Detecting single-target changes in multiple object tracking: The case of peripheral vision

In the current study it is investigated whether peripheral vision can be used to monitor multi-ple moving objects and to detect single-target changes. For this purpose, in Experiment 1, a modified MOT setup with a large projection and a constant-position centroid phase had to be checked first. Classical findings regarding the use of a virtual centroid to track multiple ob-jects and the dependency of tracking accuracy on target speed could be successfully replicat-ed. Thereafter, the main experimental variations regarding the manipulation of to-be-detected target changes could be introduced in Experiment 2. In addition to a button press used for the detection task, gaze behavior was assessed using an integrated eye-tracking system. The anal-ysis of saccadic reaction times in relation to the motor response shows that peripheral vision is naturally used to detect motion and form changes in MOT because the saccade to the target occurred after target-change offset. Furthermore, for changes of comparable task difficulties, motion changes are detected better by peripheral vision than form changes. Findings indicate that capabilities of the visual system (e.g., visual acuity) affect change detection rates and that covert-attention processes may be affected by vision-related aspects like spatial uncertainty. Moreover, it is argued that a centroid-MOT strategy might reduce the amount of saccade-related costs and that eye-tracking seems to be generally valuable to test predictions derived from theories on MOT. Finally, implications for testing covert attention in applied settings are proposed.

Detecting single-target changes in multiple object tracking: The case of peripheral vision.

In sports games, it is often necessary to perceive a large number of moving objects (e.g., the ball and players). In this context, the role of peripheral vision for processing motion information in the periphery is often discussed especially when motor responses are required. In an attempt to test the basal functionality of peripheral vision in those sports-games situations, a Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task that requires to track a certain number of targets amidst distractors, was chosen. Participants’ primary task was to recall four targets (out of 10 rectangular stimuli) after six seconds of quasi-random motion. As a second task, a button had to be pressed if a target change occurred (Exp 1: stop vs. form change to a diamond for 0.5 s; Exp 2: stop vs. slowdown for 0.5 s). While eccentricities of changes (5-10° vs. 15-20°) were manipulated, decision accuracy (recall and button press correct), motor response time as well as saccadic reaction time were calculated as dependent variables. Results show that participants indeed used peripheral vision to detect changes, because either no or very late saccades to the changed target were executed in correct trials. Moreover, a saccade was more often executed when eccentricities were small. Response accuracies were higher and response times were lower in the stop conditions of both experiments while larger eccentricities led to higher response times in all conditions. Summing up, it could be shown that monitoring targets and detecting changes can be processed by peripheral vision only and that a monitoring strategy on the basis of peripheral vision may be the optimal one as saccades may be afflicted with certain costs. Further research is planned to address the question whether this functionality is also evident in sports tasks.

Detecting single-target changes in multiple object tracking: The case of peripheral vision

In sports games, it is often necessary to perceive a large number of moving objects (e.g., the ball and players). In this context, the role of peripheral vision for processing motion information in the periphery is often discussed especially when motor responses are required. In an attempt to test the capability of using peripheral vision in those sports-games situations, a Multiple-Object-Tracking task that requires to track a certain number of targets amidst distractors, was chosen to determine the sensitivity of detecting target changes with peripheral vision only. Participants’ primary task was to recall four targets (out of 10 rectangular stimuli) after six seconds of quasi-random motion. As a second task, a button had to be pressed if a target change occurred (Exp 1: stop vs. form change to a diamond for 0.5 s; Exp 2: stop vs. slowdown for 0.5 s). Eccentricities of changes (5-10° vs. 15-20°) were manipulated, decision accuracy (recall and button press correct), motor response time and saccadic reaction time (change onset to saccade onset) were calculated and eye-movements were recorded. Results show that participants indeed used peripheral vision to detect changes, because either no or very late saccades to the changed target were executed in correct trials. Moreover, a saccade was more often executed when eccentricities were small. Response accuracies were higher and response times were lower in the stop conditions of both experiments while larger eccentricities led to higher response times in all conditions. Summing up, it could be shown that monitoring targets and detecting changes can be processed by peripheral vision only and that a monitoring strategy on the basis of peripheral vision may be the optimal one as saccades may be afflicted with certain costs. Further research is planned to address the question whether this functionality is also evident in sports tasks.

Statistical modeling of the eye for multimodal treatment planning for external beam radiation therapy of intraocular tumors

Ocular anatomy and radiation-associated toxicities provide unique challenges for external beam radiation therapy. For treatment planning, precise modeling of organs at risk and tumor volume are crucial. Development of a precise eye model and automatic adaptation of this model to patients' anatomy remain problematic because of organ shape variability. This work introduces the application of a 3-dimensional (3D) statistical shape model as a novel method for precise eye modeling for external beam radiation therapy of intraocular tumors.

Periphere Wahrnehmung beim Verfolgen mehrerer Objekte

Einleitung Beim Multiple-Object-Tracking müssen mehrere, sich bewegende Zielobjekte visuell ver-folgt werden. Dabei scheint es vorteilhaft zu sein, den Blick zwischen den Zielobjekten zu verankern, um Bewegungsinformationen peripher wahrzunehmen (Fehd & Seiffert, 2010). Nach Prüfung dieser Annahme (Experiment 1) wurde getestet, wie gut und schnell auf Bewegungs- und Formveränderungen der Zielobjekte reagiert werden kann (Experiment 2), um die Funktionalität der peripheren Wahrnehmung zu überprüfen. Methode 14 Teilnehmer hatten die Aufgabe, zum Ende eines Einzelversuchs 4 aus 10 Vierecken wiederzuerkennen, die sich linear für 6 s in einem projizierten Quadrat bewegten. Dabei wurden 3 Geschwindigkeiten (6, 9 und 12°/s) in 9 Blöcken à 15 Versuchen präsentiert, um herauszufinden, bei welcher Geschwindigkeit der Blickpunkt die längste Zeit auf dem Centroid der 4 Zielobjekte liegt und damit die Zielobjekte lange peripher wahrgenommen werden. In Experiment 2 sollten Teilnehmer bei dieser „optimalen“ Geschwindigkeit auf das Anhalten der Vierecke oder deren Formveränderung zur Raute (Manipulation:0.5 s) mit Knopfdruck reagieren, bei ausbleibender Veränderung hingegen die 4 Zielobjekte wiedererkennen (3 Bedingungen in 10 Blöcken à 12 Versuchen). Erwartet wurde, dass Bewegungsveränderungen häufiger und schneller erkannt werden als Formverände-rungen. Ergebnisse Der Geschwindigkeitsvergleich in Experiment 1 ergab, dass der Blick bei 6°/s die längste Zeit (46 %) auf den Centroid gerichtet ist, F(2,132) = 9.68, p < .01, ηp2 = .13 und die 4 Ziel-objekte bei dieser Geschwindigkeit signifikant häufiger wiedererkannt werden (59 %), F(2,132) = 37.62, p < .01, ηp2 = .36. In Experiment 2 wurde festgestellt, dass Bewegungs-veränderungen häufiger erkannt werden (83 %) als Formveränderungen (59 %), F(1,78) = 65.52, p < .01, ηp2 = .46, wobei die Erkennungsleistung der 4 Zielobjekte mit Experiment 1 vergleichbar ist (58%). Diskussion Die periphere Wahrnehmung scheint immer dann funktional zu sein, wenn mehrere, für eine Aufgabe relevante Objekte gleichzeitig verfolgt werden müssen und wenn Verände-rungen, besonders der Bewegung, schnell erkannt werden müssen. Weitere Untersu-chungen sollen zeigen, ob diese Funktionalität der peripheren Wahrnehmung auch im Sport (z.B. beim gleichzeitigen Verfolgen mehrerer Gegenspieler) erkannt werden kann. Literatur Fehd, H. M. & Seiffert, A. E. (2010). Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–13.

