Innovation and Internationalisation in Russian Companies: Challenges and Opportunities for Open Innovation and Cooperation

Increasing globalisation and intensified cross-border cooperation, together with significant technological breakthroughs, create a fascinating gap for the research of the relationship between internationalisation and innovation on national, regional and company levels in Russia. The intensified international trade between countries and regions benefited from favourable institutional conditions, and facilitated the technology transfer and the development of innovations on the national level. This study approaches the same question from the company perspective; if certain companies are more innovative than other domestic companies, will they start internationalisation more easily or get involved in cooperation with international stakeholders? When companies operate in international markets, how do they obtain knowledge? Moreover, would this new knowledge from the foreign market help then to increase innovativeness, competitiveness and develop operations in domestic/local and foreign markets? Considering the role of foreign direct investments (FDI), the research in hand tries to find out the role of companies with FDI on the other players on the home market. Do foreigners bring new technology, innovation to the country? Is there spillover effect observed and how local companies can benefit from them? This dissertation studies the internationalisation and innovation in Russian companies, both from the outward internationalisation and inward internationalisation perspectives. Russian companies developed quickly during the transition period, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The common background of these companies, the effects of the change of ownership, and some managerial difficulties make them more sensitive to competitions issues, and in this context, the opportunities brought by the developing innovations are seen in companies and on the governmental level.

Tietojohtaminen innovaatioyhteistyössä

Avoimen innovaation soveltaminen ja yhteistyö innovaatiotoiminnassa tarjoavat yrityksille mahdollisuuden tuoda markkinoille yhä kompleksisempia ja vaativampia tuotteita. Yhteistyön ongelmallisuus korostuu erilaisten käytäntöjen ja toteuttamistapojen yhteensovittamisessa. Tämän diplomityön tavoitteena oli luoda järjestelmällinen viitekehys monirajapintaisen innovaatioprosessin toteuttamiseen. Työssä sovellettiin keskeisiä teorioita niin tietojohtamisen, innovaatioprosessimallinnuksen kuin innovaatioyhteistyön saroilta. Empiirinen tutkimus toteutettiin asiantuntijahaastatteluiden avulla. Työ on osa TEKESin rahoittamaa tutkimusprojektia ”Liiketoimintakonseptien mallintaminen tuotteistettaessa ja kaupallistettaessa muovimekaniikkaosaamista”.

"Luottamus on aika kovaa tässä" - Luottamuksen rakentuminen innovaatioyhteistyössä

Pro gradu -tutkielman tavoitteena on tutkia luottamuksen rakentumista in-novaatioyhteistyössä. Tarkoituksena on selvittää miten luottamus rakentuu ja mitkä tekijät vaikuttavat luottamuksen rakentumisen taustalla. Samalla pohditaan, miten luottamuksen rakentumista voidaan tietoisesti tukea. Lisäksi mietitään luottamuksen merkitystä innovaatioyhteistyössä ja sen roolia innovaatiossa onnistumisessa. Tutkimusaineisto kerättiin kvalitatii-visten teemahaastattelujen avulla. Tutkimuksen perusteella saatiin selkeä kuva siitä, miten luottamus raken-tuu innovaatioyhteistyössä, mitkä tekijät sen rakentumiseen vaikuttavat ja miten sen rakentumista voidaan tukea. Innovaatioverkostossa esiintyvä luottamus rakentui osaamisen, identiteetin ja hyväntahtoisuuden varaan ja oli sekä organisaatioiden että yksilöiden välistä. Sen rakentumisessa osaava orkesterointi oli tärkeässä roolissa. Tutkimuksen kohteena ollut kehitystyö ei olisi onnistunut ilman luottamusta ja osin luottamuksen puutteen vuoksi kaikkia tavoitteita ei saavutettu.

Sidosryhmien odotukset voittoa tavoittelemattomalle kehitysyhtiölle. Case: Lappeenranta Innovation Oy

