Irruptive discourse and conflicted curiosity

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Political ideologies and attitudes towards income inequality in the US: a critical discourse analysis of CNN and Fox News opinion articles

The topic of the thesis is media discourse about current state if income inequality in the US, and political ideologies as influences behind the discourse. The data consists of four opinion articles, two from CNN and two from Fox News. The purpose of the study was to examine how media represents income inequality as an issue, and if the attitudes conveyed are concerned or indifferent. Previous studies have indicated that the level of income is often seen as a personal responsibility, and such perspective can be linked with Republican ideology. In contrast, the Democrats typically express more concern about the consequences of inequality. CNN has been previously considered to have a Democratic bias, and Fox News has been considered to have Republican bias, which is one reason why these two news channels were chosen as the sources of the data. The study is a critical discourse analysis, and the methods applied were sociocognitive approach, which analyzes the social and cognitive factors affecting the discourse, and appraisal framework, which was applied to scrutinize the expressed attitudes more closely by identifyind specific linguistic features. The appraisal framework includes studying such features as affect, judgment and appreciation, which offer a more detailed analysis on the attitudes present in the articles. The sociocognitive approach, additionally, offers a way of analyzing a more broad context affecting the articles. The findings were then compared, to see if there are differences between the articles, or between the news sites with alleged bias. The findings showed that CNN, with alleged Democratic bias, had a more symphatetic attitude towards income inequality, whereas Fox News, with more Republican views, showed clearly less concern towards the issue. Moreover, the Fox News articles had such dubious claims that the underlying ideology behind the articles could be even supporting of income inequality, as it allows the rich to pursue all the wealth they can without having to give anything away. The results, thus, suggest that the political ideologies may a significant effect on media discourse, which, in turn, may have a significant effect on the attitudes of the public towards great issues that could require prompt measures.

Causation and dominance : a study of Finnish causative verbs expressing social dominance

En väsentlig fråga inom såväl lingvistiska som kognitiva teorier är, hur språket beskriver kausala relationer. I finskan finns det en speciell typ av kausativa verb avledda med suffixet (U)ttA som används för att uttrycka att handlingen i fråga utförs av någon annan än subjektreferenten, t.ex. Maija haetuttaa Matilla kirjastosta kirjan ’Maija låter Matti hämta boken från biblioteket’ och Matti juoksuttaa Maijan kaupunkiin ’Matti låter Maija springa till staden’. Syftet med denna avhandling var att med exempel av sociala dominansens kausativer undersöka ordbildningens natur samt begreppet ’socialt förorsakande’. För att beskriva avledningars regelbundna argumentstruktur i form av kopplingen mellan syntaxen och semantiken upprättades deras prototypiska strukturer. Dessa verb har emellertid också specifika användningsområden som framhäver variationer i sociala relationer. Säregna egenskaper hos den sociala dominansens kausativer inkluderades i undersökningen och definierades som konstruktioner. Konstruktionerna omfattar speciella syntaktiska och/eller semantiska element och utöver det också pragmatiska värderande implikationer. Uppbyggnaden av den sociala dimensionen hos de undersökta verben består av egenskaper förbundna med typen av förorsakande, argumentens agentiva egenskaper (aktivitet eller passivitet, dominans, kontroll, viljestyrdhet och ansvarighet) samt konventionaliserade attityder och tolkningar. Ett exempel på en s.k. 'tolkningskonstruktion’ är den negativa dominansens uttryck som i avhandlingen kallas Maktmissbrukskonstruktionen. Denna konstruktion inkluderar talarens starkt kritiska hållning till den uttryckta situationen, t.ex. Asiakas juoksuttaa lentoemäntää ’Kunden låter flygvärdinnan springa’. Dessa konstruktioner fyller en viktig funktion i språklig kommunikation: att beskriva avvikande av sociala normer och att foga expressivitet till budskapet. Metodologiskt kombinerar denna avhandling teorier som baseras på det aktuella språkbruket och teoretisk lingvistisk analys. Verbens samt konstruktionernas konceptuella lexikala struktur och prototypstrukturerna analyserades med hjälp av den konceptuella semantikens verktyg, som har utvecklats av Jackendoff, Nikanne och Pörn.

