Socially shared metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning processes in student dyads and small groups

Traditionally metacognition has been theorised, methodologically studied and empirically tested from the standpoint mainly of individuals and their learning contexts. In this dissertation the emergence of metacognition is analysed more broadly. The aim of the dissertation was to explore socially shared metacognitive regulation (SSMR) as part of collaborative learning processes taking place in student dyads and small learning groups. The specific aims were to extend the concept of individual metacognition to SSMR, to develop methods to capture and analyse SSMR and to validate the usefulness of the concept of SSMR in two different learning contexts; in face-to-face student dyads solving mathematical word problems and also in small groups taking part in inquiry-based science learning in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. This dissertation is comprised of four studies. In Study I, the main aim was to explore if and how metacognition emerges during problem solving in student dyads and then to develop a method for analysing the social level of awareness, monitoring, and regulatory processes emerging during the problem solving. Two dyads comprised of 10-year-old students who were high-achieving especially in mathematical word problem solving and reading comprehension were involved in the study. An in-depth case analysis was conducted. Data consisted of over 16 (30–45 minutes) videotaped and transcribed face-to-face sessions. The dyads solved altogether 151 mathematical word problems of different difficulty levels in a game-format learning environment. The interaction flowchart was used in the analysis to uncover socially shared metacognition. Interviews (also stimulated recall interviews) were conducted in order to obtain further information about socially shared metacognition. The findings showed the emergence of metacognition in a collaborative learning context in a way that cannot solely be explained by individual conception. The concept of socially-shared metacognition (SSMR) was proposed. The results highlighted the emergence of socially shared metacognition specifically in problems where dyads encountered challenges. Small verbal and nonverbal signals between students also triggered the emergence of socially shared metacognition. Additionally, one dyad implemented a system whereby they shared metacognitive regulation based on their strengths in learning. Overall, the findings suggested that in order to discover patterns of socially shared metacognition, it is important to investigate metacognition over time. However, it was concluded that more research on socially shared metacognition, from larger data sets, is needed. These findings formed the basis of the second study. In Study II, the specific aim was to investigate whether socially shared metacognition can be reliably identified from a large dataset of collaborative face-to-face mathematical word problem solving sessions by student dyads. We specifically examined different difficulty levels of tasks as well as the function and focus of socially shared metacognition. Furthermore, the presence of observable metacognitive experiences at the beginning of socially shared metacognition was explored. Four dyads participated in the study. Each dyad was comprised of high-achieving 10-year-old students, ranked in the top 11% of their fourth grade peers (n=393). Dyads were from the same data set as in Study I. The dyads worked face-to-face in a computer-supported, game-format learning environment. Problem-solving processes for 251 tasks at three difficulty levels taking place during 56 (30–45 minutes) lessons were video-taped and analysed. Baseline data for this study were 14 675 turns of transcribed verbal and nonverbal behaviours observed in four study dyads. The micro-level analysis illustrated how participants moved between different channels of communication (individual and interpersonal). The unit of analysis was a set of turns, referred to as an ‘episode’. The results indicated that socially shared metacognition and its function and focus, as well as the appearance of metacognitive experiences can be defined in a reliable way from a larger data set by independent coders. A comparison of the different difficulty levels of the problems suggested that in order to trigger socially shared metacognition in small groups, the problems should be more difficult, as opposed to moderately difficult or easy. Although socially shared metacognition was found in collaborative face-to-face problem solving among high-achieving student dyads, more research is needed in different contexts. This consideration created the basis of the research on socially shared metacognition in Studies III and IV. In Study III, the aim was to expand the research on SSMR from face-to-face mathematical problem solving in student dyads to inquiry-based science learning among small groups in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. The specific aims were to investigate SSMR’s evolvement and functions in a CSCL environment and to explore how SSMR emerges at different phases of the inquiry process. Finally, individual student participation in SSMR during the process was studied. An in-depth explanatory case study of one small group of four girls aged 12 years was carried out. The girls attended a class that has an entrance examination and conducts a language-enriched curriculum. The small group solved complex science problems in an