Tässä tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan, mitä sidosryhmät odottivat voittoa tavoittelemattomalta case-yritykseltä Lappeenranta Innovation Oy:ltä sen perustamisen yhteydessä ja reilun vuoden toiminnan jälkeen. Tutkimuksessa selvitetään myös niitä kehittämisehdotuksia, joita sidosryhmillä on yritykselle. Tutkimus on laadullinen tapaustutkimus jasen aineisto koostuu dokumenteista, mediateksteistä ja haastatteluista. Menetelminä on käytetty teemoittelua ja diskurssianalyysiä. Tutkimuksen tuloksena löytyi kuusi alkuvaiheen odotuskokonaisuutta: 1) yrittäjien auttaminen; 2) tutkimuksen ja liiketoiminnan yhdistäminen; 3) rahoituksen hakeminen; 4) public-private -yhteistyön kehittäminen; 5) Venäjä-yhteistyön kehittäminen ja6) verkostojen luominen. Reilun vuoden toiminnan jälkeen odotukset ovat muuttuneet jonkin verran: public-private-yhteistyön odotuksen merkitys on kasvanut ja uutena odotuksena on tullut IP-oikeuksien suojaaminen. Kehittämisehdotuksia tutkimuksessa löytyi 10 eri toiminta-alueelta: yritys-kehitys; rahoitus; Venäjä-yhteistyö; verkostot; maakunnallisuus; toiminnan laajuus; yhteistyö sidosryhmien kanssa; tiedottaminen, asioista kertominen, selkeys; fokusointi ja priorisointi; sisäisen toiminnan kehittäminen ja hallituksen rakenne.

Innovation in a Non-Formal Adult Education Organisation – Multi-Case Study in Four Adult Education Centres

More than ever, education organisations are experiencing the need to develop new services and processes to satisfy expanding and changing customer needs and to adapt to the environmental changes and continually tightening economic situation. Innovation has been found in many studies to have a crucial role in the success of an organisation, both in the private and public sectors, in formal education and in manufacturing and services alike. However, studies concerning innovation in non-formal adult education organisations, such as adult education centres (AECs) in Finland, are still lacking. This study investigates innovation in the non-formal adult education organisation context from the perspective of organisational culture types and social networks. The objective is to determine the significant characteristics of an innovative non-formal adult education organisation. The analysis is based on data from interviews with the principals and fulltime staff of four case AECs. Before the case study, a pre-study phase is accomplished in order to obtain a preliminary understanding of innovation at AECs. The research found strong support for the need of innovation in AECs. Innovation is basically needed to accomplish the AEC system’s primary mission mentioned in the ACT on Liberal Adult Education. In addition, innovation is regarded vital to institutes and may prevent their decline. It helps the institutes to be more attractive, to enter new market, to increase customer satisfaction and to be on the cutting edge. Innovation is also seen as a solution to the shortage of resources. Innovative AECs search actively for additional resources for development work through project funding and subsidies, cooperation networks and creating a conversational and joyful atmosphere in the institute. The findings also suggest that the culture type that supports innovation at AECs is multidimensional, with an emphasis on the clan and adhocratic culture types and such values as: dynamism, future orientation, acquiring new resources, mistake tolerance, openness, flexibility, customer orientation, a risk-taking attitude, and community spirit. Active and creative internal and external cooperation also promote innovation at AECs. This study also suggests that the behaviour of a principal is crucial. The way he or she shows appreciation the staff, encouragement and support to the staff and his or her approachability and concrete participation in innovation activities have a strong effect on innovation attitudes and activities in AECs.

The Role of Universities in the Triple Helix model of innovation management within the biotechnology industry, Case example: Turku Science Park Network

Biotechnology has been recognized as the key strategic technology for industrial growth. The industry is heavily dependent on basic research. Finland continues to rank in the top 10 of Europe's most innovative countries in terms of tax-policy, education system, infrastructure and the number of patents issued. Regardless of the excellent statistical results, the output of this innovativeness is below acceptable. Research on the issues hindering the output creation has already been done and the identifiable weaknesses in the Finland's National Innovation system are the non-existent growth of entrepreneurship and the missing internationalization. Finland is proven to have all the enablers of the innovation policy tools, but is lacking the incentives and rewards to push the enablers, such as knowledge and human capital, forward. Science Parks are the biggest operator in research institutes in the Finnish Science and Technology system. They exist with the purpose of speeding up the commercialization process of biotechnology innovations which usually include technological uncertainty, technical inexperience, business inexperience and high technology cost. Innovation management only internally is a rather historic approach, current trend drives towards open innovation model with strong triple helix linkages. The evident problems in the innovation management within the biotechnology industry are examined through a case study approach including analysis of the semi-structured interviews which included biotechnology and business expertise from Turku School of Economics. The results from the interviews supported the theoretical implications as well as conclusions derived from the pilot survey, which focused on the companies inside Turku Science Park network. One major issue that the Finland's National innovation system is struggling with is the fact that it is technology driven, not business pulled. Another problem is the university evaluation scale which focuses more on number of graduates and short-term factors, when it should put more emphasis on the cooperation success in the long-term, such as the triple helix connections with interaction and knowledge distribution. The results of this thesis indicated that there is indeed requirement for some structural changes in the Finland's National innovation system and innovation policy in order to generate successful biotechnology companies and innovation output. There is lack of joint output and scales of success, lack of people with experience, lack of language skills, lack of business knowledge and lack of growth companies.