Corporate responsibility guaranteed by dialogue? Examining the relationship between nongovernmental organizations and business

The main objective of this doctoral dissertation is to examine the relationship between non-governmental organizations and business in the context of academic discourse, corporate responsibility discourse, and stakeholder dialogue. More specifically, motivated by the increasing emphasis on stakeholder dialogue as a tool for corporate responsibility and accountability, the aim is to critically assess the role of stakeholder dialogue as a self-regulatory mechanism, in particular from the perspective of foreign direct investments. The study comprises two parts; an introductory essay containing the research objectives, theoretical foundations and methodological choices, and four research articles that address one sub-objective: 1) to review the literature on NGO-business relations in business and society, management, and international business journals from 1998–2007; 2) to critically analyze the academic discourse on NGO-business relations; 3) to analyze the problematic aspects of sustainable foreign direct investments as a conceptual construct; and 4) to analyze the problematic aspects of stakeholder dialogue in connection with a foreign direct investment. The ontological and epistemological foundations of this dissertation build on the social constructionist view of reality. The dialogue in this study is viewed as a legitimacy bargaining process that is actively shaped by societal parties in discourse. Similarly, articulations of ‘partnership’ and ‘adversarial’ in NGO-business relations in academic business and society discourse are viewed as competing hegemonic interventions in the field. More specifically, the methods applied in the articles are literature review (Article 1), discourse theory (Article 2), conceptual analysis (Article 3), and case study with document analysis (Article 4). This dissertation has three main arguments and contributions. First, it is argued that the potential of stakeholder dialogue as a tool for corporate responsibility and accountability is inherently limited in both contexts. Second, the study shows the power implications of privileging partnership oriented NGO-business relations over adversarial ones, and of placing business at the centre of governance discourse. The third contribution is methodological: a new way to analyze academic discourse is presented by focusing on the problem setting of an article.

The multicultural moment : the history of the idea and politics of multiculturalism in Sweden in comparative, transnational and biographical context, 1964–1975

The emergence of the idea of multiculturalism in Swedish public discourse and social science in the latter half of the 1960s and introduction of official multiculturalism in 1975 constituted a major intellectual and political shift in the post-war history of Sweden. The ambition of the 1975 immigrant and minority policy to enable the preservation of ethno-cultural minorities and to create a positive attitude towards the new multicultural society among the majority population was also incorporated into Swedish cultural, educational and media policies. The rejection of assimilationism and the new commitment to ethno-cultural diversity, the multicultural moment, has earned Sweden a place on the list of the early adopters of official multiculturalism, together with Canada and Australia. This compilation thesis examines the origins and early post-war history of the idea of multiculturalism as well as the interplay between idea and politics in the shift from a public ideal of homogeneity to an ideal of multiculturalism in Sweden. It does so from a range of conceptual, comparative, transnational, and biographical perspectives. The thesis consists of an introduction (Part I) and four previously published studies (Part II). The primary research result of the thesis concerns the agency involved in the break-through and formal establishment of the idea of multiculturalism in Sweden. Actors such as ethnic activists, experts and officials were instrumental in the introduction and establishment of multiculturalism in Sweden, as they also had been in Canada and in Australia. These actors have, however, not previously been recognized and analysed as significant idea-makers and political agents in the case of Sweden. The intertwined connections between activists, social scientists, linguists, and officials facilitated the transfer of the idea of multiculturalism from a publically contested idea to public policy via the way of The Swedish Trade Union Confederation, academia and the Royal Commission of Immigration. The thesis furthermore shows that the political success of the idea of multiculturalism, such as it was within the limits of the universalist social democratic welfare state, was dependent on whom the claims-makers were, the status and positions they held, and the way the idea of multiculturalism was conceptualised and used. It was also dependent on the migratory context of labour immigration in the 1960s and 1970s and on whose behalf the advocates of multiculturalism made their claims. The majority of the labour immigrants were Finnish citizens from the former eastern half of the kingdom of Sweden who were net contributors to the Swedish welfare state. This facilitated the recognition of their ethno-cultural difference, and, following the logic of universalism, the ethno-cultural difference of other minority groups in Sweden. The historical significance of the multicultural moment is still evident in the contemporary immigration and integration policies of Sweden. The affirmation of diversity continues to set Sweden apart from the rest of Europe, now more so than in the 1970s, even though the migratory context has changed radically in the last 40 years.