Funktionalität peripherer Wahrnehmung bei Trackingaufgaben

Introduction: Beim Multiple-Object-Tracking müssen mehrere, sich bewegende Zielobjekte visuell verfolgt werden. Dabei scheint es vorteilhaft zu sein, den Blick zwischen den Zielobjekten zu verankern, um Bewegungsinformationen peripher wahrzunehmen (Fehd & Seiffert, 2010). Nach Prüfung dieser Annahme (Experiment 1) wurde getestet, wie gut und schnell auf Bewegungs- und Formveränderungen der Zielobjekte reagiert werden kann (Experiment 2), um die Funktionalität der peripheren Wahrnehmung zu überprüfen. Methods: 14 Teilnehmer hatten die Aufgabe, zum Ende eines Einzelversuchs 4 aus 10 Vierecken wiederzuerkennen, die sich linear für 6 s in einem projizierten Quadrat bewegten. Dabei wurden 3 Geschwindigkeiten (6, 9 und 12°/s) in 9 Blöcken à 15 Versuchen präsentiert, um die Ergebnisse von Fehd und Seiffert (2010) zu replizieren. In Experiment 2 sollten Teilnehmer auf das Anhalten eines Targets oder dessen Formveränderung zur Raute (Manipulation: 0.5 s) mit Knopfdruck reagieren, bei ausbleibender Veränderung hingegen die 4 Zielobjekte wiedererkennen (3 Bedingungen in 10 Blöcken à 12 Versuchen). Durch die Bestimmung von Sakkadenlatenzen (definiert als Zeitraum zwischen Beginn der Objektveränderung und Sakkadenbeginn auf das Objekt) kann bestimmt werden, ob die Veränderung bereits peripher wahrgenommen wurde. Unter anderem aufgrund der Sensitivität der Netzhaut gegenüber Bewegungen wurde erwartet, dass Bewegungsveränderungen häufiger und schneller erkannt werden und dass häufiger bereits reagiert werden kann, bevor der Blick auf dem veränderten Zielobjekt ist. Results: Experiment 1 ergab einen signifikanten Haupteffekt für Geschwindigkeit, F(2,26) = 62.66, p < .01, ηp2 = .83, mit höchsten Richtigkeiten bei 6°/s (58%). Ein Haupteffekt für Blickort, F(2,26) = 76.40, p < .01, ηp2 = .85, zeigt, dass der Blick unabhängig von der Geschwindigkeit länger auf dem Centroid war als auf Targets und Distraktoren. Aufgrund der höchsten Richtigkeiten bei 6°/s wurde diese Geschwindigkeit in Experiment 2 eingesetzt und festgestellt, dass Bewegungsveränderungen häufiger erkannt werden (83 %) als Formveränderungen (59 %), F(1,10) = 17.20, p < .01, ηp2 = .63. Unterschiede in Sakkadenlatenzen, F(1,10) = 6.73, p = .03, ηp2 = .40, deuten auf eine periphere Wahrnehmung der Bewegungsveränderungen hin. Experiment 3 wird zeigen, ob Sakkaden das Monitoring stören. Discussion/Conclusion: Die periphere Wahrnehmung scheint immer dann funktional zu sein, wenn mehrere, für eine Aufgabe relevante Objekte gleichzeitig verfolgt werden müssen und wenn Veränderungen, besonders der Bewegung, schnell erkannt werden müssen. Weitere Untersuchungen sollen zeigen, ob diese Funktionalität der peripheren Wahrnehmung auch im Sport (z.B. beim gleichzeitigen Verfolgen mehrerer Gegenspieler) erkannt werden kann. References: Fehd, H. M. & Seiffert, A. E. (2010). Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–13.

Funktionalität peripherer Wahrnehmung bei Trackingaufgaben

Schlüsselwörter: Multiple-Object-Tracking, Sakkadenlatenz, Erkennungsleistung Einleitung Beim Multiple-Object-Tracking müssen mehrere, sich bewegende Zielobjekte visuell ver-folgt werden. Dabei scheint es vorteilhaft zu sein, den Blick zwischen den Zielobjekten zu verankern, um Bewegungsinformationen peripher wahrzunehmen (Fehd & Seiffert, 2010). Nach Prüfung dieser Annahme (Experiment 1) wurde getestet, wie gut und schnell auf Bewegungs- und Formveränderungen der Zielobjekte reagiert werden kann (Experiment 2), um die Funktionalität der peripheren Wahrnehmung zu überprüfen Methode 14 Teilnehmer hatten die Aufgabe, zum Ende eines Einzelversuchs 4 aus 10 Vierecken wiederzuerkennen, die sich linear für 6 s in einem projizierten Quadrat bewegten. Dabei wurden 3 Geschwindigkeiten (6, 9 und 12°/s) in 9 Blöcken à 15 Versuchen präsentiert, um die Ergebnisse von Fehd und Seiffert (2010) zu replizieren. In Experiment 2 sollten Teilnehmer auf das Anhalten eines Targets oder dessen Formveränderung zur Raute (Manipulation: 0.5 s) mit Knopfdruck reagieren, bei ausbleibender Veränderung hinge-gen die 4 Zielobjekte wiedererkennen (3 Bedingungen in 10 Blöcken à 12 Versuchen). Erwartet wurde, dass Bewegungsveränderungen häufiger und schneller erkannt werden. Ergebnisse Experiment 1 ergab einen signifikanten Haupteffekt für Geschwindigkeit, F(2,26) = 62.66, p < .01, ηp2 = .83, mit höchsten Richtigkeiten bei 6°/s (58%). Ein Haupteffekt für Blickort, F(2,26) = 76.40, p < .01, ηp2 = .85, zeigt, dass der Blick unabhängig von der Geschwindig-keit länger auf dem Centroid war als auf Targets und Distraktoren. Aufgrund der höchs-ten Richtigkeiten bei 6°/s wurde diese Geschwindigkeit in Experiment 2 eingesetzt und festgestellt, dass Bewegungsveränderungen häufiger erkannt werden (83 %) als Form-veränderungen (59 %), F(1,10) = 17.20, p < .01, ηp2 = .63. Unterschiede in Sakkadenla-tenzen, F(1,10) = 6.73, p = .03, ηp2 = .40, deuten auf eine periphere Wahrnehmung der Bewegungsveränderungen hin. Experiment 3 wird zeigen, ob Sakkaden das Monitoring stören. Diskussion Die periphere Wahrnehmung scheint immer dann funktional zu sein, wenn mehrere, für eine Aufgabe relevante Objekte gleichzeitig verfolgt werden müssen und wenn Verände-rungen, besonders der Bewegung, schnell erkannt werden müssen. Weitere Untersu-chungen sollen zeigen, ob diese Funktionalität der peripheren Wahrnehmung auch im Sport (z.B. beim gleichzeitigen Verfolgen mehrerer Gegenspieler) erkannt werden kann. Literatur Fehd, H. M. & Seiffert, A. E. (2010). Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–13.