Roles of leadership in complex environments : Enhancing Knowledge Flows in Organisational Constellations through Practice-Based Innovation Processes

Global challenges, complexity and continuous uncertainty demand development of leadership approaches, employees and multi-organisation constellations. Current leadership theories do not sufficiently address the needs of complex business environments. First of all, before successful leadership models can be applied in practice, leadership needs to shift from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Many leadership models still view leadership solely through the perspective of linear process thinking. In addition, there is not enough knowledge or experience in applying these newer models in practice. Leadership theories continue to be based on the assumption that leaders possess or have access to all the relevant knowledge and capabilities to decide future directions without external advice. In many companies, however, the workforce consists of skilled professionals whose work and related interfaces are so challenging that the leaders cannot grasp all the linked viewpoints and cross-impacts alone. One of the main objectives of this study is to understand how to support participants in organisations and their stakeholders to, through practice-based innovation processes, confront various environments. Another aim is to find effective ways of recognising and reacting to diverse contexts, so companies and other stakeholders are better able to link to knowledge flows and shared value creation processes in advancing joint value to their customers. The main research question of this dissertation is, then, to seek understanding of how to enhance leadership in complex environments. The dissertation can, on the whole, be characterised as a qualitative multiple-case study. The research questions and objectives were investigated through six studies published in international scientific journals. The main methods applied were interviews, action research and a survey. The empirical focus was on Finnish companies, and the research questions were examined in various organisations at the top levels (leaders and managers) and bottom levels (employees) in the context of collaboration between organisations and cooperation between case companies and their client organisations. However, the emphasis of the analysis is the internal and external aspects of organisations, which are conducted in practice-based innovation processes. The results of this study suggest that the Cynefin framework, complexity leadership theory and transformational leadership represent theoretical models applicable to developing leadership through practice-based innovation. In and of themselves, they all support confronting contemporary challenges, but an implementable method for organisations may be constructed by assimilating them into practice-based innovation processes. Recognition of diverse environments, their various contexts and roles in the activities and collaboration of organisations and their interest groups is ever-more important to achieving better interaction in which a strategic or formal status may be bypassed. In innovation processes, it is not necessarily the leader who is in possession of the essential knowledge; thus, it is the role of leadership to offer methods and arenas where different actors may generate advances. Enabling and supporting continuous interaction and integrated knowledge flows is of crucial importance, to achieve emergence of innovations in the activities of organisations and various forms of collaboration. The main contribution of this dissertation relates to applying these new conceptual models in practice. Empirical evidence on the relevance of different leadership roles in practice-based innovation processes in Finnish companies is another valuable contribution. Finally, the dissertation sheds light on the significance of combining complexity science with leadership and innovation theories in research.

Cooperative strategy in emerging markets - analysis of interfirm r&d cooperation and performance in Russian manufacturing companies

Emerging markets have come to play a significant role in the world, not only due to their strong economic growth but because they have been able to foster an increasing number of innovative high technology oriented firms. However, as the markets continue to change and develop, there remain many companies in emerging markets that struggle with their competitiveness and innovativeness. To improve competitive capabilities, many scholars have come to favor interfirm cooperation, which is perceived to help companies access new knowledge and complementary resources and, by so doing, enables them to catch up quickly with Western competitors. Regardless of numerous attempts by strategic management scholars, the research field remains very fragmented and lacks understanding on how and when interfirm cooperation contributes to firm performance and competiveness in emerging markets. Furthermore, the reasons why interfirm R&D sometimes succeeds but fails at other times frequently remain unidentified. This thesis combines the extant literature on competitive and cooperative strategy, dynamic capabilities, and R&D cooperation while studying interfirm R&D relationships in and between Russian manufacturing companies. Employing primary survey data, the thesis presents numerous novel findings regarding the effect of R&D cooperation and different types of R&D partner on firms’ exploration and exploitation performance. Utilizing a competitive strategy framework enables these effects to be explained in more detail, and especially why interfirm cooperation, regardless of its potential, has had a modest effect on the general competitiveness of emerging market firms. This thesis contributes especially to the strategic management literature and presents a more holistic perspective on the usefulness of cooperative strategy in emerging markets. It provides a framework through which it is possible to assess the potential impacts of different R&D cooperation partners and to clarify the causal relationships between cooperation, performance, and long term competitiveness.

