Pursuit of change versus organizational inertia: a study on strategic renewal in the Finnish broadcasting company

This doctoral dissertation explores the intra-organizational dynamics of a strategic renewal process. The main research question is how the pursuit of change and organizational inertia co-exist, intertwine, and collide in organizational cognition and capabilities during the strategic renewal. It is a comprehensive study on how organizational capabilities, organizational cognition, and structure enhance and inhibit change. Theoretically, the study is positioned in the modern tradition of strategy research, using the dynamic capability view and the organizational and managerial cognition research tradition as the main theoretical frames. Empirically, the study is a longitudinal case study of the Finnish Broadcasting Company (Yle), following the organizational changes during the years of 2011-1014. The analysis is based on both quantitative and qualitative data, which was collected during the research process using surveys, interviews, and archives. The main theoretical contribution is the application of the two theoretical approaches in one study. Empirically, the study contributes to operationalization of the concepts related to the dynamic capability view and organizational cognition, in a media context that is going through drastic changes due to digitalization. Furthermore, the case of a public broadcasting company extends the application of the theoretical concepts to the context of public management. The results suggest that renewal is a complex process, in which an organization’s perceptions intertwine with the strategic actions and decision-making. The change evolves pathdependently: the past experiences, routines, and organizational structures tend to dictate the future visions, desires, and actions. The study also reveals how the public nature of an organization adds to the tensions between change and organizational inertia, and hampers the decision-making. The doctoral dissertation consists of six research papers, each of which explores the phenomenon under study from a different perspective.

Yksilön muutokseen suhtautuminen psykologisen omistajuuden näkökulmasta

Työntekijöiden kokema psykologinen omistajuus ja muutokseen suhtautuminen kietoutuvat yhteen tämän tutkimuksen tarkastelussa. Organisaatiot kohtaavat nykypäivänä jatkuvaa muutostarvetta ja työntekijöiden muutokseen suhtautumisella on merkittävä vaikutus muutoshankkeiden onnistuneessa läpiviennissä. Toisaalta työtä kohtaan koetut psykologisen omistajuuden tunteet nähdään merkittävänä työhön ja työn kokemiseen liittyvänä tunteena. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena onkin ymmärtää miten työntekijöiden kokema psykologinen omistajuus ilmenee työntekijöiden muutokseen suhtautumisessa. Tutkimuksen tarkastelu tapahtuu organisatorisessa kontekstissa, merkityksen luomisen viitekehyksessä. Tutkimus suoritettiin fenomenografisena tapaustutkimuksena liiketoiminnan tukipalveluita tarjoavassa asiantuntijaorganisaatiossa. Tutkimuksen lopputuloksen muodostavat neljä erilaista kuvauskategoriaa, jotka kuvaavat kohdeorganisaation työntekijöiden työtään kohtaan kokemia psykologisen omistajuuden tunteita ja sitä kuinka nämä tunteet näyttäytyvät heidän muutokseen suhtautumisessa. Psykologinen omistajuus ja muutokseen suhtautuminen ovat monitahoisia ilmiöitä, joissa yksilön kokemukseen vaikuttavat useat eri tekijät. Psykologista omistajuutta tunteva yksilö on lähtökohtaisesti valmiimpi kohtaamaan muutoksia psykologisen omistajuuden tunteiden ja muutosvalmiuden pohjautuessa monelta osin samoihin tekijöihin. Toisaalta voimakkaat psykologisen omistajuuden tunteet voivat olla yksilöä uuvuttavia, mikä saa muutokset näyttäytymään taakkana myönteisistä aikomuksista huolimatta.

The way to organizational longevity - Balancing stability and change in Shinise firms

THE WAY TO ORGANIZATIONAL LONGEVITY – Balancing stability and change in Shinise firms The overall purpose of this dissertation is to investigate the secret of longevity in Shinise firms. On the basic assumption that organizational longevity is about balancing stability and change, the theoretical perspectives incorporate routine practice, organizational culture, and organizational identity. These theories explain stability and change in an organization separately and in combination. Qualitative inductive theory building was used in the study. Overall, the empirical data comprised 75 in-depth and semi-structured interviews, 137 archival materials, and observations made over 17 weeks. According to the empirical findings, longevity in Shinise firms is attributable to the internal mechanisms (Shinise tenacity, stability in motion, and emergent change) to secure a balance between stability and change, the continuing stability of the socio-cultural environment in the local community, and active interaction between organizational and local cultures. The contribution of the study to the literature on organizational longevity and the alternative theoretical approaches is first, in theorizing the mechanisms of Shinise tenacity and cross-level cultural dynamism, and second, in pointing out the critical role of: the way firms set their ultimate goal, the dynamism in culture, and the effect of history of the firm to the current business in securing longevity. KEY WORDS Change; Culture; Organizational identity; Organizational longevity; Routines; Shinise firms; Stability; Qualitative research

Luonnonhaltijat ‒ haltijoita luonnonympäristössä? : Nature spirits : continuity and change : Conference of Belief Narrative Network of ISFNR, Zugdidi, Georgia 1.‒4.10.2014

Konferenssiraportti

Climate Change and Ethics of Geoengineering -- Implications Of Climate Emergency Ethics

Global climate change and intentional climate modification, i.e. geoengineering include various ethical problems which are entangled as a complex ensemble of questions regarding the future of the biosphere. The possibilities of catastrophic effects of climate change which are also called “climate emergency” have led to the emergence of the idea of modifying the atmospheric conditions in the form of geoengineering. The novel issue of weather ethics is a subdivision of climate ethics, and it is interested in ethical and political questions surrounding weather and climate control and modification in a restricted spatio-temporal scale. The objective of geoengineering is to counterbalance the adverse effects of climate change and its diverse corollaries in various ways on a large scale. The claim of this dissertation is that there are ethical justifications to claim that currently large-scale interventions to the climate system are ethically questionable. The justification to pursue geoengineering on the basis of considering its pros and cons, is inadequate. Moral judgement can still be elaborated in cases where decisions have to be made urgently and the selection of desirable choices is severely limited. The changes needed to avoid severe negative impacts of climate change requires commitment to mitigation as well as social changes because technical solutions cannot address the issue of climate change altogether. The quantitative emphasis of consumerism should shift to qualitative focus on the aspiration for simplicity in order to a move towards the objective of the continuation of the existence of humankind and a flourishing, vital biosphere.