncia sofre as limitações decorrentes do princípio da separação de poderes, entre o Administrativo e o Judicial, nos termos expressos no art. 71º/2 do Código de Processo, que determina que quando a emissão do acto pretendido envolva a formulação de valorações próprias do exercício da função administrativa (…) o tribunal não pode determinar o conteúdo do acto a praticar, mas deve explicitar as vinculações a observar (…) na emissão do acto devido. À limitação enunciada acresce outra, sem reflexo no texto do Código mas que se impõe por via do mesmo princípio, e que respeita aos poderes do tribunal no conhecimento e determinação dos pressupostos do acto devido, nos casos em que estes são questionados em juízo. A determinação dos pressupostos de facto do acto devido pelo tribunal está limitada pela natureza da actividade instrutória procedimental, pelo (in)cumprimento do ónus da prova no procedimento pelo interessado, nos casos limitados em que este tem relevância e pelo princípio da decisão prévia administrativa, nos termos do qual é à Administração que compete o conhecimento e decisão das pretensões que lhe são dirigidas e cuja competência que lhe foi determinada pela lei. Os limites enunciados não prejudicam a sindicabilidade, pelos tribunais, dos actos de recolha e valoração das provas pela Administração, que, nos casos em que configurem espaços de margem de livre decisão administrativa, são sindicáveis nos termos em que pode ser controlada a actividade autodeterminada da Administração, sem qualquer limitação quanto aos meios de prova.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Decisions of the Public Service Commissions, Board of Claims, and Education Department; opinions of the Attorney-General; rulings of the Secretary of State, Comptroller, State Engineer, Commissioner of Agriculture, Superintendent of Banks, Superintendent of Insurance, Civil Service Commission, Conservation Commission, Commissioner of Excise and State Tax Commissioners, etc., etc.; and messages of the Governor."

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A partir del principio general de inembargabilidad de bienes del Estado, el contenido de este documento incursiona en el tema de las excepciones al mismo legalmente contempladas, a efectos de verificar la aplicabilidad de la medida cautelar de embargo sobre tales bienes en los casos procedentes, cuando los particulares adelantan procesos ejecutivos ante la jurisdicción contenciosoadministrativa, en procura de defender sus intereses y del pago de dineros a cargo del Estado como consecuencia de contratos, sentencias, acreencias laborales, laudos arbitrales u otro tipo de documento eficaz. El propósito fue establecer claramente la normatividad aplicable en este tipo de eventos, aportando de este modo respuesta objetiva y confiable frente a la problemática generada tanto por las distintas posiciones en torno al tema adoptadas por el legislador, como igualmente por dificultades para clasificar los bienes y rentas estatales en orden a determinar su carácter y la posibilidad real de su embargo. Todo ello, además, con el referente de pronunciamientos jurisprudenciales adoptados como soporte conceptual básico puesto que desde esta perspectiva dan cuenta de una línea coincidente de pensamiento por parte de los altos organismos pertinentes.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Wydział Prawa i Administracji: Katedra Prawa Konstytucyjnego

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Participation of unincorporated associations in court and administrative proceedings is a tool of public participation which is a part of basic principles of performance of a democratic country and a civil society. By means of abiding by those principles administrative bodies and courts respect the rule of law and it becomes a standard. The rule of public participation can be as well treated as a part of the basic civil rights stipulated in the Constitution. By respecting the right of unincorporated associations to participate in court and administrative proceedings in environmental protection-related cases the goals and functions of environmental protection law can be accomplished.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

W glosowanym orzeczeniu Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny stwierdził, że od postanowień wojewódzkich sądów administracyjnych odrzucających skargi z przyczyn formalnych w sprawach wszczętych przed dniem wejścia w życie nowelizacji Prawa o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi (co miało miejsce 15 sierpnia 2015 r.) przysługuje zażalenie, a nie skarga kasacyjna. Przedmiotowe zagadnienie prawne sprowadza się do właściwej wykładni źle sformułowanych przepisów intertemporalnych. W glosie zaprezentowano istotę środków odwoławczych w postępowaniu sądowoadministracyjnym i scharakteryzowano krótko ostatnią nowelizację Prawa o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi. Autor prezentuje stanowisko krytyczne w stosunku do tezy postanowienia Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego, wskazując, że sąd powinien rozstrzygnąć sprawę co do jej istoty. Pogląd ten został poparty odpowiednią argumentacją z uwzględnieniem konkurencyjnego orzecznictwa Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego.