Creating possibilities for collective creativity : Brokerage Functions in Practice-Based Innovation

In the network era, creative achievements like innovations are more and more often created in interaction among different actors. The complexity of today‘s problems transcends the individual human mind, requiring not only individual but also collective creativity. In collective creativity, it is impossible to trace the source of new ideas to an individual. Instead, creative activity emerges from the collaboration and contribution of many individuals, thereby blurring the contribution of specific individuals in creating ideas. Collective creativity is often associated with diversity of knowledge, skills, experiences and perspectives. Collaboration between diverse actors thus triggers creativity and gives possibilities for collective creativity. This dissertation investigates collective creativity in the context of practice-based innovation. Practice-based innovation processes are triggered by problem setting in a practical context and conducted in non-linear processes utilising scientific and practical knowledge production and creation in cross-disciplinary innovation networks. In these networks diversity or distances between innovation actors are essential. Innovation potential may be found in exploiting different kinds of distances. This dissertation presents different kinds of distances, such as cognitive, functional and organisational which could be considered as sources of creativity and thus innovation. However, formation and functioning of these kinds of innovation networks can be problematic. Distances between innovating actors may be so great that a special interpretation function is needed – that is, brokerage. This dissertation defines factors that enhance collective creativity in practice-based innovation and especially in the fuzzy front end phase of innovation processes. The first objective of this dissertation is to study individual and collective creativity at the employee level and identify those factors that support individual and collective creativity in the organisation. The second objective is to study how organisations use external knowledge to support collective creativity in their innovation processes in open multi-actor innovation. The third objective is to define how brokerage functions create possibilities for collective creativity especially in the context of practice-based innovation. The research objectives have been studied through five substudies using a case-study strategy. Each substudy highlights various aspects of creativity and collective creativity. The empirical data consist of materials from innovation projects arranged in the Lahti region, Finland, or materials from the development of innovation methods in the Lahti region. The Lahti region has been chosen as the research context because the innovation policy of the region emphasises especially the promotion of practice-based innovations. The results of this dissertation indicate that all possibilities of collective creativity are not utilised in internal operations of organisations. The dissertation introduces several factors that could support collective creativity in organisations. However, creativity as a social construct is understood and experienced differently in different organisations, and these differences should be taken into account when supporting creativity in organisations. The increasing complexity of most potential innovations requires collaborative creative efforts that often exceed the boundaries of the organisation and call for the involvement of external expertise. In practice-based innovation different distances are considered as sources of creativity. This dissertation gives practical implications on how it is possible to exploit different kinds of distances knowingly. It underlines especially the importance of brokerage functions in open, practice-based innovation in order to create possibilities for collective creativity. As a contribution of this dissertation, a model of brokerage functions in practice-based innovation is formulated. According to the model, the results and success of brokerage functions are based on the context of brokerage as well as the roles, tasks, skills and capabilities of brokers. The brokerage functions in practice-based innovation are also possible to divide into social and cognitive brokerage.

Monitoring and information reporting through regulation : an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws

[Abstract]

Multidisciplinary practice vs. inter-firm collaboration in professional services market

Yritysten välinen yhteistyö kasvaa asiantuntijamarkkinoilla. Suppean palvelutarjooman omaavat yritykset muodostavat laajempia palveluita yhdistämällä osaamisiaan kumppaneidensa kanssa. Näin muodostuvat yritysryhmittymät uhkaavat alaa hallitsevia monipuolisen palvelutarjooman omaavia kansainvälisiä moniosaajayrityksiä. Tämän diplomityön tavoitteena on selvittää minkälaisia hyötyjä moniosaajayritys voi saada näitä ryhmittymiä vastaan lisäämällä omaa yhteistyötään. Tavoitteeseen pääsemiseksi markkinoilla olevat yritysryhmittymät tunnistetaan ja selvitetään minkälaisia asioita asiakas pitää tärkeänä ostaessaan asiantuntijapalveluita. Toimialan trendit ja aikaisemmat tutkimukset yritysten välisestä yhteistyöstä sekä asiakkaan ostokäyttäytymisestä osoittavat, että yhteistyön avulla yrityksellä on mahdollisuus saavuttaa monia hyötyjä. Tietoa olemassa olevista yritysryhmittymistä ja asiakkaiden ostokäyttäytymisestä kerättiin haastattelemalla yhden kansainvälisen moniosaajayrityksen henkilöstöä sekä asiakkaita. Tuloksena löytyi yritysryhmittymiä, joista osa uhkaa moniosaajayrityksen kilpailuetua. Asiakkaiden ostokäyttäyminen suosi hieman enemmän asiantuntijapalveluiden hankkimista yritysryhmittymältä moniosaajayrityksen sijaan. Tekemällä yhteistyötä ja tarjoamalla tiettyjä palveluita yhdessä kumppanin kanssa, moniosaajayritys voi saavuttaa hyötyjä yritysryhmittymiä vastaan ja vaikuttaa positiivisesti asiakkaan ostokäyttäytymiseen.

Organisaation innovatiivisuutta edistävät ja estävät tekijät. Case Technology Business Research Center

Tämän työn toimeksiantajaorganisaatio oli Lappeenrannan teknillisen yliopiston alainen, kauppatieteitä, teknologiaa ja tuotantotaloutta työssään yhdistävä tutkimusyksikkö, Technology Business Research Center, TBRC. Erään innovatiivisuustutkimusprojektin (InnoSpring) yhteydessä haluttiin selvittää myös oman tutkimusyksikön innovatiivisuuteen vaikuttavia, edistäviä ja estäviä tekijöitä. Tutkielman tavoitteena oli kartoittaa niitä seikkoja, jotka organisaation - tässä tapauksessa yliopiston tutkimusyksikön - henkilökunnan, projektityöntekijöiden, projektipäälliköiden sekä johdon mukaan vaikuttavat yksikön kykyyn luoda ja omaksua uutta, sen innovatiivisuuteen. Työ toteutettiin focus group-ryhmähaastattelumenetelmällä (kvalitatiivinen tutkimus), joihin osallistuivat omina ryhminään työntekijätaso, projektipäälliköt sekä johto.Haastattelut äänitettiin, litteroitiin ja koodattiin Atlas-Ti-ohjelmistolla. Loppuraportti verkostokuvineen luovutettiin tutkimuslaitokselle heinäkuussa 2005. Ryhmäkeskustelun teemoista ja kysymysten muodosta johtuen tulokset käsittelivät niin tutkimusyksikön nykyistä tilaa kuin eräänlaista "toivetilaa", millainen olisi ihanteellinen ja innovatiivinen työpaikka. Merkillepantavaa oli, että työssä tuli systemaattisesti esiin enemmän innovatiivisuutta edistäviä kuin ehkäiseviä seikkoja - vaikka osa edistävistä seikoista koskikin nimenomaan "toivetilaa". Keskustelluimpia teemoja olivat johtajuus,tavoitteellisuus ja strategian, yhteisen suunnan tarve. Samoin olemassa olevienprosessien kehittäminen, osaamisen (niin oman kuin koko organisaationkin) kokoaminen ja kehittäminen edelleen sekä tulosten jalkauttaminen.

Communication challenges in virtual teams – a case study of implementing computer-mediated communication technologies in inter-organisational virtual teams

This thesis seeks to answer, if communication challenges in virtual teams can be overcome with the help of computer-mediated communication. Virtual teams are becoming more common work method in many global companies. In order for virtual teams to reach their maximum potential, effective asynchronous and synchronous methods for communication are needed. The thesis covers communication in virtual teams, as well as leadership and trust building in virtual environments with the help of CMC. First, the communication challenges in virtual teams are identified by using a framework of knowledge sharing barriers in virtual teams by Rosen et al. (2007) Secondly, the leadership and trust in virtual teams are defined in the context of CMC. The performance of virtual teams is evaluated in the case study by exploiting these three dimensions. With the help of a case study of two virtual teams, the practical issues related to selecting and implementing communication technologies as well as overcoming knowledge sharing barriers is being discussed. The case studies involve a complex inter-organisational setting, where four companies are working together in order to maintain a new IT system. The communication difficulties are related to inadequate communication technologies, lack of trust and the undefined relationships of the stakeholders and the team members. As a result, it is suggested that communication technologies are needed in order to improve the virtual team performance, but are not however solely capable of solving the communication challenges in virtual teams. In addition, suitable leadership and trust between team members are required in order to improve the knowledge sharing and communication in virtual teams.

Trust in inter-organizational relationships

Trust in inter-organizational collaborative relationships has attracted substantial research interest among academics and practitioners. Previous studies have concentrated on the benefits of trust to business outcomes and economic performance, as it is considered to be a source of competitive advantage. Despite this increased level of interest, there is no consensus, much less overall agreement, about how it should be conceptualized or about the number of dimensions it incorporates. On the inter-organizational level there is an obvious challenge in defining both the trusting party and the objects of trust. Thus, the notion of trust as an under-theorized and poorly understood phenomenon still holds. Hence, the motivation of this study was fuelled by the need to increase our knowledge and understanding of the role and nature of trust in inter-organizational collaborative relationships. It is posited that there is a call for more understanding about its antecedents and consequences, as well as about the very concept in inter-organizational collaborative relationships. The study is divided into two parts. The first part gives a general overview, and the second part comprises four research publications. Both qualitative and quantitative research methodology is utilized. A multi-method research design was used because it provides different levels of data and different perspectives on the phenomenon. The results of this study reveal that trust incorporates three dimensions on both the individual and the organizational level: capability, goodwill, and self-reference. Trust develops from the reputation and behavior of the trusted party. It appears from this study that trust is clearly directed towards both individual boundary spanners and the counterpart company itself – i.e. not only to one or the other. The trusting party, on the other hand, is always an individual, and not the organization per se. Trust increases collaboration benefits and lowers collaboration drawbacks, thus having a positive effect on relationship performance. The major contribution of this study lies in uncovering the critical points and drawbacks in prior research and thereby in responding to the highlighted challenges. The way in which these challenges were addressed offers contributions to three major issues in the emerging theory of trust in the inter-organizational context: firstly, this study clarifies the trustor-trustee discussion; secondly, it conceptualizes trust as existing on both individual and organizational levels; and thirdly, it provides more information about the antecedents of trust and the ways in which it affects relationship performance.

Inter organizational learning within and by innovation networks

The thesis deals with the phenomenon of learning between organizations in innovation networks that develop new products, services or processes. Inter organizational learning is studied especially at the level of the network. The role of the network can be seen as twofold: either the network is a context for inter organizational learning, if the learner is something else than the network (organization, group, individual), or the network itself is the learner. Innovations are regarded as a primary source of competitiveness and renewal in organizations. Networking has become increasingly common particularly because of the possibility to extend the resource base of the organization through partnerships and to concentrate on core competencies. Especially in innovation activities, networks provide the possibility to answer the complex needs of the customers faster and to share the costs and risks of the development work. Networked innovation activities are often organized in practice as distributed virtual teams, either within one organization or as cross organizational co operation. The role of technology is considered in the research mainly as an enabling tool for collaboration and learning. Learning has been recognized as one important collaborative process in networks or as a motivation for networking. It is even more important in the innovation context as an enabler of renewal, since the essence of the innovation process is creating new knowledge, processes, products and services. The thesis aims at providing enhanced understanding about the inter organizational learning phenomenon in and by innovation networks, especially concentrating on the network level. The perspectives used in the research are the theoretical viewpoints and concepts, challenges, and solutions for learning. The methods used in the study are literature reviews and empirical research carried out with semi structured interviews analyzed with qualitative content analysis. The empirical research concentrates on two different areas, firstly on the theoretical approaches to learning that are relevant to innovation networks, secondly on learning in virtual innovation teams. As a result, the research identifies insights and implications for learning in innovation networks from several viewpoints on organizational learning. Using multiple perspectives allows drawing a many sided picture of the learning phenomenon that is valuable because of the versatility and complexity of situations and challenges of learning in the context of innovation and networks. The research results also show some of the challenges of learning and possible solutions for supporting especially network level learning.

De nexu inter virtutes intellectuales & morales

Invocatio: Deo moderatore.

De convenientia inter dogmata Nic. Machiavelli et vitam Oliverii Cromvelli

Invocatio: J.N.J.F.

Comparatio inter Nestorii et Cyrilli de incarnatione [kreikkaa], in concilio Ephesino, dijudicata dogmata

Dedicatio: Isaacus Eneberg.

De harmonia inter publicam et privatam salutem in civitate

Invocatio: Q.F.F.S.