asynchronous CSCL environment, participating in research-like processes of inquiry during 22 lessons (á 45–minute). Students’ network discussion were recorded in written notes (N=640) which were used as study data. A set of notes, referred to here as a ‘thread’, was used as the unit of analysis. The inter-coder agreement was regarded as substantial. The results indicated that SSMR emerges in a small group’s asynchronous CSCL inquiry process in the science domain. Hence, the results of Study III were in line with the previous Study I and Study II and revealed that metacognition cannot be reduced to the individual level alone. The findings also confirm that SSMR should be examined as a process, since SSMR can evolve during different phases and that different SSMR threads overlapped and intertwined. Although the classification of SSMR’s functions was applicable in the context of CSCL in a small group, the dominant function was different in the asynchronous CSCL inquiry in the small group in a science activity than in mathematical word problem solving among student dyads (Study II). Further, the use of different analytical methods provided complementary findings about students’ participation in SSMR. The findings suggest that it is not enough to code just a single written note or simply to examine who has the largest number of notes in the SSMR thread but also to examine the connections between the notes. As the findings of the present study are based on an in-depth analysis of a single small group, further cases were examined in Study IV, as well as looking at the SSMR’s focus, which was also studied in a face-to-face context. In Study IV, the general aim was to investigate the emergence of SSMR with a larger data set from an asynchronous CSCL inquiry process in small student groups carrying out science activities. The specific aims were to study the emergence of SSMR in the different phases of the process, students’ participation in SSMR, and the relation of SSMR’s focus to the quality of outcomes, which was not explored in previous studies. The participants were 12-year-old students from the same class as in Study III. Five small groups consisting of four students and one of five students (N=25) were involved in the study. The small groups solved ill-defined science problems in an asynchronous CSCL environment, participating in research-like processes of inquiry over a total period of 22 hours. Written notes (N=4088) detailed the network discussions of the small groups and these constituted the study data. With these notes, SSMR threads were explored. As in Study III, the thread was used as the unit of analysis. In total, 332 notes were classified as forming 41 SSMR threads. Inter-coder agreement was assessed by three coders in the different phases of the analysis and found to be reliable. Multiple methods of analysis were used. Results showed that SSMR emerged in all the asynchronous CSCL inquiry processes in the small groups. However, the findings did not reveal any significantly changing trend in the emergence of SSMR during the process. As a main trend, the number of notes included in SSMR threads differed significantly in different phases of the process and small groups differed from each other. Although student participation was seen as highly dispersed between the students, there were differences between students and small groups. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the amount of SSMR during the process or participation structure did not explain the differences in the quality of outcomes for the groups. Rather, when SSMRs were focused on understanding and procedural matters, it was associated with achieving high quality learning outcomes. In turn, when SSMRs were focused on incidental and procedural matters, it was associated with low level learning outcomes. Hence, the findings imply that the focus of any emerging SSMR is crucial to the quality of the learning outcomes. Moreover, the findings encourage the use of multiple research methods for studying SSMR. In total, the four studies convincingly indicate that a phenomenon of socially shared metacognitive regulation also exists. This means that it was possible to define the concept of SSMR theoretically, to investigate it methodologically and to validate it empirically in two different learning contexts across dyads and small groups. In-depth micro-level case analysis in Studies I and III showed the possibility to capture and analyse in detail SSMR during the collaborative process, while in Studies II and IV, the analysis validated the emergence of SSMR in larger data sets. Hence, validation was tested both between two environments and within the same environments with further cases. As a part of this dissertation, SSMR’s detailed functions and foci were revealed. Moreover, the findings showed the important role of observable metacognitive experiences as the starting point of SSMRs. It was apparent that problems dealt with by the groups should be rather difficult if SSMR is to be made clearly visible. Further, individual students’ participation was found to differ between students and groups. The multiple research methods employed revealed supplementary findings regarding SSMR. Finally, when SSMR was focused on understanding and procedural matters, this was seen to lead to higher quality learning outcomes. Socially shared metacognition regulation should therefore be taken into consideration in students’ collaborative learning at school similarly to how an individual’s metacognition is taken into account in individual learning.