A Business Incubator, Accelerator, or Coworking Space? Case Health Innovation Village at GE

Health Innovation Village at GE is one of the new communities targeted for startup and growth-oriented companies. It has been established at the premises of a multinational conglomerate that will promote networking and growth of startup companies. The concept combines features from traditional business incubators, accelerators, and coworking spaces. This research compares Health Innovation Village to these concepts regarding its goals, target clients, source of income, organization, facilities, management, and success factors. In addition, a new incubator classification model is introduced. On the other hand, Health Innovation Village is examined from its tenants’ perspective and improvements are suggested. The work was implemented as a qualitative case study by interviewing GE staff with connections to Health Innovation Village as well as startup entrepreneurs and employees’ working there. The most evident features of Health Innovation Village correspond to those of business incubators although it is atypical as a non-profit corporate business incubator. Strong network orientation and connections to venture capitalists are common characteristics of these new types of accelerators. The design of the premises conforms to the principles of coworking spaces, but the services provided to the startup companies are considerably more versatile than the services offered by coworking spaces. The advantages of Health Innovation Village are that there are first-class premises and exceptionally good networking possibilities that other types of incubators or accelerators are not able to offer. A conglomerate can also provide multifaceted special knowledge for young firms. In addition, both GE and the startups gained considerable publicity through their cooperation, indeed a characteristic that benefits both parties. Most of the expectations of the entrepreneurs were exceeded. However, communication and the scope of cooperation remain challenges. Micro companies spend their time developing and marketing their products and acquiring financing. Therefore, communication should be as clear as possible and accessible everywhere. The startups would prefer to cooperate significantly more, but few have the time available to assume the responsibility of leadership. The entrepreneurs also expected to have more possibilities for cooperation with GE. Wider collaboration might be accomplished by curation in the same way as it is used in the well-functioning coworking spaces where curators take care of practicalities and promote cooperation. Communication issues could be alleviated if the community had its own Intranet pages where all information could be concentrated. In particular, a common calendar and a room reservation system could be useful. In addition, it could be beneficial to have a section of the Intranet open for both the GE staff and the startups so that those willing to share their knowledge and those having project offers could use it for advertising.

User Experience Patterns for/of Innovation by Design: A Survey on Design Practices in the Software Development and Innovation Lifecycle

The User Experience (UX) designers are undoubtedly aware of how many UX design methods currently exist and that sometimes it becomes a problem to choose an appropriate one. What are all of methods that designers have in their “arsenal”? When can they use them? This thesis presents the research on the design methods in the contemporary context of User Experience (UX) and Innovations by using a survey approach. The study is limited to cover the domain of consumer mobile services development and provider companies around the world. The study follows 2 clear objectives: (1) to understand what design methods are currently used in that context and to what extent they are used (2) to identify at what stage according to the UX design thinking process for creating innovations they are placed. The study contributes to the research in the field of UX design and Innovations and extends the knowledge in that field together with communities’ (UXPA, SIGCHI, SIGSOFT) members’ cooperation. The research is vital due to lack of information on design practices and their application in the chosen context.

Adaptability, Transformation and Complex Changes in Namibia and Tanzania: Resilience and Innovation System Development in Local Communities