Reduced foveal vision enhances peripheral monitoring and peripheral event detection

Introduction: Although it seems plausible that sports performance relies on high-acuity foveal vision, it could be empirically shown that myoptic blur (up to +2 diopters) does not harm performance in sport tasks that require foveal information pick-up like golf putting (Bulson, Ciuffreda, & Hung, 2008). How myoptic blur affects peripheral performance is yet unknown. Attention might be less needed for processing visual cues foveally and lead to better performance because peripheral cues are better processed as a function of reduced foveal vision, which will be tested in the current experiment. Methods: 18 sport science students with self-reported myopia volunteered as participants, all of them regularly wearing contact lenses. Exclusion criteria comprised visual correction other than myopic, correction of astigmatism and use of contact lenses out of Swiss delivery area. For each of the participants, three pairs of additional contact lenses (besides their regular lenses; used in the “plano” condition) were manufactured with an individual overcorrection to a retinal defocus of +1 to +3 diopters (referred to as “+1.00 D”, “+2.00 D”, and “+3.00 D” condition, respectively). Gaze data were acquired while participants had to perform a multiple object tracking (MOT) task that required to track 4 out of 10 moving stimuli. In addition, in 66.7 % of all trials, one of the 4 targets suddenly stopped during the motion phase for a period of 0.5 s. Stimuli moved in front of a picture of a sports hall to allow for foveal processing. Due to the directional hypotheses, the level of significance for one-tailed tests on differences was set at α = .05 and posteriori effect sizes were computed as partial eta squares (ηρ2). Results: Due to problems with the gaze-data collection, 3 participants had to be excluded from further analyses. The expectation of a centroid strategy was confirmed because gaze was closer to the centroid than the target (all p < .01). In comparison to the plano baseline, participants more often recalled all 4 targets under defocus conditions, F(1,14) = 26.13, p < .01, ηρ2 = .65. The three defocus conditions differed significantly, F(2,28) = 2.56, p = .05, ηρ2 = .16, with a higher accuracy as a function of a defocus increase and significant contrasts between conditions +1.00 D and +2.00 D (p = .03) and +1.00 D and +3.00 D (p = .03). For stop trials, significant differences could neither be found between plano baseline and defocus conditions, F(1,14) = .19, p = .67, ηρ2 = .01, nor between the three defocus conditions, F(2,28) = 1.09, p = .18, ηρ2 = .07. Participants reacted faster in “4 correct+button” trials under defocus than under plano-baseline conditions, F(1,14) = 10.77, p < .01, ηρ2 = .44. The defocus conditions differed significantly, F(2,28) = 6.16, p < .01, ηρ2 = .31, with shorter response times as a function of a defocus increase and significant contrasts between +1.00 D and +2.00 D (p = .01) and +1.00 D and +3.00 D (p < .01). Discussion: The results show that gaze behaviour in MOT is not affected to a relevant degree by a visual overcorrection up to +3 diopters. Hence, it can be taken for granted that peripheral event detection was investigated in the present study. This overcorrection, however, does not harm the capability to peripherally track objects. Moreover, if an event has to be detected peripherally, neither response accuracy nor response time is negatively affected. Findings could claim considerable relevance for all sport situations in which peripheral vision is required which now needs applied studies on this topic. References: Bulson, R. C., Ciuffreda, K. J., & Hung, G. K. (2008). The effect of retinal defocus on golf putting. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 28, 334-344.