Nursing Students’ Learning about an Empowering Discourse In Patient Education

The main purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate nursing students' learning about an empowering discourse in patient education. In Phase 1, the purpose was to describe an empowering discourse between a nurse and a patient. In Phase 2, the purpose was first to create a computer simulation program of an empowering discourse based on the description, and second, the purpose was to evaluate nursing students’ learning of how to conduct an empowering discourse using a computer simulation program. The ultimate goal was to strengthen the knowledge basis on empowering discourse and to develop nursing students’ knowledge about how to conduct an empowering discourse for the development of patient education. In Phase I, empowering discourse was described using a systematic literature review with a metasummary technique (n=15). Data were collected covering a period from January 1995 to October 2005. In Phase 2, the computer simulation program of empowering discourse was created based the description in 2006–2007. A descriptive comparative design was used to evaluate students’ (n=69) process of learning empowering discourse using the computer simulation program and a pretest–post-test design without a control group was used to evaluate students’ (n=43) outcomes of learning. Data were collected in 2007. Empowering discourse was a structured process and it was possible to simulate and learned with the computer simulation program. According to students’ knowledge, empowering discourse was an unstructured process. Process of learning empowering discourse using the computer simulation program was controlled by the students and it changed students’ knowledge. The outcomes of learning empowering discourse appeared as changes of students’ knowledge to more holistic and better-organized or only to more holistic or better-organized. The study strengthened knowledge base of empowering discourse and developed students to more knowledgeable in empowering discourse.

Organizational creativity – Hegemonic and alternative discourses

SUMMARY Organizational creativity – hegemonic and alternative discourses Over the course of recent developments in the societal and business environment, the concept of creativity has been brought into new arenas. The rise of ‘creative industries’ and the idea of creativity as a form of capital have attracted the interests of business and management professionals – as well as academics. As the notion of creativity has been adopted in the organization studies literature, the concept of organizational creativity has been introduced to refer to creativity that takes place in an organizational context. This doctoral thesis focuses on organizational creativity, and its purpose is to explore and problematize the hegemonic organizational creativity discourse and to provide alternative viewpoints for theorizing about creativity in organizations. Taking a discourse theory approach, this thesis, first, provides an outline of the currently predominant, i.e. hegemonic, discourse on organizational creativity, which is explored regarding themes, perspectives, methods and paradigms. Second, this thesis consists of five studies that act as illustrations of certain alternative viewpoints. Through these exemplary studies, this thesis sheds light on the limitations and taken-for-granted aspects of the hegemonic discourse and discusses what these alternative viewpoints could offer for the understanding of and theorizing for organizational creativity. This study leans on an assumption that the development of organizational creativity knowledge and the related discourse is not inevitable or progressive but rather contingent. The organizational creativity discourse has developed in a certain direction, meaning that some themes, perspectives, and methods, as well as assumptions, values, and objectives, have gained a hegemonic position over others, and are therefore often taken for granted and considered valid and relevant. The hegemonization of certain aspects, however, contributes to the marginalization of others. The thesis concludes that the hegemonic discourse on organizational creativity is based on an extensive coverage of certain themes and perspectives, such as those focusing on individual cognitive processes, motivation, or organizational climate and their relation to creativity, to name a few. The limited focus on some themes and the confinement to certain prevalent perspectives, however, results in the marginalization of other themes and perspectives. The negative, often unintended, consequences, implications, and side effects of creativity, the factors that might hinder or prevent creativity, and a deeper inquiry into the ontology and epistemology of creativity have attracted relatively marginal interest. The material embeddedness of organizational creativity, in other words, the physical organizational environment as well as the human body and its non-cognitive resources, has largely been overlooked in the hegemonic discourse, although thereare studies in this area that give reason to believe that they might prove relevant for the understanding of creativity. The hegemonic discourse is based on an individual-centered understanding of creativity which overattributes creativity to an individual and his/her cognitive capabilities, while simultaneously neglecting how, for instance, the physical environment, artifacts, social dynamics and interactions condition organizational creativity. Due to historical reasons, quantitative as well as qualitative yet functionally- oriented studies have predominated the organizational creativity discourse, although studies falling into the interpretationist paradigm have gradually become more popular. The two radical paradigms, as well as methodological and analytical approaches typical of radical research, can be considered to hold a marginal position in the field of organizational creativity. The hegemonic organizational creativity discourse has provided extensive findings related to many aspects of organizational creativity, although the con- ceptualizations and understandings of organizational creativity in the hegemonic discourse are also in many respects limited and one-sided. The hegemonic discourse is based on an assumption that creativity is desirable, good, necessary, or even obligatory, and should be encouraged and nourished. The conceptualiza- tions of creativity favor the kind of creativity which is useful, valuable and can be harnessed for productivity. The current conceptualization is limited to the type of creativity that is acceptable and fits the managerial ideology, and washes out any risky, seemingly useless, or negative aspects of creativity. It also limits the possible meanings and representations that ‘creativity’ has in the respective discourse, excluding many meanings of creativity encountered in other discourses. The excessive focus on creativity that is good, positive, productive and fits the managerial agenda while ignoring other forms and aspects of creativity, however, contributes to the dilution of the notion. Practices aimed at encouraging the kind of creativity may actually entail a risk of fostering moderate alterations rather than more radical novelty, as well as management and organizational practices which limit creative endeavors, rather than increase their likelihood. The thesis concludes that although not often given the space and attention they deserve, there are alternative conceptualizations and understandings of organizational creativity which embrace a broader notion of creativity. The inability to accommodate the ‘other’ understandings and viewpoints within the organizational creativity discourse runs a risk of misrepresenting the complex and many-sided phenomenon of creativity in organizational context. Keywords: Organizational creativity, creativity, organization studies, discourse theory, hegemony

