Practice Literate Research: Turning the Tables

Researchers complain how difficult it is to get practitioners and policymakers to use research. In contrast, this paper looks at the issues from the perspective of practice, and argues that it is the researcher’s job to become more practice-literate, so that research begins with practice concerns and develops practice-based solutions. The paper explores the relationship between research and practice and suggests that research has insufficiently engaged with the nature of practice and practice knowledge. Using the Salisbury Statement on practice research (Salisbury Statement 2010) the paper offers a definition of practice research and analyses what would be required for an agenda for practice research. Finally the paper proposes five functions for practice research.

Vom Faux Terrain zum begehbaren Alpenpanorama Vergnügungsarchitektur an der Wende zum 20. Jahrhundert

Im späten 19. Jahrhundert realisierten Bauunternehmen Ausstellungsarchitekturen wie begehbare Berglandschaften als Großprojekte in Rabitzbauweise. Vom Konzept ein Phänomen der Vorkriegszeit, waren sie so kurzlebig wie die Ausstellungen, auf denen sie als Erlebniswelten dienten und so wenig bekannt sind sie heute: Zeitgenössische Texte schildern nicht die gebauten Anlagen, sondern die illusionistischen Landschaften, Abbildungen zeigen retuschierte Ansichten, so dass mit dem Abbruch der Bauten auch weitgehend das Wissen über die Konstruktion verschwand. Im Unterschied zu den heute noch zitierten Ikonen der Weltausstellungen seit 1851 sind die Alpenpanoramen selbst von der Forschung übersehen. Mit der Fokussierung der Architekturhistoriographie des 20. Jahrhunderts auf die Formensprache geriet in Vergessenheit, dass auch diese Bauten nahezu sämtliche Themen der architektonischen Moderne beinhalteten: ökonomisierte Bauprozesse, neue Materialien, leichte Konstruktionen, technisierte Ausstattung.

What is Practice Research in Social Work - Definitions, Barriers and Possibilities

Practice is subject to increasing pressure to demonstrate its ability to achieve outcomes required by public policy makers. As part of this process social work practice has to engage with issues around advancing knowledge-based learning processes in a close collaboration with education and research based perspectives. This has given rise to approaches seeking to combine research methodology, field research and practical experience. Practice research is connected to both “the science of the concrete” – a field of research oriented towards subjects more than objects and “mode 2 knowledge production” – an application-oriented research where frameworks and findings are discussed by a number of partners. Practice research is defined into two approaches: practice research – collaboration between practice and research – and practitioner research – processes controlled and accomplished by practitioners. The basic stakeholders in practice research are social workers, service users, administrators, management, organisations, politicians and researchers. Accordingly, practice research is necessarily collaborative, involving a meeting point for different views, interests and needs, where complexity and dilemmas are inherent. Instead of attempting to balance or reconcile these differences, it is important to respect the differences if collaboration is to be established. The strength of both practice and research in practice research is to address these difficult challenges. The danger for both fields is to avoid and reject them.