Survival competencies in SMEs in changing business environments

The thesis examines the competencies that enable business survival in changing business environments from the perspective of Russian and Finnish micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises in the field of forest industry. Additionally, it studies the competence transformation necessary in SMEs for successful continuation of business operations when a firm considers transferring its business to another industry. The dissertation builds a holistic firm-level view of survival competencies for SMEs facing changes in their business environments. The holistic firm-level view of competencies includes both the individual-level and the firm-level perspectives, regardless of the position of the person in a firm. The findings highlight the importance of high-level individual competencies and the ability to perform versatile tasks in a firm. In addition, continuous business environment scanning, self-evaluation of personal competencies, willingness to renew and change, open-mindedness, and a readiness to network, are competencies that belong to and need to be taken care of by everybody – employees and employers - in a firm. In addition to previous competencies, an ability to manage every-day business also needs to be embedded in SME owners/managers. Furthermore, Russian SMEs seem to be more proactive in change situations, when compared with Finnish SMEs, which are used to operate in a more stable business environment. In conclusion, it can be said that the thesis adds to SME literature by introducing the concept of ‘SME-level competencies’, a combination of previously discussed organisational and networking competencies which are needed in order to survive through change. Furthermore, the thesis concludes with new competence classifications, such as operational and change competencies, which offer new information concerning the required competencies by which a firm may reduce the resistance to change that can hinder business renewal. For SME practitioners, the study suggests proper preparation and proactive operations in their business to reduce the influence of endless changes, and reminds SME owners/managers that changes are, however, a significant source of new business opportunities. For educational players, the study suggests upgrading educational and training systems by improving the training as regards attitudes towards work, and especially training in the comprehensive working abilities needed in SMEs to master diverse tasks. Finally, for public actors the study suggests providing stronger support to entrepreneurs by boosting SMEs entrepreneurial conditions and the existing business possibilities in change situations. This can be done by encouraging a legislative and entrepreneurial climate that responds better to the demands of SMEs.

Sosiaalisen pääoman verkostotutkimus kohdeyrityksessä

Tässä sosiaalisen pääoman verkostotutkimuksessa tarkastellaan valitun rahoitusalalla toimivan kohdeyhtiön sosiaalisen verkoston rakennetta. Työn tavoitteena on määritellä kohdeorganisaation sosiaalinen verkosto ja löytää avainhenkilöt, jotka ovat keskeisiä organisaation toiminnalle ja tiedonjakamiselle. Näiden tunnistettujen roolien kautta pyritään selvittämään miten yritykset laajemmin voivat hyödyntää yritysten epämuodollista sosiaalista verkostoa yleensä tiedon jakamisessa. Tuloksilla pyritään myös hakemaan tukea sille miten sosiaalista epämuodollista verkostoa voidaan hyödyntää silloin kun organisaatio on muutostilassa. Työ on laadullinen tutkimus jota tuetaan numeerisella aineistolla joka on kerätty verkostokyselyllä. Pääasiallinen aineisto tutkimukselle kerättiin teemahaastatteluilla. Empiirinen aineisto kerättiin verkostoanalyysillä koko kohdeyhtiön henkilökunnalle lähetetyllä kyselyllä. Tästä johdettuna luotiin sosiaalisen verkosto kartta ja analysoitiin tulokset. Tuloksien avulla löydettyjä havaintoja käytettiin teemahaastatteluiden pohjana varsinaiselle tutkimukselle. Haastateltavat henkilöt edustivat organisaation eri yksiköitä ja ammattiryhmiä. Tutkimuksen tulokset osoittavat sen, että kohdeyrityksen sosiaalisen verkoston rakenne poikkeaa tyypillisestä muodollisesta organisaatiorakenteesta huomattavasti. Tutkimuksessa havaittiin selkeitä avainhenkilöitä joiden roolit korostuvat organisaation toiminnalle oleellisina tietoväylinä. Näiden avainhenkilöiden kautta haetaan tietoa ja apua päätöstentekoon organisaation kaikilla tasoilla. Tutkimus osoittaa myös sen, että sosiaalisen pääoman kasvaessa oikeaa tietoa osataan hakea oikeasta paikasta nopeammin ja tehokkaammin epämuodollisia reittejä pitkin. Tunnistamalla avainhenkilöt organisaatiossa, yritykset pystyvät vaikuttamaan tiedonkulkuun myös silloin kun yritys on muutostilassa. Vaikuttamalla ja kommunikoimalla myös epäformaalien verkostojen kautta yrityksien on helpompi muokata toimintatapojaan muutoksien yhteydessä.