Äidinkielisen ja vieraskielisen opetuksen vertailua äidinkielen hallinnan ja kognitiivisten prosessien toiminnan kautta

Pro gradu –tutkielmani tarkoituksena oli tarkastella eri puolilla maailmaa tehtyjen koulutuskokeilujen tuloksia suhteessa siihen, käyttävätkö ne opetuskielenä oppilaiden äidinkieltä vai oppilaille vierasta kieltä sekä pohtia syitä eri opetusohjelmien tuottamien tulosten eroille. Mahdollisena selityksenä eroille tarkastelin äidinkielellä ja vieraalla kielellä tapahtuvan prosessoinnin eroja. Tätä toimintaa tarkastelin kognitiivisen prosessoinnin eri osa-alueitten kautta. Tutkielmani on luonteeltaan teoreettinen ja perustuu sekä kielitieteen että psykologian materiaalien tarkasteluun. Tärkeimpiä lähdeteoksia ovat olleet Baker: Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (1993); Bialystok: Bilingualism in development. Language, literacy and cognition (2001); Dutcher ja Tucker: The use of first and second languages in education. A review of international experience (1994); sekä Eysenck ja Keane: Cognitive psychology: a student’s handbook (2000). Opetusohjelmien tarkastelu osoitti, että vain sellainen ohjelma, joka ottaa huomioon ja kehittää oppilaan äidinkieltä voi toimia parhaalla tavalla. Opetus voi tällöin olla myös ainakin osittain vieraskielistä. Äidinkielen taidot näkyvät kaikkien oppimistulosten pohjalla. Käsittelemieni tutkimusten perusteella kognitiivisen prosessoinnin osa-alueet, kuten muisti ja automaattiset prosessit, toimivat äidinkielellä tehokkaammin kuin vieraalla kielellä. Äidinkielellä opitut taidot ovat myös siirrettävissä muille kielille, joten tämä selittäisi äidinkielisen opetuksen etuja.

Naiskiintiöt ja työelämän tasa-arvo – diskurssianalyysi sukupuolikiintiöiden rakentumisesta eräiden suomalaisten lehtien teksteissä