Socio-Spatial Relationships in Dairy Cows

Farm animals may serve as models for evaluating social networks in a controlled environment. We used an automated system to track, at fine temporal and spatial resolution (once per minute, +/- 50 cm) every individual in six herds of dairy cows (Bos taurus). We then analysed the data using social network analyses. Relationships were based on non-random attachment and avoidance relationships in respect to synchronous use and distances observed in three different functional areas (activity, feeding and lying). We found that neither synchrony nor distance between cows was strongly predictable among the three functional areas. The emerging social networks were tightly knit for attachment relationships and less dense for avoidance relationships. These networks loosened up from the feeding and lying area to the activity area, and were less dense for relationships based on synchronicity than on median distance with respect to node degree, relative size of the largest cluster, density and diameter of the network. In addition, synchronicity was higher in dyads of dairy cows that had grown up together and shared their last dry period. This last effect disappeared with increasing herd size. Dairy herds can be characterized by one strongly clustered network including most of the herd members with many non-random attachment and avoidance relationships. Closely synchronous dyads were composed of cows with more intense previous contact. The automatic tracking of a large number of individuals proved promising in acquiring the data necessary for tackling social network analyses.

Assessment of use of microsatellite polymorphism analysis for improving spatial distribution tracking of echinococcus multilocularis

Alveolar echinococcosis (AE)--caused by the cestode Echinococcus multilocularis--is a severe zoonotic disease found in temperate and arctic regions of the northern hemisphere. Even though the transmission patterns observed in different geographical areas are heterogeneous, the nuclear and mitochondrial targets usually used for the genotyping of E. multilocularis have shown only a marked genetic homogeneity in this species. We used microsatellite sequences, because of their high typing resolution, to explore the genetic diversity of E. multilocularis. Four microsatellite targets (EmsJ, EmsK, and EmsB, which were designed in our laboratory, and NAK1, selected from the literature) were tested on a panel of 76 E. multilocularis samples (larval and adult stages) obtained from Alaska, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Genetic diversity for each target was assessed by size polymorphism analysis. With the EmsJ and EmsK targets, two alleles were found for each locus, yielding two and three genotypes, respectively, discriminating European isolates from the other groups. With NAK1, five alleles were found, yielding seven genotypes, including those specific to Tibetan and Alaskan isolates. The EmsB target, a tandem repeated multilocus microsatellite, found 17 alleles showing a complex pattern. Hierarchical clustering analyses were performed with the EmsB findings, and 29 genotypes were identified. Due to its higher genetic polymorphism, EmsB exhibited a higher discriminatory power than the other targets. The complex EmsB pattern was able to discriminate isolates on a regional and sectoral level, while avoiding overdistinction. EmsB will be used to assess the putative emergence of E. multilocularis in Europe.

Prediction of spatial orientation and morphology of calcaneonavicular coalitions

BACKGROUND: Calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC) have been reported to be associated with anatomical aberrations of either the calcaneus and/or navicular bones. These morphological abnormalities may complicate accurate surgical resection. Three-dimensional analysis of spatial orientation and morphological characteristics may help in preoperative planning of resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen feet with a diagnosis of CNC were evaluated by means of 3-D CT modeling. Three angles were defined that were expressed in relation to one reproducible landmark (lateral border of the calcaneus): the dorsoplantar inclination, anteroposterior inclination, and socket angle. The depth and width of the coalitions were measured and calculated to obtain the estimated contact surface. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the calcanei served to evaluate the presence, distortion or absence of the anterior calcaneal facet and presence of a navicular beak. The interrater correlations were assessed in order to obtain values for the accuracy of the measurement methods. Sixteen normal feet were used as controls for comparison of the socket angle; anatomy of the anterior calcaneal facet and navicular beak as well. RESULTS: The dorsoplantar inclination angle averaged 50 degrees (+/-17), the anteroposterior inclination angle 64 degrees (+/-15), and the pathologic socket angle 98 degrees (+/-11). The average contact area was 156 mm(2). Ninety-four percent of all patients in the CNC group revealed a plantar navicular beak. In 50% of those patients the anterior calcaneal facet was replaced by the navicular portion and in 44% the facet was totally missing. In contrast, the socket angle in the control group averaged 77 degrees (+/-18), which was found to be statistically different than the CNC group (p = 0.0004). Only 25% of the patients in the control group had a plantar navicular beak. High, statistically significant interrater correlations were found for all measured angles. CONCLUSION: Computer-aided CT analysis and reconstructions help to determine the spatial orientations of CNC in space and provide useful information in order to anticipate morphological abnormalities of the calcaneus and navicular.