Hiljaisen tiedon hyödyntäminen verkostoituneen yrityksen ict-ryhmässä

Työn alustavana tavoitteena oli havaita yrityksen ict-ryhmässä käytettävien teknisten välineiden, informaation hallinnan järjestelmien ja ryhmän työtilojen vaikutus hiljasen tiedon jakamiseen tai sen estymiseen. Työssä tarkasteltiin myös vaikutusta ryhmän oppimiseen sekä ryhmään muodostuvan hiljaisen tiedon syntymisen ja henkilöitymisen syihin sekä hiljaisen tiedon laatuun. Lisäksi työssä pyritään löytämään tapoja, joiden avulla hiljaista tietoa voidaan hyödyntää ja jakaa ryhmässä siten että se mahdollistaa myös ryhmän oppimisen. Haastatteluissa nousivat esiin informaation hallintaongelmat, jotka johtuvat informaation hajautumisesta informaation eri hallinta järjestelmiin, tietoturvamääräysten aiheuttamiin esteisiin ja kriittisen teknisen dokumentaation tallentamiseen. Nämä vaikeuttavat tallennetun informaation hyödyntämistä ict-ryhmässä. Tämä osaltaan aiheuttaa hiljaisen tiedon henkilöitymistä ryhmässä ja hiljaisen tiedon jakamisen menetelmien jää hyödyntämättä. Haastatteluissa osoittautui, että hiljaisen tiedon hyödyntämisongelmat johtuvat osittain ryhmän sisäisten yhteyksien verkoston rakenteesta. Vahvojen linkkien vähyys ryhmässä ja vahvojen linkkien suuntautuminen ryhmän ulkoisiin verkostoihin vaikeuttaa hiljaisen tiedon siirtymistä ryhmässä ja aiheuttaa hiljaisen tiedon henkilöitymistä. Kiire todettiin ryhmän kannalta ongelmalliseksi hiljaisen tiedon jakamisen ja hyödyntämisen esteeksi. Tiedon adaptaatioon ja omaksumiseen liittyvät ongelmat ovat sidoksissa aikaan ja hiljaisen tiedon henkilöitymiseen ryhmässä. Ryhmätyö ja ryhmän päivittäisessä toiminnassa käytettävissä olevat hiljaisen tiedon jakamisen menetelmät osoittautuvat sopivimmiksi edistämään ryhmän yhteistyökykyä sekä sosiaalisen rakenteen ja luottamuksen kehittymistä. Ne poistavat myös tiedon omaksumisen ja adaptaation esteitä. Ryhmätyö vaikuttaa myönteisesti ryhmän kollektiiviseen osaamiseen ja ryhmän hiljaisen tiedon kehittymiseen. Lisäksi se parantaa teknisen dokumentaation ymmärrettävyyttä.

Perheyrityksen sukupolvenvaihdos - hiljaisen tiedon jakaminen luopujan ja jatkajan välillä

Pro gradu –tutkielmassa tarkastellaan hiljaisen tiedon siirtymistä sukupolvenvaihdosprosessissa luopujan ja jatkajan näkökulmista. Tavoitteena on selvittää, miten hiljaista tietoa tehdään näkyväksi, miten tieto siirtyy ja liittykö tiedon siirtymiseen myös tiedon rakentumista. Tutkielma toteutettiin kvalitatiivisena tapaustutkimuksena. Aineisto kerättiin yksilö-haastattelemalla kahden eteläkarjalaisen yrityksen luovuttajaa ja jatkajaa. Aineisto analysoitiin teoriaohjaavaa sisällönanalyysia hyödyntäen. Tutkielma osoitti, että yrityksen sukupolvenvaihdoksessa siirtyy tietoa, josta osa on hiljaista tietoa. Tiedon siirtämistä pidetään tärkeänä, mutta omaa hiljaista tietoa ei tunnisteta hyvin. Tutkielman perusteella voidaan tehdä johtopäätös, että tiedon siirtämisessä on mahdollista rakentaa myös uutta merkityksellistä tietoa. Tulevaisuuden haasteina on tunnistaa yrityksissä olevaa hiljaista tietoa, järjestää ba-tiloja, jotka edesauttavat tiedon siirtymistä vuorovaikutuksessa ja kehittää edelleen menetelmiä, joiden avulla tietoa voidaan siirtää ja rakentaa sukupolvien välillä.