Tutkielman tavoitteena on selvittää, miten ”sukupuolikiintiöt yritysten hallituksissa” rakentuvat suomalaisessa mediassa ja sitä kautta; nähdäänkö sukupuolikiintiöt toimivana keinona saavuttaa työelämän tasa-arvo. Tutkielmassa luodaan silmäys sukupuolirooleihin sekä niitä uusintaviin ja ylläpitäviin rakenteisiin yhteiskunnassa. Edelleen tavoitteena on selvittää, murtavatko naiskiintiöt liike-elämässä ja politiikassa vallitsevia johtajuuden sukupuolirooleja. Tutkielmassa käsitellään tasa-arvoa yhteiskunnallisessa, johtajuustutkimuksellisessa ja feministisessä valossa. Sukupuolikiintiöistä kirjoitettaessa voidaan havaita erilaisia suhtautumistapoja niiden vaikutuksesta tasa-arvon toteutumiseen. Tutkielmassa esimerkkeinä käytettyjä lehtitekstejä leimaavat vastakkainasettelut, voimakkaat tunteet ja jakautuminen eri leireihin. Tutkimusmenetelmänä on käytetty kriittistä, valtaorientoitunutta diskurssianalyysiä, joka on antoisa viitekehys mediamaailman käytäntöjen tutkimiseen kontekstissaan. Media on tässä tutkimuksessa rajattu käsittämään tiettyjä suomalaisia sanoma-, aikakausi- ja iltapäivälehtiä. Tutkimuksen pääongelmaksi nousevat tavat, joilla sukupuolikiintiöistä mediassa kirjoitetaan sekä asenteet, joita ne lukijoille välittävät. Tämän tutkimuksen keskeisinä tuloksina voidaan esittää yleisimmät suhtautumistavat sukupuolikiintiötä kohtaan mediassa, sekä kolme diskurssia, jotka useimmiten kiintiökeskusteluissa esiintyvät. Pätevyys- diskurssi painottaa yksilön pätevyyttä ensisijaisena valintakriteerinä hallitusjäseniä valittaessa. Uhka- diskurssi esittää sukupuolikiintiöt uhkavaatimuksena, johon tullaan turvautumaan kulttuuristen muutosten hitauden vuoksi. (Epä)tasa-arvo- diskurssi näkee sukupuolikiintiöt tasa-arvoa edistävänä keinona, mutta toisaalta kokee naiskiintiöt epätasa-arvoisina ja miehiä sortavina.

Työn ja perheen suhteen sosiaalinen rakentuminen eri ikäisten puheessa

Tämän tutkielman tavoite on selvittää, miten eri ikäiset ihmiset puhuvat työ- ja perhe-elämän yhteensovittamisesta. Tarkoituksena on tuoda esille haastattelujen puheessa vakiintuneita diskursseja, jotka luovat sosiaalista todellisuutta. Aineistona käytetään kandeksaa eräässä Etelä-Karjalan Osuuspankin konttorissa tehtyä teemahaastattelua. Näitä haastatteluja analysoidaan diskurssianalyyttisesti. Haastateltujen puheessa toistuu kandeksan eri diskurssityyppiä: ihannediskurssi, "normaali" -diskurssi, organisaatio joustajana -diskurssi, omatuntodiskurssi, stressidiskurssi, minä päätän -diskurssi, ylitehokkuusdiskurssi sekä ikä ja asenteet -diskurssi.

Yrittäjyyttä rakentamassa - yrittäjyyden kolme diskurssia

Tämä tutkimus osallistuu yrittäjyyden kartoittamiseen yrittäjyyskasvatusta varten hyödyntäen näkökulmaa todellisuuden sosiaalisesta rakentumisesta. Tutkimus on kvalitatiivinen, sillä sen aineistona on teemahaastatteluissa tuotettu puhe yrittäjyydestä ja analysointimenetelmänä on diskurssianalyysi. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on diskurssianalyysin keinoin tunnistaa ne yrittäjyyttä sosiaalisesti rakentavat diskurssit, joita Lappeenrannan teknillisen yliopiston kauppatieteellisen tiedekunnan ensimmäisen vuoden opiskelijat hyödyntävät yrittäjyyttä koskevassa puheessaan. Lisäksi tavoitteena on kuvata ja ymmärtää tunnistetuissa diskursseissa rakentuvaa yrittäjyyttä sekä yrittäjyyden motivaatiotekijöitä, yrittäjyyden esteitä ja yrittäjyyden keinoja. Analyysissä tunnistetaan kolme yrittäjyyden diskurssia sekä kuvataan ja jäsennetään niissä erilailla rakentuvaa yrittäjyyttä ja siihen liittyviä käsitteitä. Yrittäjyyden kolme diskurssia ovat bisnes-, elämäntapa- ja innovaatiodiskurssi. Analyysin avulla yrittäjyyskasvatusta voidaan suunnitella ja toteuttaa uudella tavalla, joka vastaa yrittäjyyden laaja-alaista ja monimutkaista todellisuutta.

Kysymyksiä koirasta

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Tasa-arvon käsitteestä ja käytännöistä

Kirjallisuusarvostelu