Sukupolvenvaihdos perheyrityksessä - menestystarinoita

Tutkielman tavoitteena oli selvittää perheyrittäjien kokemusten kautta menestyksellisen sukupolvenvaihdoksen keskeisiä teemoja. Tämä toteutettiin käyttämällä kvalitatiivista tapaustutkimusta. Tutkimuksen tarkoituksena on pyrkiä auttamaan sekä yrittäjiä että vaihdoksessa mukana toimivia ulkopuolisia asiantuntijoita ymmärtämään perheyrityksestä luopumiseen ja vastaavasti sen jatkamiseen liittyviä haasteita ja monimuotoista päätöksentekoprosessia. Tapaustutkimus toteutettiin teemahaastattelujen avulla. Teema-haastattelujen perusteella muodostettiin neljä yrityskohtaista tarinaa, joita analysoimalla löydettiin eräitä sukupolvenvaihdoksen avaintekijöitä ja teemoja. Tärkeimmät tekijät liittyvät sukupolvenvaihdosprosessin ajalliseen sidonnaisuuteen ja dynaamisuuteen, sekä luopujan ja jatkajan sosiaalisen todellisuuden merkitykseen. Olennaista on myös erilaisen ulkopuolisen tuen tarve. Lisäksi tutkimuksessa havaittiin, että paraskaan suunnitelma ei ole automaattinen tae sukupolvenvaihdoksen onnistumisesta, vaan vaihdos edellyttää panostusta myös seurantaan ennen vaihdosta, sen aikana ja jälkeen.

The Effect of Family Ownership on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Norway

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on selvittää, onko perheomistajuus, eli yksityisomistus, kannattavampi omistusmuoto kuin institutionaalinen omistajuus ja, onko yrityksen iällä ja koolla vaikutusta perheyritysten menestymiseen. Aikaisempaan tutkimustietoon tukeutuen, tutkimuksen aluksi käydään myös läpi perheomistajuuteen yleisesti liitettyjä ominaispiirteitä sekä perheyritysten menestymistä verrattuna ei-perheyrityksiin. Empiirinen analyysi perheomistajuuden vaikutuksista yrityksen kannattavuuteen sekä yrityksen iän ja koon vaikutuksista perheyritysten menestymiseen toteutetaan kahden otoksen avulla, jotka koostuvat listaamattomista norjalaisista pienistä ja keskisuurista yrityksistä (pk-yrityksistä). Näin ollen satunnaisotos ja päätoimialaotos, johon listaamattomat pk-yritykset on valittu satunnaisesti Norjan tärkeimmiltä toimialoilta, analysoidaan erikseen. Analyysi toteutetaan käyttäen lineaarista regressioanalyysia. Vaikka satunnaisotoksen perusteella perheyritykset eivät näytä olevan ei-perheyrityksiä kannattavampia, päätoimialaotos osoittaa, että listaamattomissa pk-yrityksissä perhe- eli yksityisomistajuus on merkittävästi institutionaalista omistajuutta kannattavampi omistusmuoto. Eritoten nuoret ja pienet yritykset vastaavat perheyritysten paremmasta kannattavuudesta.

Dynamic Ownership in Family Business System – A Portfolio Business Approach

Family businesses are among the longest-lived most prevalent institutions in the world and they are an important source of economic development and growth. Ownership is a key to the business life of the firm and also one main key in family business definition. There is only a little portfolio entrepreneurship or portfolio business research within family business context. The absence of empirical evidence on the long-term relationship between family ownership and portfolio development presents an important gap in the family business literature. This study deals with the family business ownership changes and the development of portfolios in the family business and it is positioned in to the conversation of family business, growth, ownership, management and strategy. This study contributes and expands the existing body of theory on family business and ownership. From the theoretical point of view this study combines insights from the fields of portfolio entrepreneurship, ownership, and family business and integrate them. This crossfertilization produces interesting empirical and theoretical findings that can constitute a basis for solid contributions to the understanding of ownership dynamics and portfolio entrepreneurship in family firms. The research strategy chosen for this study represents longitudinal, qualitative, hermeneutic, and deductive approaches.The empirical part of study is using a case study approach with embedded design, that is, multiple levels of analysis within a single study. The study consists of two cases and it begins with a pilot case which will form a preunderstanding on the phenomenon. Pilot case develops the methodology approach to build in the main case and the main case will deepen the understanding of the phenomenon. This study develops and tests a research method of family business portfolio development focusing on investigating how ownership changes are influencing to the family business structures over time. This study reveals the linkages between dimensions of ownership and how they give rise to portfolio business development within the context of the family business. The empirical results of the study suggest that family business ownership is dynamic and owners are using ownership as a tool for creating business portfolios.