This thesis is a research about the recent complex spatial changes in Namibia and Tanzania and local communities’ capacity to cope with, adapt to and transform the unpredictability engaged to these processes. I scrutinise the concept of resilience and its potential application to explaining the development of local communities in Southern Africa when facing various social, economic and environmental changes. My research is based on three distinct but overlapping research questions: what are the main spatial changes and their impact on the study areas in Namibia and Tanzania? What are the adaptation, transformation and resilience processes of the studied local communities in Namibia and Tanzania? How are innovation systems developed, and what is their impact on the resilience of the studied local communities in Namibia and Tanzania? I use four ethnographic case studies concerning environmental change, global tourism and innovation system development in Namibia and Tanzania, as well as mixed-methodological approaches, to study these issues. The results of my empirical investigation demonstrate that the spatial changes in the localities within Namibia and Tanzania are unique, loose assemblages, a result of the complex, multisided, relational and evolutional development of human and non-human elements that do not necessarily have linear causalities. Several changes co-exist and are interconnected though uncertain and unstructured and, together with the multiple stressors related to poverty, have made communities more vulnerable to different changes. The communities’ adaptation and transformation measures have been mostly reactive, based on contingency and post hoc learning. Despite various anticipation techniques, coping measures, adaptive learning and self-organisation processes occurring in the localities, the local communities are constrained by their uneven power relationships within the larger assemblages. Thus, communities’ own opportunities to increase their resilience are limited without changing the relations in these multiform entities. Therefore, larger cooperation models are needed, like an innovation system, based on the interactions of different actors to foster cooperation, which require collaboration among and input from a diverse set of stakeholders to combine different sources of knowledge, innovation and learning. Accordingly, both Namibia and Tanzania are developing an innovation system as their key policy to foster transformation towards knowledge-based societies. Finally, the development of an innovation system needs novel bottom-up approaches to increase the resilience of local communities and embed it into local communities. Therefore, innovation policies in Namibia have emphasised the role of indigenous knowledge, and Tanzania has established the Living Lab network.

Innovaation alkupään johtaminen

Työn tavoitteena oli selventää innovaatioketjun alkupään liittyviä keskeisiä käsitteitä, menetelmiä ja toimintamalleja sekä laatia innovaation alkupään ja kyvykkyyden arviointi- ja johtamismallit. Innovaatio on määritelmänsä mukaisesti uusi keksintö, joka on sovellettu käytäntöön ja se luo yritykselle lisäarvoa. Innovaatio on uusi malli, käytäntö tai konsepti, joka muuttaa vallitsevia käytäntöjä siten, että teknologinen ja taloudellinen suorituskyky paranee. Keskeinen kysymys on kirkastaa sumea etupää (Fuzzy Front End) uusiksi liiketoiminta-mahdollisuuksiksi. Innovaation tietolähteet: hiljaiset signaalit, trendit, kilpailija- ja asiakastieto, nousevat uudet teknologiat, tuotepalaute sekä tutkimus-, patentti- ja lisensiointi-informaatio, tarjoavat yrityksille mahdollisuuksia mm. tuote-, prosessi-, palvelu- ja liiketoimintainnovaatioksi. Tulevaisuuden näkeminen alkaa tietämisestä miten hallitsemme signaaleita, jotka ovat olemassa tänään, mutta niitä ei ole tunnistettu. Taitavissa innovaatioyrityksissä tulevaisuuden etsiminen on avainprioriteetti. Mullistavia uusia teknologioita otetaan käyttöön kaikilla teollisuuden aloilla. Näitä mahdollisuuksia on jatkuvasti ja systemaattisesti monitoroitava ja hyödynnettävä. Innovaatiot ja luovuus liittyvät läheisesti toisiinsa. Yrityksen innovatiivisuuden kehittämiseen liittyy sekä organisaatio- että yksilötason jatkuvaa kehittämistä. Yksilöt ovat organisaatiossa ideoiden lähde, mutta sen kehittäminen innovaatioksi on koko organisaation vastuulla. Innovatiivinen organisaatio on aina myös luova, koska luovuus on innovaation lähde. Luovuuden avulla tuotetaan uusia ja hyödyllisiä ideoita ja toimeenpanokyky sisältää ideoiden kehittämisen ja hyödyntämisen liiketoiminnassa. Innovaatiot edellyttävät myös uutta ajattelua. Rationaalinen ajattelu on jopa innovatiivisuuden este. Ajattelukyvykkyyden kehittäminen johtaa tutkimuksien mukaan tehokkaampaan kommunikointiin ja tuloksekkaampaan tiimityöhön. Innovaatiot syntyvät usein vuorovaikutuksessa poikkiorganisatorisissa tiimeissä Innovaatiot eivät synny sattumalta vaan johtamisen tuloksena. Luovuuden ja kyvykkyyksien johtaminen on innovatiivisen organisaation peruselementtejä. Innovaatiokyvykkyyden osatekijöitä ovat innovaation tietolähteiden hyödyntäminen, toimialan osaaminen, innovaatioita tukevat johtamis- ja tietojärjestelmät, innovaatiokulttuuri, prosessilähtöisyys ja dynaaminen kyvykkyys. Innovaatioiden johtaminenon strategialähtöistä, innovaatioprosessien implementointia, työkalujen ja menetelmien hallintaa sekä innovatiivisuuden kehittämistä.