The board of directors as a part of family business governance – multilevel participation and board development

In this study, I examine the board of directors as a part of family business governance. Both boards and governance have increased their attractiveness as a research topic lately. Research on boards has concentrated mostly on the study of different board attributes, like composition, and the relationship of these attributes to the firm’s performance. Family business governance studies are criticized for ignoring the multifaceted needs of companies. More research observing the context and contingencies affecting the governance and board of directors is needed. The objective of this study is to clarify: 1) how the board participates in family business governance, and 2) how the board develops along with the firm’s and family’s development. The study is implemented as qualitative research, and the longitudinal process approach has been used as it provides the opportunity to examine development in context. Selection criteria for the two cases selected for this study are: active board of directors, at least one implemented succession, and interviewees available from two generations and from different positions in the firm. The data consists of interviews and secondary data, and it is collected from different data sources. The analysis was done selecting first some critical events from both cases to closer examination, and analysing them by using content analysis technique. Several conclusions were drawn basing on the findings. First, the family business board participates in the firm’s activities much more widely than it is customary to think. Second, the family business board is not a static part of the business, but it develops and it has to develop for different reasons. Third, ownership is not only the basis for the board’s activities or existence, but the relationship between the board and ownership is two-way. The board contributes to a large extent to the ownership decisions, and in this way to the management of ownership. Fourth, according to the cases, the board has many unrecognized possibilities to facilitate succession in family firms.

Family ownership – a source of sustainable success in listed companies

Extant research on exchange-listed firms has acknowledged that the concentration of ownership and the identity of owners make a difference. In addition, studies indicate that firms with a dominant owner outperform firms with dispersed ownership. During the last few years, scholars have identified one group of owners, in particular, whose ownership stake in publicly listed firm is positively related to performance: the business family. While acknowledging that family firms represent a unique organizational form, scholars have identified various concepts and theories in order to understand how the family influences organizational processes and firm performance. Despite multitude of research, scholars have not been able to present clear results on how firm performance is actually impacted by the family. In other words, studies comparing the performance of listed family and other types of firms have remained descriptive in nature since they lack empirical data and confirmation from the family business representatives. What seems to be missing is a convincing theory that links the involvement and behavioral consequences. Accordingly, scholars have not yet come to a mutual understanding of what precisely constitutes a family business. The variety of different definitions and theories has made comparability of different results difficult for instance. These two issues have hampered the development of a rigorous theory of family business. The overall objective of this study is to describe and understand how the family as a dominant owner can enhance firm performance, and can act a source of sustainable success in listed companies. In more detail, in order to develop understanding of the unique factors that can act as competitive advantages for listed family firms, this study is based on a qualitative approach and aims at theory development, not theory verification. The data in this study consist of 16 thematic interviews with CEOs, members of the board, supervisory board chairs, and founders of Finnish listed-family firms. The study consists of two parts. The first part introduces the research topic, research paradigm, methods, and publications, and also discusses the overall outcomes and contributions of the publications. The second part consists of four publications that address the research questions from different viewpoints. The analyses of this study indicate that family ownership in listed companies represents a structure that differs from the traditional views of agency and stewardship, as well as from resource-based and stakeholder views. As opposed to these theories and shareholder capitalism which consider humans as individualistic, opportunistic, and self-serving, and assume that the behaviors of an investor are based on the incentives and motivations to maximize private profits, the family owners form a collective social unit that is motivated to act together toward their mutual purpose or benefit. In addition, socio-emotional and psychological elements of ownership define the family members as owners, rather than the legal and financial dimensions of ownership. That is, collective psychological ownership of family over the business (F-CPO) can be seen as a construct that comprehensively captures the fusion between the family and the business. Moreover, it captures the realized, rather than merely potential, family influence on and interaction with the business, and thereby brings more theoretical clarity of the nature of the fusion between the family and the business, and offers a solution to the problem of family business definition. This doctoral dissertation provides academics, policy-makers, family business practitioners, and the society at large with many implications considering family and business relationships.